Cited by 210Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAction Observation and SynchronizationEmbodied and Extended Cognition

A predictive coding perspective on autism spectrum disorders

Open access
van Boxtel, Jeroen J. A., Lu, Hongjing·2013·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

GENERAL COMMENTARY article Front. Psychol., 28 January 2013Sec. Perception Science Volume 4 - 2013 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00019

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00019

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Predictive coding models of autism spectrum disorder postulate that individuals with autism spectrum disorder present impairments in high-level sensory perception (hypo-priors) rather than low-level sensory perception.

    “The latter finding is consistent with the predictive coding models of ASD (Pellicano and Burr, 2012; Van Boxtel and Lu, 2013), which postulate that individuals with ASD present impairments in high-level sensory perception (i.e., hypo-priors) rather than low-level sensory perception (Kern et al., 2007; Tavassoli et al., 2014).”

    From Predictive coding in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic transdiagnostic review. (2025) · cites this paper as Van Boxtel and Lu, 2013

    The paper’s discussion of exogenous attention links ASD to decreased high-level processing and less precise predictions, or “hypo-priors.” But its discussion of the predictive coding framework also says perceptual differences might arise from an attentional bias toward lower-level stimulus characteristics, rather than necessarily from malfunctioning higher-level areas. It therefore supports the hypo-prior account, not the categorical “rather than low-level” contrast. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the elaboration of the Bayesian brain hypothesis of ASD and subsequent theoretical papers, results from numerous earlier cognitive and psychophysical studies were re-interpreted post hoc in the novel framework.

    “In the elaboration of the Bayesian brain hypothesis of ASD (2) and subsequent theoretical papers (3, 4, 97–99), results from numerous earlier cognitive and psychophysical studies were re-interpreted post hoc in the novel framework.”
  • A rapidly gaining theory of autism spectrum disorder is that individuals with autism spectrum disorder lack a robust historical representation of the world, making it difficult to predict upcoming events.

    “A theory of ASD that is rapidly gaining credibility is the notion that individuals with ASD do not have a robust historical representation of the world. This lack of a probabilistic “map” of the world makes it difficult for those with ASD to predict upcoming events, and this lack of predictive coding thus limits interactions with the external environment (Pellicano and Burr, 2012; Sinha et al., 2”
  • Predictive coding, hypo-priors, Weak Central Coherence, and Enhanced Perceptual Functioning accounts characterize perception in ASD as under-utilizing top-down processes or over-functioning of bottom-up sensory processes.

    “Predictive coding, hypo-priors, Weak Central Coherence, and Enhanced Perceptual Functioning accounts characterize perception in ASD as under-utilizing top-down processes (context, prior knowledge, or global coherence) or over-functioning of bottom-up sensory processes (Pellicano and Burr, 2012, Van Boxtel and Lu, 2013, Van de Cruys et al., 2012, Lawson et al., 2014, Frith, 1989, Happe and Frith, 2”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Boxtel, J. J. A., & Lu, H.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2013
Volume
4
Pages
19-19
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030520068
Cited by
210
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5
FWCI
9.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
predictive coding, autism spectrum disorder, Bayesian brain, perceptual prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review