The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hindsight Bias
Abstract
Hindsight bias occurs when people feel that they “knew it all along,” that is, when they believe that an event is more predictable after it becomes known than it was before it became known. Hindsight bias embodies any combination of three aspects: memory distortion, beliefs about events’ objective likelihoods, or subjective beliefs about one’s own prediction abilities. Hindsight bias stems from (a) cognitive inputs (people selectively recall information consistent with what they now know to be true and engage in sensemaking to impose meaning on their own knowledge), (b) metacognitive inputs (the ease with which a past outcome is understood may be misattributed to its assumed prior likelihood), and (c) motivational inputs (people have a need to see the world as orderly and predictable and to avoid being blamed for problems). Consequences of hindsight bias include myopic attention to a single causal understanding of the past (to the neglect of other reasonable explanations) as well as general overconfidence in the certainty of one’s judgments. New technologies for visualizing and understanding data sets may have the unintended consequence of heightening hindsight bias, but an intervention that encourages people to consider alternative causal explanations for a given outcome can reduce hindsight bias.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Measures in accordance with (b), which are intended to maintain an awareness of the automation bias, seem out of place: it introduces a concrete psychological aspect that sticks out from the more technical and operational aspects outlined in the other provisions, especially considering that automation bias is just one of many relevant biases (e.g., hindsight bias, confidence bias [36, 66]), heuris”
From On the Quest for Effectiveness in Human Oversight: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2024) · cites this paper as [66]
Citations
Cites
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282 · cited 1×
“Metacognitions are thoughts about one’s own thoughts (Flavell, 1979; Werth, Strack, & Förster, 2002).”
Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/1529-1006.01431 · Cited by 3,893
Self-citationConditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree.
Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0016755 · Cited by 2,443
Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing”
Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.2.263 · Cited by 2,379 · cited 1×
“…& Thomas, 1998; Walster, 1967), such that people who possess dispositionally greater needs for control or closure show greater hindsight bias (Campbell & Tesser, 1983; Musch, 2003; Tykocinski, 2001; see also Hirt, Kardes, & Markman, 2004; Kruglanski & Webster, 1996; Musch & Wagner, 2007).”
The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the Coherence of Social Motivations
Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_1 · Cited by 1,437 · cited 1×
“People seek meaning through religion, ideologies, and other worldviews that impose order and predictability on life (Heine, Proulx, & Vohs, 2006; Jost, Banaji, & Nosek, 2004; King, Hicks, Krull, & Del Gaiso, 2006; Kray et al., 2010; Pyszczynski, Greenberg, & Solomon, 1999).”
Self-citationRoese, N. J. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.133 · Cited by 1,156 · cited 1×
“Counterfactuals are thoughts of what might have been, of what could have happened if some past action had been different (Roese, 1997).”
Self-citationLacking control increases illusory pattern perception
Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1159845 · Cited by 1,119
Self-Enhancement: Food for Thought
Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00068.x · Cited by 880
Compensatory Control: Achieving Order Through the Mind, Our Institutions, and the Heavens
Kay, A. C., Whitson, J. A., Gaucher, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01649.x · Cited by 598
Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., & Pfeiffer, T. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672002611010 · Cited by 556
Research works printed but not linked: 178
- 10.1177/1088868309341564 · DOI
- American Law Institute, 2010, Restatement of the law third torts: Liability for physical and emotional harm, 1
- Anderson J. C., 1997, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 16, 20
- 10.1016/0167-4870(93)90018-G · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-006X.49.3.323 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.486 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.305 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0015504 · DOI
- 10.1177/1088868307301033 · DOI
- 10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750597 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0021971 · DOI
- 10.1080/09658210701390701 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1000 · DOI
- 10.1080/09658210244000513 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.132 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3758/MC.38.3.356 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03195302 · DOI
- 10.1016/0273-2297(90)90003-M · DOI
- 10.1207/s15324834basp1902_5 · DOI
- 10.1207/S15324834BASP2401_3 · DOI
- 10.2307/256462 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167206288282 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0028579 · DOI
- 10.3758/s13423-011-0062-4 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00868.x · DOI
- 10.1177/01461672992511005 · DOI
- 10.1521/jscp.1989.8.3.331 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01067031 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.003 · DOI
- 10.1006/obhd.1999.2841 · DOI
- 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90010-Q · DOI
- 10.1016/0749-5978(87)90005-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-6566(92)90059-D · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.03.001 · DOI
- 10.2307/1422863 · DOI
- Eberwine K., 2005, Case Western Reserve Law Review, 55, 633
- 10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.3 · DOI
- 10.1177/1088868308316091 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.114 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.387 · DOI
- 10.3758/PBR.17.2.149 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.07.001 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00343.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-1523.1.3.288 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511809477.032 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511809477.024 · DOI
- 10.1016/0030-5073(75)90002-1 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-898X.11.2.124 · DOI
- 10.1002/bsl.897 · DOI
- 10.1002/1099-0720(200009)14:5<397::AID-ACP658>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
