Cited by 218Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and Memory

Thinking about thinking: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of metacognitive judgements

Open access
Vaccaro, Anthony G., Fleming, Stephen M.·2018·Brain and Neuroscience Advances

Abstract

Metacognition supports reflection upon and control of other cognitive processes. Despite metacognition occupying a central role in human psychology, its neural substrates remain underdetermined, partly due to study-specific differences in task domain and type of metacognitive judgement under study. It is also unclear how metacognition relates to other apparently similar abilities that depend on recursive thought such as theory of mind or mentalising. Now that neuroimaging studies of metacognition are more prevalent, we have an opportunity to characterise consistencies in neural substrates identified across different analysis types and domains. Here we used quantitative activation likelihood estimation methods to synthesise findings from 47 neuroimaging studies on metacognition, divided into categories based on the target of metacognitive evaluation (memory and decision-making), analysis type (judgement-related activation, confidence-related activation, and predictors of metacognitive sensitivity), and, for metamemory judgements, temporal focus (prospective and retrospective). A domain-general network, including medial and lateral prefrontal cortex, precuneus, and insula was associated with the level of confidence in self-performance in both decision-making and memory tasks. We found preferential engagement of right anterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in metadecision experiments and bilateral parahippocampal cortex in metamemory experiments. Results on metacognitive sensitivity were inconclusive, likely due to fewer studies reporting this contrast. Finally, by comparing our results to meta-analyses of mentalising, we obtain evidence for common engagement of the ventromedial and anterior dorsomedial prefrontal cortex in both metacognition and mentalising, suggesting that these regions may support second-order representations for thinking about the thoughts of oneself and others.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2398212818810591

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is circumstantial evidence for a link between model-based metacognition and mentalizing, with similar developmental trajectories (both emerge around age 3-4) and overlap in neural correlates, particularly in medial prefrontal cortex.

    “There is circumstantial evidence for this link, with similar developmental trajectories (both metacognition and mentalizing emerge around the age of 3-4) and overlap in neural correlates (particularly in the medial prefrontal cortex; Vaccaro & Fleming 2018).”

    From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Vaccaro & Fleming 2018

    The Introduction reports indirect developmental evidence, but gives the age as 4–5 years, not 3–4. The Discussion (‘Comparing metacognition and mentalising’) reports overlap in ventromedial and anterior dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, while noting minimal overlap in other regions. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Regions involved in theory of mind, including vmPFC, dorsomedial PFC, and temporoparietal junction, may support self-models that contribute to model-based metacognition.

    “We can also advance the hypothesis that regions involved in theory of mind-including vmPFC, dorsomedial PFC, and temporoparietal junction-may support self-models that contribute to model-based metacognition (Vaccaro & Fleming 2018, Wittmann et al. 2016).”

    From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Vaccaro & Fleming 2018

    The Discussion (‘Comparing metacognition and mentalising’; page not provided) suggests that medial PFC may support representations of one’s own mental states and reports overlap between metacognition and mentalising in vmPFC and anterior dorsomedial PFC. It identifies TPJ as involved in theory of mind, but says TPJ activation was unique to theory of mind in this comparison, not shared with metacognition. The proposed contribution of TPJ to metacognitive self-models is therefore not supported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Activity in medial and lateral prefrontal cortex, precuneus, and ventral striatum covaries with judgments of confidence in memory and perceptual tasks.

    “Convergent findings have emphasized the importance of human prefrontal cortex for the fidelity of propositional confidence estimates, with a meta-analysis revealing that activity in medial and lateral prefrontal cortex, precuneus, and ventral striatum covaries with judgments of confidence in memory and perceptual tasks (Vaccaro & Fleming 2018).”

