The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hindsight Bias
Abstract
Hindsight bias occurs when people feel that they “knew it all along,” that is, when they believe that an event is more predictable after it becomes known than it was before it became known. Hindsight bias embodies any combination of three aspects: memory distortion, beliefs about events’ objective likelihoods, or subjective beliefs about one’s own prediction abilities. Hindsight bias stems from (a) cognitive inputs (people selectively recall information consistent with what they now know to be true and engage in sensemaking to impose meaning on their own knowledge), (b) metacognitive inputs (the ease with which a past outcome is understood may be misattributed to its assumed prior likelihood), and (c) motivational inputs (people have a need to see the world as orderly and predictable and to avoid being blamed for problems). Consequences of hindsight bias include myopic attention to a single causal understanding of the past (to the neglect of other reasonable explanations) as well as general overconfidence in the certainty of one’s judgments. New technologies for visualizing and understanding data sets may have the unintended consequence of heightening hindsight bias, but an intervention that encourages people to consider alternative causal explanations for a given outcome can reduce hindsight bias.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Measures in accordance with (b), which are intended to maintain an awareness of the automation bias, seem out of place: it introduces a concrete psychological aspect that sticks out from the more technical and operational aspects outlined in the other provisions, especially considering that automation bias is just one of many relevant biases (e.g., hindsight bias, confidence bias [36, 66]), heuris”
From On the Quest for Effectiveness in Human Oversight: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2024) · cites this paper as [66]
Citations
Cites
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282 · cited 1×
“Metacognitions are thoughts about one’s own thoughts (Flavell, 1979; Werth, Strack, & Förster, 2002).”
Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/1529-1006.01431 · Cited by 3,893
Self-citationConditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree.
Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0016755 · Cited by 2,443
Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing”
Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.2.263 · Cited by 2,379 · cited 1×
“…& Thomas, 1998; Walster, 1967), such that people who possess dispositionally greater needs for control or closure show greater hindsight bias (Campbell & Tesser, 1983; Musch, 2003; Tykocinski, 2001; see also Hirt, Kardes, & Markman, 2004; Kruglanski & Webster, 1996; Musch & Wagner, 2007).”
The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the Coherence of Social Motivations
Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_1 · Cited by 1,437 · cited 1×
“People seek meaning through religion, ideologies, and other worldviews that impose order and predictability on life (Heine, Proulx, & Vohs, 2006; Jost, Banaji, & Nosek, 2004; King, Hicks, Krull, & Del Gaiso, 2006; Kray et al., 2010; Pyszczynski, Greenberg, & Solomon, 1999).”
Self-citationRoese, N. J. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.133 · Cited by 1,156 · cited 1×
“Counterfactuals are thoughts of what might have been, of what could have happened if some past action had been different (Roese, 1997).”
Self-citationLacking control increases illusory pattern perception
Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1159845 · Cited by 1,119
Self-Enhancement: Food for Thought
Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00068.x · Cited by 880
Compensatory Control: Achieving Order Through the Mind, Our Institutions, and the Heavens
Kay, A. C., Whitson, J. A., Gaucher, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01649.x · Cited by 598
Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., & Pfeiffer, T. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672002611010 · Cited by 556
Research works printed but not linked: 178
- 10.1177/1088868309341564 · DOI
- American Law Institute, 2010, Restatement of the law third torts: Liability for physical and emotional harm, 1
- Anderson J. C., 1997, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 16, 20
- 10.1016/0167-4870(93)90018-G · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-006X.49.3.323 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.486 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.305 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0015504 · DOI
- 10.1177/1088868307301033 · DOI
- 10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750597 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0021971 · DOI
- 10.1080/09658210701390701 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1000 · DOI
- 10.1080/09658210244000513 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.132 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3758/MC.38.3.356 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03195302 · DOI
- 10.1016/0273-2297(90)90003-M · DOI
- 10.1207/s15324834basp1902_5 · DOI
- 10.1207/S15324834BASP2401_3 · DOI
- 10.2307/256462 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167206288282 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0028579 · DOI
- 10.3758/s13423-011-0062-4 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00868.x · DOI
- 10.1177/01461672992511005 · DOI
- 10.1521/jscp.1989.8.3.331 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01067031 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.003 · DOI
- 10.1006/obhd.1999.2841 · DOI
- 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90010-Q · DOI
- 10.1016/0749-5978(87)90005-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-6566(92)90059-D · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.03.001 · DOI
- 10.2307/1422863 · DOI
- Eberwine K., 2005, Case Western Reserve Law Review, 55, 633
- 10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.3 · DOI
- 10.1177/1088868308316091 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.114 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.387 · DOI
- 10.3758/PBR.17.2.149 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.07.001 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00343.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-1523.1.3.288 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511809477.032 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511809477.024 · DOI
- 10.1016/0030-5073(75)90002-1 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-898X.11.2.124 · DOI
- 10.1002/bsl.897 · DOI
- 10.1002/1099-0720(200009)14:5<397::AID-ACP658>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
