Cited by 54Personality Traits and PsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAction Observation and Synchronization

A neural model of mechanisms of empathy deficits in narcissism.

Open access
Zajkowski, Wojciech·2013·Medical Science Monitor

Abstract

From a multidimensional perspective, empathy is a process that includes affective sharing and imagining and understanding the emotions of others. The primary brain structures involved in mediating the components of empathy are the anterior insula (AI), the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and specific regions of the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC). The AI and ACC are the main nodes in the salience network (SN), which selects and coordinates the information flow from the intero- and exteroreceptors. AI might play a role as a crucial hub - a dynamic switch between 2 separate networks of cognitive processing: the central executive network (CEN), which is concerned with effective task execution, and the default mode network (DMN), which is involved with self-reflective processes. Given various classifications, a deficit in empathy may be considered a central dysfunctional trait in narcissism. A recent fMRI study suggests that deficit in empathy is due to a dysfunction in the right AI. Based on the acquired data, we propose a theoretical model of imbalanced SN functioning in narcissism in which the dysfunctional AI hub is responsible for constant DMN activation, which, in turn, centers one's attention on the self. This might hinder the ability to affectively share and understand the emotions of others. This review paper on neural mechanisms of empathy deficits in narcissism aims to inspire and direct future research in this area.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12659/msm.889593

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vulnerable narcissism is characterized by hypersensitivity and dependence on others that reflects a fragile idea of self-worth regulated by strategies like diminishing the importance of connections to others.

    “On the contrary, vulnerable narcissism is characterized by hypersensitivity, and dependence on others that reflects a fragile idea of self-worth which is regulated by strategies like diminishing the importance of connections to others (3).”

    From The dark side of empathy in narcissistic personality disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [3]

    The ‘Empathy and Narcissism’ section associates vulnerable narcissism with low self-esteem, anxiety, and high susceptibility to trauma, which supports the fragile self-worth and hypersensitivity portions of the claim. The passages do not describe dependence on others or diminishing the importance of connections as a strategy for regulating self-worth. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Research highlights main obstacles in the bottom-up pathway among narcissists, but the cognitive parts of empathy seem damaged as well.

    “Research highlights main obstacles both in the bottom-up pathway among narcissists, but the cognitive parts of empathy seem damaged as well (3, 17, 18).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 103 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [3]Davis M Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach Boulder, CO Westview Press 1996
  2. [6]Batson CD These things called empathy The Social Neuroscience of Empathy Decety J Ickes W Cambridge MIT Press 2009 16 31
  3. [43]Frith U Frith CD Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2003 358 459 73 12689373 PMC1693139
  4. [92]Wicker B Keysers C Plailly J Both of us disgusted in My insula: the common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust Neuron 2003 40 655 64 14642287

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zajkowski, W.
Affiliations
Uniwersytet SWPS (PL)
Corresponding author
Zajkowski, Wojciech
Venue
Medical Science Monitor
Published
2013
Volume
19
Pages
934-941
ISSN
  • 1234-1010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1643-3750
OpenAlex
W2121705538
Cited by
54
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Medical Science Monitor (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
empathy deficits, narcissism, anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, salience network, default mode network, frontoparietal network, affective sharing, neural mechanisms of empathy, self-focus
MeSH terms
Empathy, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Models, Neurological, Narcissism, Nerve Net, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review