CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 688Mental Health and PsychiatryPsychology and Mental HealthPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 254 of the 254 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Three Approaches to Understanding and Classifying Mental Disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5 , and the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)

Clark, Lee Anna, Cuthbert, Bruce, Lewis-Fernández, Roberto, Narrow, William E., Reed, Geoffrey M.·2017·Psychological Science in the Public Interest
DOI 10.1177/1529100617727266
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The diagnosis of mental disorder initially appears relatively straightforward: Patients present with symptoms or visible signs of illness; health professionals make diagnoses based primarily on these symptoms and signs; and they prescribe medication, psychotherapy, or both, accordingly. However, despite a dramatic expansion of knowledge about mental disorders during the past half century, understanding of their components and processes remains rudimentary. We provide histories and descriptions of three systems with different purposes relevant to understanding and classifying mental disorder. Two major diagnostic manuals—the International Classification of Diseases and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—provide classification systems relevant to public health, clinical diagnosis, service provision, and specific research applications, the former internationally and the latter primarily for the United States. In contrast, the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria provides a framework that emphasizes integration of basic behavioral and neuroscience research to deepen the understanding of mental disorder. We identify four key issues that present challenges to understanding and classifying mental disorder: etiology, including the multiple causality of mental disorder; whether the relevant phenomena are discrete categories or dimensions; thresholds, which set the boundaries between disorder and nondisorder; and comorbidity, the fact that individuals with mental illness often meet diagnostic requirements for multiple conditions. We discuss how the three systems’ approaches to these key issues correspond or diverge as a result of their different histories, purposes, and constituencies. Although the systems have varying degrees of overlap and distinguishing features, they share the goal of reducing the burden of suffering due to mental disorder.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1529100617727266

Cites

254 of 254 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. American Medico-Psychological Association, 1918, Statistical manual for the use of institutions for the insane
  2. American Psychiatric Association, 1942, Statistical manual for the use of hospitals for mental diseases
  3. American Psychiatric Association, 1952, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
  4. American Psychiatric Association, 1968, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
  5. American Psychiatric Association, 1980, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
  6. American Psychiatric Association, 1987, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
  7. American Psychiatric Association, 1994, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
  8. American Psychiatric Association, 2000, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
  9. Barlow D. H., 2011, Unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: Therapist guide
  10. 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1017/S0954579400000882 · DOI
  12. Clark D. A., 1999, Scientific foundations of cognitive theory of depression
  13. Cuthbert B. N., 2013, Neurobiology of mental illness, 1076
  14. Farr W., 1839, First annual report
  15. Institute of International Statistics, 1900, Bulletin of the Institute of International Statistics, 12, 280
  16. Jablensky A., 2007, World Psychiatry, 6, 157
  17. 10.1001/archpsyc.1994.0395001000800 · DOI
  18. 10.1590/S0042-96862004001100011 · DOI
  19. Kupfer D. J., 2002, A research agenda for DSM-V
  20. Lewis-Fernández R., 2016, The DSM-5 handbook on the Cultural Formulation Interview
  21. 10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.128 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Narrow W. E., 2007, Age and gender considerations in psychiatric diagnosis: A research agenda for DSM-V
  23. Otero-Ojeda A., 1998, Third Cuban glossary of psychiatry
  24. Skodol A. E., 1987, An annotated bibliography of DSM-III, xi
  25. Spitzer R. L., 1988, International classification in psychiatry: Unity and diversity, 263
  26. Stengel E., 1959, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 21, 601
  27. Svendsen D., 2006, Morbidity and mortality in people with serious mental illness
  28. Tsuang M. T., 2003, Primary Psychiatry, 10, 37
  29. U.S. Public Health Service, Division of Public Health Methods, 1944, Manual for coding causes of illness according to a diagnosis code for tabulating morbidity statistics
  30. Wakefield J. C., 2007, World Psychiatry, 6, 149
  31. Woodruff R. A., 1974, Psychiatric diagnosis
  32. World Health Organization, 1949, International statistical classification of diseases, injuries, and causes of death, 6th revision
  33. World Health Organization, 1967, International statistical classification of diseases, injuries, and causes of death, 8th revision
  34. World Health Organization, 1974, Glossary of mental disorders and guide to their classification
  35. World Health Organization, 1979, International statistical classification of diseases, injuries, and causes of death, 9th revision
  36. World Health Organization, 1992, International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th revision
  37. World Health Organization, 1992, The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioral disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines
  38. World Health Organization, 1993, The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research
  39. World Health Organization, 1996, Diagnostic and management guidelines for mental disorders in primary care: ICD-10 Chapter V Primary Care Version
  40. World Health Organization, 2001, International classification of functioning, disability, and health
  41. World Health Organization, 2008, mhGAP—Mental Health Gap Action Programme: Scaling up care for mental, neurological, and substance use disorders
  42. World Health Organization, 2011, Mental Health Atlas 2011
  43. World Health Organization, 2013, Mental Health Action Plan 2013-2020
  44. World Health Organization, 2013, Assessment and management of conditions specifically related to stress: mhGAP Intervention Guide module
  45. World Health Organization, 2014, Constitution of the World Health Organization. In World Health Organization basic documents
  46. World Health Organization, 2016, mhGAP Intervention guide for mental, neurological, and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings
  47. World Health Organization & U.S. Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, 1985, Mental disorders, alcohol, and drug-related problems: International perspectives on their diagnosis and classification

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 688

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Clark, L. A., Cuthbert, B., Lewis-Fernández, R., Narrow, W. E., & Reed, G. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Clark, Lee Anna
ORCID
Venue
Psychological Science in the Public Interest
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2017-11
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
72-145
ISSN
  • 1539-6053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-1006
DOI
10.1177/1529100617727266
OpenAlex
W2773726752
Semantic Scholar
3730ce1f675bbab813255daf9b2797407241ae39
Cited by
688
References
249
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 133 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 2
FWCI
417.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Gothic.net (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
mental disorder classification, ICD-11, DSM-5, Research Domain Criteria, diagnostic classification systems, etiology of mental disorders, diagnostic thresholds, comorbidities, history of psychiatry
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.), United States, Comorbidity, International Classification of Diseases, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review