Cited by 601Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressFree Radicals and Antioxidants

Free Radical Theory of Aging: An Update: Increasing the Functional Life Span

HARMAN, DENHAM·2006·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Aging is the progressive accumulation of diverse, deleterious changes with time that increase the chance of disease and death. The basic chemical process underlying aging was first advanced by the free radical theory of aging (FRTA) in 1954: the reaction of active free radicals, normally produced in the organisms, with cellular constituents initiates the changes associated with aging. The involvement of free radicals in aging is related to their key role in the origin and evolution of life. Aging changes are commonly attributed to development, genetic defects, the environment, disease, and an inborn aging process (IAP). The latter produces aging changes at an exponentially increasing rate with age, becoming the major risk factor for disease and death for humans after the age of 28 years in the developed countries. In them the IAP limits human average life expectancy at birth (ALE-B)--a rough measure of the healthy life span--to about 85 years; few reach 100 years and only one is known to have lived to 122 years. In these countries, improvements in living conditions (ILC) have gradually raised ALE-Bs to 76-79 years, 6-9 years less than the limit imposed by aging, with no change in the maximum life span (MLS). The extensive studies based on the FRTA hold promise that ALE-B and the MLS can be extended, the ALE-B possibly by a few years, and the MLS somewhat less.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1196/annals.1354.003

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HARMAN, D.
Affiliations
Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
HARMAN, DENHAM
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-05
Volume
1067
Issue
1
Pages
10-21
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W1951314249
Cited by
601
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 36
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Free Radicals and Antioxidants
Keywords
free radical theory of aging, free radicals, maximum lifespan, healthspan, aging and disease
MeSH terms
Aging, Biological Evolution, Free Radicals, Humans, Life Expectancy, Longevity, Models, Biological, Mortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review