The DOI matches its Crossref record; 117 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Abstract
This article synthesizes the large but diverse literature on organizational legitimacy, highlighting similarities and disparities among the leading strategic and institutional approaches. The analysis identifies three primary forms of legitimacy: pragmatic, based on audience self-interest; moral, based on normative approval: and cognitive, based on comprehensibility and taken-for-grantedness. The article then examines strategies for gaining, maintaining, and repairing legitimacy of each type, suggesting both the promises and the pitfalls of such instrumental manipulations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“…a generalized perception or assumption that the actions of an entity are (desirable), proper, or appropriate within some socially constructed system of norms, values, beliefs, and definitions. (Suchman 1995, 574)”
From Algorithmic Governance: Experimental Evidence on Citizens' and Public Administrators' Legitimacy Perceptions of Automated Decision‐Making (2026) · cites this paper as Suchman 1995
In the citing paper
“Conformity to cognitive institutions confers legitimacy, which help firms to create public acceptance, political protection and venture capital mobilization (Suchman, 1995).”
From Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective (2010) · cites this paper as Suchman, 1995
In the citing paper
“Discourse analysts added interactive dimensions by addressing collective sensemaking around specific issues.Because collective sense-making is an ongoing process, the interpretations sediment into particular discourses, i.e. ways of talking and thinking about issues (Hajer, 1995).Discourses contain deep structural elements that are framed by actors in particular ways.This discursive framing is a”
From Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective (2010) · cites this paper as Suchman, 1995
Citations
Cites
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226550 · Cited by 28,308
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (2004) · Advances in strategic management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1 · Cited by 25,973
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
The Interpretation of Cultures
Fenn, R. K., & Geertz, C. (1974) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1384392 · Cited by 19,241
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The Interpretation of Cultures
Dadze-Arthur, A. F. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912128310 · Cited by 16,510
External Control of Organizations: Resource Dependence Perspective
Miner, J. B. (2011) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315701967-54 · Cited by 14,229
The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis
Powell, W., & DiMaggio, P. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393344 · Cited by 11,926
The Logic of Collective Action.
Golembiewski, R. T., & Olson, M. (1966) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091298 · Cited by 11,371
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 119 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,035
Amine, L. S., & Staub, K. M. (2009) · Entrepreneurship and Regional Development · doi:10.1080/08985620802182144 · Cited by 285
Managing Organizational Legitimacy: Communication Strategies for Organizations in Crisis
Massey, J. E. (2001) · Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/002194360103800202 · Cited by 285
Growth of industry clusters and innovation: Lessons from Beijing Zhongguancun Science Park
Tan, J. (2005) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.06.006 · Cited by 287
Reynolds, S. J., Schultz, F. C., & Hekman, D. R. (2006) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-005-5493-2 · Cited by 284
Corporate Sustainable Development: is ‘Integrated Reporting’ a Legitimation Strategy?
Lai, A., Melloni, G., & Stacchezzini, R. (2014) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1863 · Cited by 283
An institutional perspective on the changes in management accountants’ professional role
Goretzki, L., Strauss, E. R., & Weber, J. (2013) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2012.11.002 · Cited by 283
Individual Rights and the Making of the International System
Reus‐Smit, C. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139046527 · Cited by 284
Talent management and dynamic view of talent in small and medium enterprises
Krishnan, T., & Scullion, H. (2016) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.10.003 · Cited by 283
de Bakker, F. G. A., Rasche, A., & Ponte, S. (2019) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2019.10 · Cited by 287
A bibliometric review of the innovation adoption literature
van Oorschot, J. A. W. H., Hofman, E., & Halman, J. I. M. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.032 · Cited by 315
From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability
Rasche, A., & Esser, D. E. (2006) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-005-5355-y · Cited by 282
