Cited by 283Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related FatigueCoffee research and impacts

Effects of caffeine on the human circadian clock in vivo and in vitro

Open access
Burke, Tina M., Markwald, Rachel R., McHill, Andrew W., Chinoy, Evan D., Snider, Jesse A., Bessman, Sara C., Jung, Christopher M., O’Neill, John S. +1 more·2015·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

Caffeine's wakefulness-promoting and sleep-disrupting effects are well established, yet whether caffeine affects human circadian timing is unknown. We show that evening caffeine consumption delays the human circadian melatonin rhythm in vivo and that chronic application of caffeine lengthens the circadian period of molecular oscillations in vitro, primarily with an adenosine receptor/cyclic adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-dependent mechanism. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, ~49-day long, within-subject study, we found that consumption of a caffeine dose equivalent to that in a double espresso 3 hours before habitual bedtime induced a ~40-min phase delay of the circadian melatonin rhythm in humans. This magnitude of delay was nearly half of the magnitude of the phase-delaying response induced by exposure to 3 hours of evening bright light (~3000 lux, ~7 W/m(2)) that began at habitual bedtime. Furthermore, using human osteosarcoma U2OS cells expressing clock gene luciferase reporters, we found a dose-dependent lengthening of the circadian period by caffeine. By pharmacological dissection and small interfering RNA knockdown, we established that perturbation of adenosine receptor signaling, but not ryanodine receptor or phosphodiesterase activity, was sufficient to account for caffeine's effects on cellular timekeeping. We also used a cyclic AMP biosensor to show that caffeine increased cyclic AMP levels, indicating that caffeine influenced a core component of the cellular circadian clock. Together, our findings demonstrate that caffeine influences human circadian timing, showing one way that the world's most widely consumed psychoactive drug affects human physiology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac5125

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Chen JF Eltzschig HK Fredholm BB Adenosine receptors as drug targets--what are the challenges? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov 2013 12 265 286 23535933 PMC3930074

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burke, T. M., Markwald, R. R., McHill, A. W., Chinoy, E. D., Snider, J. A., Bessman, S. C., Jung, C. M., O’Neill, J. S., & Wright, K. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
Corresponding author
  • Jung, Christopher M.
  • Wright, Kenneth P.
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2015-09-16
Volume
7
Issue
305
Pages
305ra146-305ra146
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W1899622156
Cited by
283
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 1
FWCI
13.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (R01 HL081761)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Wellcome Trust (093734/Z/10/Z)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UP_1201/4)
  • NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Colorado Clinical and Translational Science Award (UL1 TR001082)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
Keywords
caffeine, circadian clock, melatonin rhythm, circadian phase delay, adenosine receptors, cyclic AMP, clock gene expression, U2OS cells, bright light exposure, sleep disruption, psychoactive substances
MeSH terms
Cyclic AMP, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Caffeine, Circadian Rhythm, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Melatonin, Biosensing Techniques, RNA, Small Interfering, Cell Line, Tumor, Luminescence, Young Adult, Circadian Clocks, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review