The DOI matches its Crossref record; 117 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Abstract
This article synthesizes the large but diverse literature on organizational legitimacy, highlighting similarities and disparities among the leading strategic and institutional approaches. The analysis identifies three primary forms of legitimacy: pragmatic, based on audience self-interest; moral, based on normative approval: and cognitive, based on comprehensibility and taken-for-grantedness. The article then examines strategies for gaining, maintaining, and repairing legitimacy of each type, suggesting both the promises and the pitfalls of such instrumental manipulations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“…a generalized perception or assumption that the actions of an entity are (desirable), proper, or appropriate within some socially constructed system of norms, values, beliefs, and definitions. (Suchman 1995, 574)”
From Algorithmic Governance: Experimental Evidence on Citizens' and Public Administrators' Legitimacy Perceptions of Automated Decision‐Making (2026) · cites this paper as Suchman 1995
In the citing paper
“Conformity to cognitive institutions confers legitimacy, which help firms to create public acceptance, political protection and venture capital mobilization (Suchman, 1995).”
From Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective (2010) · cites this paper as Suchman, 1995
In the citing paper
“Discourse analysts added interactive dimensions by addressing collective sensemaking around specific issues.Because collective sense-making is an ongoing process, the interpretations sediment into particular discourses, i.e. ways of talking and thinking about issues (Hajer, 1995).Discourses contain deep structural elements that are framed by actors in particular ways.This discursive framing is a”
From Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective (2010) · cites this paper as Suchman, 1995
Citations
Cites
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226550 · Cited by 28,308
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (2004) · Advances in strategic management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1 · Cited by 25,973
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
The Interpretation of Cultures
Fenn, R. K., & Geertz, C. (1974) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1384392 · Cited by 19,241
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The Interpretation of Cultures
Dadze-Arthur, A. F. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912128310 · Cited by 16,510
External Control of Organizations: Resource Dependence Perspective
Miner, J. B. (2011) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315701967-54 · Cited by 14,229
The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis
Powell, W., & DiMaggio, P. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393344 · Cited by 11,926
The Logic of Collective Action.
Golembiewski, R. T., & Olson, M. (1966) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091298 · Cited by 11,371
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,035
On the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from GCC countries
Pillai, R., & Al‐Malkawi, H. N. (2017) · Research in International Business and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.110 · Cited by 250
Townsend, D. M., & Hart, T. A. (2008) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00248.x · Cited by 249
Stakeholders’ Perspectives on the Role of Regulatory Reform in Integrated Reporting
Stubbs, W., & Higgins, C. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2954-0 · Cited by 212
Kobrin, S. J. (2009) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq200919321 · Cited by 249
Husted, B. W., & de Sousa-Filho, J. M. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.025 · Cited by 259
Cultural variation and the psychological contract
Thomas, D. C., Au, K., & Ravlin, E. C. (2003) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.209 · Cited by 251
Rapid Institutional Shifts and the Co–evolution of Entrepreneurial Firms in Transition Economies
Ahlström, D., & Bruton, G. D. (2010) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00373.x · Cited by 257
Mooneeapen, O., Abhayawansa, S., & Khan, N. M. (2022) · Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal · doi:10.1108/sampj-07-2021-0298 · Cited by 275
Dumay, J. C., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J., & Torre, M. L. (2017) · Open Research Online (The Open University) · doi:10.1108/medar-05-2017-0150?utm_campaign=repec&wt.mc_id=repec · Cited by 248
Vedula, S., Doblinger, C., Pacheco, D. F., York, J. G., Bacq, S. C., Russo, M. V., & Dean, T. J. (2021) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2019.0143 · Cited by 253
Hot Spots and Blind Spots: Geographical Clusters of Firms and Innovation
