The DOI matches its Crossref record; 127 of the 140 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 6 of the 86 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching
Open accessAbstract
Evidence for the superiority of guided instruction is explained in the context of our knowledge of human cognitive architecture, expert–novice differences, and cognitive load. Although unguided or minimally guided instructional approaches are very popular and intuitively appealing, the point is made that these approaches ignore both the structures that constitute human cognitive architecture and evidence from empirical studies over the past half-century that consistently indicate that minimally guided instruction is less effective and less efficient than instructional approaches that place a strong emphasis on guidance of the student learning process. The advantage of guidance begins to recede only when learners have sufficiently high prior knowledge to provide "internal" guidance. Recent developments in instructional research and instructional design models that support guidance during instruction are briefly described.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
34 Own interpretation · 32 No full text of the sources · 16 Sources not found · 12 No basis given · 8 Not checked yet · 4 Partly supported · 2 Supported · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Direct instruction involving considerable guidance, including examples, resulted in vastly more learning than discovery.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Current Research Supporting Direct Guidance
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Klahr & Nigam, 2004 source
The Method passage says direct instruction included examples and explanations, while discovery learning included neither. The Day 1 assessment reports that 77% of children receiving direct instruction mastered the experimental-design skill, compared with 23% receiving discovery learning. The finding concerns this skill in third- and fourth-grade children, not learning in general. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Those relatively few students who learned via discovery showed no signs of superior quality of learning.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Current Research Supporting Direct Guidance
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Klahr & Nigam, 2004 source
The Discussion reports that the few children who mastered the skill through discovery were as proficient at evaluating science-fair posters as those who mastered it through direct instruction. The Day 2: Poster Evaluations section likewise reports no difference in poster scores between the two groups. This supports the claim about the quality of learning among the relatively few discovery learners who achieved mastery. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Working memory has two well-known characteristics: When processing novel information, it is very limited in duration and in capacity.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Working Memory Characteristics and Functions
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Peterson & Peterson, 1959 source
- Partly supportedcites Miller, 1956 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In the discussion of immediate memory (pp. 92–93), Miller says its span is limited by the number of chunks, supporting the capacity part of the claim. The paper does not establish a limit on duration, and it does not specifically frame the finding as applying when processing novel information. (LLM, conf=0.87)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The work of Klahr and Nigam (2004), discussed earlier, unambiguously demonstrated the advantages of direct instruction in science.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Empirical Evidence About Science Learning From Unguided Instruction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Klahr & Nigam, 2004 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract and Discussion report a clear advantage for direct instruction over discovery learning in teaching third- and fourth-grade children to design simple, unconfounded experiments. But the claim broadens that finding to science instruction generally: among children who mastered the skill, the two groups performed equally well on broader scientific judgments, and the Discussion calls for matching instructional approaches to topic and student. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Much of this work provides a clear antecedent to the expertise reversal effect, discussed earlier, according to which instructional methods that are effective for novices become less effective as expertise increases.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Individual Differences in Learning From Instruction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Cronbach & Snow, 1977
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites Kyllonen & Lajoie, 2003 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Woltz Article section reports that stronger treatments benefited less able learners, whereas weaker treatments benefited more able learners—an ATI pattern that could be viewed as an antecedent. It does not specifically discuss novices becoming experts or identify an expertise reversal effect, and it describes the ATI findings as somewhat inconsistent. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Snow, Corno, & Jackson, 1996
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Constructivist approaches to instruction are based, in part, on a concern that individual differences moderate the impact of instruction.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Individual Differences in Learning From Instruction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Cronbach & Snow, 1977
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites Kyllonen & Lajoie, 2003 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The THEMES section describes aptitude–treatment interactions and says instruction should accommodate individual learners’ aptitudes. That supports the concern that individual differences affect how instruction works, but the paper does not connect that concern specifically to constructivist approaches. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Snow, Corno, & Jackson, 1996
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For novices, studying worked examples seems invariably superior to discovering or constructing a solution to a problem.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Current Research Supporting Direct Guidance
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The result is a set of differently named but similar instructional approaches requiring minimal guidance that are disconnected from much that we know of human cognition.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Implications of Human Cognitive Architecture for Constructivist Instruction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We are skillful in an area because our long-term memory contains huge amounts of information concerning the area.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Human Cognitive Architecture
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Controlled experiments almost uniformly indicate that when dealing with novel information, learners should be explicitly shown what to do and how to do it.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > RESEARCH COMPARING GUIDED AND UNGUIDED INSTRUCTION
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 24
- It may state two separate claims as one. 29
In the paper
“A similar line of reasoning was followed by Dehoney (1995), who posited that the mental models and strategies of experts have been developed through the slow process of accumulating experience in their domain areas.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > THE ORIGINS OF CONSTRUCTIVISM AND THE CURRENT VIEW OF MINIMALLY GUIDED INSTRUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Dehoney, 1995
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The finding that expert chess players are far better able than novices to reproduce briefly seen board configurations taken from real games, but do not differ in reproducing random board configurations, has been replicated in a variety of other areas”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Human Cognitive Architecture
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites De Groot, 1945/1965
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Chase & Simon, 1973 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The aim of all instruction is to alter long-term memory.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Human Cognitive Architecture
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Complete information will result in a more accurate representation that is also more easily acquired.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > THE ORIGINS OF CONSTRUCTIVISM AND THE CURRENT VIEW OF MINIMALLY GUIDED INSTRUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If nothing has changed in long-term memory, nothing has been learned.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Human Cognitive Architecture
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Hardiman, Pollatsek, and Weil (1986) and Brown and Campione (1994) noted that when students learn science in classrooms with pure-discovery methods and minimal feedback, they often become lost and frustrated, and their confusion can lead to misconceptions.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Current Research Supporting Direct Guidance
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hardiman, Pollatsek, & Weil, 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Brown & Campione, 1994 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The more knowledgeable learners did not experience a negative effect and benefited equally from both types of treatments.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Current Research Supporting Direct Guidance
