Cited by 191Eating Disorders and BehaviorsRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The role of reward circuitry and food addiction in the obesity epidemic: An update

Leigh, Sarah-Jane, Morris, Margaret J.·2018·Biological Psychology

Abstract

The increasing worldwide prevalence of obesity is partially related to the ready availability of highly palatable foods which increases the incidence of hedonic, non-homeostatic feeding. The "food addiction" hypothesis postulates that exposure to these foods alters the brain's reward circuitry, driving an addiction-like behavioural phenotype of compulsive overeating. This review highlights recent evidence that examines changes in the mesolimbic dopaminergic circuit, the primary component of the reward system, associated with exposure to highly palatable foods and obesity. The majority of obesity studies in animals have not measured addictive-like behaviours, but reports of such behaviours have been restricted to experiments using models of binge eating. Where examined, the prevalence of addiction-like behaviour in overweight and obese subjects indicates that 10-25% of the population meets the Yale Food Addiction Score criteria. There is considerable overlap in the behaviours ascribed to food addiction and binge eating disorder, and food addiction scores correlate highly with measures of binge eating. We feel that more research is required in humans to determine whether food addiction is both behaviourally and neurobiologically distinct from binge eating disorder. While the reward circuitry is clearly affected by both highly palatable foods and diet-induced obesity in a similar manner to short and long exposure to drugs of abuse, the challenge for the future is to show that these neurobiological changes are associated with addiction-like behaviour.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.12.013

Cites

205 of 205 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leigh, S.-J., & Morris, M. J.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Morris, Margaret J.
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
131
Pages
31-42
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2563821226
Cited by
191
References
205
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia to MJM
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
food addiction, obesity, reward systems, mesolimbic dopamine system, highly palatable food, binge eating, binge eating disorder, compulsive eating, Yale Food Addiction Scale, diet-induced obesity
MeSH terms
Food Addiction, Animals, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Reward, Binge-Eating Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review