- 10.1086/527342 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03196819 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15324834basp2602&3_1 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.48 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.30.5.960 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1022352330466 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.311 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03197054 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02271.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.009 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1069 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.566 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.437 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0278-4254(97)10003-5 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2308/accr.2006.81.2.377 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1101 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01499075 · DOI
- 10.1177/1088868309353750 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1007755019837 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.179 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/obhd.1999.2847 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.joep.2006.11.002 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.107 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00534-4 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0017905 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4899-0924-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF01499038 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470752937.ch16 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01139.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167282082012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.12.009 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1231 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.29 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.264 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.32 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1994.tb01850.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00813.x · DOI
- 10.1080/09658210244000522 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.76.4.569 · DOI
- 10.1348/014466600164499 · DOI
- 10.1002/bdm.632 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.004 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.838 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.007 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0076486 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.502 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3758/BF03212966 · DOI
- 10.1177/1948550611401756 · DOI
- 10.1080/09658210244000540 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.64 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.472 · DOI
- 10.1177/01461672952112001 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0020449 · DOI
- 10.1027/1864-9335.39.3.182 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.34.5.1043 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0017006 · DOI
- 10.1027/1618-3169.55.5.342 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.737 · DOI
- 10.1506/car.25.1.10 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1981.tb00479.x · DOI
- Peters P. G., 1999, Arizona State Law Journal, 31, 1277
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.013 · DOI
- 10.1080/09658210244000603 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00381.x · DOI
- 10.1002/acp.1377 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.147 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.14.4.709 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.14 · DOI
- 10.1026//1618-3169.49.4.270 · DOI
- 10.1080/09658210244000487 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.835 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1600229 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03212965 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470752937.ch13 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01703.x · DOI
- 10.1177/01461672972312002 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.437 · DOI
- 10.1006/jesp.1996.0010 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00033.x · DOI
- Roese N. J., 2007, Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles, 2, 91
- Roese N. J., 2010, Harvard Business Review, 88, 26
- 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00013-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00528-0 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00704.x · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.185 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03213410 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1196/annals.1279.012 · DOI
- 10.1086/378531 · DOI
- 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90044-T · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.04.001 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0023581 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01642.x · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03202434 · DOI
- 10.1016/0749-5978(92)90064-E · DOI
- 10.1006/obhd.1993.1053 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00078.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-1523.3.4.544 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10979-005-5692-5 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1025706823554 · DOI
- 10.1006/obhd.1997.2682 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0034782 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0077095 · DOI
- Tetlock P. E., 2005, Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know
- 10.1017/S0003055400400043 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.143 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.904 · DOI
- 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90049-X · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0146167201273011 · DOI
- 10.1002/ejsp.120 · DOI
- 10.1177/001872676702000302 · DOI
- 10.1177/1368430208095399 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167291171005 · DOI
- 10.1006/obhd.2001.2976 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00085.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.415 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-1523.4.2.345 · DOI
- 10.1037/0894-4105.20.4.461 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10339-011-0414-z · DOI
- 10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00052-X · DOI
- 10.1006/obhd.1995.1093 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 404
Long live the King! Beginnings loom larger than endings of past and recurrent events
Teigen, K. H., Böhm, G., Bruckmüller, S., Hegarty, P. V., & Luminet, O. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.013 · Cited by 20
Outcome Knowledge and False Belief
Ghrear, S. E., Birch, S., & Bernstein, D. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00118 · Cited by 29
“Cognitive and social psychological research has investigated the pervasive Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org 1 February 2016 | Volume 7 | Article 118 nature of the curse of knowledge and its effects on social cognition and memory (see Lilienfeld et al., 2009; Roese and Vohs, 2012).”