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tuovinen & Sweller, 1999 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yet it may be a fundamental error to assume that the pedagogic content of the learning experience is identical to the methods and processes (i.e., the epistemology) of the discipline being studied and a mistake to assume that instruction should exclusively focus on methods and processes.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > THE ORIGINS OF CONSTRUCTIVISM AND THE CURRENT VIEW OF MINIMALLY GUIDED INSTRUCTION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Any instructional theory that ignores the limits of working memory when dealing with novel information or ignores the disappearance of those limits when dealing with familiar information is unlikely to be effective.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Working Memory Characteristics and Functions
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, that working memory load does not contribute to the accumulation of knowledge in long-term memory because while working memory is being used to search for problem solutions, it is not available and cannot be used to learn.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Implications of Human Cognitive Architecture for Constructivist Instruction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Tuovinen and Sweller (1999) showed that exploration practice (a discovery technique) caused a much larger cognitive load and led to poorer learning than worked-examples practice.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Current Research Supporting Direct Guidance
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tuovinen & Sweller, 1999 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The constructivist description of learning is accurate, but the instructional consequences suggested by constructivists do not necessarily follow.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > THE ORIGINS OF CONSTRUCTIVISM AND THE CURRENT VIEW OF MINIMALLY GUIDED INSTRUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Any instructional recommendation that does not or cannot specify what has been changed in long-term memory, or that does not increase the efficiency with which relevant information is stored in or retrieved from long-term memory, is likely to be ineffective.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Human Cognitive Architecture
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Minimally guided instruction appears to proceed with no reference to the characteristics of working memory, long-term memory, or the intricate relations between them.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > THE CONSEQUENCES OF HUMAN COGNITIVE ARCHITECTURE FOR MINIMAL GUIDANCE DURING INSTRUCTION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most learners of all ages know how to construct knowledge when given adequate information and there is no evidence that presenting them with partial information enhances their ability to construct a representation more than giving them full information.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > THE ORIGINS OF CONSTRUCTIVISM AND THE CURRENT VIEW OF MINIMALLY GUIDED INSTRUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In all of the many studies he reported, guided instruction not only produced more immediate recall of facts than unguided approaches, but also longer term transfer and problem-solving skills.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Current Research Supporting Direct Guidance
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Mayer, 2001 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Solving a problem requires problem-solving search and search must occur using our limited working memory.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Current Research Supporting Direct Guidance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Berkson (1993) also reviewed much of the literature on PBL and arrived at many of the same conclusions as Albanese and Mitchell (1993).”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Medical Problem-Based Learning Research
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Berkson, 1993 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“He provided evidence that the same learner might benefit from stronger and weaker treatments depending on the type of learning and transfer outcome desired.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Knowing Less After Instruction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Woltz, 2003 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Each of these and other publications by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences amply document the lack of evidence for unguided approaches and the benefits of more strongly guided instruction.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Empirical Evidence About Science Learning From Unguided Instruction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites McCray, DeHaan, and Schuck (2003)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Gollub, Berthanthal, Labov, and Curtis (2003)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Kilpatrick, Swafford, and Findell (2001)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, problem-solving search overburdens limited working memory and requires working memory resources to be used for activities that are unrelated to learning.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Current Research Supporting Direct Guidance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In the instructional methods described by Cronbach and Snow (1977) strong treatments implied highly structured instructional presentations where explicit organization of information and learning support were provided.The weaker treatments were relatively unstructured and so provided much less learning support.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Individual Differences in Learning From Instruction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Cronbach & Snow, 1977
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Both researchers concluded that the available evidence does not support the use of minimal guidance and both suggested that some form of stronger guidance is necessary for both effective learning and transfer.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > RESEARCH ON EDUCATIONAL MODELS FAVORING MINIMAL GUIDANCE DURING INSTRUCTION IN VARIOUS SETTINGS
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Roblyer, 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Perkins, 1991
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, studying a worked example both reduces working memory load because search is reduced or eliminated and directs attention (i.e., directs working memory resources) to learning the essential relations between problem-solving moves.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Current Research Supporting Direct Guidance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Their meta-analysis of the English language literature of the effectiveness of PBL produced a number of negative findings concerning its impact, including lower basic science exam scores, no differences in residency selections, and more study hours each day.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Medical Problem-Based Learning Research
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Albanese & Mitchell, 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“They reported that although PBL students receive better scores for their clinical performance, they also order significantly more unnecessary tests at a much higher cost per patient with less benefit.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Medical Problem-Based Learning Research
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Albanese & Mitchell, 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It emphasizes the importance of providing novices in an area with extensive guidance because they do not have sufficient knowledge in long-term memory to prevent unproductive problem-solving search.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Current Research Supporting Direct Guidance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“All in all, a lack of clarity about the difference between learning a discipline and research in the discipline coupled with the priority afforded to unbiased observation in the best inductivist and empiricist tradition has led many educators to advocate a problem-based method as the way to teach a discipline (Allen, Barker, & Ramsden, 1986;Anthony, 1973;Barrows & Tamblyn, 1980;Obioma, 1986).”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Medical Problem-Based Learning Research
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Clark hypothesized that the most effective components of treatments help less experienced learners by providing task-specific learning strategies embedded in instructional presentations.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Knowing Less After Instruction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Clark, 1989
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Not matched
In the paper
“More able learners, he suggested, have acquired implicit, task-specific learning strategies that are more effective for them than those embedded in the structured versions of the course.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Knowing Less After Instruction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Clark, 1989
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“He concluded that the magnitude of these statistics is not sufficient to meet standards of predictive validity to support the use of the measures or the experiential methods for training at work.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > RESEARCH ON EDUCATIONAL MODELS FAVORING MINIMAL GUIDANCE DURING INSTRUCTION IN VARIOUS SETTINGS
