Cited by 457Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsMemory Processes and InfluencesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hindsight Bias

Roese, Neal J., Vohs, Kathleen D.·2012·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

Hindsight bias occurs when people feel that they “knew it all along,” that is, when they believe that an event is more predictable after it becomes known than it was before it became known. Hindsight bias embodies any combination of three aspects: memory distortion, beliefs about events’ objective likelihoods, or subjective beliefs about one’s own prediction abilities. Hindsight bias stems from (a) cognitive inputs (people selectively recall information consistent with what they now know to be true and engage in sensemaking to impose meaning on their own knowledge), (b) metacognitive inputs (the ease with which a past outcome is understood may be misattributed to its assumed prior likelihood), and (c) motivational inputs (people have a need to see the world as orderly and predictable and to avoid being blamed for problems). Consequences of hindsight bias include myopic attention to a single causal understanding of the past (to the neglect of other reasonable explanations) as well as general overconfidence in the certainty of one’s judgments. New technologies for visualizing and understanding data sets may have the unintended consequence of heightening hindsight bias, but an intervention that encourages people to consider alternative causal explanations for a given outcome can reduce hindsight bias.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1745691612454303

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 178

  1. 10.1177/1088868309341564 · DOI
  2. American Law Institute, 2010, Restatement of the law third torts: Liability for physical and emotional harm, 1
  3. Anderson J. C., 1997, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 16, 20
  4. 10.1016/0167-4870(93)90018-G · DOI
  5. 10.1037/0022-006X.49.3.323 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.486 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.305 · DOI
  8. 10.1037/a0015504 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/1088868307301033 · DOI
  10. 10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750597 · DOI
  11. 10.1037/a0021971 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/09658210701390701 · DOI
  13. 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1000 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/09658210244000513 · DOI
  15. 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.132 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.007 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.3758/MC.38.3.356 · DOI
  18. 10.3758/BF03195302 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/0273-2297(90)90003-M · DOI
  20. 10.1207/s15324834basp1902_5 · DOI
  21. 10.1207/S15324834BASP2401_3 · DOI
  22. 10.2307/256462 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/0146167206288282 · DOI
  24. 10.1037/a0028579 · DOI
  25. 10.3758/s13423-011-0062-4 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00868.x · DOI
  27. 10.1177/01461672992511005 · DOI
  28. 10.1521/jscp.1989.8.3.331 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/BF01067031 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.003 · DOI
  31. 10.1006/obhd.1999.2841 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90010-Q · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0749-5978(87)90005-7 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/0092-6566(92)90059-D · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.03.001 · DOI
  36. 10.2307/1422863 · DOI
  37. Eberwine K., 2005, Case Western Reserve Law Review, 55, 633
  38. 10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.3 · DOI
  39. 10.1177/1088868308316091 · DOI
  40. 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.114 · DOI
  41. 10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.387 · DOI
  42. 10.3758/PBR.17.2.149 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.07.001 · DOI
  44. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00343.x · DOI
  45. 10.1037/0096-1523.1.3.288 · DOI
  46. 10.1017/CBO9780511809477.032 · DOI
  47. 10.1017/CBO9780511809477.024 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/0030-5073(75)90002-1 · DOI
  49. 10.1037/1076-898X.11.2.124 · DOI
  50. 10.1002/bsl.897 · DOI
  51. 10.1002/1099-0720(200009)14:5<397::AID-ACP658>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
  52. 10.1086/527342 · DOI
  53. 10.3758/BF03196819 · DOI
  54. 10.1207/s15324834basp2602&3_1 · DOI
  55. 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.48 · DOI
  56. 10.1037/0278-7393.30.5.960 · DOI
  57. 10.1023/A:1022352330466 · DOI
  58. 10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.311 · DOI
  59. 10.3758/BF03197054 · DOI
  60. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02271.x · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.009 · DOI
  62. 10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1069 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.566 · DOI
  64. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.437 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/S0278-4254(97)10003-5 · DOI
  66. 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.2308/accr.2006.81.2.377 · DOI
  68. 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1101 · DOI
  69. 10.1007/BF01499075 · DOI
  70. 10.1177/1088868309353750 · DOI
  71. 10.1023/A:1007755019837 · DOI
  72. 10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.179 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1006/obhd.1999.2847 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.joep.2006.11.002 · DOI
  75. 10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.107 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00534-4 · DOI
  77. 10.1037/a0017905 · DOI
  78. 10.1007/978-1-4899-0924-4 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1007/BF01499038 · DOI