    From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Vaccaro & Fleming 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 91

  1. Ais J Zylberberg A Barttfeld P et al (2016) Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments. Cognition 146: 377– 386. 26513356
  2. Allen M Frank D Schwarzkopf DS et al (2016) Unexpected arousal modulates the influence of sensory noise on confidence. Elife 5: e18103. 27776633 PMC5079750
  3. Arango-Muñoz S (2011) Two levels of metacognition. Philosophia 39(1): 71– 82.
  4. Baird B Cieslak M Smallwood J et al (2015) Regional white matter variation associated with domain-specific metacognitive accuracy. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 27(3): 440– 452. 25313660
  5. Baird B Smallwood J Gorgolewski KJ et al (2013) Medial and lateral networks in anterior prefrontal cortex support metacognitive ability for memory and perception. Journal of Neuroscience 33(42): 16657– 16665. 24133268 PMC6618531
  6. Bonini F Burle B Liegeois-Chauvel C et al (2014) Action monitoring and medial frontal cortex: Leading role of supplementary motor area. Science 343(6173): 888– 891. 24558161
  7. Carruthers P (2009) How we know our own minds: The relationship between mindreading and metacognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(2): 121– 138. 19386144
  8. Carruthers P (2011) The Opacity of Mind: An Integrative Theory of Self-Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Chiou K Carlson RA Arnett P et al (2011) Metacognitive monitoring in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 17(4): 1– 12. 21554787
  10. Chua EF Pergolizzi D Weintraub RR (2014) The cognitive neuroscience of metamemory monitoring: Understanding metamemory processes, subjective levels expressed, and metacognitive accuracy. In Fleming SM Frith CD (eds) The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 267– 291.
  11. Chua EF Schacter DL Sperling RA (2009) Neural correlates of metamemory: A comparison of feeling-of-knowing and retrospective confidence judgments. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21(9): 1751– 1765. 18823230 PMC2709699
  12. Cosentino S (2014) Metacognition in Alzheimer’s disease. In Fleming SM Frith CD (eds) The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 389– 407.
  13. David AS Bedford N Wiffen B et al (2014) Failures of metacognition and lack of insight in neuropsychiatric disorders. In Fleming SM Frith CD (eds) The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 345– 366.
  14. Dehaene S Posner MI Tucker DM (1994) Localization of a neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science 5(5): 303– 305.
  15. Didic M Barbeau EJ Felician O et al (2011) Which memory system is impaired first in Alzheimer’s disease? Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 27(1): 11– 22. 21799246
  16. Eickhoff SB Bzdok D Laird AR et al (2012) Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited. Neuroimage 59(3): 2349– 2361. 21963913 PMC3254820
  17. Eickhoff SB Laird AR Grefkes C et al (2009) Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: A random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Human Brain Mapping 30(9): 2907– 2926. 19172646 PMC2872071
  18. Fitzgerald LM Arvaneh M Dockree PM (2017) Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments. Consciousness and Cognition 49: 264– 277. 28222381
  19. Fleming SM Daw ND (2017) Self-evaluation of decision-making: A general Bayesian framework for metacognitive computation. Psychological Review 124(1): 91– 114. 28004960 PMC5178868
  20. Fleming SM Dolan RJ (2014) The neural basis of metacognitive ability. In: Fleming SM Frith CD (eds) The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 245– 266.
  21. Fleming SM Frith CD (2014) The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
  22. Fleming SM Ryu J Golfinos JG Blackmon KE (2014) Domain-specific impairment in metacognitive accuracy following anterior prefrontal lesions. Brain 137(10): 2811– 2822. 25100039 PMC4163038
  23. Frith CD (2012) The role of metacognition in human social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367(1599): 2213– 2223. PMC3385688 22734064
  24. Frith CD Frith U (1999) Interacting minds a biological basis. Science 286(5445): 1692– 1695. 10576727