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Iliff, 1994
- Not matchedcites Kolb, Boyatzis, & Mainemelis, 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Higher aptitude students who chose highly structured approaches tended to like them but achieve at a lower level than with less structured versions but did not suffer by knowing less after than before instruction.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Knowing Less After Instruction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Clark, 1982 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Clark pointed to suggestive evidence that more able students who select the more guided versions of courses do so because they believe that they will achieve the required learning with a minimum of effort.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Knowing Less After Instruction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Clark, 1989
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Cronbach and Snow's (1977) review of ATI research described a number of replicated ordinal and disordinal interactions between various instructional methods and aptitudes.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Individual Differences in Learning From Instruction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Cronbach & Snow, 1977
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“There was an indication in their review that increased clinical practice evaluation scores may have been due to the fact the PBL students are required to spend more time in clinical settings.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Medical Problem-Based Learning Research
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Albanese & Mitchell, 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“She reviewed studies where the problem-solving ability of PBL students was compared with the same ability in conventionally trained students and found no support for any differences, and so failed to replicate the clinical advantage found by Albanese and Mitchell.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Medical Problem-Based Learning Research
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Berkson, 1993 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, it may be an error to assume that the pedagogic content of the learning experience is identical to the methods and processes (i.e., the epistemology) of the discipline being studied and a mistake to assume that instruction should exclusively focus on application.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > CONCLUSIONS
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Also important for medical educators has been the constant finding in research summaries that PBL is not more effective but is more costly than traditional instruction.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Medical Problem-Based Learning Research
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites research summaries
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the reasons for the ongoing popularity of a failed approach are unclear, the origins of the support for instruction with minimal guidance in science education and medical education might be found in the post-Sputnik science curriculum reforms such as Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, Chemical Education Material Study, and Physical Science Study Committee.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > CONCLUSIONS
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Arocha and Patel (1995) found that participants trained in PBL retained the backward-directed reasoning pattern, but did not seem to acquire forward-directed reasoning, which is a hallmark of expertise.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Medical Problem-Based Learning Research
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Arocha and Patel (1995) source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The practice of a profession is not the same as learning to practice the profession.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Medical Problem-Based Learning Research
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Not only is unguided instruction normally less effective; there is also evidence that it may have negative results when students acquire misconceptions or incomplete or disorganized knowledge.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > CONCLUSIONS
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This point of view appears to have led to unguided practical or project work and the rejection of instruction based on the facts, laws, principles, and theories that make up a discipline's content.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > CONCLUSIONS
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Arocha and Patel (1995) concluded that the negative results can be accounted for by the effect of splitting of attention resources and the high working memory load on schema acquisition during problem solving.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Medical Problem-Based Learning Research
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Arocha and Patel (1995) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At that time, educators shifted away from teaching a discipline as a body of knowledge toward the assumption that knowledge can best or only be learned through experience that is based only on the procedures of the discipline.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > CONCLUSIONS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If students have difficulty separating the biomedical knowledge they have learned from the particular clinical cases associated with that knowledge, it is not surprising that when given a different problem they bring to bear on the new problem some irrelevant biomedical knowledge.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Medical Problem-Based Learning Research
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although PBL students generated more elaborate explanations, they had less coherent explanations and more errors.”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Medical Problem-Based Learning Research
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Patel, Groen, and Norman (1993) source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“La mémoire de travail est la structure cognitive dans laquelle les processus conscients ont lieu. Elle est très limitée à la fois en durée et en quantité.”
From Enseignement explicite et développement decompétences : antinomie ou nécessité? (2020) · cites this paper as Kirschner et al., 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“these results align with claims that a certain degree of instructional support is needed in the use of video games in order to achieve the desired learning outcome [81-83].”
From The Effect of Multiplayer Video Games on Incidental and Intentional L2 Vocabulary Learning: The Case of Among Us (2021) · cites this paper as [81]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“la situation de résolution de problèmes non guidée place la mémoire de travail dans une situation de surcharge cognitive, rendant impossible le transfert d'informations dans la mémoire à long terme (Kirschner et al., 2006).”
From Enseignement explicite et développement decompétences : antinomie ou nécessité? (2020) · cites this paper as Kirschner et al., 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This could potentially explain how step-by-step usage of the AI code generator could potentially reduce cognitive load and allow novices to learn faster due to more availability of their mental resources, specifcally for germane cognitive load which is responsible for creating mental models and storing long-term memory [46].”
From Studying the effect of AI Code Generators on Supporting Novice Learners in Introductory Programming (2023) · cites this paper as [46]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Analysis of Kirschner et al. [16] showed that learning with DBL and related methods is highly complex, and can thus overwhelm learners.”
From Students as Designers of Augmented Reality: Impact on Learning and Motivation in Computer Science (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“il est nécessaire de tenir compte des limitations de la mémoire de travail, chose que ne font pas toujours les approches minimalement guidées”
From Enseignement explicite et développement decompétences : antinomie ou nécessité? (2020) · cites this paper as Kirschner et al., 2006
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“le but de toute instruction est donc de modifier la mémoire à long terme.”
From Enseignement explicite et développement decompétences : antinomie ou nécessité? (2020) · cites this paper as Kirschner et al., 2006
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“To the best of our knowledge, this is the first integrative empirical counterevidence against the claim that problem solving as a sensemaking activity for novices is not an effective instructional approach (cf. Kirschner etal., 2006, and follow-up work).”
From When Problem Solving Followed by Instruction Works: Evidence for Productive Failure (2021) · cites this paper as Kirschner et al., 2006
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Scaffolding in these contexts also has the potential to help problem-centered instructional models overcome criticisms that they do not lead to adequate content learning (Kirschner, Sweller, & Clark, 2006).”
From Synthesizing Results From Empirical Research on Computer-Based Scaffolding in STEM Education (2017) · cites this paper as Kirschner, Sweller, & Clark, 2006
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The former is more closely aligned with a teaching model that emphasises direct instruction (Kirschner et al., 2006).”
From Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as Kirschner et al., 2006
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the usage of guided discovery learning is more effective and efficient than a minimally guided instructional approach (Kirschner, Sweller & Clark, 2006) because it provides the guidance needed by students to achieve the intended learning outcome (Mayer, 2004).”
From Teaching and Learning Science Using YouTube Videos and Discovery Learning in Primary School (2020) · cites this paper as Kirschner, Sweller & Clark, 2006
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These domain-specific, biologically secondary skills need to be explicitly taught (Kirschner et al. 2006; Sweller et al. 2007) and actively learned.”
From Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later (2019) · cites this paper as Kirschner et al. 2006
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Cette différence entre (socio)constructivisme comme démarche d'apprentissage et (socio)constructivisme comme démarche d'enseignement (dont l'efficacité est remise en doute par des recherches basées sur des données probantes décrites dans les sections 1 et 3) a également été relevée par Kirschner, Sweller et Clark (2006) : « La description constructiviste de l'apprentissage est exacte, mais les”
From Enseignement explicite et développement decompétences : antinomie ou nécessité? (2020) · cites this paper as Kirschner, Sweller et Clark (2006)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“presque toutes les informations stockées en mémoire de travail qui ne sont pas répétées sont perdues après 30 secondes (Kirschner et al., 2006)”
From Enseignement explicite et développement decompétences : antinomie ou nécessité? (2020) · cites this paper as Kirschner et al., 2006
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“l'exploration libre d'un environnement complexe peut générer une forte charge cognitive qui est néfaste à l'apprentissage. Ceci est particulièrement vrai pour les apprenants novices (Kirschner et al., 2006).”
From Enseignement explicite et développement decompétences : antinomie ou nécessité? (2020) · cites this paper as Kirschner et al., 2006
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Tuovinen et Sweller (1999) ont montré que la « pratique d'exploration » (une approche par la découverte) causait une bien plus grande charge cognitive et menait à un apprentissage plus pauvre que les problèmes déjà résolus (« worked examples ») (Kirschner et al., 2006).”
From Enseignement explicite et développement decompétences : antinomie ou nécessité? (2020) · cites this paper as Kirschner et al., 2006
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“les « experts en résolution de problèmes » développent leurs compétences en s'appuyant sur leur grande expérience qui leur a permis de stocker nombre de schémas dans leur mémoire à long terme; ces derniers leur permettant de résoudre plus facilement les problèmes (Kirschner et al., 2006).”
From Enseignement explicite et développement decompétences : antinomie ou nécessité? (2020) · cites this paper as Kirschner et al., 2006
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Un apprenant peut donc être engagé dans des activités de résolution de problèmes pendant un temps important et ne presque rien apprendre en fin de compte (Kirschner et al., 2006).”
From Enseignement explicite et développement decompétences : antinomie ou nécessité? (2020) · cites this paper as Kirschner et al., 2006
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Those who think they are capable of multitasking tend to overestimate their ability in the actual multitasking tasks (Sanbonmatsu et al., 2013) or assume they can do them without the loss of efficiency and productivity (Kirschner, Sweller, & Clark, 2006).”
From The indirect relationship of media multitasking self-efficacy on learning performance within the personal learning environment: Implications from the mechanism of perceived attention problems and self-regulation strategies (2017) · cites this paper as Kirschner et al., 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“P. A. Kirschner et al. (2006) have shown that there exists a clear body of research using controlled experiments indicating that the relatively guided instructional procedures supported by cognitive load theorists are more effective (at least for novice students) than relatively unguided instructional procedures used by advocates of discovery or inquiry learning.”
From Cognitive Load Theory: New Conceptualizations, Specifications, and Integrated Research Perspectives (2010) · cites this paper as P. A. Kirschner et al. (2006)
In the citing paper
“Adaptive feedback (which is well-known to be essential in exploratory learning environments, Kirschner et al., 2006) is provided to students based on their interactions with the system and their affective states.”
From Affective learning: Improving engagement and enhancing learning with affect-aware feedback (2017) · cites this paper as Kirschner et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“if a learning environment is too cognitively demanding, schema construction and schema automation in LTM are not going to occur (P.A. Kirschner et al. 2006).”
From Making the Black Box of Collaborative Learning Transparent: Combining Process-Oriented and Cognitive Load Approaches (2010) · cites this paper as P.A. Kirschner et al. 2006
In the citing paper
“There is a strong inclination toward exploratory teaching pedagogies involving digital resources for teaching about AI (c.f. [99,100]).”
From In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in teacher education: A scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [99]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > Human Cognitive Architecture
“De Groot's (1945Groot's ( /1965) work on chess expertise”
§ Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work > References
“De Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague, Nether- lands: Mouton. (Original work published 1946)”
Citations
Cites
(1983) · Cited by 33,192
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,563
DEWEY, J. M. (1986) · The Educational Forum · doi:10.1080/00131728609335764 · Cited by 13,872
Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning
Sweller, J. (1988) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7 · Cited by 11,048
Self-citation(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,534
Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60422-3 · Cited by 7,216
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory
(2010) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-62209-1 · Cited by 6,035
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Ausubel D. P., 1964, The Arithmetic Teacher, 11, 290
- Bernstein, D. A., Penner, L. A., Clarke-Stewart, A., Roy, E. J. & Wickens, C. D. (2003). Psychology (6th ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
- Clark R. E., 1998, Educational Technology, 38, 5
- Estes F., 1999, Educational Technology, 37, 5
- Glaser, R. (1987). Further notes toward a psychology of instruction. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 1-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Kolb, D. A. (1971). Individual learning styles and the learning process (Working Paper No. 535-71). Cambridge, MA: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
- Kolb, D. A. & Fry, R. (1975). Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. In C. Cooper (Ed.), Studies of group process (pp. 33-57). New York: Wiley.
