CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CRISPR-Cas9 in agriculture: Approaches, applications, future perspectives, and associated challenges

Adhikari, Prabin, Poudel, Mousami·2020·Malaysian Journal of Halal Research
DOI 10.2478/mjhr-2020-0002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The discovery of an adaptive immune system especially in archae and bacteria, CRISPR/Cas has revolutionized the field of agriculture and served as a potential gene editing tool, producing great excitement to the molecular scientists for the improved genetic manipulations. CRISPR/Cas9 is a RNA guided endonuclease which is popular among its predecessors ZFN and TALEN’s. The utilities of CRISPR from its predecessors is the use of short RNA fragments to locate target and breaking the double strands which avoids the need of protein engineering, thus allowing time efficiency measure for gene editing. It is a simple, flexible and highly efficient programmable DNA cleavage system that can be modified for widespread applications like knocking out the genes, controlling transcription, modifying epigenomes, controlling genome-wide screens, modifying genes for disease and stress tolerance and imaging chromosomes. However, gene cargo delivery system, off target cutting and issues on the safety of living organisms imposes major challenge to this system. Several attempts have been done to rectify these challenges; using sgRNA design software, cas9 nickases and other mutants. Thus, further addressing these challenges may open the avenue for CRISPR/cas9 for addressing the agriculture related problems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2478/mjhr-2020-0002

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 1 CRISPR/Cas9 for DSBs and repair either by NHEJ or HDR
Figure 1 CRISPR/Cas9 for DSBs and repair either by NHEJ or HDRCC-BY · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 123

  1. [1] J. L. Clarke and P. Zhang, “Plant biotechnology for food security and bioeconomy,” Plant Mol. Biol., vol. 83 (1), pp. 1–3, 2013.10.1007/s11103-013-0097-123860797 · DOI
  2. [3] P. Stamm, R. Ramamoorthy, and P. P. Kumar, “Feeding the extra billions: strategies to improve crops and enhance future food security,” Plant Biotechnol. Rep., vol. 5 (2), pp. 107–120, 2011.10.1007/s11816-011-0169-0 · DOI
  3. [4] H.C.J. Godfray, “Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People,” Science, vol. 327, (5967), pp. 812–818, 2010.10.1126/science.1185383 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [5] J.D.G. Jones, “Elevating crop disease resistance with cloned genes,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., vol. 369 (1639), pp. 20130087–20130087, 2014.10.1098/rstb.2013.0087 · DOI
  5. [6] M.K. Samanta, A. Dey, and S. Gayen, “CRISPR/Cas9: an advanced tool for editing plant genomes,” Transgenic Res., vol. 25 (5), pp. 561–573, 2016.10.1007/s11248-016-9953-527012546 · DOI
  6. [7] A. Ansari, “Engineered Dwarf Male-Sterile Rice: A Promising Genetic Tool for Facilitating Recurrent Selection in Rice,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 8, 2017.10.3389/fpls.2017.02132573349329326740 · DOI
  7. [8] D. Jaganathan, K. Ramasamy, G. Sellamuthu, S. Jayabalan, and G. Venkataraman, “CRISPR for crop improvement: An update review,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 9, 2018.10.3389/fpls.2018.00985605666630065734 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [9] F. Georges and H. Ray, “Genome editing of crops: A renewed opportunity for food security,” GM Crops Food, vol. 8 (1), pp. 1–12, 2017.10.1080/21645698.2016.1270489559297728075688 · DOI