- 10.1086/527342 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03196819 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15324834basp2602&3_1 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.48 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.30.5.960 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1022352330466 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.311 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03197054 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02271.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.009 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1069 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.566 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.437 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0278-4254(97)10003-5 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2308/accr.2006.81.2.377 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1101 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01499075 · DOI
- 10.1177/1088868309353750 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1007755019837 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.179 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/obhd.1999.2847 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.joep.2006.11.002 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.107 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00534-4 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0017905 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4899-0924-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF01499038 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470752937.ch16 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01139.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167282082012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.12.009 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1231 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.29 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.264 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.32 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1994.tb01850.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00813.x · DOI
- 10.1080/09658210244000522 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.76.4.569 · DOI
- 10.1348/014466600164499 · DOI
- 10.1002/bdm.632 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.004 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.838 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.007 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0076486 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.502 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3758/BF03212966 · DOI
- 10.1177/1948550611401756 · DOI
- 10.1080/09658210244000540 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.64 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.472 · DOI
- 10.1177/01461672952112001 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0020449 · DOI
- 10.1027/1864-9335.39.3.182 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.34.5.1043 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0017006 · DOI
- 10.1027/1618-3169.55.5.342 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.737 · DOI
- 10.1506/car.25.1.10 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1981.tb00479.x · DOI
- Peters P. G., 1999, Arizona State Law Journal, 31, 1277
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.013 · DOI
- 10.1080/09658210244000603 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00381.x · DOI
- 10.1002/acp.1377 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.147 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.14.4.709 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.14 · DOI
- 10.1026//1618-3169.49.4.270 · DOI
- 10.1080/09658210244000487 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.835 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1600229 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03212965 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470752937.ch13 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01703.x · DOI
- 10.1177/01461672972312002 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.437 · DOI
- 10.1006/jesp.1996.0010 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00033.x · DOI
- Roese N. J., 2007, Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles, 2, 91
- Roese N. J., 2010, Harvard Business Review, 88, 26
- 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00013-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00528-0 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00704.x · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.185 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03213410 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1196/annals.1279.012 · DOI
- 10.1086/378531 · DOI
- 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90044-T · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.04.001 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0023581 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01642.x · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03202434 · DOI
- 10.1016/0749-5978(92)90064-E · DOI
- 10.1006/obhd.1993.1053 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00078.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-1523.3.4.544 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10979-005-5692-5 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1025706823554 · DOI
- 10.1006/obhd.1997.2682 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0034782 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0077095 · DOI
- Tetlock P. E., 2005, Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know
- 10.1017/S0003055400400043 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.143 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.904 · DOI
- 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90049-X · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0146167201273011 · DOI
- 10.1002/ejsp.120 · DOI
- 10.1177/001872676702000302 · DOI
- 10.1177/1368430208095399 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167291171005 · DOI
- 10.1006/obhd.2001.2976 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00085.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.415 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-1523.4.2.345 · DOI
- 10.1037/0894-4105.20.4.461 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10339-011-0414-z · DOI
- 10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00052-X · DOI
- 10.1006/obhd.1995.1093 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 404
Bordalo, P., Conlon, J., Gennaioli, N., Kwon, S., & Shleifer, A. (2021) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.3386/w29273 · Cited by 1
Editorial for Special Section on Golf Coaching
Jenkins, S. (2021) · International journal of sports science & coaching · doi:10.1177/17479541211027763 · Cited by 1
Which eye are you looking through? The impact of cognitive bias on process safety
Kerin, T. (2021) · Process safety progress · doi:10.1002/prs.12279 · Cited by 1
Psychologické aspekty rozhodování soudů se zaměřením na hodnocení důkazu znaleckým posudkem
Baráková, M. M. (2020) · Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi · doi:10.5817/cpvp2020-1-7 · Cited by 1
Chen, Y.-H., Cheng, H.-P., Lu, Y.-W., Lee, P.-H., Northoff, G., & Yen, N. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220690 · Cited by 1
“Both cognitive and motivational factors have been proposed to account for HB; however, the empirical evidence for motivational factors is generally weak [3,4,5,8] Therefore, in this study, we focused on cognitive factors.”
