Cited by 213COVID-19 and Mental HealthCommunication and COVID-19 ImpactMedia Influence and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 89 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Media for Coping During COVID-19 Social Distancing: Stress, Anxiety, and Psychological Well-Being

Open access

Abstract

In spring 2020, COVID-19 and the ensuing social distancing and stay-at-home orders instigated abrupt changes to employment and educational infrastructure, leading to uncertainty, concern, and stress among United States college students. The media consumption patterns of this and other social groups across the globe were affected, with early evidence suggesting viewers were seeking both pandemic-themed media and reassuring, familiar content. A general increase in media consumption, and increased consumption of specific types of content, may have been due to media use for coping strategies. This paper examines the relationship between the stress and anxiety of university students and their strategic use of media for coping during initial social distancing periods in March-April 2020 using data from a cross-sectional survey. We examine links between specific types of media use with psychological well-being concepts, and examine the moderating roles of traits (hope, optimism, and resilience) as buffers against negative relationships between stress and anxiety and psychological well-being. Our findings indicate that stress was linked to more hedonic and less eudaimonic media use, as well as more avoidant and escapist media-based coping. Anxiety, on the other hand, was linked to more media use in general, specifically more eudaimonic media use and a full range of media-based coping strategies. In turn, escapist media was linked to negative affect, while reframing media and eudaimonic media were linked to positive affect. Avoidant coping was tied to poorer mental health, and humor coping was tied to better mental health. Hedonic and need-satisfying media use were linked to more flourishing. Hope, optimism, and resilience were all predictive of media use, with the latter two traits moderating responses to stress and anxiety. The findings give a nuanced portrait of college students’ media use during a pandemic-induced shutdown, showing that media use is closely intertwined with well-being in both adaptive and maladaptive patterns.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a cross-sectional survey of 425 U.S. university students during initial COVID-19 social distancing, stress and anxiety were linked to distinct patterns of media use for coping, with some strategies associated with better and others with worse well-being. Media use partially mediated these relationships, and trait optimism, hope, and resilience moderated several paths.

Key findings

  • Stress was associated with more hedonic media use (β = .129, p < .05) and less eudaimonic media use (β = −.167, p < .05), as well as more avoidant (β = .128, p < .05) and escapist (β = .133, p < .05) media coping. Anxiety was associated with more media exposure (β = .160, p < .05), more eudaimonic media use (β = .159, p < .05), and all five media-coping dimensions, including problem-focused (β = .263, p < .001), avoidant (β = .364, p < .001), escapist (β = .424, p < .001), reframing (β = .233, p < .001), and humor coping (β = .238, p < .001).
  • Escapist coping was associated with less positive affect (β = −.162, p < .001), avoidant coping with lower mental health (β = −.157, p < .001), and reframing coping with more positive affect (β = .136, p < .01); humor coping was associated with higher mental health (β = .106, p < .01). Hedonic media (β = .157, p < .001) and media need satisfaction (β = .180, p < .001) were associated with more flourishing, and eudaimonic media with more positive affect (β = .094, p < .05).
  • Mediation tests found reframing coping suppressed anxiety’s effect on affect (β = .032, SE = .013, 95% CI [.009, .061]), humor coping suppressed anxiety’s effect on mental health (β = .025, SE = .012, 95% CI [.006, .051]), and eudaimonic media suppressed anxiety’s effects on affect (β = .015, SE = .009, 95% CI [.001, .036]) and flourishing (β = .015, SE = .010, 95% CI [.000, .037]). Negative indirect effects appeared for escapist coping on affect and avoidant coping on mental health.
  • Optimism, hope, and resilience showed main effects and moderation: optimism negatively predicted avoidant coping and positively predicted affect, mental health, and flourishing; hope positively predicted media exposure, several coping styles, and flourishing; resilience negatively predicted escapist and humor coping and positively predicted affect and mental health. Optimism and resilience moderated stress-to-coping paths, and moderated mediation was found for optimism and resilience via reframing, avoidant, humor, and escapist coping.