  9. [10] M. Jinek, K. Chylinski, I. Fonfara, M. Hauer, J. A. Doudna, and E. Charpentier, “A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity,” Science, vol. 337 (6096), pp. 816–821, 2012.10.1126/science.1225829 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [11] A. Malzahn, L. Lowder, and Y. Qi, “Plant genome editing with TALEN and CRISPR,” Cell Biosci., vol. 7, Pp. 21, 2017.10.1186/s13578-017-0148-4540429228451378 · DOI
  11. [13] G. Govindan and S. Ramalingam, “Programmable Site-Specific Nucleases for Targeted Genome Engineering in Higher Eukaryotes,” J. Cell. Physiol., vol. 231 (11), pp. 2380–2392, 2016.10.1002/jcp.25367 · DOI
  12. [14] K. Chen and C. Gao, “TALENs: Customizable Molecular DNA Scissors for Genome Engineering of Plants,” J. Genet. Genomics, vol. 40 (6), pp. 271–279, 2013.10.1016/j.jgg.2013.03.00923790626 · DOI
  13. [15] Y. Osakabe and K. Osakabe, “Genome Editing with Engineered Nucleases in Plants,” Plant Cell Physiol., vol. 56 (3), pp. 389–400, 2015.10.1093/pcp/pcu17025416289 · DOI
  14. [16] K. Pauwels, N. Podevin, D. Breyer, D. Carroll, and P. Herman, “Engineering nucleases for gene targeting: safety and regulatory considerations,” New Biotechnol., vol. 31 (1), pp. 18–27, 2014.10.1016/j.nbt.2013.07.00123851284 · DOI
  15. [18] H. I. Ahmad, “A Review of CRISPR-Based Genome Editing: Survival, Evolution and Challenges.,” Curr. Issues Mol. Biol., vol. 28, pp. 47–68, 2018.10.21775/cimb.028.04729428910 · DOI
  16. [19] F. Jiang and J. A. Doudna, “CRISPR–Cas9 structures and mechanisms,” Annu. Rev. Biophys., vol. 46, pp. 505–529, 2017.10.1146/annurev-biophys-062215-01082228375731 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [20] P. Horvath and R. Barrangou, “CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea,” Science, vol. 327 (5962), pp. 167–170, 2010.10.1126/science.1179555 · DOI
  18. [21] X. Dai, X. Chen, Q. Fang, J. Li, and Z. Bai, “Inducible CRISPR genome-editing tool: classifications and future trends,” Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., vol. 38 (4), pp. 573–586, 2018.10.1080/07388551.2017.137899928936886 · DOI
  19. [23] Y. Cui, J. Xu, M. Cheng, X. Liao, and S. Peng, “Review of CRISPR/Cas9 sgRNA design tools,” Interdiscip. Sci. Comput. Life Sci., vol. 10 (2), pp. 455–465, 2018.10.1007/s12539-018-0298-z29644494 · DOI
  20. [24] J. Li, “CRISPR/Cas: a novel way of RNA-guided genome editing: CRISPR/Cas: a novel way of RNA-guided genome editing,” Hered. Beijing, vol. 35 (11), pp. 1265–1273, 2013.10.3724/SP.J.1005.2013.01265 · DOI
  21. [25] H. Ledford, “CRISPR, the disruptor,” Nat. News, vol. 522 (7554), p. 20, 2015.10.1038/522020a · DOI
  22. [26] D. Zhang, Z. Li, and JF. Li, “Targeted gene manipulation in plants using CRISPR-Cas9.,” J. Genet. Genomics, 2016.10.1016/j.jgg.2016.03.00127165865 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [27] C.M. Lee, T.J. Cradick, and G. Bao, “The Neisseria meningitidis CRISPR-Cas9 System Enables Specific Genome Editing in Mammalian Cells,” Mol. Ther., vol. 24 (3), pp. 645–654, 2016.10.1038/mt.2016.8478693726782639 · DOI
  24. [28] F.A. Ran, P.D. Hsu, J. Wright, V. Agarwala, D.A. Scott, and F. Zhang, “Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system,” Nat. Protoc., vol. 8 (11), Pp. 2281, 2013.10.1038/nprot.2013.143396986024157548 · DOI · Paper page
  25. [29] S.R. Choudhury, Y. Cui, K. Lubecka, B. Stefanska, and J. Irudayaraj, “CRISPR-dCas9 mediated TET1 targeting for selective DNA demethylation at BRCA1 promoter,” Oncotarget, vol. 7 (29), pp. 46545–46556, 2016.10.18632/oncotarget.10234 · DOI
