Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 917

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 173 of the 173 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Considerations of Methodology, Application, and Safety

Open access
Patterson, Stephen D., Hughes, Luke, Warmington, Stuart, Burr, Jamie, Scott, Brendan R., Owens, Johnny, Abe, Takashi, Nielsen, Jakob L., Libardi, Cleiton Augusto, Laurentino, Gilberto, Neto, Gabriel Rodrigues, Brandner, Christopher, Martin-Hernandez, Juan, Loenneke, Jeremy·2019·Frontiers in Physiology
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2019.00533
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The current manuscript sets out a position stand for blood flow restriction (BFR) exercise, focusing on the methodology, application and safety of this mode of training. With the emergence of this technique and the wide variety of applications within the literature, the aim of this position stand is to set out a current research informed guide to BFR training to practitioners. This covers the use of BFR to enhance muscular strength and hypertrophy via training with resistance and aerobic exercise and preventing muscle atrophy using the technique passively. The authorship team for this article was selected from the researchers focused in BFR training research with expertise in exercise science, strength and conditioning and sports medicine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphys.2019.00533

Cites

173 of 173 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 917

Metadata

Authors
Patterson, S. D., Hughes, L., Warmington, S., Burr, J., Scott, B. R., Owens, J., Abe, T., Nielsen, J. L., Libardi, C. A., Laurentino, G., Neto, G. R., Brandner, C., Martin-Hernandez, J., & Loenneke, J.
Venue
Frontiers in Physiology
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2019-05-15
Volume
10
Pages
533-533
ISSN
1664-042X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3389/fphys.2019.00533
OpenAlex
W2944877286
Cited by
917
References
173
FWCI
88.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.