Cited by 69Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Cultivating multiple aspects of attention through mindfulness meditation accounts for psychological well-being through decreased rumination

Open access
Wolkin, Jennifer·2015·Psychology Research and Behavior Management

Abstract

In the last few decades, mindfulness meditation has gained prominence as an adjunctive psychotherapeutic technique. In fact, a vast literature of controlled studies has found that mindfulness meditation is related to improved mental health across a variety of disorders. Elucidating the components involved in mindfulness meditation's positive impact on psychological well-being is an important step in more precisely identifying the populations that would most benefit from its therapeutic utilization. Yet, a consensus regarding the particular underlying mechanisms that contribute to these outcomes is very much limited. There are many reasons for this, including the inconsistent operationalization and use of mindfulness meditation across research investigations. Despite the elusive mechanisms, many studies seem to indicate that cultivating different aspects of attention is a feasible, consistent, and parsimonious starting point bridging mindfulness practice and psychological well-being. Attention in itself is a complex construct. It comprises different networks, including alerting, orienting, and executive attention, and is also explained in terms of the way it is regulated. This paper supports a previously suggested idea that cultivating all aspects of attention through mindfulness meditation leads to greater psychological well-being through decreased ruminative processes. Ruminative processes are decreased by engaging in both focused and receptive attention, which foster the ability to distract and decenter.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/prbm.s31458

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conceptual frameworks have posited domain-specific effects of specific contemplative practices.

    “conceptual frameworks pushing for a systematic theory-driven investigation of these interventions [5,23,24,25] have posited domain-specific effects of specific practices.”

    From 10-Week Trajectories of Candidate Psychological Processes Differentially Predict Mental Health Gains from Online Dyadic versus Mindfulness Interventions: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2024) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Introduction says theoretical frameworks seek to clarify mindfulness and its mechanisms, and the Limitations section distinguishes among contemplative practices and interventions. But the paper does not posit that specific practices have domain-specific effects; it says their varied use makes particular mechanisms difficult to identify. The supplied passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [74]Moore A Malinowski P Meditation, mindfulness and cognitive flexibility Conscious Cogn 2009 18 1 176 186 19181542
  2. [96]Teasdale JD Segal Z Williams JM How does cognitive therapy prevent depressive relapse and why should attentional control (mindfulness) training help? Behav Res Ther 1995 33 1 25 39 7872934

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolkin, J.
Affiliations
NYU Langone Health (US)
Corresponding author
Wolkin, Jennifer
Venue
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Published
2015-06
Volume
8
Pages
171
ISSN
1179-1578 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1720566417
Cited by
69
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology Research and Behavior Management (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
mindfulness meditation, attention, psychological well-being, rumination, focused attention, orienting attention, executive attention, attentional control, decentering, distraction, mechanisms of mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review