Cited by 371Spatial Cognition and NavigationMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Thoughts, behaviour, and brain dynamics during navigation in the real world

Spiers, Hugo J., Maguire, Eleanor A.·2006·NeuroImage

Abstract

How does the human brain allow us to interact with and navigate through a constantly changing world? Whilst controlled experiments using functional brain imaging can give insightful snapshots of neuronal responses to relatively simplified stimuli, they cannot hope to mirror the challenges faced by the brain in the real world. However, trying to study the brain mechanisms supporting daily living represents a huge challenge. By combining functional neuroimaging, an accurate interactive virtual simulation of a bustling central London (UK), and a novel means of 'reading' participants' thoughts whilst they moved around the city, we ascertained the online neural correlates underpinning navigation in this real-world context. A complex choreography of neural dynamics was revealed comprising focal and distributed, transient and sustained brain activity. Our results provide new insights into the specific roles of individual brain areas, in particular the hippocampus, retrosplenial, and frontal cortices, as well as offering clues about how functional specialisations operate within dynamic brain systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.037

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar brain networks to the classic episodic memory network have been activated in navigation, spatial tasks, episodic future thinking, default mode, and daydreaming, leading to suggestions that the network performs a general function.

    “Intriguingly, similar brain networks to the classic episodic memory network (also replicated in this study with the RM > RO contrast) has also been activated in a variety of other circumstances including navigation (Burgess et al., 2002; Hartley et al., 2003; Spiers and Maguire, 2006), spatial tasks (Maguire et al., 2003; Kumaran and Maguire, 2005), episodic future thinking (Atance and O'Neill, 2”

    From Using Imagination to Understand the Neural Basis of Episodic Memory (2007) · cites this paper as Spiers and Maguire, 2006

  • Such a representation might take a schematic form, such that similar distances across different environments are processed similarly or by the same neural populations in the RSC.

    “Such a representation might take a schematic form, such that similar distances across different environments are processed similarly or by the same neural populations in the RSC 153,154 .”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [154]

  • There is some functional MRI evidence of increased activation of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex in highly familiar environments that had been navigated extensively over many years, even following bilateral hippocampal lesions.

    “There is some functional MRI evidence of increased activation of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex in highly familiar environments that had been navigated extensively over many years 127,154 , even following bilateral hippocampal lesions 198 , but the precise conditions in which this region is activated is unclear.”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [154]

  • One prior fMRI study involving London taxi drivers navigating a virtual simulation of London reported that the hippocampus is engaged at the start of navigating this highly familiar environment.

    “One study involving London taxi drivers navigating a virtual simulation of London (UK) reported that the hippocampus is engaged at the start of navigating this highly familiar environment (Spiers and Maguire 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spiers, H. J., & Maguire, E. A.
Affiliations
UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Corresponding author
Spiers, Hugo J.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-07
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
1826-1840
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144232743
Cited by
371
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 20
FWCI
33.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
real-world navigation, human navigation, virtual reality simulation, hippocampus, retrosplenial cortex, frontal cortex, thought reading, functional specialization, everyday life
MeSH terms
Adult, Automobile Driving, Behavior, Brain, Computer Simulation, Eye Movements, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mental Processes, Middle Aged, Orientation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review