Cited by 54Personality Traits and PsychologyEmotions and Moral BehaviorSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Styles of Leadership, Fears of Compassion, and Competing to Avoid Inferiority

Open access
Basran, Jaskaran, Pires, Claudia, Matos, Marcela, McEwan, Kirsten, Gilbert, Paul·2019·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

There is general agreement that styles of leadership evolved from mammalian group living strategies that form social ranks. In both non-human primates and humans, different styles of hierarchical dominant-subordinate and leader-follower behavior can be observed. These can be described in terms of dimensions of antisocial (relatively self-focused, aggressive and threat-based) and prosocial (relatively empathic, caring, and supportive) interpersonal styles. The aim of this study was to explore how a set of established self-report questionnaires might relate to these two dimensions. Two hundred and nineteen students completed questionnaires assessing ruthless self-advancement, coalition building, and dominant leadership styles, as well as hypercompetitiveness, narcissism, striving to avoid inferiority, compassion focused and ego focused goals, fears of compassion, social safeness and attachment (in)security. A principal component analysis supported an antisocial leadership style factor which comprised of ruthless self-advancement, narcissism and hypercompetitiveness. This was significantly correlated with fears of compassion, ego focused goals, insecure striving (striving to avoid inferiority), fears of losing out, fears of being overlooked, fears of being rejected, and avoidant relating in close relationships. It was significantly negatively correlated with compassionate goals. As the results did not reveal a clear factor solution for a prosocial leadership style, we chose to use the coalition building leadership style variable. This showed the opposite pattern, being significantly negatively correlated with narcissism, hypercompetitiveness, fears of compassion, fears of active rejection, and avoidance in close relationships. It was significantly positively correlated with secure striving, compassionate goals, and social safeness. We also found that fears of compassion for others was a partial mediator of the relationship between insecure striving with antisocial leadership style. Moreover, lower fears of compassion for the self emerged as a key mediator for the relationship between non-avoidant attachment with coalition building leadership style and, secure non-striving with coalition building leadership style. While the motive to accumulate social power, resources and dominance may be linked to antisocial forms of leadership, the intensity of the drive may also be linked to unaddressed threats and fears of rejection and fears of compassion. Efforts to promote more ethical, moral and prosocial forms of leadership may falter if such fears are left unaddressed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02460

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Antisocial leadership is fearful of offering compassion to others and resistant to compassion.

    “Antisocial leadership is fearful of offering compassion to others and resistance to compassion”

    From Whither compassionate leadership? A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Basran et al. (2019)

  • Prosocial leadership is associated with coalition building, secure striving, compassionate goals and feeling socially safe.

    “Prosocial leadership is associated with coalition building, secure striving, compassionate goals and feeling socially safe”

    From Whither compassionate leadership? A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Basran et al. (2019)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Barkow J. H. (1989). Darwin, Sex and Status: Biological Approaches to Mind and Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  2. Byrne B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modelling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, 2nd Edn New York, NY: Routledge Academic.
  3. Ewest T. (2017). Prosocial Leadership: Understanding the Development of Prosocial Behavior Within Leaders and Their Organizational Settings. New York. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Lindholm C. (1993). Charisma. London: Wiley.
  5. West M. A. Chowla R. (2017). “Compassionate leadership and compassionate healthcare,” in Compassion: Concepts, Research and Applications, ed. Gilbert P. (London: Routledge).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Basran, J., Pires, C., Matos, M., McEwan, K., & Gilbert, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Derby (GB)
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
Corresponding author
Gilbert, Paul
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2019-01-22
Volume
9
Pages
2460-2460
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2910909748
Cited by
54
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
leadership styles, prosocial leadership, narcissism, coalition building, compassion, insecure attachment, social safeness, compassionate goals, fear of rejection, attachment avoidance, social hierarchy, self-report questionnaire

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review