Cited by 113Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and related disorders

Racial differences in the human endogenous circadian period

Open access
Smith, Mark R., Burgess, Helen J., Fogg, Louis F., Eastman, Charmane I.·2009·PLoS ONE

Abstract

The length of the endogenous period of the human circadian clock (tau) is slightly greater than 24 hours. There are individual differences in tau, which influence the phase angle of entrainment to the light/dark (LD) cycle, and in doing so contribute to morningness-eveningness. We have recently reported that tau measured in subjects living on an ultradian LD cycle averaged 24.2 hours, and is similar to tau measured using different experimental methods. Here we report racial differences in tau. Subjects lived on an ultradian LD cycle (1.5 hours sleep, 2.5 hours wake) for 3 days. Circadian phase assessments were conducted before and after the ultradian days to determine the change in circadian phase, which was attributed to tau. African American subjects had a significantly shorter tau than subjects of other races. We also tested for racial differences in our previous circadian phase advancing and phase delaying studies. In the phase advancing study, subjects underwent 4 days of a gradually advancing sleep schedule combined with a bright light pulse upon awakening each morning. In the phase delaying study, subjects underwent 4 days of a gradually delaying sleep schedule combined with evening light pulses before bedtime. African American subjects had larger phase advances and smaller phase delays, relative to Caucasian subjects. The racial differences in tau and circadian phase shifting have important implications for understanding normal phase differences between individuals, for developing solutions to the problems of jet lag and shift work, and for the diagnosis and treatment of circadian rhythm based sleep disorders such as advanced and delayed sleep phase disorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0006014

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Healthy adults show interindividual differences in the free-running circadian period (tau), which shows robust stability within individuals.

    “Healthy adults show interindividual differences in the free-running circadian period (tau),94–98 which shows robust stability within individuals.97”

    From Circadian rhythms, sleep deprivation, and human performance (2013) · cites this paper as [95]

  • The higher morning chronotype prevalence in British black ethnicity was argued to be due to the shorter τ reported previously in individuals with black ethnicity.

    “This was argued to be due to the shorter τ reported previously in individuals with black ethnicity (45)”
  • Genetic variants may underlie some interindividual and interethnic differences in the period of the endogenous circadian cycle that manifest as differences in chronotype.

    “Such genetic variants may underlie some of the interindividual (44) and interethnic differences (45) in the period (or τ) of the endogenous circadian cycle that manifest themselves as differences in chronotype.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]Pittendrigh CS Daan S 1976 A functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents. IV. Entrainment: pacemaker as clock. Journal of Comparative Physiology 106 291 331

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, M. R., Burgess, H. J., Fogg, L. F., & Eastman, C. I.
Affiliations
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Eastman, Charmane I.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2009-06-30
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
e6014
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000253660
Cited by
113
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL086934)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR007677)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
circadian period, racial differences, African Americans, circadian phase, chronotype, phase shifting, light pulses, jet lag, shift work, circadian rhythm sleep disorders, delayed sleep phase syndrome
MeSH terms
Adult, Biological Clocks, Black or African American, Circadian Rhythm, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Iris, Light, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders, Time Factors, Wakefulness, Photoperiod

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review