BackgroundAlenius, K. (2019) · The Romanian Journal for Baltic and Nordic Studies · doi:10.53604/rjbns.v11i1_4 · Cited by 1
Ehlers, U., Ryeng, E., McCormack, E., Khan, F., & Ehlers, S. (2018) · ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems. Part A: Civil Engineering · doi:10.1061/ajrua6.0000986 · Cited by 1
“This bias embodies “beliefs about events’ objective likelihoods, or subjective beliefs about one’s own prediction abilities” (Roese and Vohs 2012, p.411) and thus can be problematic in the reconstruction and causation analysis of crashes (Dilich et al. 2006).”
BackgroundMyers, B., Johnson, S., Shoemake, R., & Myers, J. (2017) · doi:10.1037/cns0000133 · Cited by 1
“Researchers have demonstrated that the hindsight bias is robust across a variety of domains (Roese & Vohs, 2012), including legal judgments (Hastie et al., 1999).”
BackgroundDo Echocardiography Appropriate Use Criteria Really Matter?
Dent, J. (2016) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2015.12.010 · Cited by 1
Ogbeibu, S., Senadjki, A., Gaskin, J., & Awal, I. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59916-4_8 · Cited by 1
Framing, Overconfidence and Regret in Italian Mortgage Banking Litigations
Lucarelli, C., & Mazzocchini, F. J. (2019) · Palgrave Macmillan studies in banking and financial institutions · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16295-5_6 · Cited by 1
Why Frankenstein is a Stigma Among Scientists
Nagy, P., Wylie, R., Eschrich, J., & Finn, E. (2017) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9936-9 · Cited by 18
“When people try to make sense of an event, they tend to interpret it as a collection of interconnected and coherent episodes, resulting in oversimplified and biased perceptions (Roese and Vohs 2012).”
BackgroundHughes, N. (2021) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-021-01655-8
Cheaters claim they knew the answers all along
Stanley, M. L., Stone, A. R., & Marsh, E. J. (2020) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01812-w
Hayashi, K., Maeda, H., Sato, M., Suzuki, A., Nakaya, Y., Hayashi, H., Hayashi, K., Miura, T., & Kobayashi, Y. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16213529
Thinking-in-Bets at Test Time Reduces Sycophantic Revisions in LLM AgentsPreprint
Bui, N. D. Q. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.34654
Future Opportunity Influences the Effects of Counterfactual Thinking on Regret and Surprise
Choi, H. (2026) · Psychologische Studien · doi:10.1007/s12646-026-00892-3
Ebrahimi, H., & Zarei, E. (2026) · Journal of Safety Science and Resilience · doi:10.1016/j.jnlssr.2026.100378
Ghosh, B. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.36739
“Hindsight bias in human judgment [7, 27] is the human counterpart of the leakage we measure.”
Gupta, A. (2026) · European Conference on Games Based Learning · doi:10.34190/ecgbl.20.1.5399
“Research by Fischhoff (1975) and Roese and Vohs (2012) shows that outcome knowledge does not just supplement memory; it actively reconstructs it.”
How Do Forward‐Looking Estimates of Credit Losses Affect the Judgments of Financial Statement Users?