Pouder, R. W., & John, C. H. S. (1996) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259168 · Cited by 247
Institutional Antecedents of Corporate Governance Legitimacy
Judge, W. Q., Douglas, T. J., & Kutan, A. M. (2008) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206308318615 · Cited by 255
Searcy, C., & Elkhawas, D. (2012) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.022 · Cited by 245
Necessary Evils and Interpersonal Sensitivity in Organizations
Molinsky, A. L., & Margolis, J. D. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.16387884 · Cited by 247
Xie, C., Bagozzi, R. P., & Grønhaug, K. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.043 · Cited by 247
Rahman, H. U., Zahid, M., & Al‐Faryan, M. A. S. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136859 · Cited by 303
The Impact of Voluntary Sustainability Reporting on Firm Value: Insights from Signaling Theory
Friske, W., Hoelscher, S. A., & Nikolov, A. N. (2023) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-022-00879-2 · Cited by 249
Organizational Values: A Dynamic Perspective
Bourne, H., & Jenkins, M. (2013) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840612467155 · Cited by 248
Stakeholder Rights and Corporate Governance: A Cross-National Study of Hostile Takeovers
Schneper, W. D., & Guillén, M. F. (2004) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4131474 · Cited by 244
Raven, R., Kern, F., Verhees, B., & Smith, A. (2016) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.02.002 · Cited by 277
Tempel, A., & Walgenbach, P. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00644.x · Cited by 243
Williams, C. C., Martínez, Á., & Kedir, A. M. (2016) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12238 · Cited by 256
An Institutional Approach to Gender Diversity and Firm Performance
Zhang, L. (2020) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2019.1297 · Cited by 254
Howlett, M. P. (2004) · Policy and Society · doi:10.1016/s1449-4035(04)70030-2 · Cited by 242
Sine, W. D., David, R. J., & Mitsuhashi, H. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0300 · Cited by 241
Stakeholder Perceptions of Age and Other Dimensions of Newness
Choi, Y. R., & Shepherd, D. A. (2005) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206304272294 · Cited by 257
Bartkus, B. R., & Glassman, M. (2007) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9612-0 · Cited by 240
Schneiberg, M., & Bartley, T. (2001) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/323574 · Cited by 240
Zhou, M., Govindan, K., Xie, X.-B., & Yan, L. (2021) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102038 · Cited by 217
Corporate Motives for Social Initiative: Legitimacy, Sustainability, or the Bottom Line?
Brønn, P. S., & Vidaver‐Cohen, D. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0818-1_7 · Cited by 239
Sensemaking, storytelling and the legitimization of elite business careers
Maclean, M., Harvey, C. E., & Chia, R. (2012) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726711425616 · Cited by 252
Shin, J., Moon, J. J., & Kang, J. (2022) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.102071 · Cited by 278
Cuevas‐Rodríguez, G., Gómez‐Mejía, L. R., & Wiseman, R. M. (2012) · Corporate Governance An International Review · doi:10.1111/corg.12004 · Cited by 273
Denk, N., Kaufmann, L., & Roesch, J.-F. (2012) · Journal of International Management · doi:10.1016/j.intman.2012.07.001 · Cited by 236
Nicholls, A. J. (2009) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.08.001 · Cited by 237
Judging a business by its cover: An institutional perspective on new ventures and the business plan
Karlsson, T., & Honig, B. (2008) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.10.003 · Cited by 249
Mitchell, R. K., Weaver, G. R., Agle, B. R., Bailey, A. D., & Carlson, J. (2015) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2013.0486 · Cited by 237
Extending the use of institutional theory in operations and supply chain management research
Kauppi, K. (2013) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-10-2011-0364 · Cited by 235
Elzen, B., Geels, F. W., Leeuwis, C., & van Mierlo, B. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.018 · Cited by 235
Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Salience in Family Firms1
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., Chrisman, J. J., & Spence, L. J. (2011) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq201121215 · Cited by 261
Institutions and emerging markets: effects and implications for multinational corporations
Rottig, D. (2016) · International Journal of Emerging Markets · doi:10.1108/ijoem-12-2015-0248 · Cited by 247
Strategies of legitimation: MNEs and the adoption of CSR in response to host-country institutions