Tyler, T. R., Goff, P. A., & MacCoun, R. J. (2015) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100615617791 · Cited by 280
Global Fields and Imperial Forms: Field Theory and the British and American Empires
Go, J. (2008) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00326.x · Cited by 281
Clarke, T., & Boersma, M. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2781-3 · Cited by 284
An Overview of Corporate Sustainability Reporting Legislation in the European Union
Hummel, K., & Jobst, D. (2024) · Accounting in Europe · doi:10.1080/17449480.2024.2312145 · Cited by 315
Toward a legitimacy‐based view of political risk: The case of Google and Yahoo in China
Stevens, C. E., Xie, E., & Peng, M. W. (2015) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2369 · Cited by 280
Neville, B. A., Bell, S. J., & Whitwell, G. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0818-9 · Cited by 302
Ruebottom, T. (2011) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.05.001 · Cited by 276
Darendeli, I. S., & Hill, T. L. (2015) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2015.27 · Cited by 279
ORGANIZATIONAL PERCEPTION MANAGEMENT
Elsbach, K. D. (2003) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(03)25007-3 · Cited by 277
PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development
Edström, K., & Kolmos, A. (2014) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043797.2014.895703 · Cited by 276
Sustainability Disclosure and Reputation: A Comparative Study
Michelon, G. (2011) · Corporate Reputation Review · doi:10.1057/crr.2011.10 · Cited by 276
Beer, M., Boselie, P., & Brewster, C. (2015) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21726 · Cited by 342
Lester, R. H., Certo, S. T., Dalton, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A. (2005) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-627x.2006.00151.x · Cited by 273
Globalization and Corporate Social Responsibility
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0018 · Cited by 272
Luo, L. (2017) · Accounting and Finance · doi:10.1111/acfi.12267 · Cited by 285
Signaling Theory in Entrepreneurship Research: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda
Bafera, J., & Kleinert, S. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/10422587221138489 · Cited by 379
Governance structures, voluntary disclosures and public accountability
Ntim, C. G., Soobaroyen, T., & Broad, M. (2017) · Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-10-2014-1842 · Cited by 287
Carbon disclosure, carbon performance and financial performance: International evidence
Siddique, M. A., Akhtaruzzaman, M., Rashid, A., & Hammami, H. (2021) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101734 · Cited by 334
The Economics and Sociology of Management Consulting
Armbrüster, T. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511488467 · Cited by 282
Political behavior, social responsibility, and perceived corruption: a structuration perspective
Luo, Y. (2006) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400224 · Cited by 271
Schurman, R. A. (2004) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2004.51.2.243 · Cited by 271
Crossing the line(s): A dual threshold model of anger in organizations
Geddes, D., & Callister, R. R. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.25275495 · Cited by 280
Institutional Determinants of Macro–Level Entrepreneurship
Valdez, M. E., & Richardson, J. (2013) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12000 · Cited by 271
Academic Institutions in Search of Quality: Local Orders and Global Standards
Paradeise, C., & Thœnig, J.-C. (2013) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840612473550 · Cited by 300
Child, J., Lü, Y., & Tsai, T. (2007) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607078112 · Cited by 274
Schmutzler, J., Andonova, V., & Díaz-Serrano, L. (2018) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258717753142 · Cited by 309
The age-effect of financial indicators as buffers against the liability of newness
Wiklund, J., Baker, T., & Shepherd, D. A. (2008) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.10.011 · Cited by 270
A Sociocognitive Interpretation of Organizational Downsizing
McKinley, W., Zhao, J., & Rust, K. G. (2000) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259272 · Cited by 270
Samuelsson, M. J., & Davidsson, P. (2008) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-007-9093-7 · Cited by 269
Transforming audit technologies: Business risk audit methodologies and the audit field
Robson, K., Humphrey, C., Khalifa, R., & Jones, J. (2006) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.002 · Cited by 269
Nothing At The Center?: Academic Legitimacy in the Information Systems Field
Lyytinen, K., & King, J. L. (2004) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00051 · Cited by 269
Business Model Innovation Performance: When does Adding a New Business Model Benefit an Incumbent?