BackgroundComplexity in simulation-based education: exploring the role of hindsight bias
Motavalli, A., & Nestel, D. (2016) · Advances in Simulation · doi:10.1186/s41077-015-0005-7 · Cited by 16
Adult age differences in hindsight bias: The role of recall ability.
Groß, J., & Bayen, U. (2015) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/pag0000017 · Cited by 16
Truth‐Sensitivity and Folk Epistemology
Gerken, M. (2018) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12515 · Cited by 29
Hameed, I., Hameed, I., Akram, U., Arain, G. A., & Eid, R. (2024) · Technological forecasting & social change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123771 · Cited by 15
Measuring transparency in intelligent robots
Angelopoulos, G., Lacroix, D., Wullenkord, R., Rossi, A., Rossi, S., & Eyssel, F. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-29685-w · Cited by 15
“This phenomenon is known as the hindsight bias 54,55 , and could have skewed the answers of participants.”
Müller, L., Gossmann, K., Schmid, R., Rosner, R., & Unterhitzenberger, J. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246069 · Cited by 15
“This can result in individuals recalling or rating their experiences differently from what they actually felt, thought, or perceived in a given situation, a phenomenon commonly known as recall or hindsight bias [11,12].”
BackgroundThe Effect of Visual Hindsight Bias on Radiologist Perception.
Chen, J., Littlefair, S., Bourne, R., & Reed, W. (2019) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2019.09.032 · Cited by 15
Inhibitory control underlies individual differences in older adults’ hindsight bias.
Coolin, A., Erdfelder, E., Bernstein, D. M., Thornton, A. E., & Thornton, W. L. (2016) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/pag0000088 · Cited by 25
“It is possible that individuals with higher working memory capacity had sufficient cognitive capacities to engage in a sense-making process (see Pezzo & Pezzo, 2007; Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
BackgroundFrye, T., & Yakovlev, A. (2016) · doi:10.1177/0010414015621074 · Cited by 15
“Numerous studies in social psychology find that respondents adjust their assessment of past events to fit the observed outcome (Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
BackgroundBalch, J. A., Chatham, A. H., Hong, P. K. W., Manganiello, L., Baskaran, N. P., Bihorac, A., Shickel, B., Moseley, R., & Loftus, T. J. (2024) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1477447 · Cited by 15
“…interviewing survivors introduces a hindsight bias in treatment and that patients experience regret in only a minority of cases (Becerra Pérez et al., 2016; Rid and Wendler, 2014b strategies exist, no studies of predicting PROMs adjusted for hindsight bias in their analysis (Roese and Vohs, 2012).”
The role of a team psychological safety feeling in teamwork in the classroom
Gonda, D., Tirpáková, A., Pavlovičová, G., & Ďuriš, V. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37618 · Cited by 23
“For this reason, it is natural that students try to avoid making mistakes or try to hide them in order to prevent a decrease in their own value in the eyes of the teacher and classmates [41].”
BackgroundPandey, P. K., Dhaliwal, A. K., & Pandey, P. K. (2024) · The International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research · doi:10.1080/09593969.2024.2374365 · Cited by 13
“Moreover, a diverse range of participants were recruited from various online portals that utilize different AI-enabled service software programs or algorithms, as recommended by Roese and Vohs (2012).”
When and Why Narcissists Exhibit Greater Hindsight Bias and Less Perceived Learning
Howes, S. S., Kausel, E. E., Jackson, A. T., & Reb, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320929421 · Cited by 15
“…implicates allocating blame (“I should have known this”) more strongly than could counterfactual thinking (“I could have known this”) and thus links theoretically to the self-protection motives involved in both hindsight bias and narcissism (Campbell et al., 2011; Pezzo, 2011; Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
BackgroundMarchetti, A., Baglio, F., Castelli, I., Griffanti, L., Nemni, R., Rossetto, F., Valle, A., Zanette, M., & Massaro, D. (2018) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/0033294118755673 · Cited by 20
Moral hindsight for good actions and the effects of imagined alternatives to reality
Byrne, R. M. J., & Timmons, S. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.010 · Cited by 15
Oeberst, A., von der Beck, I., Back, M., Cress, U., & Nestler, S. (2017) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0865-7 · Cited by 14
“Psychological research with individuals indicates, however, that human information processing is often biased (e.g., Pohl, 2017).”
