Cited by 526Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Dynamics of the Microglial/Amyloid Interaction Indicate a Role in Plaque Maintenance

Open access
Bolmont, Tristan, Haiss, Florent, Eicke, Daniel, Radde, Rebecca, Mathis, Chester A., Klunk, William E., Kohsaka, Shinichi, Jucker, Mathias +1 more·2008·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Microglial cells aggregate around amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's disease, but, despite their therapeutic potential, various aspects of their reactive kinetics and role in plaque pathogenesis remain hypothetical. Through use of in vivo imaging and quantitative morphological measures in transgenic mice, we demonstrate that local resident microglia rapidly react to plaque formation by extending processes and subsequently migrating toward plaques, in which individual transformed microglia somata remain spatially stable for weeks. The number of plaque-associated microglia increased at a rate of almost three per plaque per month, independent of plaque volume. Larger plaques were surrounded by larger microglia, and a subset of plaques changed in size over time, with an increase or decrease related to the volume of associated microglia. Far from adopting a more static role, plaque-associated microglia retained rapid process and membrane movement at the plaque/glia interface. Microglia internalized systemically injected amyloid-binding dye at a much higher rate in the vicinity of plaques. These results indicate a role for microglia in plaque maintenance and provide a model with multiple targets for therapeutic intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4814-07.2008

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microglia can internalize fibrillar Aβ in vitro and in vivo.

    “Although microglia can internalize fibrillar Aβ in vitro and in vivo”

    From Attenuating astrocyte activation accelerates plaque pathogenesis in APP/PS1 mice (2013) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Introduction says microglia can phagocytose Aβ in culture, and the ‘Microglia uptake of injected dye’ section reports Aβ-positive particles inside microglia in vivo. But the Discussion explicitly says further study is needed to determine whether the internalized material is soluble Aβ or fibrillary amyloid. The source therefore supports Aβ uptake in both settings, not the claim that fibrillar Aβ is internalized in vivo. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Either deposition of Aβ itself or secondary metabolic or inflammatory events lead to progressive impairment of microglial clearance function.

    “suggesting that either the deposition of A␤ itself or secondary metabolic or inflammatory events lead to a progressive impairment of microglial clearance function.”

    From Critical Role of Astroglial Apolipoprotein E and Liver X Receptor-α Expression for Microglial Aβ Phagocytosis (2011) · cites this paper as Bolmont et al., 2008

    The Discussion (page unavailable in our copy) says the microglial response is ultimately inefficient at clearing existing amyloid deposits. It does not show a progressive decline in clearance function or identify Aβ deposition, metabolic events, or inflammation as its cause; the Discussion instead describes ongoing phagocytic activity. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Microglia exhibit an increasing capacity for Aβ phagocytosis as Aβ adopts protofibrillar conformations but fail to phagocytose fibrillar deposits in vivo.

    “Thus, the long-term persistence of methoxy-XO4 and Aβ42 (HiLyte)-555 plaque labeling coupled with the absence of TS label inside microglia strongly suggests that little phagocytosis of fibrillar amyloid takes place in vivo.”

    From CX3CR1 in Microglia Regulates Brain Amyloid Deposition through Selective Protofibrillar Amyloid-β Phagocytosis (2010) · cites this paper as Bolmont et al., 2008

    The Discussion (page unavailable) proposes that microglia may phagocytose protofibrils at plaque edges, but does not report increasing phagocytic capacity as Aβ changes conformation. It also says further study is needed to determine whether the material taken up is soluble or fibrillar Aβ, so it does not establish that microglia fail to phagocytose fibrillar deposits in vivo. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the AD brain, microglia accumulate at the site of newly formed Aβ deposits via migration or local proliferation and may help restrict plaque growth.

    “In the AD brain, microglia accumulate at the site of newly formed A␤ deposits via migration or local proliferation and may help restrict plaque growth.4,5”

    From CX3CR1 Deficiency Alters Microglial Activation and Reduces Beta-Amyloid Deposition in Two Alzheimer's Disease Mouse Models (2010) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Microglial migration and Discussion sections report movement toward new plaques and an increase in plaque-associated microglia; the Discussion offers cell division as one possible source of additional cells, rather than demonstrating local proliferation. The Discussion also finds that plaques with less microglial coverage tended to grow, consistent with the hedged suggestion that microglia may restrict growth. These observations come from transgenic mice, so the claim's unqualified reference to the AD brain extends beyond the studied setting. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Microglia are brain-resident innate immune effector cells and are widely thought to be the key mediators of amyloid beta clearance.

    “Microglia are brain-resident innate immune effector cells and are widely thought to be the key mediators of amyloid beta clearance [14–16].”

    From IL-1β-driven amyloid plaque clearance is associated with an expansion of transcriptionally reprogrammed microglia (2019) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Introduction describes microglia reacting to brain injury and phagocytosing amyloid beta, and the Discussion reports that they can take up amyloid in vivo. But the paper calls their role in clearance controversial and says their response is inefficient at clearing existing deposits without additional manipulation. It does not establish resident microglia as the key mediators of amyloid beta clearance. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bolmont, T., Haiss, F., Eicke, D., Radde, R., Mathis, C. A., Klunk, W. E., Kohsaka, S., Jucker, M., & Calhoun, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research (DE)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • National Institute of Neuroscience (JP)
Corresponding author
Calhoun, Michael E.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2008-04-16
Volume
28
Issue
16
Pages
4283-4292
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2052652421
Cited by
526
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 31
FWCI
16.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (AG0011039, R01AG020226, AG020226)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
microglia, amyloid plaques, Alzheimer's disease, microglial migration, plaque-associated microglia, plaque size, transgenic mouse model
MeSH terms
Amyloid, Animals, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Time Factors, Microglia, Mice, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review