  26. [30] Y. Gao, X. Xiong, S. Wong, E.J. Charles, W.A. Lim, and L.S. Qi, “Complex transcriptional modulation with orthogonal and inducible dCas9 regulators,” Nat. Methods, vol. 13, Pp. 1043, 2016.10.1038/nmeth.4042543690227776111 · DOI
  27. [31] C. Gao, “The future of CRISPR technologies in agriculture,” Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, vol. 19 (5), pp. 275–276, 2018.10.1038/nrm.2018.229382940 · DOI
  28. [32] G. Song, “CRISPR/Cas9: a powerful tool for crop genome editing,” Crop J., vol. 4 (2), pp. 75–82, 2016.10.1016/j.cj.2015.12.002 · DOI
  29. [33] K. Yin, C. Gao, and J.L. Qiu, “Progress and prospects in plant genome editing,” Nat. Plants, 2017.10.1038/nplants.2017.10728758991 · DOI
  30. [34] B. Zetsche, “Multiplex gene editing by CRISPR–Cpf1 using a single crRNA array,” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 35 (1), pp. 31–34, 2017.10.1038/nbt.3737522507527918548 · DOI · Paper page
  31. [35] S.S.A. Zaidi, M.M. Mahfouz, and S. Mansoor, “CRISPR-Cpf1: A New Tool for Plant Genome Editing,” Trends Plant Sci., vol. 22 (7), pp. 550–553, 2017.10.1016/j.tplants.2017.05.00128532598 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [36] L. Cong, “Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems,” Science, vol. 339, (6121), pp. 819–823, 2013.10.1126/science.1231143 · DOI · Paper page
  33. [38] J.P. Guilinger, D.B. Thompson, and D.R. Liu, “Fusion of catalytically inactive Cas9 to FokI nuclease improves the specificity of genome modification,” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 32 (6), pp. 577–582, 2014.10.1038/nbt.2909426342024770324 · DOI · Paper page
  34. [39] M. Wade, “High-throughput silencing using the CRISPR-Cas9 system: a review of the benefits and challenges,” J. Biomol. Screen., vol. 20 (8), pp. 1027– 1039, 2015.10.1177/1087057115587916 · DOI
  35. [40] L. Bortesi and R. Fischer, “The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond,” Biotechnol. Adv., vol. 33 (1), pp. 41–52, 2015.10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.12.00625536441 · DOI
  36. [41] A. Ricroch, P. Clairand, and W. Harwood, “Use of CRISPR systems in plant genome editing toward new opportunities in agriculture,” Emerg. Top. Life Sci., vol. 1 (2), pp. 169–182, 2017.10.1042/ETLS20170085728899333525765 · DOI
  37. [42] E.C. Oerke, “Crop losses to pests,” J. Agric. Sci., vol. 144 (1), pp. 31–43, 2006.10.1017/S0021859605005708 · DOI · Paper page
  38. [43] J.W.Woo, “DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins,” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 33, Pp. 1162, 2015.10.1038/nbt.338926479191 · DOI · Paper page
  39. [44] J. Miao, “Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system,” Cell Res., vol. 23 (10), Pp. 1233, 2013.10.1038/cr.2013.123379023923999856 · DOI
  40. [45] Q. Shan, Y. Wang, J. Li, and C. Gao, “Genome editing in rice and wheat using the CRISPR/Cas system,” Nat. Protoc., vol. 9 (10), Pp. 2395, 2014.10.1038/nprot.2014.15725232936 · DOI
  41. [47] Y. Sun, “Generation of High-Amylose Rice through CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Targeted Mutagenesis of Starch Branching Enzymes,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 8, 2017.10.3389/fpls.2017.00298533933528326091 · DOI
  42. [48] Y. Sun, “Engineering herbicide-resistant rice plants through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homologous recombination of acetolactate synthase,” Mol. Plant, vol. 9 (4), pp. 628–631, 2016.10.1016/j.molp.2016.01.00126768120 · DOI
  43. [49] R. Xu, “Gene targeting using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated CRISPR-Cas system in rice,” Rice, vol. 7 (1), Pp. 5, 2014.10.1186/s12284-014-0005-6405263324920971 · DOI
