Cited by 19Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesConducting polymers and applications

The Pursuit of Chronically Reliable Neural Interfaces: A Materials Perspective

Open access
Guo, Liang·2016·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces represent one of the most astonishing technologies in our era. However, the grand challenge of chronic instability and limited throughput of the electrode-tissue interface has significantly hindered the further development and ultimate deployment of such exciting technologies. A multidisciplinary research workforce has been called upon to respond to this engineering need. In this paper, I briefly review this multidisciplinary pursuit of chronically reliable neural interfaces from a materials perspective by analyzing the problem, abstracting the engineering principles, and summarizing the corresponding engineering strategies. I further draw my future perspectives by extending the proposed engineering principles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2016.00599

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Implant materials are assessed based on their chemical and mechanical similarity to the target tissue to prevent an undesirable immune response.

    “These materials will also be assessed based on their chemical and mechanical similarity to the target tissue to prevent an undesirable immune response to these alien materials (Guo 2016).”

    From Peripheral nerve bionic interface: a review of electrodes (2019) · cites this paper as Guo 2016

  • For some electrode coatings, particularly conducting polymers, there is an additional technological challenge of delamination of films from underlying conductors.

    “However, for some of these coatings, in particular conducting polymers, there is an additional technological challenge of delamination of these films from the underlying conductors (Guo 2016).”

    From Peripheral nerve bionic interface: a review of electrodes (2019) · cites this paper as Guo 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, L.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Guo, Liang
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2016-12-27
Volume
10
Pages
599-599
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2561617906
Cited by
19
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ohio State University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Conducting polymers and applications
Keywords
brain-computer interface, neural interfaces, electrode materials, chronic instability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review