BackgroundReceipt of reward leads to altered estimation of effort
Pooresmaeili, A., Wannig, A., & Dolan, R. J. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1507527112 · Cited by 22
Empathetic Robot Judge, we Trust You
Watamura, E., Ioku, T., Mukai, T., & Yamamoto, M. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2232982 · Cited by 14
“Humans, who rely on intuitive processes to make decisions, are susceptible to cognitive biases such as confirmation bias (Nickerson, 1998), hindsight bias (Roese & Vohs, 2012), and representativeness heuristics (Kahneman & Tversky, 1972).”
The Road Not Taken: Technological Uncertainty and the Evaluation of Innovations
Tan, D. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1567 · Cited by 17
Hi-def memories of lo-def scenes
Rivera-Aparicio, J., Yu, Q., & Firestone, C. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01829-1 · Cited by 13
Stelmakh, I., Shah, N. B., Singh, A., & Daumé, H. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449149 · Cited by 24
“• Hindsight bias (Fischhoff and Beyth, 1975; Hawkins and Hastie, 1990; Roese and Vohs, 2012) and Outcome bias (Baron and Hershey, 1988; Allison et al.”
BackgroundReducing delays to diagnosis in ambulatory care settings: A macrocognition perspective
Patterson, E. S., Su, G., & Sarkar, U. (2019) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102965 · Cited by 11
Goodwin, P., Moritz, B., & Siemsen, E. (2018) · The Handbook of Behavioral Operations · doi:10.1002/9781119138341.ch12 · Cited by 13
Effects of dysphoria and induced negative mood on the processes underlying hindsight bias
Groß, J., & Bayen, U. (2017) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2016.1249461 · Cited by 13
“This hindsight bias is a well-researched and omnipresent cognitive distortion (see Roese & Vohs, 2012, for a review).”
BackgroundErly, W., Tran, M. P., Dillon, R. C., & Krupinski, E. (2010) · Journal of computer assisted tomography · doi:10.1097/rct.0b013e3181c21f72 · Cited by 13
Factors influencing wildfire management decisions after the 2009 US federal policy update
Fillmore, S. D., McCaffrey, S., Bean, R., Evans, A. M., Iniguez, J. M., Thode, A. E., Smith, A. M. S., & Thompson, M. P. (2024) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf23129 · Cited by 17
Hughes, J., Douglas, C., Jones, L., Brown, N., Nguyen, A., Jarugula, R., Lyrstedt, A., Hazelwood, S., Wu, Y., Saleh, F., et al. (2022) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.05.29.22275652 · Cited by 12
Results From Invoking Artificial Neural Networks to Measure Insider Threat Detection & Mitigation
Williams, A. D., Abbott, S. N., Shoman, N., & Charlton, W. S. (2021) · DTRAP · doi:10.1145/3457909 · Cited by 12
Categorical judgments do not modify sensory representations in working memory
Luu, L., & Stocker, A. A. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008968 · Cited by 21
Hindsight bias and outcome bias in judging directors’ liability and the role of free will beliefs
Strohmaier, N., Pluut, H., van den Bos, K., Adriaanse, J., & Vriesendorp, R. D. (2020) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12722 · Cited by 16
“Recent research has suggested that hindsight bias is not a unified concept and is rather best regarded as an umbrella term for three separate, albeit related, biases, each with different causal mechanisms (e.g., Blank et al., 2008; Kelman et al., 1998; Nestler et al., 2010; Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
BackgroundCan Data Visualizations Change Minds? Identifying Mechanisms of Elaborative Thinking and Persuasion
Markant, D., Rogha, M., Karduni, A., Wesslen, R., & Dou, W.-W. (2022) · 2022 IEEE Workshop on Visualization for Social Good (VIS4Good) · doi:10.1109/vis4good57762.2022.00005 · Cited by 11
Older and younger adults’ hindsight bias after positive and negative outcomes
Groß, J., & Bayen, U. (2021) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-021-01195-w · Cited by 11
Leadership and Character(s): Behavioral Business Ethics in ‘War and Peace’
Michaelson, C. W. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04746-y · Cited by 13
A postdictive bias associated with déjà vu
