Cited by 57Psychedelics and Drug StudiesNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

Psychedelic drug use in healthy individuals: a review of benefits, costs, and implications for drug policy

Open access
Elsey, James W.B.·2017·Drug Science Policy and Law

Abstract

The potential of psychedelic drugs in the treatment of mental health problems is increasingly being recognized. However, relatively little thrust has been given to the suggestion that individuals without any mental health problems may benefit from using psychedelic drugs, and that they may have a right to do so. This review considers contemporary research into the use of psychedelic drugs in healthy individuals, including neurobiological and subjective effects. In line with findings suggesting positive effects in the treatment of mental health problems, such research highlights the potential of psychedelic drugs for the enhancement of wellbeing even in healthy individuals. The relatively low risk associated with usage does not appear to align with stringent drug laws that impose heavy penalties for their use. Some policy implications, and suggestions for future research, are considered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2050324517723232

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychedelics have repeatedly produced enhancements in well-being in healthy individuals, including enhanced mood, altruistic behaviour and prosociality, as well as significant decreases in clinical symptomatology.

    “Psychedelics have also been shown to repeatedly produce enhancements in well-being in healthy individuals, giving rise to effects such as enhanced mood, altruistic behaviour and prosociality, as well as significant decreases in clinical symptomatology (39–41).”

    From Examining the Potential Synergistic Effects Between Mindfulness Training and Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy (2021) · cites this paper as [39]

    In “Effects of psychedelic drugs in healthy individuals” (page unavailable), the review reports improved mood and well-being in healthy participants and more prosocial choices in an LSD study. It does not report significant decreases in clinical symptomatology among healthy individuals; its discussion of symptom improvement concerns patients with mental health conditions. The claim also states repeated benefits more firmly than the review’s conclusion that psychedelics have the potential to improve well-being. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Adelaars A (2001) Court case in Holland against the use of ayahuasca by the Dutch Santo Daime Church. Journal of Clandestine Laboratory Investigating Chemists Association 11(3): 12.
  2. Boire RG (2001) On cognitive liberty. The Journal of Cognitive Liberties 2(1): 7-22.
  3. dos Santos RG and Strassman RJ (2011) Ayahuasca and psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry (eLetter), 3 December. Available at: http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/ 190/1/81.2.e-letters#ayahuasca-and-psychosis (accessed 9 January 2017).
  4. Meyer JH, McMain S, Kennedy SH, et al. (2003) Dysfunctional attitudes and 5-HT2 receptors during depression and self-harm. American Journal of Psychiatry 160(1): 90-99.
  5. Narby J (2002) Shamans and scientists. In: Grob CS (ed.) Hallucinogens: A Reader. New York, NY: Putnam, pp.159-163.
  6. Pahnke WN (1963) Drugs and mysticism: An analysis of the relationship between psychedelic drugs and the mystical con- sciousness: A thesis. PhD Thesis, Harvard University.
  7. Rohde SA and Sander H (2011) The development of the legal situation of Santo Daime in Germany. In: Labate BC and Jungaberle H (eds) The Internationalization of Ayahuasca. Mu¨nster: LIT Verlag, pp.339-352.
  8. Sandberg R (2011) Judging Religious Drug use: The Misuse of the Definition of ''Religion''. In: Labate BC and Jungaberle H (eds) The Internationalization of Ayahuasca. Zurich, Switzerland: Lit Verlag, pp.389-401.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elsey, J. W. B.
Affiliations
Roeterseilandcampus – gebouw G, the Netherlands
Corresponding author
Elsey, James W.B.
Venue
Drug Science Policy and Law
Published
2017-01
Volume
3
ISSN
2050-3245 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2739110661
Cited by
57
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug Science Policy and Law (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Keywords
psychedelics, healthy individuals, subjective effects, neurobiological effects, drug policy, drug law, psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review