Koonce, L., Mongold, C., Quaid, L., & Winchel, J. (2026) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1911-3846.70090
Time Machine Experiments: Using Historically-Bounded AI for Inquiry into the Human Mind
Yakura, H., Schimmelpfennig, R., Lopez-Lopez, E., Artiles, A. H., Brinkmann, L., Bonnefon, J.-F., Shariff, A. F., & Rahwan, I. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.15468
“Livingwitnessescanrespondtonewquestions,buttheirrec- ollectionsandretrospectivejudgmentsmaybeshapedbysubse-quentexperiencesandoutcomeknowledge[44].”
Biased Reasoning, Argument Analysis, and the Principle of Charity
Mueller, N., Löwenstein, D., & Vosgerau, G. (2026) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-026-09728-w · Cited by 1
When prophecy failed in July 2025, Japan: Who believed and how did they react to disconfirmation?
Sakakibara, R., & Ozono, H. (2026) · Social Psychology · doi:10.32872/spb.19551
Grüner, S., & Mußhoff, O. (2026) · PLOS Climate · doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000967
Orellana-Calderón, L., Silva, A. Y., Arias-Lagos, L., Sandoval, V., Alarcón-Jouanet, T., Schnettler, B., Riquelme-Segura, L., Sepúlveda, J., & Reutter, K. (2026) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2026.2711862
The Way We Were(n’t): Insecurity Bias in Memories of Adult Attachment Relationships
Palmiero, M. C., & Fraley, R. C. (2026) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/02654075261475719
Bennett, E. A. (2026) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.70180
Knowledge and beliefs about behavioral biases
Holzknecht, A., Huber, J., Kirchler, M., & Steinbacher, T. (2026) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2026.101237
Inefficacy of the SCAN Technique in Discriminating Between Truthful and Fabricated Statements
Areh, I., & Umolac, M. (2026) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-026-09834-1
The effect of previous team environment on the current motivation in Japanese varsity soccer players
Yasuda, Y., Hamamura, T., Inagaki, K., Kato, K., Koido, M., & Tsuchiya, H. (2026) · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · doi:10.3389/fspor.2026.1872084
Dau, P. H., Giese, H., Rumpel, M., Hertwig, R., & Wegwarth, O. (2026) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2026.105709
Szubin, R. (2026) · Studia Rossica Posnaniensia · doi:10.14746/strp.2026.51.1.08
Intuitive Judgments of Strangers Are More Popular but Not More Accurate Than Deliberate Ones
Remmers, C., Anoschin, A., Zimmermann, J., Grosz, M. P., Back, M., & Rau, R. (2026) · Social Psychology and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506261452705
Şahin, G. (2026) · Imagination, Cognition and Personality · doi:10.1177/02762366261457368
Divekar, P. R., Sanghvi, M., Chandani, A., Ubarhande, P., Pathak, M., & Bagade, S. J. (2026) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2026.101205
Blackwell, S., Chauhan, S., Grobman, W., Gyamfi-Bannerman, C., & Saade, G. (2026) · American Journal of Perinatology · doi:10.1055/a-2894-7944
Gkinopoulos, T., Siemiątkowski, M., & Bilewicz, M. (2026) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302261445317
“…pattern is also compatible with insights from the literature on other cognitive biases, such as the hindsight bias, which shows that once outcomes are known, individuals are more likely to impose simplified, intention-focused causal narratives on complex or ambiguous events (Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
From uncertainty to understanding: The focus on follow-up initiative
Corines, M. J., Taya, M. D., Sinha, V., Jaspan, O., Brady, E. J., Hayes, C. D., Pitman, J., Lo, G. C., Schweitzer, A. D., & Agress, H. (2026) · Clinical Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2026.110843
The Capture and Death of John Wilkes Booth: Was the Right Man Identified?
