CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 257Probiotics and Fermented FoodsExercise and Physiological ResponsesAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Probiotic supplementation affects markers of intestinal barrier, oxidation, and inflammation in trained men; a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial

Open access
Lamprecht, Manfred, Bogner, Simon, Schippinger, Gert, Steinbauer, Kurt, Fankhauser, Florian, Hallstroem, Seth, Schuetz, Burkhard, Greilberger, Joachim F·2012·Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-9-45PMC PMC3465223
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Probiotics are an upcoming group of nutraceuticals claiming positive effects on athlete's gut health, redox biology and immunity but there is lack of evidence to support these statements. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled trial to observe effects of probiotic supplementation on markers of intestinal barrier, oxidation and inflammation, at rest and after intense exercise. 23 trained men received multi-species probiotics (1010 CFU/day, Ecologic®Performance or OMNi-BiOTiC®POWER, n = 11) or placebo (n = 12) for 14 weeks and performed an intense cycle ergometry over 90 minutes at baseline and after 14 weeks. Zonulin and α1-antitrypsin were measured from feces to estimate gut leakage at baseline and at the end of treatment. Venous blood was collected at baseline and after 14 weeks, before and immediately post exercise, to determine carbonyl proteins (CP), malondialdehyde (MDA), total oxidation status of lipids (TOS), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Statistical analysis used multifactorial analysis of variance (ANOVA). Level of significance was set at p < 0.05, a trend at p < 0.1. RESULTS: Zonulin decreased with supplementation from values slightly above normal into normal ranges (<30 ng/ml) and was significantly lower after 14 weeks with probiotics compared to placebo (p = 0.019). We observed no influence on α1-antitrypsin (p > 0.1). CP increased significantly from pre to post exercise in both groups at baseline and in the placebo group after 14 weeks of treatment (p = 0.006). After 14 weeks, CP concentrations were tendentially lower with probiotics (p = 0.061). TOS was slightly increased above normal in both groups, at baseline and after 14 weeks of treatment. There was no effect of supplementation or exercise on TOS. At baseline, both groups showed considerably higher TNF-α concentrations than normal. After 14 weeks TNF-α was tendentially lower in the supplemented group (p = 0.054). IL-6 increased significantly from pre to post exercise in both groups (p = 0.001), but supplementation had no effect. MDA was not influenced, neither by supplementation nor by exercise. CONCLUSIONS: The probiotic treatment decreased Zonulin in feces, a marker indicating enhanced gut permeability. Moreover, probiotic supplementation beneficially affected TNF-α and exercise induced protein oxidation. These results demonstrate promising benefits for probiotic use in trained men. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT01474629.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1550-2783-9-45

Cites

56 of 57 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 CONSORT diagram.
Figure 1 CONSORT diagram.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Stool concentrations of zonulin in trained men before and after 14 weeks of treatment. Pro with probiotics supplemented group, Plac placebo group, Tx treatment, wk week; n = 11 (probiotic supplementation), n = 12 (placebo). Values are means ± SD. There was a signficant difference between groups after 14 wk of treatment: PTx < 0.05 (ANOVA).
Figure 2 Stool concentrations of zonulin in trained men before and after 14 weeks of treatment. Pro with probiotics supplemented group, Plac placebo group, Tx treatment, wk week; n = 11 (probiotic supplementation), n = 12 (placebo). Values are means ± SD. There was a signficant difference between groups after 14 wk of treatment: PTx < 0.05 (ANOVA).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Plasma concentrations of carbonyl groups bounded on protein in trained men before and after 14 weeks of treatment, and pre/post a triple step test cycle ergometry. Pro with probiotics supplemented group, Plac placebo group, Ex exercise, Tx treatment, wk week; n = 11 (probiotic supplementation), n = 12 (placebo). Values are means ± SD. There was a significant differences from pre to post exercise (except “Pro wk14”): PEx < 0.05; and a tendential difference between groups after 14 wk of treatment: PTx < 0.1 (ANOVA).
Figure 3 Plasma concentrations of carbonyl groups bounded on protein in trained men before and after 14 weeks of treatment, and pre/post a triple step test cycle ergometry. Pro with probiotics supplemented group, Plac placebo group, Ex exercise, Tx treatment, wk week; n = 11 (probiotic supplementation), n = 12 (placebo). Values are means ± SD. There was a significant differences from pre to post exercise (except “Pro wk14”): PEx < 0.05; and a tendential difference between groups after 14 wk of treatment: PTx < 0.1 (ANOVA).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Plasma concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in trained men before and after 14 weeks of treatment, and pre/post a triple step test cycle ergometry. Pro with probiotics supplemented group, Plac placebo group, Tx treatment, wk week; n = 11 (probiotic supplementation), n = 12 (placebo). Values are means ± SD. There was a tendential difference between groups after 14 wk of treatment: PTx < 0.1 (ANOVA).
Figure 4 Plasma concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in trained men before and after 14 weeks of treatment, and pre/post a triple step test cycle ergometry. Pro with probiotics supplemented group, Plac placebo group, Tx treatment, wk week; n = 11 (probiotic supplementation), n = 12 (placebo). Values are means ± SD. There was a tendential difference between groups after 14 wk of treatment: PTx < 0.1 (ANOVA).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Plasma concentrations of interleukin-6 in trained men before and after 14 weeks of treatment, and pre/post a triple step test cycle ergometry. Pro with probiotics supplemented group, Plac placebo group, Ex exercise, wk week; n = 11 (probiotic supplementation), n = 12 (placebo). Values are means ± SD. There were significant differences from pre to post exercise: PEx < 0.05 (ANOVA).
Figure 5 Plasma concentrations of interleukin-6 in trained men before and after 14 weeks of treatment, and pre/post a triple step test cycle ergometry. Pro with probiotics supplemented group, Plac placebo group, Ex exercise, wk week; n = 11 (probiotic supplementation), n = 12 (placebo). Values are means ± SD. There were significant differences from pre to post exercise: PEx < 0.05 (ANOVA).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. West NP, 2009, Exerc Immunol Rev, 15, 107
  2. Anderson RC, 2010, FEMS Microbiol Lett, 309, 184
  3. Commission of experts of the German Society of Sports Medicine and Prevention, 2002, Guidelines for testing in sports medicine. Plane IV
  4. Dill DB, 1999, J Appl Physiol, 73, 1265
  5. Koning CJM, 2007, Am J Gastroenterol, 102, 1
  6. Jeukendrup AE, 2000, Clin Sci, 98, 47, 10.1042/CS19990258 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lamprecht, M., Bogner, S., Schippinger, G., Steinbauer, K., Fankhauser, F., Hallstroem, S., Schuetz, B., & Greilberger, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
  • SportchirurgiePlusCentre for Individual Sport Medicine and Surgery Graz Austria
  • VRVis GmbH (Austria) (AT)
Corresponding author
Lamprecht, Manfred
ORCID
Greilberger, Joachim F
Venue
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2012-02-06
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
45-45
ISSN
1550-2783 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/1550-2783-9-45
PMC
PMC3465223
OpenAlex
W2160904230
Cited by
257
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
12.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
probiotics, probiotic supplementation, athletes, trained men, intestinal barrier, leaky gut, zonulin, alpha-1-antitrypsin, oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, malondialdehyde, protein carbonyls, inflammation, TNF-α, interleukin-6, physical activity, gut health, nutraceuticals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review