Kim, S. K., & Min, S. (2015) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1193 · Cited by 271
The Logic of Institutional Logics
Cloutier, C., & Langley, A. (2013) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1056492612469057 · Cited by 273
Blind Dates and Arranged Marriages: Longitudinal Processes of Network Orchestration
Paquin, R. L., & Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2013) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840612470230 · Cited by 284
Status in Organization and Management Theory
Piazza, A., & Castellucci, F. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206313498904 · Cited by 267
Ren, S., Huang, M., Liu, D., & Yan, J. (2022) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12609 · Cited by 267
The Construction of Corporate Social Responsibility in Network Societies: A Communication View
Schultz, F., Castelló, I., & Morsing, M. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1826-8 · Cited by 300
Strategies of Legitimacy Through Social Media: The Networked Strategy
Castelló, I., Etter, M. A., & Nielsen, F. Å. (2015) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12145 · Cited by 289
EXPLORING CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS FOR STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
Yang, J., Shen, Q., Ho, C. M., Drew, D. S., & Chan, A. P. C. (2009) · Journal of Civil Engineering and Management · doi:10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.337-348 · Cited by 265
Filatotchev, I. V., & Nakajima, C. (2014) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2014.0014 · Cited by 289
Erkama, N., & Vaara, E. (2010) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840609346924 · Cited by 267
The Face of the Firm: The Influence of CEOs on Corporate Reputation
Love, E. G., Lim, J.-G., & Bednar, M. K. (2016) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0862 · Cited by 265
Liminal movement by digital platform‐based sharing economy ventures: The case of Uber Technologies
Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., Roberts, A., & Xu, L. (2022) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3148 · Cited by 274
Why Firms Mandate ISO 14001 Certification
Darnall, N. (2006) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650306289387 · Cited by 273
The Continuity–Change Duality in Narrative Texts of Organizational Identity*
Chreim, S. (2005) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00509.x · Cited by 264
Near and dear? The role of location in CSR engagement
Husted, B. W., Jamali, D., & Saffar, W. (2015) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2437 · Cited by 268
Approaches to corporate sustainability among German companies
Hahn, T., & Scheermesser, M. (2006) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.100 · Cited by 266
Social responsibility disclosure: A study of proxies for the public visibility of Portuguese banks
Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2008) · The British Accounting Review · doi:10.1016/j.bar.2008.02.004 · Cited by 264
Chang, S. (2003) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.03.002 · Cited by 261
Drivers of Supplier Sustainability: Moving Beyond Compliance to Commitment
Foerstl, K. D., Azadegan, A., Leppelt, T., & Hartmann, E. (2014) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12067 · Cited by 287
Kim, H., Kim, H., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2010) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2010.17 · Cited by 259
The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in sustainability reporting
Manetti, G., & Bellucci, M. (2016) · Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-08-2014-1797 · Cited by 300
Board Sustainability Committees, Climate Change Initiatives, Carbon Performance, and Market Value
Orazalin, N. S., Ntim, C. G., & Malagila, J. K. (2023) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12715 · Cited by 269
Sustainability communication in tourism – A literature review
Tölkes, C. (2018) · Tourism Management Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2018.04.002 · Cited by 307
Guo, R., Tao, L., Li, C. B., & Wang, T. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2672-7 · Cited by 292
David, R. J., Sine, W., & Haveman, H. A. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0745 · Cited by 257
Ahlström, D., & Bruton, G. D. (2002) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/104225870202600404 · Cited by 258
Agirre-Aramburu, I., & Pescador, I. G. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3438-1 · Cited by 302
Etter, M. A., Colleoni, E., Illia, L., Meggiorin, K., & d’Eugenio, A. (2016) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650316683926 · Cited by 283
Chu, Z., Xu, J., Lai, F., & Collins, B. J. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2018.2794453 · Cited by 282
From stakeholders to institutions: the changing face of social enterprise governance theory
Mason, C., Kirkbride, J., & Bryde, D. (2007) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251740710727296 · Cited by 257
Halliday, T. C., & Shaffer, G. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107707092.002 · Cited by 260
Desperately Seeking Legitimacy: Organizational Identity and Emerging Industries
Clegg, S. R., Rhodes, C., & Kornberger, M. (2006) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840606067995 · Cited by 269
McNamara, G. M., Deephouse, D. L., & Luce, R. A. (2002) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.289 · Cited by 256