  44. [50] H. Zhou, B. Liu, D.P. Weeks, M.H. Spalding, and B. Yang, “Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in rice,” Nucleic Acids Res., vol. 42 (17), pp. 10903–10914, 2014.10.1093/nar/gku806 · DOI
  45. [51] Y. Meng, “Targeted mutagenesis by CRISPR/Cas9 system in the model legume Medicago truncatula,” Plant Cell Rep., vol. 36 (2), pp. 371–374, 2017.10.1007/s00299-016-2069-927834007 · DOI
  46. [52] Q. Shan, “Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system,” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 31, Pp. 686, 2013.10.1038/nbt.265023929338 · DOI · Paper page
  47. [53] H. Zhang, “The CRISPR/C as9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation,” Plant Biotechnol. J., vol. 12 (6), pp. 797–807, 2014.10.1111/pbi.1220024854982 · DOI
  48. [54] K. Xie and Y. Yang, “RNA-Guided Genome Editing in Plants Using a CRISPR–Cas System,” Mol. Plant, vol. 6 (6), pp. 1975–1983, 2013.10.1093/mp/sst119 · DOI
  49. [55] M. Nieves-Cordones, “Production of low-Cs + rice plants by inactivation of the K + transporter Os HAK 1 with the CRISPR -Cas system,” Plant J., vol. 92 (1), pp. 43–56, 2017.10.1111/tpj.1363228670755 · DOI
  50. [56] J. Ma, “Disruption of OsSEC3A increases the content of salicylic acid and induces plant defense responses in rice,” J. Exp. Bot., vol. 69 (5), pp. 1051– 1064, 2018.10.1093/jxb/erx458 · DOI
  51. [57] X. Mao, “OsPRX2 contributes to stomatal closure and improves potassium deficiency tolerance in rice,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., vol. 495 (1), pp. 461–467, 2018.10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.11.04529128357 · DOI
  52. [58] T. Wang, J.J. Wei, D.M. Sabatini, and E.S. Lander, “Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system,” Science, vol. 343 (6166), pp. 80–84, 2014.10.1126/science.1246981 · DOI · Paper page
  53. [59] J. Gil-Humanes, “High-efficiency gene targeting in hexaploid wheat using DNA replicons and CRISPR/Cas9,” Plant J., vol. 89 (6), pp. 1251–1262, 2017.10.1111/tpj.13446 · DOI
  54. [60] D. Kim, B. Alptekin, and H. Budak, “CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in wheat,” Funct. Integr. Genomics, vol. 18 (1), pp. 31–41, 2018.10.1007/s10142-017-0572-x28918562 · DOI · Paper page
  55. [61] W. Wang, “Transgenerational CRISPR-Cas9 Activity Facilitates Multiplex Gene Editing in Allopolyploid Wheat,” CRISPR J., vol. 1 (1), pp. 65–74, 2018.10.1089/crispr.2017.0010631932130627700 · DOI
  56. [63] S. Svitashev, C. Schwartz, B. Lenderts, J. K. Young, and A. Mark Cigan, “Genome editing in maize directed by CRISPR–Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes,” Nat. Commun., vol. 7, Pp. 13274, 2016.10.1038/ncomms13274 · DOI
  57. [64] N.M. Butler, N.J. Baltes, D.F. Voytas, and D.S. Douches, “Geminivirus-Mediated Genome Editing in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Using Sequence-Specific Nucleases,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 7, 2016.10.3389/fpls.2016.01045495538027493650 · DOI
  58. [65] E. Waltz, “Gene-edited CRISPR mushroom escapes US regulation,” Nat. News, vol. 532 (7599), Pp. 293, 2016.10.1038/nature.2016.19754 · DOI
  59. [66] H. Jia, V. Orbovic, J.B. Jones, and N. Wang, “Modification of the PthA4 effector binding elements in Type I CsLOB1 promoter using Cas9/sgRNA to produce transgenic Duncan grapefruit alleviating XccΔpthA4:dCsLOB1.3 infection,” Plant Biotechnol. J., vol. 14 (5), pp. 1291–1301, 2016.10.1111/pbi.12495 · DOI
  60. [67] H. Jia, “Genome editing of the disease susceptibility gene CsLOB1 in citrus confers resistance to citrus canker,” Plant Biotechnol. J., vol. 15 (7), pp. 817– 823, 2017.10.1111/pbi.12677546643627936512 · DOI
