Cited by 87Visual perception and processing mechanismsEmbodied and Extended CognitionBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

Precision and False Perceptual Inference

Open access
Parr, Thomas, Benrimoh, David A., Vincent, Peter, Friston, Karl J.·2018·Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience

Abstract

Accurate perceptual inference fundamentally depends upon accurate beliefs about the reliability of sensory data. In this paper, we describe a Bayes optimal and biologically plausible scheme that refines these beliefs through a gradient descent on variational free energy. To illustrate this, we simulate belief updating during visual foraging and show that changes in estimated sensory precision (i.e., confidence in visual data) are highly sensitive to prior beliefs about the contents of a visual scene. In brief, confident prior beliefs induce an increase in estimated precision when consistent with sensory evidence, but a decrease when they conflict. Prior beliefs held with low confidence are rapidly updated to posterior beliefs, determined by sensory data. These induce much smaller changes in beliefs about sensory precision. We argue that pathologies of scene construction may be due to abnormal priors, and show that these can induce a reduction in estimated sensory precision. Having previously associated this precision with cholinergic signaling, we note that several neurodegenerative conditions are associated with visual disturbances and cholinergic deficits; notably, the synucleinopathies. On relating the message passing in our model to the functional anatomy of the ventral visual stream, we find that simulated neuronal loss in temporal lobe regions induces confident, inaccurate, empirical prior beliefs at lower levels in the visual hierarchy. This provides a plausible, if speculative, computational mechanism for the loss of cholinergic signaling and the visual disturbances associated with temporal lobe Lewy body pathology. This may be seen as an illustration of the sorts of hypotheses that may be expressed within this computational framework.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnint.2018.00039

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dopamine is proposed to encode precision weighting.

    “dopamine is proposed to encode precision weighting44”

    From Deviations in effective connectivity explain different hallucination subtypes in Parkinson's disease psychosis (2026) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Introduction associates sensory precision with acetylcholine, not dopamine. The only substantive dopamine passage, in Computational neuropathology, says impaired dopamine signaling might contribute to these disorders but does not link it to precision weighting. Searched the paper for “dopamine” and “dopamine precision weighting.” (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dauwels J. (2007). On variational message passing on factor graphs. Information Theory ISIT 2007 in IEEE International Symposium on, IEEE (Nice).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parr, T., Benrimoh, D. A., Vincent, P., & Friston, K. J.
Affiliations
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
Parr, Thomas
Venue
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
Published
2018-09-20
Volume
12
Pages
39-39
ISSN
1662-5145 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2890724683
Cited by
87
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Rosetrees Trust (173346)
  • Wellcome Trust (088130/Z/09/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Keywords
sensory precision, perceptual inference, variational free energy, Bayesian belief updating, prior beliefs, visual foraging, cholinergic neurotransmission, synucleinopathies, Lewy bodies, temporal lobe, ventral stream, message passing, neuronal loss, visual disturbances, computational models of perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review