The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technology Brokering and Innovation in a Product Development Firm
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
The state and technical innovation: a case-study of the electrical vehicle in France
Callon, M. (1980) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(80)90032-3 · Cited by 223
Cited by
Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 · Cited by 16,670
Structural Holes and Good Ideas
Burt, R. S. (2004) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/421787 · Cited by 5,642
Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134367 · Cited by 9,665
Carlile, P. R. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0094 · Cited by 3,101
Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future
O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0025 · Cited by 2,580
Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013 · Cited by 2,435
Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0428 · Cited by 2,224
Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation
Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0406 · Cited by 2,195
Orchestrating Innovation Networks
Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.21318923 · Cited by 1,803
Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals
Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2001) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094828 · Cited by 1,729
Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation
Sawhney, M., Verona, G., & Prandelli, E. (2005) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20046 · Cited by 1,406
Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data
Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2001) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00135-9 · Cited by 1,315
Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.51.3.451 · Cited by 1,152
From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V. (2017) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0462 · Cited by 1,121
Kellogg, K. C., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2006) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0157 · Cited by 802
Digital Product Innovation Within Four Classes of Innovation Networks
Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., & Boland Jr., R. J. (2016) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12093 · Cited by 806
Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules
Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2009) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2009.54.3.413 · Cited by 804
“…importance, this question has been explored in a variety of research traditions, ranging from organizational studies (Burns and Stalker, 1961; Hargadon and Sutton, 1997) and competitive strategy (Rindova and Kotha, 2001; Rothaermel, Hitt, and Jobe, 2006) to network sociology (Uzzi, 1997;…”
BackgroundGeorge, J. M. (2007) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/078559814 · Cited by 781
RESEARCH ON EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2004) · Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-7301(03)22004-1 · Cited by 770
Levinthal, D., & Rerup, C. (2006) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0197 · Cited by 744
Carnabuci, G., & Operti, E. (2013) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2084 · Cited by 596
Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review
Long, J. C., Cunningham, F. C., & Braithwaite, J. (2013) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-158 · Cited by 523
A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets
Dahlander, L., & Wallin, M. W. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.011 · Cited by 470
An organizational memory approach: To information management
Anand, V., Manz, C. C., & Glick, W. H. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259063 · Cited by 454
Assessing the dynamic capabilities view: spare change, everyone?
Arend, R. J., & Bromiley, P. (2009) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127008100132 · Cited by 413
Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2017) · The SMS Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Capabilities · doi:10.1002/9781405164054.ch21 · Cited by 368
Data Analytics, Innovation, and Firm Productivity
Wu, L., Hitt, L., & Lou, B. (2020) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3281 · Cited by 368
Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory
Antunes, H. D. J. G., & Pinheiro, P. G. (2020) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2019.04.002 · Cited by 342
The Interplay between Intuition and Rationality in Strategic Decision Making: A Paradox Perspective
Calabretta, G., Gemser, G., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2017) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840616655483 · Cited by 324
“Previous empirical studies have demonstrated the suitability of such projects for studying innovation challenges (Hargadon & Sutton, 1997; Robertson & Swan; 2003; Stigliani & Ravasi, 2012) and their management with a paradoxical approach (Andriopoulos & Lewis, 2009).”
Circularity Brokers: Digital Platform Organizations and Waste Recovery in Food Supply Chains
Ciulli, F., Kolk, A., & Boe-Lillegraven, S. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04160-5 · Cited by 310
Pil, F. K., & Leana, C. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.47084647 · Cited by 280
Dynamic Capabilities in Public Organizations: A literature review and research agenda
Piening, E. P. (2013) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.708358 · Cited by 270
Information, Technology, and Information Worker Productivity
Aral, S., Brynjolfsson, E., & Van Alstyne, M. (2012) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1110.0408 · Cited by 256
Cattani, G. (2006) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtj016 · Cited by 251
Symbolic Power and Organizational Culture
Hallett, T. (2003) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/1467-9558.00181 · Cited by 249
Reconsidering the Trade-off Between Expertise and Flexibility: a Cognitive Entrenchment Perspective
Dane, E. (2010) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.35.4.zok579 · Cited by 603
A causal test of the strength of weak ties
Rajkumar, K., Saint-Jacques, G., Bojinov, I., Brynjolfsson, E., & Aral, S. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abl4476 · Cited by 216
Progressing to the Center: Coordinating Project Work
Dahlander, L., & O'Mahony, S. (2011) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0571 · Cited by 211
Networks, Creativity, and Time: Staying Creative through Brokerage and Network Rejuvenation
Soda, G., Mannucci, P. V., & Burt, R. S. (2021) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2019.1209 · Cited by 182
Waardenburg, L., Huysman, M., & Sergeeva, A. V. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1544 · Cited by 165
(2007) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 141
Dodgson, M., Gann, D. M., & Salter, A. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0287 · Cited by 101
Wijewickrama, M. K. C. S., Rameezdeen, R., & Chileshe, N. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127938 · Cited by 99
Lee, J. M., Narula, R., & Hillemann, J. (2021) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101193 · Cited by 71
Khan, Z., Lew, Y. K., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2015) · Global Strategy Journal · doi:10.1002/gsj.1089 · Cited by 61
Song, S., Nerur, S., & Teng, J. T. C. (2007) · ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/1240616.1240620 · Cited by 50
Llewellyn, S., Procter, R., Harvey, G., Maniatopoulos, G., & Boyd, A. (2014) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr02230 · Cited by 43
Ding, Z., Srinivasan, A., Macneil, S., & Chan, J. (2023) · Creativity and Cognition · doi:10.1145/3591196.3593516 · Cited by 35
IdeateRelate: An Examples Gallery That Helps Creators Explore Ideas in Relation to Their Own
Xu, X. (., Xiong, R., Wang, B., Min, D., & Dow, S. P. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3479496 · Cited by 21
Zuzul, T., Pahnke, E. C., Larson, J., Bourke, P., Caurvina, N., Shah, N. P., Amini, F., Weston, J., Park, Y., Vogelstein, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.00641 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 716
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977101619
- Cited by
- 2,888
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 39.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