- Roblyer M. D., 1996, Learning and Leading With Technology, 24, 12
- Trafton, J. G. & Reiser, R. J. (1993). The contribution of studying examples and solving problems to skill acquisition. In M. Polson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1017-1022). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,301–2,400 of 6,869
Timberlake, M. D., Stefanidis, D., & Gardner, A. K. (2018) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-018-6163-7 · Cited by 14
Wagner, K., Bergner, M., Krause, U.-M., & Stark, R. (2018) · Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000219 · Cited by 16
Navarrete-Ulloa, J. A., Gomez, D. M., & Dartnell, P. (2018) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.06.006 · Cited by 14
How Success Versus Failure Cases Support Knowledge Construction in Collaborative Problem-Solving
Tawfik, A. A., Kim, K., Hogan, M., & Msilu, F. (2018) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633118799750 · Cited by 17
Stoszkowski, J., & McCarthy, L. (2019) · Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education · doi:10.47408/jldhe.v0i14.458 · Cited by 14
“For example, although Bangura (2005) suggests that heutagogical learning helps students develop confidence and competence, it has also been suggested that if an individual is to reason independently and engage in successful problem-solving type activities, a foundational level of domain-specific knowledge is required…”
BackgroundBringing Inferentialism to Science Education
Causton, E. (2019) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-019-00027-3 · Cited by 14
Teacher Presence in a Different Light: Authority Shift in Multi-user Virtual Environments
Kuznetcova, I., Lin, T., & Glassman, M. (2020) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-020-09438-6 · Cited by 15
“These models include direct (teacher-guided) instruction (Kirschner et al. 2006), some behaviorist theories of education (Narciss et al. 2007), and some socio-cultural theories of education (Stahl et al. 2006).”
BackgroundInstructional psychology and teaching reading: Ending the reading wars
Solity, J. E. (2020) · The Educational and Developmental Psychologist · doi:10.1017/edp.2020.18 · Cited by 15
Teaching a hands-on course during corona lockdown: from problems to opportunities
Hut, R., Pols, F., & Verschuur, D. J. (2020) · Physics Education · doi:10.1088/1361-6552/abb06a · Cited by 14
“Rather than only playing around, we strongly believe in the added value of the teacher and made sure the course is ‘guided education’ Kirschner et al (2006).”
BackgroundExamining the materiality and spatiality of design scaffolds in computational making
Litts, B. K., Searle, K. A., Kafai, Y. B., & Lewis, W. E. (2021) · International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100295 · Cited by 15
Computer-Supported Human Mentoring for Personalized and Equitable Math Learning
Schaldenbrand, P., Lobczowski, N. G., Richey, J. E., Gupta, S., McLaughlin, E. A., Adeniran, A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78270-2_55 · Cited by 14
Assessing a novel problem‐based learning approach with game elements in a business analytics course
Bayley, T., Wheatley, D., & Hurst, A. (2021) · Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education · doi:10.1111/dsji.12246 · Cited by 18
Chevalère, J., Cazenave, L., Berthon, M., Martinez, R., Mazenod, V., Borion, M., Pailler, D., Rocher, N., Cadet, R., Lenne, C., et al. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0259664 · Cited by 14
“These include an appropriate level of guidance [25, 30], which reduces the cognitive load [55, 57] and therefore also the WM demands of the task.”
BackgroundInfluentialMariegaard, S., Seidelin, L., & Bruun, J. (2022) · International Journal of Research & Method in Education · doi:10.1080/1743727x.2022.2035351 · Cited by 15
The devil’s advocate: identifying persistent problems in serious game design
Westera, W. (2022) · International Journal of Serious Games · doi:10.17083/ijsg.v9i3.547 · Cited by 17
“In hundreds of research studies over the last 50 years, evidence for the effectiveness of such minimal guidance approaches is almost non-existent: guidance- and instruction-based approaches consistently produce superior learning outcomes [23], [24].”
BackgroundKay, R. H., & Edwards, J. (2012) · Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology · doi:10.21432/t2pk5z · Cited by 14
In at the Deep End: An Activity‐Led Introduction to First Year Creative Computing
Anderson, E. F., Peters, C., Halloran, J., et al. (2012) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2012.03066.x · Cited by 14
“It has been criticised due to the amount of guidance given to students [KSC06], relying on the use of ‘scaffolding’, i.e. close guidance of the learner’s discovery, which some consider a simple improvement of a fundamentally ineffective approach [SKC07].”
BackgroundO’Neil, H. F., Lang, J., Perez, R. S., Escalante, D., & Fox, F. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7579-8_1 · Cited by 15
Helping Students to Think Like Scientists in Socratic Dialogue-Inducing Labs
Hake, R. R. (2011) · The Physics Teacher · doi:10.1119/1.3670087 · Cited by 14
Automated computer forensics training in a virtualized environment
Brueckner, S., Guaspari, D., Adelstein, F., & Weeks, J. L. (2008) · Digital Investigation · doi:10.1016/j.diin.2008.05.009 · Cited by 14
Do specific relevance instructions promote transfer appropriate processing?
McCrudden, M. T. (2010) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9158-x · Cited by 14
“Further, providing readers with relevance instructions may be more effective than providing minimal guidance ( Kirschner et al. 2006 ).”
BackgroundExploring Students’ Initial Reactions to the Feedback They Receive on Coursework
Jones, H. L. J., Hoppitt, L., James, H., et al. (2012) · Bioscience Education · doi:10.11120/beej.2012.20000004 · Cited by 14
“However, the minimal guidance approach has been criticised as being ineffective (Kirschner et al. 2006).”
BackgroundGould, K. (2013) · Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) · doi:10.13016/m2xd86 · Cited by 14
“The arguments presented by Kirschner et al. (2006), Smedley (2007), Yuan et al. (2011) and Levett-Jones (2005) suggested that SDL approaches like PBL may not be appropriate for all students in all situations. Levett-Jones (2005) suggested that PBL requires a high degree of selfdirected learning readiness (SDLR) while…”
BackgroundInfluentialWijnen, M., Loyens, S. M. M., & Schaap, L. (2015) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2015.1060504 · Cited by 18
“Performing more controlled experiments to investigate the relative effectiveness of PBL is one way to get greater clarity concerning this debated issue (Kirschner et al., 2006).”