Soto, A. L., Barr, J., & Pappas, T. N. (2026) · American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology · doi:10.1097/paf.0000000000001111
Cognitive biases and rational decision making for volcanic hazards and risks
Papale, P. (2026) · Frontiers in Earth Science · doi:10.3389/feart.2026.1755833
Rothfeld, L., Bayen, U. J., & Schaper, M. L. (2026) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.70175
Richter, S. G., Brenner, L. H., & Ghaznavi, S. (2026) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2026.121393
That’s not how I recall it! (The surprising plasticity of long-term memory)
Burnett, D. J. (2026) · The Cognitive Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.53841/bpscog.2026.1.11.49
Vermeulen, N. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-08632-y
“Consequently, individuals who felt more anger were more likely to reinterpret the crisis as being both foreseeable and preventable, which is a pattern consistent with hindsight bias (Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
Szubin, R. (2025) · Rusycystyczne Studia Literaturoznawcze · doi:10.31261/rsl.2025.35.02
Nazam, F., & Munawar, I. (2025) · Cogent Mental Health · doi:10.1080/28324765.2025.2561668
“Hindsight bias occurs when individuals believe an event was predictable after learning its outcome, leading them to overestimate their ability to foresee and prevent it (Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
Kinda, S. (2025) · The Educational and Developmental Psychologist · doi:10.1080/20590776.2025.2526337
“In Study 1, participants rated the task as less difficult after observing correct responses, which aligns with the hypothesis and supports prior research findings (Birch, 2005; Camerer et al., 1989; Chi et al., 2004; Hinds, 1999; Nickerson, 1999; Nückles et al., 2005; Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
Politis, S., Sivasubramaniam, D., Agius, E. J., Gogan, T., & Papalia, N. (2025) · Psychology, Crime & Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2025.2559026
A PPP Projects Valuation: Real Options, Competition and Anchoring Bias
Anyebe, D., Bari, A. D., Santoro, D., & Villani, G. (2025) · Computational Economics · doi:10.1007/s10614-025-11109-6
“Hindsight bias arises when individuals perceive past events as more predictable than they were (Roese & Vohs, 2012 ).”
From crisis to global reform? Delphi insights on the feasibility of an international clearing union
Patomäki, H. (2025) · Journal of post Keynesian economics · doi:10.1080/01603477.2025.2544048
“People tend to extrapolate from current trends and developments and commit the hindsight bias (when we know what has already happened or is happening, we start to see it as more inevitable than it was; Tetlock 1999; Pohl 2004).”
Karamitros, G., Grant, M. P., & Lamaris, G. (2025) · Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2025.05.046
Young children’s monitoring of learning by self or other
Pillow, B. H., Arterberry, M., & Cleary, S. (2025) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-025-09438-w
“For example, once adults learn the outcome of an event, they often view the outcome as more predictable than they did before the event occurred (Bernstein et al., 2007; Fischhoff, 1975; Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
How Causal Focus and Specificity in Risk Factor Disclosures Jointly Affect Investor Judgments
Yoo, G.-S., & Tan, H. (2025) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.00445
People calibrate future expectations to past performance when predicting transparently random events
Roberts, R., Hastie, R., & Todorov, A. (2025) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf237
“For example, under these conditions people tend to view past events as more predictable than they were in reality (13, 14), to attribute successes to their own efforts and failure to factors beyond their control ( 15, 16), and to judge decisions based on the quality of the outcome rather than on…”
Basil, D., Runte, M., Werle, C. O. C., & Chernishenko, J. (2025) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/08997640251348653
“Unaware the outcome influenced their judgment, they reframe their perception of the past to fit the present (Hawkins & Hastie, 1990; Roese & Vohs, 2012; Shachar & Eckstein, 2007).”
Chen, H., & Xu, C.-X. (2025) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-025-09937-w
“Additionally, the belief that appropriate weight allocation guarantees success can lead to hindsight bias (Louie 1999; Roese and Vohs 2012).”
Deeply navigating among cross-cultural issues makes you a better expert
Melinder, A., Lekva, K. B., & Fosse, H. R. (2025) · Children and youth services review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108501
Navasardyan, A. R., Lobastov, K. V., Marapov, D. I., Makarova, D. D., Mikaelyan, M. V., Mareev, Y. V., Drapkina, O. M., & Martsevich, S. Y. (2025) · Medical Technologies Assessment and Choice · doi:10.17116/medtech20254702158
van Sassen, C., Mamede, S., van den Broek, W. W., Bindels, P., & Zwaan, L. (2025) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000006122 · Cited by 2
Niinimäki, P., Vuola, J., Kivelä, T., Mäkitie, A., & Uusitalo, M. (2025) · Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2025.06.022
Mind and Money: The Impact of Cognitive Biases on Investor’s Decision-Making
Sakeerthi, S. (2025) · Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management · doi:10.52783/jisem.v10i42s.8199 · Cited by 1
“Hindsight bias, on the other hand, is “ the tendency to overestimate the predictability of future events ” , once their outcomes are known (Roese &Vohs, 2012).”