  80. 10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311 · DOI
  81. 10.1002/9780470752937.ch16 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01139.x · DOI
  83. 10.1177/0146167282082012 · DOI
  84. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.004 · DOI
  85. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.12.009 · DOI
  86. 10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1231 · DOI
  87. 10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.29 · DOI
  88. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.004 · DOI
  89. 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.264 · DOI
  90. 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.32 · DOI
  91. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1994.tb01850.x · DOI
  92. 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00813.x · DOI
  93. 10.1080/09658210244000522 · DOI
  94. 10.1037/0021-9010.76.4.569 · DOI
  95. 10.1348/014466600164499 · DOI
  96. 10.1002/bdm.632 · DOI
  97. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.017 · DOI
  98. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.004 · DOI
  99. 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.838 · DOI
  100. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.007 · DOI
  101. 10.1037/h0076486 · DOI · Paper page
  102. 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.502 · DOI · Paper page
  103. 10.3758/BF03212966 · DOI
  104. 10.1177/1948550611401756 · DOI
  105. 10.1080/09658210244000540 · DOI
  106. 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.64 · DOI
  107. 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.472 · DOI
  108. 10.1177/01461672952112001 · DOI
  109. 10.1037/a0020449 · DOI
  110. 10.1027/1864-9335.39.3.182 · DOI
  111. 10.1037/0278-7393.34.5.1043 · DOI
  112. 10.1037/a0017006 · DOI
  113. 10.1027/1618-3169.55.5.342 · DOI
  114. 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.737 · DOI
  115. 10.1506/car.25.1.10 · DOI
  116. 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1981.tb00479.x · DOI
  117. Peters P. G., 1999, Arizona State Law Journal, 31, 1277
  118. 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.013 · DOI
  119. 10.1080/09658210244000603 · DOI
  120. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00381.x · DOI
  121. 10.1002/acp.1377 · DOI
  122. 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.147 · DOI
  123. 10.1037/0278-7393.14.4.709 · DOI
  124. 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.14 · DOI
  125. 10.1026//1618-3169.49.4.270 · DOI
  126. 10.1080/09658210244000487 · DOI
  127. 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.835 · DOI · Paper page
  128. 10.2307/1600229 · DOI
  129. 10.3758/BF03212965 · DOI
  130. 10.1002/9780470752937.ch13 · DOI
  131. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01703.x · DOI
  132. 10.1177/01461672972312002 · DOI
  133. 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.437 · DOI
  134. 10.1006/jesp.1996.0010 · DOI
  135. 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00033.x · DOI
  136. Roese N. J., 2007, Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles, 2, 91
  137. Roese N. J., 2010, Harvard Business Review, 88, 26
  138. 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00013-8 · DOI
  139. 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00528-0 · DOI
  140. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00704.x · DOI
  141. 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.185 · DOI
  142. 10.3758/BF03213410 · DOI
  143. 10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
  144. 10.1196/annals.1279.012 · DOI
  145. 10.1086/378531 · DOI
  146. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90044-T · DOI
  147. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.04.001 · DOI
  148. 10.1037/a0023581 · DOI
  149. 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01642.x · DOI
  150. 10.3758/BF03202434 · DOI
  151. 10.1016/0749-5978(92)90064-E · DOI
  152. 10.1006/obhd.1993.1053 · DOI
  153. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00078.x · DOI
  154. 10.1037/0096-1523.3.4.544 · DOI
  155. 10.1007/s10979-005-5692-5 · DOI
  156. 10.1023/A:1025706823554 · DOI
  157. 10.1006/obhd.1997.2682 · DOI
  158. 10.1037/h0034782 · DOI
  159. 10.1037/h0077095 · DOI
  160. Tetlock P. E., 2005, Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know
  161. 10.1017/S0003055400400043 · DOI
  162. 10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.143 · DOI
  163. 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.904 · DOI
  164. 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90049-X · DOI
  165. 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403 · DOI · Paper page
  166. 10.1177/0146167201273011 · DOI
  167. 10.1002/ejsp.120 · DOI
  168. 10.1177/001872676702000302 · DOI
  169. 10.1177/1368430208095399 · DOI
  170. 10.1177/0146167291171005 · DOI
  171. 10.1006/obhd.2001.2976 · DOI
  172. 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00085.x · DOI
  173. 10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.415 · DOI
  174. 10.1037/0096-1523.4.2.345 · DOI
  175. 10.1037/0894-4105.20.4.461 · DOI
  176. 10.1007/s10339-011-0414-z · DOI
  177. 10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00052-X · DOI
  178. 10.1006/obhd.1995.1093 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 404

Metadata

Authors
Roese, N. J., & Vohs, K. D.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2012-09
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
411-426
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W4211165067
Cited by
457
References
186
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
hindsight bias, memory distortion, perceived predictability, metacognition, overconfidence, causal explanation, sensemaking, alternative explanations, data visualization, bias reduction interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review