BackgroundEstey, A., Kennedy, A. R., & Coady, Y. (2016) · Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/2910925.2910944 · Cited by 14
Student-led microfluidics lab practicals: Improving engagement and learning outcomes
Morton, J. A. S., & Bridle, H. L. (2016) · Biomicrofluidics · doi:10.1063/1.4953448 · Cited by 14
Dimensions and Modalities of Inquiry-Based Teaching: Understanding the Variety of Practices
Grangeat, M. (2016) · Education Inquiry · doi:10.3402/edui.v7.29863 · Cited by 16
Khaerunisak, K., Kartono, K., Hidayah, I., et al. (2017) · Infinity Journal · doi:10.22460/infinity.v6i1.236 · Cited by 14
Balgopal, M. M., Casper, A. M., Atadero, R., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1346847 · Cited by 14
“Kirschner et al. (2006) were critical of instructional strategies that are too openended because they frustrate students, who then require augmented instructor guidance to meet learning objectives.”
BackgroundSrilaphat, E., & Jantakoon, T. (2018) · Higher Education Studies · doi:10.5539/hes.v9n1p76 · Cited by 13
Zulu, E., Haupt, T. C., & Tramontin, V. (2018) · Problems of Education in the 21st Century · doi:10.33225/pec/18.76.864 · Cited by 14
Munter, C., & Haines, C. (2019) · Mathematical Thinking and Learning · doi:10.1080/10986065.2019.1576002 · Cited by 16
A Cognitive Load Theory Simulation Design to Assess and Manage Deteriorating Patients
Say, R., Visentin, D. C., Betihavas, V., & Minutillo, S. (2019) · International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship · doi:10.1515/ijnes-2019-0009 · Cited by 15
Goodnough, K. C., Azam, S., & Wells, P. R. (2019) · Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education · doi:10.1007/s42330-019-00060-y · Cited by 14
“It should also be noted that the nature of inquiry, how it should be structured to support student learning, and its value have been controversial (Clark et al., 2012; Kirschner et al., 2006; Zhang, 2016).”
BackgroundDecision‐based learning in religious education
Plummer, K., Taeger, S., & Burton, M. N. (2020) · Teaching Theology & Religion · doi:10.1111/teth.12538 · Cited by 17
SMALL GROUP LEARNING METHODS AND THEIR EFFECT ON LEARNERS’ RELATIONSHIPS
Borůvková, R., & Emanovský, P. (2016) · Problems of Education in the 21st Century · doi:10.33225/pec/16.70.45 · Cited by 14
A qualitative investigation of implementation of app-based maths instruction for young learners
Gulliford, A., Walton, J. M., Allison, K., & Pitchford, N. J. (2021) · Educational and Child Psychology · doi:10.53841/bpsecp.2021.38.3.90 · Cited by 14
Camillo, J., & de Mattos, C. R. (2014) · Ensaio · doi:10.1590/1983-21172014160113 · Cited by 14
Wang, Z. (2010) · ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 14
Job characteristics and mentoring in pre‐schools
Waaland, T. (2013) · Journal of Workplace Learning · doi:10.1108/jwl-mar-2012-0027 · Cited by 14
Teaching the Conceptual History of Physics to Physics Teachers
Garik, P., Garbayo, L., Benétreau-Dupin, Y., Winrich, C., Duffy, A., Gross, N. A., & Jariwala, M. (2014) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-014-9731-9 · Cited by 16
Ayala-Pimentel, J. O., Díaz-Pérez, J. A., & Orozco‐Vargas, L. C. (2009) · Educación Médica · doi:10.4321/s1575-18132009000100005 · Cited by 14
Evolutionary bases of human cognitive architecture
Sweller, J. (2008) · ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER) · doi:10.1145/1404520.1404521 · Cited by 14
Self-citationSequencing spatial concepts in problem-based GIS instruction
Howarth, J. T., & Sinton, D. S. (2011) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.042 · Cited by 16
Development of students' personal professional theories in senior secondary vocational education
Schaap, H., van der Schaaf, M. F., & de Bruijn, E. (2011) · Evaluation & Research in Education · doi:10.1080/09500790.2010.550280 · Cited by 16
Applying Multimodal Discourse Analysis to Learning Objects' User Interface
Vorvilas, G., Karalis, T., & Ravalis, K. (2010) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/6031 · Cited by 15
Merchie, E., & Keer, H. V. (2016) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/684939 · Cited by 14
Embellishing Problem-Solving Examples with Deep Structure Information Facilitates Transfer
Lee, H. S., Betts, S., & Anderson, J. R. (2016) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2016.1180277 · Cited by 14
Berta, R., Bellotti, F., van der Spek, E. D., & Winkler, T. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-4560-52-8_32-1 · Cited by 14
Listening to Romanian Teenagers: Lessons in Motivation and ELT Methodology
Taylor, F. (2013) · International Perspectives on Motivation · doi:10.1057/9781137000873_3 · Cited by 14
Anderson, E. F., & Peters, C. (2009) · Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) · doi:10.2312/eged.20091012 · Cited by 14
Reinventing the Role of Information and Communications Technologies in Education
Dede, C. (2007) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146810710901402 · Cited by 14
“…are relatively invariant regardless of individual perspective (e.g., arithmetic operations) are learned more quickly when taught as “truths” than when found through exploration that, in extreme unguided forms, involves students slowly reinventing civilization (Kirschner, Sweller, & Clark, 2006).”
