Cited by 210Regulation of Appetite and ObesityNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

Relative ability of fat and sugar tastes to activate reward, gustatory, and somatosensory regions

Open access
Stice, Eric, Burger, Kyle S, Yokum, Sonja·2013·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Although the intake of high-fat and high-sugar food activates mesolimbic reward, gustatory, and oral somatosensory brain regions, contributing to overeating, few studies have examined the relative role of fat and sugar in the activation of these brain regions, which would inform policy, prevention, and treatment interventions designed to reduce obesity.Objective We evaluated the effect of a high-fat or high-sugar equicaloric chocolate milkshake and increasing fat or sugar milkshake content on the activation of these regions.Design Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the neural response to the intake of high-fat/high-sugar, high-fat/low-sugar, low-fat/high-sugar, and low-fat/low-sugar chocolate milkshakes and a tasteless solution in 106 lean adolescents (mean ± SD age = 15.00 ± 0.88 y). Analyses contrasted the activation to the various milkshakes.Results High-fat compared with high-sugar equicaloric milkshakes caused greater activation in the bilateral caudate, postcentral gyrus, hippocampus, and inferior frontal gyrus. High-sugar compared with high-fat equicaloric milkshakes caused greater activation in the bilateral insula extending into the putamen, the Rolandic operculum, and thalamus, which produced large activation regions. Increasing sugar in low-fat milkshakes caused greater activation in the bilateral insula and Rolandic operculum; increasing fat content did not elicit greater activation in any region.Conclusions Fat caused greater activation of the caudate and oral somatosensory regions than did sugar, sugar caused greater activation in the putamen and gustatory regions than did fat, increasing sugar caused greater activity in gustatory regions, and increasing fat did not affect the activation. Results imply that sugar more effectively recruits reward and gustatory regions, suggesting that policy, prevention, and treatment interventions should prioritize reductions in sugar intake. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as DK092468.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.113.069443

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Thesen S, Heid O, Mueller E, Schad LR. Prospective acquisition correction for head motion with image-based tracking for real-time fMRI. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:457-65.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stice, E., Burger, K. S., & Yokum, S.
Affiliations
Oregon Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Stice, Eric
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
98
Issue
6
Pages
1377-1384
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166248476
Cited by
210
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Oregon
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK080760, R01DK080760, R01DK092468, DK092468)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Keywords
fat taste, sugar taste, food reward, gustatory processing, caudate nucleus, insula, putamen, rolandic operculum, thalamus, hippocampus, adolescents, obesity prevention, sugar-sweetened beverages
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Beverages, Brain Mapping, Caudate Nucleus, Dairy Products, Dietary Fats, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neurons, Oregon, Reward, Sensation, Somatosensory Cortex, Taste, Dietary Sucrose, Taste Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review