Cited by 363Drug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsBerberine and alkaloids researchDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

Bioavailability study of berberine and the enhancing effects of TPGS on intestinal absorption in rats

Open access
Chen, Wei, Miao, Yu-Qiang, Fan, Dong-Jiao, Yang, Shen-Shen, Lin, Xia, Meng, Ling-Kuo, Tang, Xing·2011·AAPS PharmSciTech

Abstract

Berberine chloride (BBR) is a natural isoquinoline alkaloid extracted from medicinal herbs. It has been reported that the intestinal absorption of BBR is very low. In this study, the absolute bioavailability of BBR was studied, and the enhancing effects of D-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS) on intestinal absorption were investigated in rats. BBR injection was administrated via the femoral vein at a dose of 1.0 mg kg(-1) in intravenous group, and BBR oral formulations were administrated by oral gavage at a dose of 100 mg kg(-1) in BBR control (control) group and BBR-TPGS (test) group, respectively. The result showed that BBR had a very low absolute bioavailability of 0.68%, and TPGS could enhance intestinal absorption of BBR significantly. TPGS at a concentration of 2.5% could improve peak concentration (C(max)) and area under the curve (AUC(0-36)) of BBR by 2.9 and 1.9 times, respectively. The absorption enhancing ability of TPGS may be due to its ability to affect the biological activity of P-glycoprotein and thereby reduce the excretion of absorbed BBR into the intestinal lumen. This study indicated that absolute bioavailability of BBR was 0.68% in rats, and TPGS was a good absorption enhancer capable of enhancing intestinal absorption of BBR significantly.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1208/s12249-011-9632-z

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinical literature dedicated to berberine interactions remains fragmented, dispersed across isolated pharmacokinetic studies, case reports, and broad pharmacological reviews.

    “Nonetheless, the clinical literature dedicated to berberine interactions remains fragmented, dispersed across isolated pharmacokinetic studies, case reports, and broad pharmacological reviews in which interactions are treated only marginally [2,41].”

    From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Animal Studies results and Pharmacokinetics Analysis identify this as a berberine pharmacokinetic study in rats, so it can serve as an example of an individual study. The paper does not assess whether clinical literature on berberine interactions is fragmented or dispersed across case reports and reviews; its rat study is not itself clinical evidence. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Formulations designed to raise absorption, whether TPGS-based, dihydroberberine or other enhanced-bioavailability preparations, change systemic exposure deliberately, so an effect size measured with one product cannot be carried over to another even when the labeled dose matches.

    “Formulations designed to raise absorption, whether TPGS-based, dihydroberberine or other enhanced-bioavailability preparations, change systemic exposure deliberately, so an effect size measured with one product cannot be carried over to another even when the labeled dose matches.”

    From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [41]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, W., Miao, Y.-Q., Fan, D.-J., Yang, S.-S., Lin, X., Meng, L.-K., & Tang, X.
Affiliations
Shenyang Pharmaceutical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Tang, Xing
Venue
AAPS PharmSciTech
Published
2011-06
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
705-711
ISSN
1530-9932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038231515
Cited by
363
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AAPS PharmSciTech (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Science and Technology of Liaoning Province (2009ZX09301–012)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Berberine and alkaloids research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
berberine, TPGS, absolute bioavailability, intestinal absorption, absorption enhancers, P-glycoprotein, isoquinoline alkaloids, oral bioavailability, rats
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Animals, Berberine, Biological Availability, Drug Carriers, Drug Synergism, Intestinal Absorption, Male, Polyethylene Glycols, Random Allocation, Vitamin E, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review