The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide
Abstract
“Paradox” appears increasingly in organization studies, often to describe conflicting demands, opposing perspectives, or seemingly illogical findings. This article helps researchers move beyond labeling—to explore paradoxes and contribute insights more in tune with organizational complexity and ambiguity. I first develop a framework that clarifies the nature of paradoxical tensions, reinforcing cycles, and their management. Using this framework, I then review studies in which paradoxes spurred by change and plurality are investigated. I conclude by outlining strategies for identifying and representing paradox, addressing implications for research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009 · Cited by 6,477
Paradoxical Thinking and Change in the Frames of Reference
Westenholz, A. (1993) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069301400104 · Cited by 175
Cited by
Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation
Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0406 · Cited by 2,195
Self-citationToward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0223 · Cited by 1,631
Self-citationMultiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications
Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0431 · Cited by 1,571
What Differences Make a Difference?: The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations
Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x · Cited by 1,276
Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162422 · Cited by 1,385
Self-citationFrom creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V. (2017) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0462 · Cited by 1,121
Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive Approach
Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162421 · Cited by 1,116
Appio, F. P., Lima, M., & Paroutis, S. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.018 · Cited by 747
An inconvenient truth: How organizations translate climate change into business as usual
Wright, C., & Nyberg, D. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0718 · Cited by 722
Organizational culture and performance measurement systems
Henri, J.-F. (2006) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2004.10.003 · Cited by 700
Leader narcissism and follower outcomes: the counterbalancing effect of leader humility.
Owens, B. P., Wallace, A. S., & Waldman, D. A. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038698 · Cited by 407
Tsoukas, H. (2017) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12219 · Cited by 368
Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions.
Putnam, L. L., Myers, K. K., & Gailliard, B. M. (2014) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726713495704 · Cited by 341
Adler, P. S., & Chen, C. X. (2011) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2011.02.002 · Cited by 329
The Interplay between Intuition and Rationality in Strategic Decision Making: A Paradox Perspective
Calabretta, G., Gemser, G., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2017) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840616655483 · Cited by 324
“Strategies of resolution seek to resolve the underlying tensions not by eliminating them but by finding ways to meet the competing demands – that is, by engaging in paradoxical thinking (Lewis, 2000).”
InfluentialSeeing the Forest and the Trees: How a Systems Perspective Informs Paradox Research
Schad, J., & Bansal, P. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12398 · Cited by 266
Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities
Hillebrand, B., Driessen, P. H., & Koll, O. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-015-0424-y · Cited by 257
Deutero-Learning in Organizations: A Review and a Reformulation
Visser, M. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24351883 · Cited by 168
The role of HRM in developing sustainable organizations: Contemporary challenges and contradictions
Podgorodnichenko, N., Edgar, F., & McAndrew, I. (2020) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.04.001 · Cited by 160
Exploring inter-organizational paradoxes: Methodological lessons from a study of a grand challenge
Jarzabkowski, P., Bednarek, R., Chalkias, K., & Cacciatori, E. (2019) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127018805345 · Cited by 150
Surviving the paradoxes of virtual teamwork
Dubé, L., & Robey, D. (2009) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2008.00313.x · Cited by 140
Vlaar, P. W. L., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2007) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607078003 · Cited by 136
The Learning Spiral: A Process Perspective on Paradox
Raisch, S., Hargrave, T. J., & van de Ven, A. H. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12397 · Cited by 131
Toward a Meta-Theory of Creativity Forms: How Novelty and Usefulness Shape Creativity
Harvey, S., & Berry, J. W. (2023) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2020.0110 · Cited by 125
Sustainable HRM: An extension of the paradox perspective
Poon, T. S.-C., & Law, K. K. (2022) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100818 · Cited by 88
Paradox as a Lens for Theorizing Sustainable HRM: Mapping and Coping with Paradoxes and Tensions
Ehnert, I. (2014) · CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37524-8_11 · Cited by 73
Paradoxes and Dual Processes: A Review and Synthesis
Keller, J., & Sadler‐Smith, E. (2019) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12200 · Cited by 66
The sensemaking-coevolution-implementation theory of software design
Ralph, P. (2015) · Science of Computer Programming · doi:10.1016/j.scico.2014.11.007 · Cited by 60
Hödl, T., & Myrach, T. (2023) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-023-00808-9 · Cited by 51
Ribeiro, B., Meckin, R., Balmer, A., & Shapira, P. (2023) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104607 · Cited by 51
Handling tensions in human resource management: Insights from paradox theory
Keegan, A., Brandl, J., & Aust, I. (2019) · German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung · doi:10.1177/2397002218810312 · Cited by 49
Norouzinik, Y., Rahimnia, F., Maharati, Y., & Eslami, G. (2022) · Innovation · doi:10.1080/14479338.2021.1897467 · Cited by 48
A Figure is Worth a Thousand Words: The role of visualization in paradox theorizing
Pradies, C., Berti, M., Pina e Cunha, M., Rego, A., Tunarosa, A., & Clegg, S. (2023) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/01708406231161998 · Cited by 26
The role of paradoxical logic in innovation: The case of Intel
Norman, P. M., Palich, L. E., Livingstone, L. P., & Carini, G. R. (2004) · The Journal of High Technology Management Research · doi:10.1016/j.hitech.2003.09.004 · Cited by 17
(2017) · Saint Mary's University Institutional Repository (Saint Mary's University) · Cited by 10
Implementing multiple intervention strategies in Dutch public health-related policy networks
Harting, J., Peters, D., Grêaux, K., van Assema, P., Verweij, S., Stronks, K., & Klijn, E.-H. (2019) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/dax067 · Cited by 9
Marathe, A. S., & Piper, A. M. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757666 · Cited by 21
“Theories of paradox understand how seemingly contradictory elements coexist and are negotiated by organizations and their workers [20, 55].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, M. W.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 760
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084612155
- Cited by
- 2,555
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