Cleary, A. M., Huebert, A. M., McNeely-White, K. L., & Spahr, K. S. (2019) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01578-w · Cited by 11
An inclusive taxonomy of behavioral biases
Peón, D., Antelo, M., & Calvo-Silvosa, A. (2017) · European Journal of Government and Economics · doi:10.17979/ejge.2017.6.1.4322 · Cited by 13
“Recent research on the hindsight bias includes theoretical (Roese and Vohs, 2012)”
BackgroundPolitical knowledge reduces hindsight memory distortion in election judgements
Calvillo, D., & Rutchick, A. M. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.870179 · Cited by 11
“Roese and Vohs (2012) suggested that expertise may decrease the memory distortion component and increase the foreseeability component of hindsight bias.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMissed Lung Lesions: Side-by-Side Comparison of Chest Radiography with MDCT
Tack, D., & Howarth, N. (2019) · IDKD Springer Series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11149-6_2 · Cited by 11
“Hindsight bias [22] with the information available from the MDCT makes the initial lesion extremely obvious.”
Jugnandan, S., & Willows, G. D. (2023) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12935 · Cited by 17
Chen, J., Kwan, C., Yeung, L. Y., Choi, H. Y., Lo, Y. C., Au, S. Y., Tsang, C. H., Cheng, B., & Feldman, G. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104154 · Cited by 15
Schmutz, J. (2021) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820.2021.1951189 · Cited by 10
“The results are mainly based on self-report data, and a hindsight bias cannot be ruled out (Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
Danz, D. N. (2020) · Games Econ. Behav. · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2020.10.001 · Cited by 10
Moritz, S., Ahmed, K., Krott, N., Ohls, I., & Reininger, K. (2020) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508619.2020.1815994 · Cited by 10
“…to counter the well-established hindsight bias, also termed the “I-knew-it-all-along effect” (i.e., prior knowledge is edited over without the full awareness of the participant; Fischhoff & Beyth, 1975; Roese & Vohs, 2012; Tversky & Kahneman, 1973), thus creating a corrective “aha” experience.”
BackgroundAn Alternate Path: The Experience of High-Potential Individuals Who Left School
Ritchotte, J. A., & Graefe, A. K. (2017) · Gifted Child Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0016986217722615 · Cited by 10
Moral judgments of risky choices: A moral echoing effect
Parkinson, M., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2017) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500005854 · Cited by 12
“A similar mechanism has been proposed for hind-sight bias, the tendency for people with outcome knowledge to believe they would have predicted the outcome (Fischhoff, 1975; Hawkins & Hastie 1990; Roese & Vohs 2012).”
Ignoring Memory Hints: The Stubborn Influence of Environmental Cues on Recognition Memory
Selmeczy, D., & Dobbins, I. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000383 · Cited by 10
Ganz, J., Marzahl, C., Ammeling, J., Rosbach, E., Richter, B., Puget, C., Denk, D., Demeter, E., Tăbăran, F., Wasinger, G., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-77244-6 · Cited by 9
“…that while the PHH3-assisted labeling methodology may result in a high level of agreement among pathologists, it may also introduce a hindsight bias 44 , i.e., that the reviewers judge potential MF objects differently in H&E after knowing the biological truth through the PHH3 image, even if the…”
BackgroundSong, X., Qi, L., Liu, S., Ding, S., & Li, D. (2024) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2024.110205 · Cited by 12
Experiments on Self-Nudging, Autonomy, and the Prospect of Behavioral-Self-Management
Tontrup, S. W., & Sprigman, C. J. (2019) · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/jels.12321 · Cited by 10
An archetypal perspective on householders who ‘wait and see’ during a bushfire
Strahan, K. (2020) · Progress in Disaster Science · doi:10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100107 · Cited by 11
Only Familiar Information is a "Curse": Children's Ability to Predict What Their Peers Know.
