Cited by 66Neurological disorders and treatmentsMotor Control and AdaptationBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

Peripheral electrical stimulation to reduce pathological tremor: a review

Open access
Pascual-Valdunciel, Alejandro, Hoo, Grace W., Avrillon, Simon, Barroso, Filipe Oliveira, Goldman, Jennifer G., Hernandez-Pavon, Julio C., Pons, José L.·2021·Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Interventions to reduce tremor in essential tremor (ET) and Parkinson’s disease (PD) clinical populations often utilize pharmacological or surgical therapies. However, there can be significant side effects, decline in effectiveness over time, or clinical contraindications for these interventions. Therefore, alternative approaches must be considered and developed. Some non-pharmacological strategies include assistive devices, orthoses and mechanical loading of the tremorgenic limb, while others propose peripheral electrical stimulation. Specifically, peripheral electrical stimulation encompasses strategies that activate motor and sensory pathways to evoke muscle contractions and impact sensorimotor function. Numerous studies report the efficacy of peripheral electrical stimulation to alter tremor generation, thereby opening new perspectives for both short- and long-term tremor reduction. Therefore, it is timely to explore this promising modality in a comprehensive review. In this review, we analyzed 27 studies that reported the use of peripheral electrical stimulation to reduce tremor and discuss various considerations regarding peripheral electrical stimulation: the stimulation strategies and parameters, electrodes, experimental designs, results, and mechanisms hypothesized to reduce tremor. From our review, we identified a high degree of disparity across studies with regard to stimulation patterns, experimental designs and methods of assessing tremor. Having standardized experimental methodology is a critical step in the field and is needed in order to accurately compare results across studies. With this review, we explore peripheral electrical stimulation as an intervention for tremor reduction, identify the limitations and benefits of the current state-of-the-art studies, and provide ideas to guide the development of novel approaches based on the neural circuitries and mechanical properties implied in tremor generation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12984-021-00811-9

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct comparison between tremor management results is hampered because each device described in the literature was based on a different physiopathological hypothesis.

    “Another drawback that hampered a direct comparison between tremor management results is the fact that each of the different devices described in the literature was based on a different physiopathological hypothesis (106).”

    From A Review on Wearable Technologies for Tremor Suppression (2021) · cites this paper as [106]

    The Results (Stimulation strategies; page unavailable) describe different stimulation strategies based on different mechanical and physiological models. The Discussion says that variation across studies makes comparisons difficult. It does not establish that each device was based on a different pathophysiological hypothesis; the review also identifies differences in assessment metrics, stimulation parameters, and patient groups as barriers to comparison. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pascual-Valdunciel, A., Hoo, G. W., Avrillon, S., Barroso, F. O., Goldman, J. G., Hernandez-Pavon, J. C., & Pons, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Corresponding author
Pons, José L.
Venue
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Published
2021-02-15
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
33-33
ISSN
1743-0003 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3132381348
Cited by
66
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • European Commission (779982)
  • Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Keywords
peripheral electrical stimulation, pathological tremor, essential tremor, Parkinson's disease, tremor suppression, non-pharmacological treatment, stimulation parameters, electrodes, tremor assessment, sensorimotor pathways, assistive devices
MeSH terms
Electric Stimulation Therapy, Humans, Male, Tremor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review