  61. [68] J. Chandrasekaran, “Development of broad virus resistance in non-transgenic cucumber using CRISPR/Cas9 technology,” Mol. Plant Pathol., vol. 17 (7), pp. 1140–1153, 2016.10.1111/mpp.12375 · DOI · Paper page
  62. [69] W.Z. Jiang, I.M. Henry, P.G. Lynagh, L. Comai, E.B. Cahoon, and D.P. Weeks, “Significant enhancement of fatty acid composition in seeds of the allohexaploid, Camelina sativa, using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing,” Plant Biotechnol. J., vol. 15 (5), pp. 648–657, 2017.10.1111/pbi.12663539900427862889 · DOI
  63. [70] Y. Cai, “CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in soybean hairy roots,” PLoS One, vol. 10 (8), p. e0136064, 2015.10.1371/journal.pone.0136064454046226284791 · DOI
  64. [71] N. Sauer, J. Narvaez-Vasquez, J. Mozoruk, R. Miller, Z. Warburg, and M. Woodward, “Oligonucleotide-mediated genome editing provides precision and function to engineered nucleases and antibiotics in plants,” Plant Physiol., 2017.10.1104/pp.15.01696482511326864017 · DOI
  65. [72] A. Hummel, R. Chauhan, T. Cernak, A. Mutka, A. Vijayaraghavan, and A. Boyher, “Allele exchange at the EPSPS locus confers glyphosate tolerance in cassava,” Plant Biotechnol. J., 2018.10.1111/pbi.12868599931129223136 · DOI
  66. [73] K. Chen, Y. Wang, R. Zhang, H. Zhang, and C. Gao, “CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing and Precision Plant Breeding in Agriculture,” Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., vol. 70 (1), pp. 667–697, 2019.10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-10004930835493 · DOI
  67. [74] W. Jiang, H. Zhou, H. Bi, M. Fromm, B. Yang, and D.P. Weeks, “Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice,” Nucleic Acids Res., vol. 41 (20), pp. e188–e188, 2013.10.1093/nar/gkt780381437423999092 · DOI
  68. [75] R. Xu, “Rapid improvement of grain weight via highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multiplex genome editing in rice,” J. Genet. Genomics Yi Chuan Xue Bao, vol. 43 (8), pp. 529–532, 2016.10.1016/j.jgg.2016.07.00327543262 · DOI · Paper page
  69. [76] M. Li, “Reassessment of the Four Yield-related Genes Gn1a, DEP1, GS3, and IPA1 in Rice Using a CRISPR/Cas9 System,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 7, 2016.10.3389/fpls.2016.00377481188427066031 · DOI
  70. [77] Y. Zhang, “Analysis of the functions of TaGW2 homeologs in wheat grain weight and protein content traits,” Plant J., vol. 94 (5), pp. 857–866, 2018.10.1111/tpj.1390329570880 · DOI
  71. [78] J. Huang, “Identifying a large number of high-yield genes in rice by pedigree analysis, whole-genome sequencing, and CRISPR-Cas9 gene knockout,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 115 (32), pp. E7559–E7567, 2018.10.1073/pnas.1806110115609409730037991 · DOI
  72. [79] J. Duitama, “Whole Genome Sequencing of Elite Rice Cultivars as a Comprehensive Information Resource for Marker Assisted Selection,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10 (4), 2015.10.1371/journal.pone.0124617441456525923345 · DOI
  73. [80] S. Sánchez-León, “Low-gluten, nontransgenic wheat engineered with CRISPR/Cas9,” Plant Biotechnol. J., vol. 16 (4), Pp. 902–910, 2018.10.1111/pbi.12837586703128921815 · DOI
  74. [82] C. Klap, “Tomato facultative parthenocarpy results from SlAGAMOUS-LIKE 6 loss of function,” Plant Biotechnol. J., vol. 15 (5), pp. 634–647, 2017.10.1111/pbi.12662539900227862876 · DOI
  75. [83] R. Ueta, “Rapid breeding of parthenocarpic tomato plants using CRISPR/Cas9,” Sci. Rep., vol. 7 (1), p. 507, 2017.10.1038/s41598-017-00501-4542869228360425 · DOI · Paper page