Ghrear, S., Fung, K., Haddock, T., & Birch, S. A. J. (2020) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13437 · Cited by 9
“It occurs across a variety of paradigms and information types (Blank, Fischer, & Erdfelder, 2003; Bryant & Brockway, 1997; Tykocinski, Pick, & Kedmi, 2002), across cultures (Heine & Lehman, 1996; Pohl, Bender, & Lachmann, 2002), and has been documented in many applied settings,This research was…”
BackgroundBiases in construction project dispute resolution
Cheung, S. O., & Li, K. (2019) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-03-2018-0109 · Cited by 19
“The better a person can make sense of the story and inject meaning into the past, the greater is the HE (Hawkins and Hastie, 1990; Blank and Nestler, 2007; Roese and Vohs, 2012).”
BackgroundIs Hindsight Really 20/20?: The Impact of Outcome Information on the Decision-Making Process
Beltrani, A., Reed, A. L., Zapf, P. A., & Otto, R. K. (2018) · International Journal of Forensic Mental Health · doi:10.1080/14999013.2018.1505790 · Cited by 16
“…(e.g., “I said it would happen”); impressions of foreseeability involve the belief that one could have personally foreseen the event (e.g., “I knew it would happen”), and impressions of inevitability reflect one’s belief that the event was inevitable (e.g., “it had to happen”) (Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
BackgroundHow lacking control drives fluency effects in evaluative judgment
Blair, S. (2019) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.11.003 · Cited by 12
Goll, J., & Zięba, K. (2025) · Tourism and Hospitality Research · doi:10.1177/14673584251313726 · Cited by 11
“Moreover, the aim was to conduct the interviews right after the crisis-event phase to minimize the risk of hindsight bias and obtain the most reliable results (Roese and Vohs, 2012), which also came along with the limited study time.”
Geissmar, J., Niemand, T., & Kraus, S. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3468 · Cited by 8
Meißner, C., Meyrose, A., Kaman, A., Michalkiewicz, M., & Ravens‐Sieberer, U. (2022) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2022.828085 · Cited by 12
Hindsight bias in assessing child sexual abuse
Scurich, N., Güney, Ş., & Dietz, P. (2022) · Journal of Sexual Aggression · doi:10.1080/13552600.2022.2034999 · Cited by 8
Pupillometry and Hindsight Bias: Physiological Arousal Predicts Compensatory Behavior
Sleegers, W. W. A., Proulx, T., & van Beest, I. (2020) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550620966153 · Cited by 7
“Several processes have been proposed to underlie the hindsight bias (Hawkins & Hastie, 1990; Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
BackgroundNye, A., Connell, J., Haake, R., & Barkham, M. (2018) · British Journal of Guidance and Counselling · doi:10.1080/03069885.2018.1544608 · Cited by 8
Blinding or information control in diagnosis: could it reduce errors in clinical decision-making?
Lockhart, J. J., & Satya‐Murti, S. (2018) · Diagnosis · doi:10.1515/dx-2018-0030 · Cited by 8
Changes in sensed dis/continuity in the development of student teachers throughout teacher education
van Rijswijk, M., Bronkhorst, L., Akkerman, S., & van Tartwijk, J. (2018) · doi:10.1080/02619768.2018.1448782 · Cited by 8
“Moreover, the design helped to avoid effects of hindsight bias (Roese and Vohs 2012) and allowed analysis of student teacher’ development as it unfolds in teacher education.”