  25. Galvin SJ Podd JV Drga V et al (2003) Type 2 tasks in the theory of signal detectability: Discrimination between correct and incorrect decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10(4): 843– 876. 15000533
  26. Garavan H Ross T Kaufman J et al (2003) A midline dissociation between error-processing and response-conflict monitoring. Neuroimage 20(2): 1132– 1139. 14568482
  27. García-Cordero I Sedeño L Fuente LD et al (2016) Feeling, learning from and being aware of inner states: Interoceptive dimensions in neurodegeneration and stroke. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371(1708): 20160006. PMC5062096 28080965
  28. Garfinkel SN Manassei MF Hamilton-Fletcher G et al (2016) Interoceptive dimensions across cardiac and respiratory axes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371(1708): 20160014. PMC5062102 28080971
  29. Garrison J Erdeniz B Done J (2013) Prediction error in reinforcement learning: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 37(7): 1297– 1310. 23567522
  30. Gehring WJ Goss B Coles MGH et al (1993) A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science 4(6): 385– 390.
  31. Gilleen J David A Greenwood K (2016) Self-reflection and set-shifting mediate awareness in cognitively preserved schizophrenia patients. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 21(3): 185– 196. 27112316
  32. Grimaldi P Lau H Basso MA (2015) There are things that we know that we know, and there are things that we do not know we do not know: Confidence in decision-making. Neuroscience & Biobehavioural Reviews 55: 88– 97. PMC4501881 25929444
  33. Haskins AL Yonelinas AP Quamme JR et al (2008) Perirhinal cortex supports encoding and familiarity-based recognition of novel associations. Neuron 59(4): 554– 560. 18760692
  34. Hembacher E Ghetti S (2014) Don’t look at my answer. Psychological Science 25(9): 1768– 1776. 25015686
  35. Henson R Cansino S Herron J et al (2003) A familiarity signal in human anterior medial temporal cortex? Hippocampus 13(2): 301– 304. 12699337
  36. Hester R Foxe JJ Molholm S et al (2005) Neural mechanisms involved in error processing: A comparison of errors made with and without awareness. Neuroimage 27(3): 602– 608. 16024258
  37. Hester R Nestor L Garavan H (2009) Impaired error awareness and anterior cingulate cortex hypoactivity in chronic cannabis users. Neuropsychopharmacology 34(11): 2450– 2458. 19553917 PMC2743772
  38. Janowsky JS Shimamura AP Squire LR (1989) Memory and metamemory: Comparisons between patients with frontal lobe lesions and amnesic patients. Psychobiology 17(1): 3– 11.
  39. Jenkins AC Mitchell JP (2011) Medial prefrontal cortex subserves diverse forms of self-reflection. Social Neuroscience 6(3): 211– 218. 20711940
  40. Jenkinson M Beckmann CF Behrens TE et al (2012) FSL. NeuroImage 62(2): 782– 790. 21979382
  41. Kao Y Davis ES Gabrieli JD (2005) Neural correlates of actual and predicted memory formation. Nature Neuroscience 8(12): 1776– 1783. 16286927
  42. Kelemen WL Frost PJ Weaver CA (2000) Individual differences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacognitive ability. Memory & Cognition 28(1): 92– 107. 10714142
  43. Kepecs A Uchida N and Zariwala Mainen (2008) Neural correlates, computation and behavioural impact of decision confidence. Nature 455(7210): 227– 231. 18690210
  44. Koren D Seidman LJ Goldsmith M Harvey PD (2006) Real-world cognitive - and metacognitive - dysfunction in schizophrenia: a new approach for measuring (and remediating) more “right stuff”. Schizophrenia Bulletin 32(2): 310– 326. 16397202 PMC2632222
  45. Leonesio RJ Nelson TO (1990) Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16(3): 464– 467. 2140404
  46. Lockl K Schneider W (2007) Knowledge about the mind: Links between theory of mind and later metamemory. Child Development 78(1): 148– 167. 17328698
  47. Lombardo MV Chakrabarti B Bullmore ET et al (2010) Shared neural circuits for mentalizing about the self and others. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22(7): 1623– 1635. 19580380
  48. McGlynn SM Kaszniak AW (1991) When metacognition fails: Impaired awareness of deficit in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3(2): 183– 187. 23972092
  49. Maniscalco B Lau H (2012) A signal detection theoretic approach for estimating metacognitive sensitivity from confidence ratings. Consciousness and Cognition 21(1): 422– 430. 22071269