When authority biases the holder: the case of the Costa Concordia disaster
Mastrogiorgio, A., Nauta, P. D., Palumbo, R., & Leccese, E. (2025) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-06-2024-1258
Mitigating visual hindsight bias in radiology: can education alter perceptual decision making?
Chen, J., Reed, W. M., & Gandomkar, Z. (2025) · Medical Imaging · doi:10.1117/12.3048627
Inclusion of brand in self predicts future use
Ross, B. J., Stein, R., Slepian, M., Sin, A. Y., Montgomery, R. M., & Rutchick, A. M. (2024) · Journal of Marketing Analytics · doi:10.1057/s41270-024-00365-4
“…they reflect consumers’ habits, can contribute to predictions of future behavior (Ji and Wood 2007), but such reports may not be accurate (see the robust literature demonstrating biases and errors in memory about previous choices; Baron and Hershey, 1988; Mather et al. 2000; Roese and Vohs 2012).”
Algorithmic Transparency in Forecasting Support Systems
Feddersen, L., & Cleophas, C. (2024) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2026.172
“An underlying cause of noise modeling is hindsight bias, where decision-makers perceive past events as more predictable than they were (Roese and Vohs, 2012).”
Frailties of Memory: Implications for Therapists Treating Gender Dysphoric Youth
Kulatunga-Moruzi, C., & Lawler, J. (2024) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/0092623x.2024.2406854
“As Roese and Vohs (2012) point out, when attention is applied solely to one causal explanation, negating other potential explanations, we become entrenched in our convictions.”
Soucise, A., Shekher, R., Faller, J., Keppel, D., Anthony, G., Dexter, E. U., & Chowdhry, V. K. (2024) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2024.0158 · Cited by 1
“23 We also recognize hindsight bias 24 can play a role in our evaluation of cases ( “ Monday Morning Quarterback ” ).”
Preserved memory for decisions across adulthood
Taylor, M. K., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., & Marsh, E. J. (2024) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825585.2024.2398790
“…decisions are not always remembered accurately; for example, both younger and older adults are susceptible to the hindsight bias and misremember their earlier judgments, believing they “knew it all along” even though they had just learned the answer (Bernstein et al., 2011; Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
Las decisiones judiciales en órganos colegiados y el sesgo de retrospectiva en grupos
Rodríguez, N. V. (2024) · Vniversitas · doi:10.11144/javeriana.vj73.djoc
Jeon, Y., Kim, H., Hwang, S.-S., & Kim, J. (2024) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102644
Online Criticism of Parents After Child Accidents: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis
Toews, K., Cummings, J. A., McLean, M., & Knowles, L. A. (2024) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6167
“One possible explanation for this finding is through the hindsight bias (Fischhoff, 1975; Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
BackgroundRosas, A. A. G., Lladó, G. M. R., & Durán, L. E. S. (2024) · [in]genios revista de investigación y labor creativa · doi:10.54114/ingeniosv10i2.14406
‘I knew all along’: making sense of post-self-deception judgments
Orlandi, M. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04563-6
“Lastly, foreseeability captures “the feeling that ‘I knew it all along,’” in the belief that an event could have been easily predicted (Roese & Vohs, 2012, p. 413).”
InfluentialRisk Preferences in the Delegation Process
Schwaninger, M. C., Mühlböck, M., & Sauermann, J. (2023) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-023-09908-4
“The so-called outcome bias (Baron & Hershey, 1988), closely related to the better-known hindsight bias (Roese & Vohs, 2012), suggests that voters tend to deduce ‘good’ decisions from ‘good’ outcomes and ‘bad’ decisions from ‘bad’ outcomes.”
Cognitivism and the argument from evidence non-responsiveness*
Eriksson, J., & Tiozzo, M. (2023) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-023-10424-x
“Indeed, there is even a name for the phenomenon: hindsight bias (Roese and Vohs 2012).”
