Cited by 368Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentLanguage Development and Disorders

Gaze behavior and affect at 6 months: Predicting clinical outcomes and language development in typically developing infants and infants at risk for autism

Open access
Young, Gregory S., Merin, Noah, Rogers, Sally J., Ozonoff, Sally·2009·Developmental Science

Abstract

This paper presents follow‐up longitudinal data to research that previously suggested the possibility of abnormal gaze behavior marked by decreased eye contact in a subgroup of 6‐month‐old infants at risk for autism (Merin, Young, Ozonoff & Rogers, 2007). Using eye‐tracking data and behavioral data recorded during a live mother–infant interaction involving the still‐face procedure, the predictive utility of gaze behavior and affective behaviors at 6 months was examined using diagnostic outcome data obtained longitudinally over the following 18 months. Results revealed that none of the infants previously identified as showing lower rates of eye contact had any signs of autism at outcome. In contrast, three infants who were diagnosed with autism demonstrated consistent gaze to the eye region and typical affective responses at 6 months. Individual differences in face scanning and affective responsivity during the live interaction were not related to any continuous measures of symptom frequency or symptom severity. In contrast, results of growth curve models for language development revealed significant relationships between face scanning and expressive language. Greater amounts of fixation to the mother's mouth during live interaction predicted higher levels of expressive language at outcome and greater rates of growth. These findings suggest that although gaze behavior at 6 months may not provide early markers for autism as initially conceived, gaze to the mouth in particular may be useful in predicting individual differences in language development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00833.x

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attention to faces in 6-month-old at-risk infants is not associated with later ASD diagnosis.

    “This appears consistent with the surprising finding that attention to faces in 6 month old at-risk infants is not associated with later ASD diagnosis (Young, Merin, Rogers, & Ozonoff, 2009)”

    From Atypical attentional networks and the emergence of autism (2013) · cites this paper as Young, Merin, Rogers, & Ozonoff, 2009

  • Previous studies have used the strategy of contrasting ASD with no ASD outcome collapsed across risk group.

    “Several previous studies have also used the strategy of contrasting ASD with no ASD outcome collapsed across risk group [11, 67–72].”
  • Typical orienting to faces and eyes is measured in 6-month-old Sib-A during live interaction.

    “Typical orienting to faces and eyes is measured in 6-months old Sib-A during live interaction (Ozonoff et al., 2010; Young, Merin, Rogers, & Ozonoff, 2009), but a decrease in orienting becomes apparent from 12 months (Ozonoff et al., 2010).”

    From From early markers to neuro-developmental mechanisms of autism (2014) · cites this paper as Young, Merin, Rogers, & Ozonoff, 2009

  • Behavioral responses to the still face paradigm were found to be typical at 6 months in Sib-A.

    “Behavioral responses to the ‘still face’ paradigm were measured in studies of high-risk infants, but were found to be typical at 6 months in Sib-A (Rozga et al., 2011; Young et al., 2009).”

    From From early markers to neuro-developmental mechanisms of autism (2014) · cites this paper as Young et al., 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Aslin RN Jusczyk PW Pisoni DB Kuhn D Siegler RS Speech and auditory processing during infancy: Constraints on and precursors to language Handbook of Child Psychology, Volume 2: Cognition, Perception, and Language 1998 5th ed. New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 147 198
  2. Sparrow SS Balla DA Cicchetti DV Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: Interveiw Edition, Survey Form Manual 1984 Circle Pines, MN American Guidance Service

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Young, G. S., Merin, N., Rogers, S. J., & Ozonoff, S.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Young, Gregory S.
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-08-11
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
798-814
ISSN
  • 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7687
OpenAlex
W2034621560
Cited by
368
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 22
FWCI
9.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH068398)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
gaze behavior, eye contact, autism risk, infants, facial scanning, expressive language development, still-face procedure, mother-infant interaction, language outcome prediction
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Affect, Attention, Autistic Disorder, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Communication, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Infant, Language Development, Male, Mother-Child Relations, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review