BackgroundOeberst, A., von der Beck, I., & Nestler, S. (2014) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-014-0603-7 · Cited by 8
Clinical Guidelines and Professional Liability: A Short Comment from the Legal Side
Guillod, O. (2010) · ORL · doi:10.1159/000272134 · Cited by 8
Behavioral analysis of mergers and acquisitions decisions
Asaoka, D. (2019) · Corporate Board: role, duties and composition · doi:10.22495/cbv15i3art1 · Cited by 8
“This is an example of hindsight bias, where people regard something as if they perceived it beforehand, even if they did not (Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
BackgroundKind, L., Luttenberger, K., Leßmann, V., Dorscht, L., Mühle, C., Müller, C., Siegmann, E., Schneider, S., & Kornhuber, J. (2023) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-023-07629-x · Cited by 7
Weak correlations among 13 episodic memory tasks related to the same public event
Murphy, G., Loftus, E. F., Levine, L. J., Grady, R. H., & Greene, C. M. (2023) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4103 · Cited by 8
“Hindsight bias, or the ‘ knew-it-all-along ’ effect, is the tendency for memories for pre-event expectations to be biased once the outcome is known (Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
BackgroundKrebs, M.-C., Oeberst, A., & von der Beck, I. (2023) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12647 · Cited by 7
Hansen, J. B., Sørensen, J., Glassou, E. N., Homilius, M., & Hansen, T. (2022) · Acta Orthopaedica · doi:10.2340/17453674.2022.1617 · Cited by 7
Jervis, R. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2116638118 · Cited by 7
Individual Processing of Phishing Emails: Towards a Phishing Detection Framework
Hamoud, A., Aimeur, E., & Benmohammed, M. (2022) · International Journal of Security and Privacy in Pervasive Computing · doi:10.4018/ijsppc.311060 · Cited by 7
Critique of the Bias-of-Crowds Model Simply Restates the Model: Reply to Connor and Evers (2020)
Payne, B. K., Vuletich, H. A., & Lundberg, K. B. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691621997394 · Cited by 12
“Puzzles rarely seem puzzling once the answer has been explained (Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
BackgroundWikipedia outperforms individuals when it comes to hindsight bias
Oeberst, A., von der Beck, I., Creß, U., & Nestler, S. (2019) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-019-01165-7 · Cited by 6
Human factors, cognitive bias and the paramedic
Allen, J. (2019) · Journal of Paramedic Practice · doi:10.12968/jpar.2019.11.1.8 · Cited by 8
Evaluating interventions that prevent or counter violent extremism: A practical guide
Bellasio, J., Sim, M., van Gorp, A., Cox, K., Ito, K., Baruch, B., Guerin, B., Martin, A., Grand-Clément, S., Janta, B., et al. (2018) · RAND Corporation eBooks · doi:10.7249/rr2094 · Cited by 10
“• An ethical issue specific for all theorybased evaluation might be that it is difficult to reconstruct the programme theory without falling prey to hindsight bias (Roese and Vohs, 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialPataky, T. C., & Lamb, P. F. (2017) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2017.1378493 · Cited by 9
Mukheibir, P., & Mitchell, C. A. (2018) · Urban Water Journal · doi:10.1080/1573062x.2018.1508602 · Cited by 8
“This overconfidence trap can be driven when the certainty of our judgement is based on a myopic attention to a limited causal understanding of a past event, in other words, it is based on hindsight bias (Roese & Vohs 2012).”
POHL, R. F., Michalkiewicz, M., Erdfelder, E., & Hilbig, B. E. (2017) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-017-0689-0 · Cited by 10
“As a second example, hindsight bias, that is, the tendency to overestimate one’s pre-outcome knowledge (see Pohl & Erdfelder, 2017, for a general overview), has been found to be much larger for almanac questions than for case histories (ChristensenSzalanski & Willham, 1991).”
BackgroundDomain Knowledge and Hindsight Bias among Poker Players
Calvillo, D., & Rutchick, A. M. (2014) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1799 · Cited by 7
“Finally, participants’ performance on the poker knowledge questionnaire was negatively correlated with hindsight bias from the memory condition as predicted by others (Roese & Vohs, 2012) and reported in a computer simulation (Hertwig et al., 2003).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSadatsafavi, M., Marra, C., Aaron, S., & Bryan, S. (2012) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-201 · Cited by 7
Communicating uncertain experimental evidencePreprint
Davis, A., Davis, A. L., & Fischhoff, B. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/7d3g9
Hindsight Bias in Forensic Mental Health Novices and Experts: An Exploratory Study
Weber, M. A., Albrecht, J. N., Endrass, J., Humbel, D., Meier, D. R., Singh, J. P., & Gerth, J. (2024) · Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/24732850.2024.2396991 · Cited by 4
“For instance, after the results of an election have been announced, people tend to believe that they had seen it coming, although this was not the case (e.g., Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016).”