  76. [84] A. Ficke, C. Cowger, G. Bergstrom, and G. Brodal, “Understanding Yield Loss and Pathogen Biology to Improve Disease Management: Septoria Nodorum Blotch - A Case Study in Wheat,” Plant Dis., vol. 102 (4), Pp. 696–707, 2017.10.1094/PDIS-09-17-1375-FE30673402 · DOI
  77. [85] Y. Wang, “Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew,” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 32 (9), Pp. 947–951, 2014.10.1038/nbt.296925038773 · DOI · Paper page
  78. [86] Y. Zhang, “Simultaneous modification of three homoeologs of TaEDR1 by genome editing enhances powdery mildew resistance in wheat,” Plant J., vol. 91 (4), Pp. 714–724, 2017.10.1111/tpj.1359928502081 · DOI · Paper page
  79. [87] F. Wang, “Enhanced Rice Blast Resistance by CRISPR/Cas9-Targeted Mutagenesis of the ERF Transcription Factor Gene OsERF922,” PLOS ONE, vol. 11 (4), p. e0154027, 2016.10.1371/journal.pone.0154027484602327116122 · DOI
  80. [88] J. Zhou, “Gene targeting by the TAL effector PthXo2 reveals cryptic resistance gene for bacterial blight of rice,” Plant J., vol. 82 (4), pp. 632–643, 2015.10.1111/tpj.1283825824104 · DOI
  81. [89] V. Nekrasov, C. Wang, J. Win, C. Lanz, D. Weigel, and S. Kamoun, “Rapid generation of a transgene-free powdery mildew resistant tomato by genome deletion,” Sci. Rep., vol. 7 (1), Pp. 482, 2017.10.1038/s41598-017-00578-x542867328352080 · DOI
  82. [90] A. Ortigosa, S. Gimenez-Ibanez, N. Leonhardt, and R. Solano, “Design of a bacterial speck resistant tomato by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of SlJAZ2,” Plant Biotechnol. J., vol. 17 (3), pp. 665–673, 2019.10.1111/pbi.13006638178030183125 · DOI
  83. [91] A. Macovei, “Novel alleles of rice eIF4G generated by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis confer resistance to Rice tungro spherical virus,” Plant Biotechnol. J., vol. 16 (11), pp. 1918–1927, 2018.10.1111/pbi.12927 · DOI
  84. [92] Z. Iqbal, M.N. Sattar, and M. Shafiq, “CRISPR/Cas9: A Tool to Circumscribe Cotton Leaf Curl Disease,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 7, Pp. 475, 2016.10.3389/fpls.2016.00475482846527148303 · DOI
  85. [93] H.P. Lu, “Resistance of rice to insect pests mediated by suppression of serotonin biosynthesis,” Nat. Plants, vol. 4 (6), Pp. 338–344, 2018.10.1038/s41477-018-0152-729735983 · DOI
  86. [94] R. Li, “CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated SlNPR1 mutagenesis reduces tomato plant drought tolerance,” BMC Plant Biol., vol. 19 (1), p. 38, 2019.10.1186/s12870-018-1627-4634172730669982 · DOI
  87. [96] J. Li, “Generation of thermosensitive male-sterile maize by targeted knockout of the ZmTMS5 gene,” J. Genet. Genomics Yi Chuan Xue Bao, vol. 44 (9), Pp. 465–468, 2017.10.1016/j.jgg.2017.02.00228412227 · DOI
  88. [97] H. Zhou, “Development of Commercial Thermo-sensitive Genic Male Sterile Rice Accelerates Hybrid Rice Breeding Using the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated TMS5 Editing System,” Sci. Rep., vol. 6, Pp. 37395, 2016.10.1038/srep37395 · DOI
  89. [98] Q. Li, “Development of japonica Photo-Sensitive Genic Male Sterile Rice Lines by Editing Carbon Starved Anther Using CRISPR/Cas9,” J. Genet. Genomics Yi Chuan Xue Bao, vol. 43 (6), pp. 415–419, 2016.10.1016/j.jgg.2016.04.01127317309 · DOI
  90. [99] M. Singh, M. Kumar, M.C. Albertsen, J.K. Young, and A.M. Cigan, “Concurrent modifications in the three homeologs of Ms45 gene with CRISPR-Cas9 lead to rapid generation of male sterile bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.),” Plant Mol. Biol., vol. 97 (4–5), pp. 371–383, 2018.10.1007/s11103-018-0749-229959585 · DOI