Methods

  • Cross-sectional survey of students at two American universities that canceled face-to-face instruction the week of March 9, 2020; data collected March 23–April 17, 2020. After screening, N = 425 (M age = 20.19, SD = 2.18; 68.5% women).
  • Measures included the 14-item Perceived Stress Scale, 7-item GAD-7, self-reported media exposure across 12 media types, a 28-item Brief COPE adapted to media use, hedonic and eudaimonic media motivations, intrinsic need satisfaction via media, trait optimism, hope, resilience, and outcomes of affect, mental health, and flourishing.
  • Analyses included descriptive statistics and correlations, exploratory factor analysis of media coping, hierarchical regression models, and parallel mediation/moderation tests using PROCESS with 10,000 bootstrap samples.

Limitations

  • Stated by the authors: the cross-sectional design cannot establish causal direction; the non-probability sample from two large public universities is not representative of all U.S. college students; self-reported media use may inflate relationships with well-being; the measure did not capture media multitasking or separate multitasking from solo media use; some effect sizes were small; and multiple testing of mediators and moderators may have inflated alpha error.
  • Evident from the text: the sample was predominantly women (68.5%) and White/Caucasian (78.1%), which further limits generalizability beyond the authors’ stated non-representativeness.
  • Evident from the text: several findings rely on small effects and near-zero estimates, and the authors caution against overinterpreting them without replication in larger samples.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577639

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 89 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 167 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 54
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 46
88 of 88
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Whether trait resilience patterns apply to media use for coping has not yet been demonstrated.

    “Whether these patterns also apply to media use for coping, however, has not yet been demonstrated.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Stress and anxiety are important factors in psychological well-being more generally.

    “On the contrary, stress and anxiety are important factors in psychological well-being more generally.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The stress and anxiety reported by students resulted from the COVID-19 situation and associated social distancing.

    “acute stress and anxiety resulting from the COVID-19 situation were associated with an increased tendency to use media as a coping tool”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The COVID-19 crisis and ensuing social distancing policies impacted people all around the globe.

    “the COVID-19 crisis and the ensuing policies of social distancing and mass closures impacted people all around the globe.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Psychological well-being variables (affect, mental health, and flourishing) are outcomes of media use.

    “our theoretically grounded model conceptualizes psychological well-being variables (affect, mental health, and flourishing) as outcomes of media use”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Media exposure scores may in many cases reflect the accumulation of multiple media used concurrently.

    “We believe that the media exposure scores in our data may in many cases reflect the accumulation of multiple media which were used concurrently.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Mental-health scores exceed the stated response scale

    Major

    The mental-health measure is described as running from 1 to 4, but Table 1 reports an observed maximum of 5.00.

  • Claim that all traits positively predicted all well-being outcomes conflicts with Table 6

    Minor

    Table 6 reports a negative coefficient for hope predicting mental health and no statistically significant coefficients for hope predicting affect or resilience predicting flourishing. It therefore does not support the claim that all three traits positively predicted all three outcomes.

  • Descriptions of reframing effects for pessimists conflict

    Minor

    One passage says reframing had more negative effects on affect for more pessimistic individuals; the discussion instead describes its effects on their affective states as helpful.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 86 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Gold, 2020, Netflix and YouTube are Slowing Down in Europe to Keep the Internet From Breaking.
  2. Hess, 2020, How Coronavirus Dramatically Changed College for Over 14 Million Students.
  3. Hudd, 2000, Stress at college: effects omn health habits, health status and self-esteem., Coll. Student J., 34, 217
  4. 2020, COVID-19: Tracking the Impact on the Entertainment Industry.
  5. Müller, 2016, Excessive and addictive use of the internet: prevalence, related contents, predictors, and psychological consequences, The Routledge Handbook of Media Use and Well-Being: International Perspectives on Theory and Research on Positive Media Effects, 223
  6. Sutton, 2020, Pandemic-Related Programming Surges on Netflix Amid Coronavirus Spread.
  7. Szalai, 2020, Netflix Agrees to Limit Streaming Traffic in Europe to Ease Coronavirus-Related Congestion.
  8. Weissbrot, 2020, Daytime is Streaming Time: TV Viewing Habits in the Time of COVID-19.
  9. 2020, Coronavirus: Impact on Young People With Mental Health Needs.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–213 of 213

Metadata

Authors
Eden, A. L., Johnson, B. K., Reinecke, L., & Grady, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Eden, Allison L.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2020-12-18
Volume
11
Pages
577639-577639
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3112675699
Cited by
204
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 32
FWCI
11.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, social distancing, stress, anxiety, psychological well-being, university students, avoidance coping, coping humor, hope, optimism, resilience, eudaimonia, positive and negative affect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review