Rathert, N. (2016) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2016.19 · Cited by 240
Zhang, Y., Wang, H. C., & Zhou, X. (2019) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2017.0412 · Cited by 238
Perceived stakeholder influences and organizations’ use of environmental audits
Darnall, N., Seol, I., & Sarkis, J. (2008) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2008.07.002 · Cited by 234
Webb, J. W., Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., Kistruck, G. M., & Tihanyi, L. (2010) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-010-0237-y · Cited by 254
Board Gender Quotas: Exploring Ethical Tensions From A Multi-Theoretical Perspective
Terjesen, S. A., & Sealy, R. H. V. (2016) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2016.7 · Cited by 232
Hampel, C. E., Tracey, P., & Weber, K. (2019) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2017.0460 · Cited by 249
Corporate governance and carbon performance: role of carbon strategy and awareness of climate risk
Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2020) · Accounting and Finance · doi:10.1111/acfi.12687 · Cited by 234
Achieving legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: The case of emerging economy firms
Zheng, Q., Luo, Y., & Maksimov, V. R. (2014) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2014.05.001 · Cited by 260
Toward a Process Theory of Making Sustainability Strategies Legitimate in Action
Hengst, I.-A., Jarzabkowski, P. A., Hoegl, M., & Muethel, M. (2019) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0960 · Cited by 233
University technology transfer offices: The search for identity to build legitimacy
O’Kane, C., Mangematin, V., Geoghegan, W., & Fitzgerald, C. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.08.003 · Cited by 232
The quest for legitimacy in world politics – international institutions’ legitimation strategies
Gronau, J., & Schmidtke, H. (2015) · Review of International Studies · doi:10.1017/s0260210515000492 · Cited by 232
Wyrwich, M., Stuetzer, M., & Sternberg, R. (2015) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-015-9695-4 · Cited by 259
McMullen, J. S., Brownell, K. M., & Adams, J. (2020) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258720922460 · Cited by 254
Investment decisions in the renewable energy sector: An analysis of non-financial drivers
Masini, A., & Menichetti, E. (2012) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.08.003 · Cited by 232
Social license to operate: Legitimacy by another name?
Gehman, J., Lefsrud, L., & Fast, S. (2017) · Canadian Public Administration · doi:10.1111/capa.12218 · Cited by 232
Ghobadian, A., Talavera, I., Bhattacharya, A., Kumar, P. V., Garza‐Reyes, J. A., & O’Regan, N. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.06.001 · Cited by 239
The trend of integrated reporting practice in South Africa: ceremonial or substantive?
Haji, A. A., & Anifowose, M. (2016) · Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal · doi:10.1108/sampj-11-2015-0106 · Cited by 230
Ethical Climates in Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda
Newman, A., Round, H., Bhattacharya, S., & Roy, A. (2017) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2017.23 · Cited by 244
Asymmetric roles of business ties and political ties in product innovation
Wu, J. (2011) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.014 · Cited by 229
To What Extent Do Gender Diverse Boards Enhance Corporate Social Performance?
Francœur, C., Labelle, R., Balti, S., & el Bouzaidi, S. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3529-z · Cited by 229
Dyduch, J., & Krasodomska, J. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9111934 · Cited by 229
Sustainability reporting and firm’s performance
Buallay, A. M. (2019) · International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · doi:10.1108/ijppm-10-2018-0371 · Cited by 229
Galletta, S., Mazzù, S., & Naciti, V. (2022) · Research in International Business and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101684 · Cited by 259
PUBLIC VALUE CREATION BY CROSS‐SECTOR COLLABORATIONS: A FRAMEWORK AND CHALLENGES OF ASSESSMENT
Page, S., Stone, M. M., Bryson, J. M., & Crosby, B. C. (2015) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12161 · Cited by 262
Employer Legitimacy and Recruitment Success in Small Businesses
Williamson, I. O. (2000) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/104225870002500104 · Cited by 228
Lashitew, A. A., Bals, L., & van Tulder, R. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3995-y · Cited by 169
Li, J., Li, P., & Wang, B. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2985 · Cited by 230
Czinkota, M., Kaufmann, H. R., & Basile, G. (2014) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.10.005 · Cited by 224
Does transparency strengthen legitimacy?
