Cited by 272Iron Metabolism and DisordersFerroptosis and cancer prognosisImmune cells in cancer

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 169 of the 180 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 164 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Iron as a Central Player and Promising Target in Cancer Progression

Open access
Jung, Michaela, Mertens, Christina, Tomat, Elisa, Brüne, Bernhard·2019·International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Abstract

Iron is an essential element for virtually all organisms. On the one hand, it facilitates cell proliferation and growth. On the other hand, iron may be detrimental due to its redox abilities, thereby contributing to free radical formation, which in turn may provoke oxidative stress and DNA damage. Iron also plays a crucial role in tumor progression and metastasis due to its major function in tumor cell survival and reprogramming of the tumor microenvironment. Therefore, pathways of iron acquisition, export, and storage are often perturbed in cancers, suggesting that targeting iron metabolic pathways might represent opportunities towards innovative approaches in cancer treatment. Recent evidence points to a crucial role of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) as a source of iron within the tumor microenvironment, implying that specifically targeting the TAM iron pool might add to the efficacy of tumor therapy. Here, we provide a brief summary of tumor cell iron metabolism and updated molecular mechanisms that regulate cellular and systemic iron homeostasis with regard to the development of cancer. Since iron adds to shaping major hallmarks of cancer, we emphasize innovative therapeutic strategies to address the iron pool of tumor cells or cells of the tumor microenvironment for the treatment of cancer.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that iron metabolism is reprogrammed in cancer to support proliferation, survival, metastasis, and tumor microenvironment crosstalk, with tumor-associated macrophages acting as iron donors. It highlights therapeutic opportunities including hepcidin/FPN modulation, Tf/TfR targeting, iron chelators, and ferroptosis induction, while noting major clinical validation gaps.

Key findings

  • Iron is essential but redox-active; the Fenton reaction produces hydroxyl radicals, causing DNA strand breaks and protein/lipid modifications, while iron-dependent lipid peroxidation drives ferroptosis via glutathione depletion and GPX4 inactivation.
  • Cancer cells often increase iron uptake/storage and decrease export: high TfR1, FTL, and IRP-2 correlate with poor prognosis, higher tumor grade, and chemoresistance; low FPN correlates with worse survival, whereas higher FPN correlates with better outcome. Anemia is detected in approximately 40–70% of all cancer patients, linked to TNF-α/IL-6 and iron restriction.
  • Tumor-associated macrophages can adopt an iron-release/donor phenotype, including via Lcn-2 and independently of FPN, supporting tumor cell proliferation and growth; anti-inflammatory macrophages show CD163/CD91, HO-1, upregulated FPN, and reduced FT. Excess heme or iron may shift macrophages toward a pro-inflammatory, anti-tumoral phenotype.
  • Therapeutic strategies discussed include targeting hepcidin (antibodies/aptamers, BMP/SMAD, IL-6/STAT3), FPN stabilizers, anti-TfR antibodies and drug conjugates, ferritin nanocages, Lcn-2/siderophore pathways, iron chelators (DFO, DFX, Triapine, VLX600), and ferroptosis inducers; no iron chelator used clinically for iron overload has been approved for cancer.

Methods

  • Narrative review; no primary experimental data or systematic search is described. It synthesizes published literature on tumor cell iron metabolism, systemic iron homeostasis, TAM biology, and iron-targeting therapies.
  • Main analysis is thematic and descriptive, citing mechanistic studies, animal models, and clinical trials; it includes a summary table of pre-clinical studies and clinical trials (Table 1) and a scheme of tumor iron exploitation (Figure 1).

Limitations

  • Stated: prospective clinical data for targeting hepcidin are still missing; lack of long-term follow-up studies in cancer patients makes efficacy and safety difficult to predict; no clinically used iron chelator has obtained approval for the cancer setting; targeting iron in the tumor microenvironment remains largely unexplored.
  • Stated: mechanisms of Lcn-2 iron handling remain unclear, including how tumor cells selectively take up iron-loaded versus iron-free Lcn-2.
  • Evident: as a narrative review, it does not use a systematic search, risk-of-bias assessment, or quantitative synthesis, so conclusions depend on the selected cited literature.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijms20020273

Cites

169 of 169 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 164 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 82 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 39
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 15
52 of 52
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Iron is essential for virtually all organisms.

    “Iron is an essential element for virtually all organisms.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Iron is a growth-limiting factor for virtually all organisms.

    “Iron is the most abundant element by mass on the Earth and is a growth-limiting factor for virtually all organisms.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no excretory route for excess iron.

    “Considering the poor bioavailability of iron, the interplay of different proteins involved in iron import, storage, and export has to be tightly regulated, as there is no excretory route for excess iron.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings from mouse models of cancer translate to human cancer.

    “Mice fed a low-iron diet prior to implanting tumor cells showed significantly delayed tumor growth [22].”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In vitro findings about iron handling translate to in vivo tumor behavior.

    “This iron-donating macrophage phenotype was directly linked to enhanced tumor cell proliferation and growth, both in vitro and in vivo [64,66,67,70,71,72].”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Opposite associations reported for ferroportin and patient outcome

    Minor

    The paper first says ferroportin expression is inversely correlated with survival and disease outcome, but then says increased ferroportin expression correlates with better patient outcome.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 180 references

11 of the 180 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 272

Metadata

Authors
Jung, M., Mertens, C., Tomat, E., & Brüne, B.
Affiliations
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Brüne, Bernhard
Venue
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-01-11
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
273
ISSN
1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2910083100
Cited by
268
References
180
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 12
FWCI
6.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB815)
  • Wilhelm Sander-Stiftung (2017.130.1)
  • National Institutes of Health (GM127646)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
Keywords
iron metabolism, tumor progression, tumor microenvironment, tumor-associated macrophages, iron homeostasis, oxidative stress, metastasis, iron acquisition, iron export, iron storage, cancer therapy, redox biology
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, DNA Damage, Humans, Iron, Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Oxidative Stress, Disease Progression, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Tumor Microenvironment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review