  50. Metcalfe J (2008) Evolution of metacognition. In: Dunlosky J Bjork R (eds) Handbook of Metamemory and Memory. London: Psychology Press, pp. 27– 46.
  51. Metcalfe J Dunlosky J (2008) Metamemory. In: Roediger HL III (eds) Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 349– 362.
  52. Metcalfe J Schwartz B (2015) The ghost in the machine: Self-reflective consciousness and the neuroscience of metacognition. In: Dunlosky J Tauber S (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Metacognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 407– 424.
  53. Metcalfe J Shimamura AP (1996) Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  54. Miyamoto K Setsuie R Osada T et al (2018) Reversible silencing of the frontopolar cortex selectively impairs metacognitive judgment on non-experience in primates. Neuron 97(4): 980– 989 e6. 29395916
  55. Moeller SJ Goldstein RZ (2014) Impaired self-awareness in human addiction: Deficient attribution of personal relevance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18(12): 635– 641. 25278368 PMC4254155
  56. Moeller SJ Fleming SM Gan G et al (2016) Metacognitive impairment in active cocaine use disorder is associated with individual differences in brain structure. European Neuropsychopharmacology 26(4): 653– 662. 26948669 PMC4805109
  57. Molenberghs P Johnson H Henry JD et al (2016) Understanding the minds of others: A neuroimaging meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 65: 276– 291. 27073047
  58. Montaldi D Spencer TJ Roberts N et al (2006) The neural system that mediates familiarity memory. Hippocampus 16(5): 504– 520. 16634088
  59. Morales J Lau H Fleming SM (2018) Domain-specific patterns of activity support metacognition in human prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 38(14): 3534– 3546. 29519851 PMC5895040
  60. Moulin CJ James N Perfect TJ et al (2003) Knowing what you cannot recognise: Further evidence for intact metacognition in Alzheimer’s disease. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 10(1): 74– 82.
  61. Neubert F Mars R Thomas A et al (2014) Comparison of human ventral frontal cortex areas for cognitive control and language with areas in monkey frontal cortex. Neuron 81(3): 700– 713. 24485097
  62. Neubert F Mars RB Sallet J et al (2015) Connectivity reveals relationship of brain areas for reward-guided learning and decision making in human and monkey frontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112(20): E2695– E2704. 25947150 PMC4443352
  63. Nicolle A Klein-Flugge MC Hunt LT et al (2012) An agent independent axis for executed and modeled choice in medial prefrontal cortex. Neuron 75(6): 1114– 1121. 22998878 PMC3458212
  64. Orfei MD Piras F Macci E et al (2012) The neuroanatomical correlates of cognitive insight in schizophrenia. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 8(4): 418– 423. 22287264 PMC3624955
  65. Pannu JK Kaszniak AW Rapcsak SZ (2005) Metamemory for faces following frontal lobe damage. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 11(6): 668– 676. 16248902
  66. Pollack C Ashby NC (2018) Where arithmetic and phonology meet: The meta-analytic convergence of arithmetic and phonological processing in the brain. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 30: 251– 264. 28533112 PMC6969128
  67. Proust J (2013) The Philosophy of Metacognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  68. Ridderinkhof KR Ullsperger M Crone EA et al (2004) The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 306(5695): 443– 447. 15486290
  69. Sallet J Mars RB Noonan MP et al (2013) The organization of dorsal frontal cortex in humans and macaques. Journal of Neuroscience 33(30): 12255– 12274. 23884933 PMC3744647
  70. Saxe R Moran JM Scholz J et al (2006) Overlapping and non-overlapping brain regions for theory of mind and self reflection in individual subjects. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 1(3): 229– 234. 18985110 PMC2555418
  71. Schilbach L Bzdok D Timmermans B et al (2012) Introspective minds: Using ALE meta-analyses to study commonalities in the neural correlates of emotional processing, social & unconstrained cognition. PLoS ONE 7(2): e30920. 22319593 PMC3272038
  72. Schmitz TW Kawahara-Baccus TN Johnson SC (2004) Metacognitive evaluation, self-relevance, and the right prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage 22(2): 941– 947. 15193625