Curtin, D. M., & Meijer, A. J. (2006) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-2006-0091 · Cited by 226
Organizational Misfits and the Origins of Brokerage in Intrafirm Networks
Kleinbaum, A. M. (2012) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839212461141 · Cited by 225
Binz, C., Harris-Lovett, S., Kiparsky, M., Sedlak, D. L., & Truffer, B. (2015) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.005 · Cited by 241
Thunnissen, M. (2015) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-08-2015-0159 · Cited by 226
Between Legitimacy and Efficiency: An Institutional Theory of Corporate Giving
Jeong, Y., & Kim, T. Y. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0575 · Cited by 234
Hyatt, D. G., & Berente, N. (2017) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1979 · Cited by 231
Fini, R., Fu, K., Mathisen, M. T., Rasmussen, E., & Wright, M. (2016) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9779-9 · Cited by 240
Female entrepreneurship in Africa: A review, trends, and future research directions
Ojöng, N., Simba, A., & Dana, L. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.032 · Cited by 240
McFarland, R. G., Bloodgood, J. M., & Payan, J. M. (2008) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.72.2.63 · Cited by 226
Brown, A. D., & Toyoki, S. (2013) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840612467158 · Cited by 223
Anchors Aweigh: The Sources, Variety, and Challenges of Mission Drift
Grimes, M. G., Williams, T., & Zhao, E. (2019) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2017.0254 · Cited by 185
Hu, D., Qiu, L., She, M., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2746 · Cited by 223
Corporate social responsibility in cruising: Using materiality analysis to create shared value
Font, X., Guix, M., & Bonilla-Priego, M. J. (2015) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2015.10.007 · Cited by 229
Does Twitter Increase Perceived Police Legitimacy?
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Meijer, A. J. (2015) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12378 · Cited by 237
Wright, C., & Rwabizambuga, A. (2006) · Business and Society Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8594.2006.00263.x · Cited by 222
Convincing the crowd: entrepreneurial storytelling in crowdfunding campaigns
Bejarano, T. (2017) · Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) · Cited by 222
Washington, M., & Patterson, K. D. W. (2010) · Sport Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.smr.2010.06.003 · Cited by 221
Types of firms generating network externalities and MNCs' co‐location decisions
Chang, S., & Park, S.-K. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.464 · Cited by 218
Voluntary Disclosures of Emissions by US Firms
Stanny, E. (2012) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1732 · Cited by 220
Influences on Student Intention and Behavior Toward Environmental Sustainability
Swaim, J. A., Maloni, M. J., Napshin, S. A., & Henley, A. B. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1883-z · Cited by 220
Desai, V. M. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.60263082 · Cited by 220
Armed, and Dangerous (?): Motivating Rule Adherence Among Agents of Social Control
Tyler, T. R., Callahan, P. E., & Frost, J. (2007) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00304.x · Cited by 227
The Political Mobilization of Firms and Industries
Walker, E. T., & Rea, C. M. (2014) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043215 · Cited by 220
Independent directors' background and CSR disclosure
Gago, R. F., García, L. C., & Antolín, M. N. (2018) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1515 · Cited by 220
Procurement issues in Malaysia
Hui, W. S., Othman, R., Omar, N. H., Rahman, R. A., & Haron, N. H. (2011) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/09513551111163666 · Cited by 219
Spence, L. J., & Rinaldi, L. (2012) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2012.03.003 · Cited by 238
NGOs and corporations: conflict and collaboration
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-5125 · Cited by 223
Third-Party Certification, Sponsorship, and Consumers’ Ecolabel Use
Darnall, N., Ji, H., & Vázquez‐Brust, D. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3138-2 · Cited by 218
The Nature of Social Innovation
Nicholls, A. J., & Murdock, A. (2012) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230367098_1 · Cited by 218
York, J. G., Vedula, S., & Lenox, M. J. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0769 · Cited by 229
The transparency dilemma: How AI disclosure erodes trust
Schilke, O. S., & Reimann, M. (2025) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2025.104405 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Suchman, M. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Suchman, Mark C.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 571
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162412465
- Cited by
- 19,903
- References
- 119
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2681 · 2025: 1654 · 2024: 1347 · 2023: 1207 · 2022: 1227 · 2021: 1174 · 2020: 1231 · 2019: 1123 · 2018: 948 · 2017: 865 · 2016: 807 · 2015: 769 · 2014: 768 · 2013: 729 · 2012: 572
- FWCI
- 29.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Strategy and Culture
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
- Keywords
- organizational legitimacy, legitimacy management, pragmatic legitimacy, moral legitimacy, cognitive legitimacy, legitimation strategies, legitimacy maintenance, institutional theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review