Cited by 488Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesCytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer

Chronic Exposure to Interleukin-6 Causes Hepatic Insulin Resistance in Mice

Open access
Klover, Peter J., Zimmers, Teresa A., Koniaris, Leonidas G., Mooney, Robert A.·2003·Diabetes

Abstract

Interleukin (IL)-6 is one of several proinflammatory cytokines associated with the insulin resistance of obesity and type 2 diabetes. There is, however, little direct evidence in vivo for a causative role of IL-6 in insulin resistance. Here, a 5-day constant subcutaneous infusion of hIL-6 before portal vein insulin challenge resulted in impairment of early insulin receptor signaling in the liver of mice. Importantly, the sixfold elevation of IL-6 attained with constant infusion was similar to levels reached in obesity. Consistent with an hepatic response to IL-6, STAT3 phosphorylation was increased in livers of IL-6-treated mice at 5 days. Chronic infusion of IL-6 also reduced hepatic insulin receptor autophosphorylation by 60% and tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrates-1 and -2 by 60 and 40%, respectively. IL-6 had no effect on the mass of these proteins. IL-6 also decreased refeeding-dependent glucokinase mRNA induction by ∼40%. Insulin tolerance tests revealed reduced insulin sensitivity. In contrast to hepatic insulin receptor signal transduction, 5-day IL-6 exposure failed to suppress skeletal muscle insulin receptor signal transduction. These data suggest that chronic IL-6 treatment selectively impairs hepatic insulin signaling in vivo, further supporting a role for IL-6 in hepatic insulin resistance of obesity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diabetes.52.11.2784

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interleukin-6 causes hepatic and muscle insulin resistance in humans and in mice.

    “and causes hepatic and muscle insulin resistance in humans and in mice (39,55-60).”

    From Expression of <i>Mfn2</i>, the Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy Type 2A Gene, in Human Skeletal Muscle (2005) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Results section, “Effect of IL-6 on liver versus skeletal muscle” (page not supplied), reports impaired hepatic insulin signaling in mice but no effect on skeletal-muscle insulin receptor signaling. The Discussion likewise says the findings suggest IL-6 may not mediate skeletal-muscle insulin resistance. The paper discusses insulin resistance in humans as a hypothesis, not a demonstrated causal finding. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interleukin-6 interferes with insulin signaling in muscle and hepatic cells.

    “Several reports indicate that interleukin-6 interferes with insulin signaling in muscle and hepatic cells (39,55)”

    From Expression of <i>Mfn2</i>, the Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy Type 2A Gene, in Human Skeletal Muscle (2005) · cites this paper as [55]

    The ‘Effect of IL-6 on liver versus skeletal muscle’ section reports impaired insulin signaling in mouse liver, but explicitly says that chronic IL-6 treatment did not affect insulin receptor signaling in skeletal muscle. The Discussion likewise describes the effect as hepatic rather than muscular, contrary to the claim’s muscle component. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klover, P. J., Zimmers, T. A., Koniaris, L. G., & Mooney, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2003-11-01
Volume
52
Issue
11
Pages
2784-2789
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2155824086
Cited by
488
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 29
FWCI
14.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK060732, R01DK038138, R01-DK38138, R01-DK60732)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Keywords
interleukin-6, hepatic insulin resistance, insulin receptor signaling, STAT3 phosphorylation, insulin receptor autophosphorylation, IRS-1, insulin receptor substrate 2, glucokinase, insulin tolerance, obesity, type 2 diabetes, inflammatory cytokines, skeletal muscle insulin signaling
MeSH terms
Animals, Glucokinase, Infusions, Parenteral, Insulin Antagonists, Insulin Resistance, Liver, Phosphoproteins, Phosphorylation, Receptor, Insulin, RNA, Messenger, Transcription, Genetic, Signal Transduction, Interleukin-6, Muscle, Skeletal, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Mice, Insulin Receptor Substrate Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review