BackgroundMadden, K. R. (2011) · Montana State University ScholarWorks (Montana State University) · Cited by 14
Fantasy, Fashion and Fact : Middle Schools, Middle Schooling and Student Achievement
Dinham, S., & Rowe, K. (2008) · ACEReSearch Repository (Australian Council for Educational Research) · Cited by 14
Editorial: Recent Approaches for Assessing Cognitive Load From a Validity Perspective
Krell, M., Xu, K. M., Rey, G. D., & PAAS, F. G. W. C. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.838422 · Cited by 16
Learner-Centered Teaching in Mathematics Education
Stephan, M. L. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_87 · Cited by 14
Luciano, J. (2014) · Seton Hall University eRepository (Seton Hall University) · Cited by 14
Mayer, R. R. (2013) · doi:10.31274/etd-180810-1693 · Cited by 15
“Some argue that scaffolds are ineffective because PBL methods rely on unstructured interactions to effect learning (Kirschner et al., 2006; Choo et al., 2010).”
BackgroundA learning analytics dashboard to support students' reflection on collaboration
Echeverría, V., Fernandez-Nieto, G. M., Zhao, L., Palominos, E., Srivastava, N., Gašević, D., Pammer‐Schindler, V., & Martínez‐Maldonado, R. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.13088 · Cited by 14
Extending Cognitive Load Theory: The CLAM Framework for Biometric, Adaptive, and Ethical Learning
Vasilaki, E., & Mavrogianni, A. (2025) · Psychology International · doi:10.3390/psycholint7020040 · Cited by 26
Dangol, A., Zhao, R., Wolfe, R., Ramanan, T., Kientz, J. A., & Yip, J. C. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) · doi:10.1145/3713043.3728836 · Cited by 21
“These modes are designed for seamless switching, allowing children to easily transition between them.”
Lin, H., Pryor, M., & Beckmann, N. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105391 · Cited by 22
Rethinking Cognitive Load Theory
Kalyuga, S., & Plass, J. L. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780190078539.001.0001 · Cited by 18
Lukešová, A., & Jennings, P. (2026) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2025.2612532 · Cited by 16
A Broad View of Education and Teaching Based in Educational Neuroscience
Woolcott, G. (2011) · International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education · doi:10.20533/ijcdse.2042.6364.2011.0084 · Cited by 13
“Evidence from such principles, many of which are based in cognitive load theory [6,7], supports the notion that some models of instructional design may not be efficient and it has been suggested that some common teaching practices should be abandoned in favour of more effective teaching strategies [8,9].”
BackgroundLearning by progressive inquiry in a physics lesson with the support of cloud-based technology
Deng, X., Wang, M., Chen, H., Xie, J., & Chen, J. (2019) · Research in Science & Technological Education · doi:10.1080/02635143.2019.1629408 · Cited by 17
“Therefore, inquiry-based learning with minimal or no guidance is usually unfruitful (Al fi eri, Brooks, Aldrich, and Tenenbaum ’ s 2011; Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark 2006).”
BackgroundDo pre-service teachers develop a schema for inclusive classroom practice?
Auhl, G., & Bain, A. (2020) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/1359866x.2020.1777530 · Cited by 14
“Working memory is then available for attending to novel situations and circumstances (Kirschner et al., 2006; Paas, van Gog, & Sweller, 2010; Sweller, 1988, p. 1994).”
BackgroundAdorno, D. P., Mallahnia, T., Koch, V., et al. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11120774 · Cited by 13
“This, however, seems to create difficulties for the so-called working memory, which again impairs the self-regulation competencies [23].”
BackgroundUS and Chinese elementary teachers’ noticing of cross-cultural mathematics videos
Ding, M., Li, X., Manfredonia, M. L., & Luo, W. (2022) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-021-09526-z · Cited by 13
“Both styles may lead to little learning (Anderson et al., 2000; Kirschner et al., 2006).”
BackgroundCo-designing a pedagogical framework and principles for a hybrid STEM learning environment design
Mäkelä, T., Fenyvesi, K., Kankaanranta, M., Pnevmatikos, D., & Christodoulou, P. (2022) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-022-10114-y · Cited by 25
Seijas, N., & Uskola, A. (2022) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2022.2095453 · Cited by 13
“(2006) indicated that students may focus on the activity itself and not reflect on the relevant concepts, so they may not reach the intended scientific conclusions or may even acquire disorganised, incomplete knowledge or even conceptual errors (Kirschner et al. 2006).”
BackgroundMorales, S. C., Vinueza-Burgos, G. C., Carvajal, C. L. Y., et al. (2023) · Sports · doi:10.3390/sports11030061 · Cited by 13
“[31] are reinforced, in that beginners do not have the underlying mental models or schemes necessary to “learn by doing” or, as Mayer affirms [30], learners must be cognitively active in study, but teachers must employ directed practice.”
BackgroundCan simulations help higher education in training professional skills?
Lehtinen, E. (2023) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101772 · Cited by 19
Chang-Tik, C. (2023) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00131881.2023.2256747 · Cited by 13
“In terms of supporting quality collaborative learning, it is important, too, to recognise that simply placing students in groups does not necessarily mean they know how to collaborate, as reflected in the study analysis: students’ collaborative skills cannot be assumed (Kirschner et al. 2006).”
BackgroundTeachers’ Perceptions of STEAM Education
Breda, A., Garcia, V., & dos Santos, N. (2023) · International Journal of Technology in Education · doi:10.46328/ijte.563 · Cited by 14
“…a lack of student engagement which can result in boredom and disinterest, hindering the learning process, (Santyasa et al., 2020; Baran et al., 2018; Samsudin et al., 2018; Kirschner et al., 2006; Sweller, 2003), but its effectiveness in promoting knowledge and certain skills are also mentioned.”
BackgroundChatGPT ha llegado ¿Y ahora qué hacemos? La creatividad, nuestro último refugio
Romo-Pérez, V., Soidán, J. L. G., Özdemir, A. S., & Leirós‐Rodríguez, R. (2023) · Revista de Investigación en Educación · doi:10.35869/reined.v21i3.4973 · Cited by 32
Are Inductive Teaching Methods Compatible with Cognitive Load Theory?