The Influence of Feeling-of-Knowing on Metacognitive Processes in the Digital Media Environment
Lew, Z., & Flanagin, A. (2024) · J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl. · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000426 · Cited by 6
Ebb and flow: design fixation and creativity in professional groups
Zhang, W. (2024) · Journal of Engineering Design · doi:10.1080/09544828.2024.2306783 · Cited by 6
“Additionally, self-reporting during interviews often entails retrospective sense-making and reconstruction of past events (Huber 1985; Podsakoff and Organ 1986; Roese and Vohs 2012), potentially introducing biases in specifying how design fixation actually occurs.”
BackgroundSommers, R., & Bohns, V. (2023) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4554126 · Cited by 6
Pilbeam, C., & Karanikas, N. (2023) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106318 · Cited by 6
Jurors use mental state information to assess breach in negligence cases.
Margoni, F., & Brown, T. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105442 · Cited by 6
Visual hindsight bias for abnormal mammograms in radiologists
Schill, H. M., Gray, S. M., & Brady, T. (2023) · Journal of Medical Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.10.s1.s11910 · Cited by 6
“The second radiologist could indeed see the mass.(20) This sequence of events is common in radiology.”
BackgroundQuinn, M. S., & Keane, M. T. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105142 · Cited by 6
“In hindsight bias, negative events elicit less bias overall, while controllable outcomes elicit more bias when measured by foreseeability, but less bias when measured by inevitability (Blank & Peters, 2010; Pezzo & Beckstead, 2008; Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
BackgroundHindsight bias in metamemory: outcome knowledge influences the recollection of judgments of learning
Zimdahl, M. F., & Undorf, M. (2021) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2021.1919144 · Cited by 11
“In many studies on the hindsight bias, correctly recollected judgments (ROJ = OJ) are excluded when computing ΔHB (see Pohl, 2007; Pohl & Erdfelder, 2017).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialYousef, E. A., Sutcliffe, K. M., McDonald, K. M., & Newman‐Toker, D. E. (2021) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720821996187 · Cited by 9
“As a result, any errors “detected” might simply be the result of hindsight bias (Roese & Vohs, 2012; Wears & Nemeth, 2007; Wears & Sutcliffe, 2020), or at least viewed as such.”
BackgroundAdding to the Controversy? Civil Society’s Evaluation of the National Conference Dialogue in Yemen
Elayah, M. A. A., van Kempen, L., & Schulpen, L. (2020) · Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding · doi:10.1080/17502977.2019.1703491 · Cited by 6
“First, the scholarly perspective may be subject to ‘hindsight bias’, where actors ‘believe that an event is more predictable after it becomes known than it was before it became known’ (Roese and Vohs 2012, 411).”
BackgroundTeigen, K., & Keren, G. (2020) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-019-01011-6 · Cited by 6
“One is exaggerated beliefs in foreseeability and control, as indicated by research on the hindsight bias (Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
BackgroundAge stereotypes and compliance with feedback in elderly drivers
Söllner, M., & Florack, A. (2019) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.10.001 · Cited by 7
Evaluating scientific research: Belief, hindsight bias, ethics, and research evaluation
Hom, H. L., & Nuland, A. V. (2019) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3519 · Cited by 6
Bias Measurement Scale for Repeated Dispute Evaluations
Li, K., & Cheung, S.-O. (2018) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000617 · Cited by 6
Thomas, J. A., Dyment, J. E., Moltow, D., & Hay, I. (2016) · International Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.1080/13603116.2016.1155665 · Cited by 6
“We were aware that this retrospective work invites interviewees to ‘re-write history’ of what they thought and felt before something happened (Roese and Vohs 2012).”
BackgroundBlank, H., Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2015) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12116 · Cited by 6
The Devil Is in the Details: When Holistic Thinkers React Negatively to Incongruent Information
Chinchanachokchai, S., & Noel, H. (2015) · doi:10.7903/cmr.13853 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Roese, N. J., & Vohs, K. D.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 411-426
- ISSN
- 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6924
- OpenAlex
- W4211165067
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 186
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 9.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- hindsight bias, memory distortion, perceived predictability, metacognition, overconfidence, causal explanation, sensemaking, alternative explanations, data visualization, bias reduction interventions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review