  91. [100] L. Yao, “OsMATL mutation induces haploid seed formation in indica rice,” Nat. Plants, vol. 4 (8), pp. 530–533, 2018.10.1038/s41477-018-0193-y29988153 · DOI
  92. [101] X. Yu, “A selfish genetic element confers non-Mendelian inheritance in rice,” Science, vol. 360 (6393), pp. 1130–1132, 2018.10.1126/science.aar4279 · DOI
  93. [102] T. Li, “Domestication of wild tomato is accelerated by genome editing,” Nat. Biotechnol., Oct. 2018.10.1038/nbt.427330272676 · DOI
  94. [103] M. Endo, M. Mikami, and S. Toki, “Biallelic Gene Targeting in Rice,” Plant Physiol., vol. 170 (2), pp. 667–677, 2016.10.1104/pp.15.01663473457726668334 · DOI
  95. [104] J. Li, “Gene replacements and insertions in rice by intron targeting using CRISPR–Cas9,” Nat. Plants, vol. 2 (10), Pp. 16139, 2016.10.1038/nplants.2016.139 · DOI
  96. [105] H. Butt, “Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing Using a Chimeric Single-Guide RNA Molecule,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 8, 2017.10.3389/fpls.2017.01441557372328883826 · DOI
  97. [106] S. Henikoff and L. Comai, “Single-nucleotide mutations for plant functional genomics,” Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., vol. 54, pp. 375–401, 2003.10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.13500914502996 · DOI
  98. [107] A.C. Komor, Y.B. Kim, M.S. Packer, J.A. Zuris, and D.R. Liu, “Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage,” Nature, vol. 533 (7603), pp. 420–424, 2016.10.1038/nature17946 · DOI · Paper page
  99. [108] Y. Zhang, K. Massel, I.D. Godwin, and C. Gao, “Applications and potential of genome editing in crop improvement,” Genome Biol., vol. 19 (1), Pp. 210, 2018.10.1186/s13059-018-1586-y626705530501614 · DOI
  100. [109] N.M. Gaudelli, “Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage,” Nature, vol. 551 (7681), pp. 464–471, 2017.10.1038/nature24644 · DOI · Paper page
  101. [110] Y. Chen, Z. Wang, H. Ni, Y. Xu, Q. Chen, and L. Jiang, “CRISPR/Cas9-mediated base-editing system efficiently generates gain-of-function mutations in Arabidopsis,” Sci. China Life Sci., vol. 60 (5), Pp. 520–523, 2017.10.1007/s11427-017-9021-528303459 · DOI
  102. [111] S. Tian, “Engineering herbicide-resistant watermelon variety through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated base-editing,” Plant Cell Rep., vol. 37 (9), Pp. 1353– 1356, 2018.10.1007/s00299-018-2299-0 · DOI · Paper page
  103. [112] C. Li, “Expanded base editing in rice and wheat using a Cas9-adenosine deaminase fusion,” Genome Biol., vol. 19 (1), p. 59, 2018.10.1186/s13059-018-1443-z597239929807545 · DOI
  104. [113] F. Yan, “Highly Efficient A·T to G·C Base Editing by Cas9n-Guided tRNA Adenosine Deaminase in Rice,” Mol. Plant, vol. 11 (4), Pp. 631–634, 2018.10.1016/j.molp.2018.02.00829476918 · DOI
  105. [114] K. Hua, X. Tao, F. Yuan, D. Wang, and J.K. Zhu, “Precise A·T to G·C Base Editing in the Rice Genome,” Mol. Plant, vol. 11 (4), pp. 627–630, 2018.10.1016/j.molp.2018.02.00729476916 · DOI
  106. [116] Z. Liang, “Efficient DNA-free genome editing of bread wheat using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes,” Nat. Commun., vol. 8, Pp. 14261, 2017.10.1038/ncomms14261 · DOI
  107. [117] Y. Zhang, “Efficient and transgene-free genome editing in wheat through transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 DNA or RNA,” Nat. Commun., vol. 7, Pp. 12617, 2016.10.1038/ncomms12617 · DOI
  108. [118] H.L. Xing, “A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants,” BMC Plant Biol., vol. 14 (1), Pp. 327, 2014.10.1186/s12870-014-0327-y426298825432517 · DOI · Paper page