Gorbunova, A., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Costley, J. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09828-z · Cited by 23
“…teaching methods (e.g., problem-solving followed by instruction) compared to more traditional deductive teaching methods (instruction followed by problem-solving) (Ausubel, 1964; Kirschner et al., 2006; Moon & Brockway, 2019; Prince & Felder, 2006; Schmidt et al., 2007; Wise & O’Neill, 2009).”
BackgroundAn Overview of Constructivist Learning Theory
武, 星. (2023) · Advances in Social Sciences · doi:10.12677/ass.2023.1211908 · Cited by 14
Lin, Z., & Sweller, J. (2024) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-024-00799-5 · Cited by 13
“For many years, there has been a debate concerning whether explicit instruction or inquiry-based learning is superior in teaching concepts and procedures (Kirschner et al., 2006).”
Self-citationA Review of Pedagogical Approaches for Improved Engagement and Learning Outcomes in Mathematics
Lee, J., & Paul, N. (2023) · Journal of Student Research · doi:10.47611/jsrhs.v12i3.5021 · Cited by 13
“In the academic realm, critics of traditional methods, such as Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006), propose compelling arguments against the ease of implementation characterizing lecture-based pedagogies.”
BackgroundCorves, C., Stadler, M. J., & Fischer, M. R. (2024) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-024-00826-5 · Cited by 14
“However, direct instructional guidance (Kirschner et al., 2006) could be represented as consistent with the simulated situation.”
InfluentialReiser, M., Binder, M., & Weitzel, H. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14060607 · Cited by 14
Inferring a Learner's Cognitive, Motivational and Emotional State in a Digital Educational Game.
Bedek, M. A., Seitlinger, P. C., Kopeinik, S., et al. (2012) · The Electronic Journal of e-Learning · Cited by 13
Increasing Efficiency in Military Learning: Theoretical Considerations and Practical Applications
Vogel-Walcutt, J. J., Carper, T. M., Bowers, C. A., & Nicholson, D. M. (2010) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1080/08995605.2010.492701 · Cited by 14
“In an expert, the filtering process is conducted internally, but in a novice, an INCREASING EFFICIENCY IN MILITARY LEARNING 325 external central executive can aid effectiveness and efficiency by helping the learner attend to and properly filter information (Kirschner et al., 2006).”
BackgroundMethodThe Power in Digital Literacy and Algorithmic Skill
Csernoch, M., & Biró, P. (2015) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.705 · Cited by 13
Learning in context from an interdisciplinary perspective
Quasthoff, U. Μ., & Wild, E. (2014) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2013.12.004 · Cited by 13
Vitale, J. M., Black, J. B., & Swart, M. I. (2013) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034098 · Cited by 13
Hsu, Y., Gao, Y., Liu, T. C., & Sweller, J. (2015) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 13
Self-citationElements of Design‐Based Science Activities That Affect Students' Motivation
Jones, B. D., Chittum, J. R., Akalin, S., et al. (2015) · School Science and Mathematics · doi:10.1111/ssm.12143 · Cited by 13
Effects of different real-time feedback types on human performance in high-demanding work conditions
Cohen, I., Brinkman, W., & Neerincx, M. A. (2016) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.03.007 · Cited by 13
“Adding instructions to such training would provide more advantages, especially for the training of novices (Kirschner et al., 2006).”
BackgroundStealth Assessment of Self-Regulated Learning in Game-Based Learning Environments.
Sabourin, J. L. (2013) · NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries) · Cited by 13
Instructional influences on English language learners' storytelling
Ma, S., Anderson, R. C., Lin, T., Zhang, J., Morris, J. A., Nguyen‐Jahiel, K., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Scott, T., Sun, J., et al. (2016) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.12.004 · Cited by 15
A web-based scaffolding-learning tool for design students’ sustainable spatial planning
Jeong, J. S., Ramírez-Gómez, Á., & González‐Gómez, D. (2017) · Architectural Engineering and Design Management · doi:10.1080/17452007.2017.1300129 · Cited by 13
“Previous research specified that learners who have a lack of adequate knowledge can adequately perform problem solving with various scaffolding model inquiries (Kim & Hannafin, 2011; Kirschner, Sweller, & Clark, 2006; Yeo & Quek, 2014).”
BackgroundNisperuza, E. P. F., & Albis, A. F. D. L. O. (2018) · Revista Científica · doi:10.14483/23448350.12452 · Cited by 13
Schneider, B., Bumbacher, E. W., & Blikstein, P. (2015) · Computer Supported Collaborative Learning · Cited by 13
Bazhenov, R. I. (2019) · Education Research International · doi:10.1155/2019/8358954 · Cited by 13
Learning Outside the Classroom
Begel, A., & Ko, A. J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.027 · Cited by 18
Rayner, G. M., Charlton-Robb, K.-M., Thompson, C. D., et al. (2013) · International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education · Cited by 13
Inquiry-based instruction as a trend of contemporary education
Dostál, J. (2013) · e-Pedagogium · doi:10.5507/epd.2013.034 · Cited by 13
Johnson, B. P., & Činčera, J. (2019) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.08.003 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E.
- Affiliations
- Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Venue
- Educational Psychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 75-86
- ISSN
- 0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6985
- OpenAlex
- W1976637107
- Semantic Scholar
- cb9f9f2768fbb5eeab699c9147d622fc68b9edac
- Cited by
- 7,776
- References
- 140
- Citations by year
- 2026: 705 · 2025: 534 · 2024: 429 · 2023: 407 · 2022: 394 · 2021: 458 · 2020: 519 · 2019: 457 · 2018: 431 · 2017: 387 · 2016: 446 · 2015: 428 · 2014: 388 · 2013: 399 · 2012: 376
- FWCI
- 117.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Educational Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- guided teaching, constructivist teaching, discovery learning, problem-based learning, experiential learning, inquiry-based learning, cognitive architecture, expert-novice differences, cognitive load, prior knowledge, instructional design model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
