Cited by 829Digital Platforms and EconomicsBusiness Strategy and InnovationMerger and Competition Analysis

Platform Envelopment

Open access
Eisenmann, Thomas R., Parker, Geoffrey, Van Alstyne, Marshall W.·2010·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.1496336

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Path channeling adds to understanding competitive strategy, including platform envelopment.

    “The notion of path channeling adds to our understanding of competitive strategy, including recent insights related to platform envelopment (Eisenmann et al. 2011).”

    From Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation (2018) · cites this paper as Eisenmann et al. 2011

  • Platform envelopment is described as a firm leveraging shared relationships from overlapping user bases to envelop an existing provider's service by replicating functionality in a multiplatform bundle.

    “Platform envelopment is described in the literature as a firm leveraging the shared relationships created by overlapping user bases to envelop the service offered by an existing provider by, for example, replicating the functionality of their existing platform as part of a multiplatform bundle.”

    From Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation (2018) · cites this paper as Eisenmann et al. 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. R Bork, 1978, The Antitrust Paradox
  2. C Christensen, 1997, The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail
  3. T Eisenmann, 2007, Managing Networked Businesses: course overview for educators. HBS note, 807
  4. S Greenstein, 1997, What does industry convergence mean? In Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence
  5. J Thompson, 1967, Organizations in Action

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Tulane University (US)
Corresponding author
Eisenmann, Thomas R.
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010
Volume
32
Issue
12
Pages
1270-1285
ISSN
  • 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-5068
OpenAlex
W4252733663
Cited by
829
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 71 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 12
FWCI
40.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
Keywords
platform envelopment, platform markets, network effects, switching costs, user relationships, Schumpeterian innovation, market share capture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review