The Hindsight Bias and Its Applications
Gao, L.-N. (2023) · Arts, Culture and Language · doi:10.61173/w3rt3985
I “knew” they wouldn’t last: Hindsight bias in judgments of a dating couple
Bleske-Rechek, A. L., Gunseor, M. M., & Nguyen, K. (2023) · Social Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.32872/spb.9967
Behavioural Finance, Overconfidence and Chinese Investors
Zhao, Y. (2022) · BCP Business & Management · doi:10.54691/bcpbm.v32i.2882
“Hindsight bias is the tendency to see what has happened as relatively inevitable and obvious, without realising that the review of the outcome will influence people's judgement (Roese and Vohs, 2012).”
BackgroundSpeicher, M. (2022) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.05347
Al-Tarawneh, A. (2022) · Dirasat Human and Social Sciences · doi:10.35516/hum.v49i2.1779
Unintentional Inception: When a Premium Is Offered to Unintentional Creations
Fulmer, A. G., & Reich, T. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211063750
Paddeu, F. I. (2021) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3770705
Categorical judgments do not modify sensory information in working memory
Luu, L., & Stocker, A. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.06.15.152223
Rachev, N. R., & Petrova, M. (2019) · American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.31219/osf.io/wbk86
Dorman, R. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3732518
Sauer, S., & Sülzenbrück, S. (2018) · Arbeitswelten der Zukunft · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-23397-6_11
Bracco, F., Modafferi, C., & Ferraris, L. (2018) · Geopolitical, Social Security and Freedom Journal · doi:10.2478/gssfj-2018-0007
“These videos were selected because they reference the Genoa flood that occurred on 9 October 2014.3 The Roese and Vohs (2012) framework was adopted in order to identify sentences that presented the hindsight bias.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWehde, M. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON) · doi:10.1109/temscon.2018.8488453
“We all suffer to some extent from hindsight bias—which involves misremembering earlier opinions or judgements [7].”
BackgroundBobeth, S., & Matthies, E. (2017) · Energy Efficiency · doi:10.1007/s12053-017-9586-4 · Cited by 31
Reprint of: Equal egocentric bias in school-aged children with and without autism spectrum disorders
Begeer, S., Bernstein, D. M., Aßfalg, A., Azdad, H., Glasbergen, T., Wierda, M., & Koot, H. M. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.05.017 · Cited by 2
“Hindsight bias refers to the phenomenon that, after learning an outcome, people find it difficult to judge a naive perspective that lacks this outcome knowledge (Fischhoff, 1975; Roese & Vohs, 2012).”
BackgroundMuslims Love Jesus, Too? Corrective Information Alters Prejudices Against Islam
Moritz, S., Göritz, A., Kühn, S., Schneider, B. C., Krieger, E., Röhlinger, J., & Zimmerer, S. (2016) · Pastoral Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11089-016-0706-4
“Unlike most other studies on hindsight bias (Bernstein et al. 2011; Pohl 2004), we analyzed changes in opinion and not in knowledge.”
ResultSchneider, J. (2014) · Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik · doi:10.1007/s12399-014-0440-x
The influence of complexity on the final project performance from students’ perspectives
Chandra, H., & Hartono, B. (2025) · AIP Conference Proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0227800
Nudges jako narzędzia behawioralnej polityki publicznej i ich akceptowanie w Polsce
Miłaszewicz, D. (2023) · Rozprawy i Studia · doi:10.18276/978-83-7972-667-7
Hindsight Bias: Why We Think We Are Good Predictors Even Though We Are Not
Hofmann, A. (2022) · The Ten Commandments of Risk Leadership · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-88797-1_11
Kranefeld, I., Genau, H. A., & Blickle, G. (2021) · Persönlichkeit und weltpolitische Gestaltung · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-32348-6_5
Thanheiser, E. (2021) · Advances in STEM Education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68956-8_8
Lee, X.-Q. (2021) · Decision Making in Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-0143-9_41
Metadata
- Authors
- Roese, N. J., & Vohs, K. D.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 411-426
- ISSN
- 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6924
- OpenAlex
- W4211165067
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 186
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 9.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- hindsight bias, memory distortion, perceived predictability, metacognition, overconfidence, causal explanation, sensemaking, alternative explanations, data visualization, bias reduction interventions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review