Cited by 355Wireless Power Transfer SystemsWireless Body Area NetworksInduction Heating and Inverter Technology

Wireless power transfer techniques for implantable medical devices: a review

Open access
Khan, Sadeque Reza, Pavuluri, Sumanth Kumar, Cummins, Gerard, Desmulliez, Marc P. Y.·2020·Sensors

Abstract

Wireless power transfer (WPT) systems have become increasingly suitable solutions for the electrical powering of advanced multifunctional micro-electronic devices such as those found in current biomedical implants. The design and implementation of high power transfer efficiency WPT systems are, however, challenging. The size of the WPT system, the separation distance between the outside environment and location of the implanted medical device inside the body, the operating frequency and tissue safety due to power dissipation are key parameters to consider in the design of WPT systems. This article provides a systematic review of the wide range of WPT systems that have been investigated over the last two decades to improve overall system performance. The various strategies implemented to transfer wireless power in implantable medical devices (IMDs) were reviewed, which includes capacitive coupling, inductive coupling, magnetic resonance coupling and, more recently, acoustic and optical powering methods. The strengths and limitations of all these techniques are benchmarked against each other and particular emphasis is placed on comparing the implanted receiver size, the WPT distance, power transfer efficiency and tissue safety presented by the resulting systems. Necessary improvements and trends of each WPT techniques are also indicated per specific IMD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s20123487

Cites

209 of 209 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A coupling coefficient k closer to 1 maximizes energy transfer and minimizes potential thermal damage to neural tissues.

    “A value closer to 1 not only maximizes energy transfer but also minimizes potential thermal damage to neural tissues—a concern for BMIs requiring high computational power for real-time neural decoding (Haerinia and Shadid, 2020; Khan et al., 2020).”

    From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Khan et al., 2020

    Section 3.2.5 gives a power-transfer-efficiency equation that increases with the coupling coefficient k, supporting the energy-transfer part of the claim. The paper discusses tissue damage from high operating frequencies in Section 2.2 and reports absorption rates for brain implants in Section 4.4.1, but it does not say that bringing k closer to 1 minimizes thermal damage to neural tissue. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A capacitive coupling system utilizes a closed current loop and relies on the displacement current between conductor plates to establish wireless power transfer across tissue layers.

    “This system utilizes a closed current loop and relies on the displacement current, IDisp., between the conductor plates to establish wireless power transfer across tissue layers (Khan et al., 2020).”

    From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Khan et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 219 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [18]Basaeri H. Christensen D.B. Roundy S. A review of acoustic power transfer for bio-medical implants Smart Mater. Struct. 2016 25 123001 10.1088/0964-1726/25/12/123001 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [74]Sadiku N. Elements of Electromagnetics Sounders College Press Orlando, FL, USA 1994 9780511841040
  3. [173]Pozar D. Microwave Engineering Fourth Edition Wiley Hoboken, NJ, USA 2005 9780470631553
  4. [175]Volakis J. Chen C.-C. Fujimoto K. Small Antennas: Miniaturization Techniques & Applications McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing New York, NY, USA 2010 0071625542
  5. [176]Gustafsson M. Tayli D. Cismasu M. Physical Bounds of Antennas Springer Singapore 2015 1 32
  6. [179]Yaghjian A.D. Best S.R. Impedance, bandwidth, and Q of antennas Proceedings of the IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. Digest. Held in Conjunction with: USNC/CNC/URSI North American Radio Sci. Meeting (Cat. No.03CH37450) Columbus, OH, USA 22–27 June 2003 Volume 1 501 504
  7. [199]Nakamura K. Ultrasonic Transducers: Materials and Design for Sensors, Actuators and Medical Applications Woodhead Publishing Cambridge, UK 2012 9780857096302
  8. [210]Hoskins P. Martin K. Thrush A. Diagnostic Ultrasound: Physics and Equipment Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 2010 9780521757102
  9. [217]Sze S.M. Ng K.K. Physics of Semiconductor Devices John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken, NJ, USA 2006 9780470068328

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khan, S. R., Pavuluri, S. K., Cummins, G., & Desmulliez, M. P. Y.
Affiliations
  • Heriot-Watt University (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Khan, Sadeque Reza
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-06-19
Volume
20
Issue
12
Pages
3487
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036329699
Cited by
355
References
219
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 6
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/K034537/2)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Power Transfer Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Induction Heating and Inverter Technology
Keywords
wireless power transfer, biomedical implants, inductive coupling, magnetic resonance coupling, capacitive coupling, power transfer efficiency, tissue safety, separation distance, operating frequency
MeSH terms
Electronics, Electric Power Supplies, Prostheses and Implants, Wireless Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review