Markets, Morals, and Practices of Trade: Jurisdictional Disputes in the U.S. Commerce in Cadavers
Anteby, M. (2010) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.606 · Cited by 261
Stål, H. I., & Corvellec, H. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.249 · Cited by 278
Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management: Evidence from China
Kuo, L., Yeh, C., & Yu, H. (2011) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.274 · Cited by 255
The changing university business model: a stakeholder perspective
Miller, K., McAdam, M., & McAdam, R. (2014) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12064 · Cited by 282
Stakeholder marketing: a definition and conceptual framework
Hult, G. T. M., Mena, J. A., Ferrell, O. C., & Ferrell, L. K. (2011) · AMS Review · doi:10.1007/s13162-011-0002-5 · Cited by 283
Green, S. E., Li, Y., & Nohria, N. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.36461725 · Cited by 255
Wry, T., Cobb, J. A., & Aldrich, H. E. (2013) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2013.781862 · Cited by 255
Terrorism and international business: A research agenda
Czinkota, M. R., Knight, G., Liesch, P. W., & Steen, J. T. (2010) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2010.12 · Cited by 252
Clercq, D. D., Danis, W. M., & Dakhli, M. (2009) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.09.002 · Cited by 264
Stakeholder pressures, EMS implementation, and green innovation in MNC overseas subsidiaries
Kawai, N., Strange, R. N., & Zucchella, A. (2018) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.02.004 · Cited by 267
The Mind and Heart of Resonance: The Role of Cognition and Emotions in Frame Effectiveness
Giorgi, S. (2017) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12278 · Cited by 255
ESG Controversies, ESG Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Accuracy
Schiemann, F., & Tietmeyer, R. (2022) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102373 · Cited by 272
Carbon footprints and legitimation strategies: symbolism or action?
Hrasky, S. L. (2011) · Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513571211191798 · Cited by 253
Growth and Survival of International Joint Ventures: An External-Internal Legitimacy Perspective
Lu, J. W., & Xu, D. (2006) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206305281399 · Cited by 253
The Riddle of Heterarchy: Power Transitions in Cross-Functional Teams
Aime, F., Humphrey, S. E., DeRue, D. S., & Paul, J. B. (2013) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0756 · Cited by 283
Misery Loves Company: The Spread of Negative Impacts Resulting from an Organizational Crisis
Yu, T., Sengul, M., & Lester, R. H. (2008) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2008.31193499 · Cited by 254
More than just a game: ethical issues in gamification
Kim, T. W., & Werbach, K. D. (2016) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-016-9401-5 · Cited by 262
Toward a Greater Understanding of Entrepreneurship and Strategy in the Informal Economy
Webb, J. W., Ireland, R. D., & Ketchen, D. J. (2014) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1176 · Cited by 265
Fostering Stakeholder Engagement: The Role of Materiality Disclosure in Integrated Reporting
Fasan, M., & Mio, C. (2016) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1917 · Cited by 252
Creating New Ventures: A Review and Research Agenda
Shepherd, D. A., Souitaris, V., & Gruber, M. B. (2020) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206319900537 · Cited by 256
Algorithmic control and gig workers: a legitimacy perspective of Uber drivers
Wiener, M., Cram, W. A., & Benlian, A. (2023) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2021.1977729 · Cited by 251
Institutional theory‐based research on corporate social responsibility: Bringing values back in
Risi, D., Vigneau, L., Bohn, S., & Wickert, C. M. J. (2022) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12299 · Cited by 279
Performance Configurations over Time: Implications for Growth– and Profit–Oriented Strategies
Steffens, P., Davidsson, P., & Fitzsimmons, J. R. (2008) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00283.x · Cited by 251
A comprehensive comparison of corporate environmental reporting and responsiveness
van Staden, C. J., & Hooks, J. (2007) · The British Accounting Review · doi:10.1016/j.bar.2007.05.004 · Cited by 248
Parsons, R., Lacey, J., & Moffat, K. B. (2014) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.04.002 · Cited by 250
Metadata
- Authors
- Suchman, M. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Suchman, Mark C.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 571
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162412465
- Cited by
- 19,903
- References
- 119
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2681 · 2025: 1654 · 2024: 1347 · 2023: 1207 · 2022: 1227 · 2021: 1174 · 2020: 1231 · 2019: 1123 · 2018: 948 · 2017: 865 · 2016: 807 · 2015: 769 · 2014: 768 · 2013: 729 · 2012: 572
- FWCI
- 29.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Strategy and Culture
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
- Keywords
- organizational legitimacy, legitimacy management, pragmatic legitimacy, moral legitimacy, cognitive legitimacy, legitimation strategies, legitimacy maintenance, institutional theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review