  109. [119] D. Ding, K. Chen, Y. Chen, H. Li, and K. Xie, “Engineering Introns to Express RNA Guides for Cas9- and Cpf1-Mediated Multiplex Genome Editing,” Mol. Plant, vol. 11 (4), Pp. 542–552, 2018.10.1016/j.molp.2018.02.00529462720 · DOI
  110. [120] X. Meng, “Construction of a Genome-Wide Mutant Library in Rice Using CRISPR/Cas9,” Mol. Plant, vol. 10 (9), Pp. 1238–1241, 2017.10.1016/j.molp.2017.06.006 · DOI
  111. [121] Y. Lu, “Genome-wide Targeted Mutagenesis in Rice Using the CRISPR/Cas9 System,” Mol. Plant, vol. 10 (9), Pp. 1242–1245, 2017.10.1016/j.molp.2017.06.007 · DOI
  112. [122] T.B. Jacobs, N. Zhang, D. Patel, and G.B. Martin, “Generation of a Collection of Mutant Tomato Lines Using Pooled CRISPR Libraries,” Plant Physiol., vol. 174 (4), pp. 2023–2037, 2017.10.1104/pp.17.00489 · DOI
  113. [123] N.A. Abdallah, C.S. Prakash, and A.G. McHughen, “Genome editing for crop improvement: Challenges and opportunities,” GM Crops Food, vol. 6 (4), Pp. 183–205, 2016.10.1080/21645698.2015.1129937503322226930114 · DOI
  114. [124] H.D. Jones, “Challenging regulations: Managing risks in crop biotechnology,” Food Energy Secur., vol. 4 (2), Pp. 87–91, 2015.10.1002/fes3.60511141827867501 · DOI
  115. [126] J.H. Jung and Y.W. Seo, “Challenges in wide implementation of genome editing for crop improvement,” J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol., vol. 20 (2), pp. 129– 135, 2017.10.1007/s12892-017-0019-0 · DOI
  116. [127] Z.H. Lemmon, “Rapid improvement of domestication traits in an orphan crop by genome editing,” Nat. Plants, vol. 4 (10), pp. 766–770, 2018.10.1038/s41477-018-0259-x30287957 · DOI
  117. [128] S.B. Gelvin, “Plant proteins involved in Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation,” Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., vol. 48, pp. 45–68, 2010.10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-08185220337518 · DOI
  118. [129] Y. Ran, Z. Liang, and C. Gao, “Current and future editing reagent delivery systems for plant genome editing,” Sci. China Life Sci., vol. 60 (5), Pp. 490– 505, 2017.10.1007/s11427-017-9022-128527114 · DOI
  119. [130] G.S. Demirer, “High aspect ratio nanomaterials enable delivery of functional genetic material without DNA integration in mature plants,” Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 14 (5), pp. 456–464, 2019.10.1038/s41565-019-0382-530804481 · DOI
  120. [131] D. Kim, “Genome-wide target specificities of CRISPR RNA-guided programmable deaminases,” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 35 (5), pp. 475–480, 2017.10.1038/nbt.385228398345 · DOI
  121. [132] H.A. Rees, “Improving the DNA specificity and applicability of base editing through protein engineering and protein delivery,” Nat. Commun., vol. 8, Pp. 15790, 2017.10.1038/ncomms15790 · DOI · Paper page
  122. [133] D.E. Voth, L.J. Broederdorf, and J.G. Graham, “Bacterial Type IV secretion systems: versatile virulence machines,” Future Microbiol., vol. 7 (2), pp. 241– 257, 2012.10.2217/fmb.11.150356305922324993 · DOI
  123. [134] P.A. Mateos-Gomez, F. Gong, N. Nair, K.M. Miller, E. Lazzerini-Denchi, and A. Sfeir, “Mammalian polymerase θ promotes alternative NHEJ and suppresses recombination,” Nature, vol. 518 (7538), pp. 254–257, 2015.10.1038/nature14157 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 23

Metadata

Authors
Adhikari, P., & Poudel, M.
Affiliations
Agriculture and Forestry University
Venue
Malaysian Journal of Halal Research
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Published
2020-05-11
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
6-16
ISSN
2616-1923
DOI
10.2478/mjhr-2020-0002
Cited by
23
References
9
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review