  73. Schnyer DM Verfaellie M Alexander MP et al (2004) A role for right medial prefrontal cortex in accurate feeling-of-knowing judgments: Evidence from patients with lesions to frontal cortex. Neuropsychologia 42(7): 957– 966. 14998710
  74. Schraw G (1996) The effect of generalized metacognitive knowledge on test performance and confidence judgments. The Journal of Experimental Education 65(2): 135– 146.
  75. Schurz M Radua J Aichhorn M et al (2014) Fractionating theory of mind: A meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 42: 9– 34. 24486722
  76. Schwartz BL Diaz F (2014) Quantifying human metacognition for the neurosciences. In: Fleming SM Frith CD (eds) The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 9– 23.
  77. Shad M (2004) Insight and prefrontal cortex in first-episode schizophrenia. Neuroimage 22(3): 1315– 1320. 15219603
  78. Shekhar M Rahnev D (2018) Distinguishing the roles of dorsolateral and anterior PFC in visual metacognition. Journal of Neuroscience 38(22): 5078– 5087. 29720553 PMC6705938
  79. Shimamura AP (2000) Toward a cognitive neuroscience of metacognition. Consciousness and Cognition 9(2): 313– 323. 10924251
  80. Simons JS Peers PV Mazuz YS et al (2010) Dissociation between memory accuracy and memory confidence following bilateral parietal lesions. Cereb Cortex 20(2): 479– 485. 19542474 PMC2803741
  81. Sokolowski HM Fias W Ononye CB et al (2017) Are numbers grounded in a general magnitude processing system? A functional neuroimaging meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia 105: 50– 69. 28119003
  82. Souchay C (2007) Metamemory in Alzheimer’s disease. Cortex 43(7): 987– 1003. 17941355
  83. Spalletta G Piras F Piras F et al (2014) The structural neuroanatomy of metacognitive insight in schizophrenia and its psychopathological and neuropsychological correlates. Human Brain Mapping 35(9): 4729– 4740. 24700789 PMC6869551
  84. Taylor SF Stern ER Gehring WJ (2007) Neural systems for error monitoring. The Neuroscientist 13(2): 160– 172. 17404376
  85. Turkeltaub PE Eickhoff SB Laird AR et al (2012) Minimizing within-experiment and within-group effects in activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses. Human Brain Mapping 33(1): 1– 13. 21305667 PMC4791073
  86. Ullsperger M Harsay HA Wessel JR et al (2010) Conscious perception of errors and its relation to the anterior insula. Brain Structure & Function 214(5–6): 629– 643. 20512371 PMC2886909
  87. Valk SL Bernhardt BC Böckler A et al (2016) Substrates of metacognition on perception and metacognition on higher-order cognition relate to different subsystems of the mentalizing network. Human Brain Mapping 37(10): 3388– 3399. 27151776 PMC6867437
  88. van der Meer L de Vos AE Stiekema AP Pijnenborg GH van Tol MJ Nolen WA David AS Aleman A (2013) Insight in schizophrenia: involvement of self-reflection networks? Schizophrenia Bulletin 39(6): 1288. PMC3796073 23104865
  89. White TP Engen NH Sørensen S et al (2014) Uncertainty and confidence from the triple-network perspective: Voxel-based meta-analyses. Brain and Cognition 85: 191– 200. 24424423
  90. Ye Q Zou F Lau H Hu Y Kwok SC (2018) Causal evidence for mnemonic metacognition in human precuneus. Journal of Neuroscience 38(28): 6379– 6387. 29921714 PMC6041789
  91. Yoshida W Seymour B Friston KJ et al (2010) Neural mechanisms of belief inference during cooperative games. The Journal of Neuroscience 30(32): 10744– 10751. 20702705 PMC2967416

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaccaro, A. G., & Fleming, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
Fleming, Stephen M.
Venue
Brain and Neuroscience Advances
Published
2018-01
Volume
2
Pages
2398212818810591-2398212818810591
ISSN
2398-2128 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901104049
Cited by
218
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain and Neuroscience Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (203147/Z/16/Z, 206648/Z/17/Z)
  • Royal Society (206648/Z/17/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
metacognition, metamemory, metacognitive confidence, metacognitive sensitivity, neural correlates, prefrontal cortex, parahippocampal cortex, precuneus, insula, mentalization, theory of mind, second-order representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review