The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Principles of Scientific Management, The
Abstract
This brief essay by the founder of scientific management has served for nearly a century as a primer for administrators and for students of managerial techniques. Although scientific management was developed primarily as a system for increasing productivity in industry, its principles have been applied to all kinds of large-scale enterprises, including operations with departments and agencies of the federal government. It is in this volume that Frederick Winslow Taylor gave the theory of scientific management its clearest airing. Born in 1856, Taylor began work at age eighteen as an apprentice to a pattern-maker and as a machinist. A few years later he joined the Midvale Steel Company as a laborer, and in eight years rose to chief engineer. During this time he developed and tested what he called the task system, which became known as the Taylor System and eventually as scientific management. He made careful experiments to determine the best way of performing each operation and the amount of time it required, analyzing the materials, tools, and work sequence, and establishing a clear division of labor between management and workers. His experiments laid the groundwork for the principles that are expounded in this essay, which was first published in 1911.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321 · Cited by 2,994
Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0223 · Cited by 1,631
Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices
Edmans, A. (2011) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.021 · Cited by 2,511
Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives
Locke, E. A. (1968) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(68)90004-4 · Cited by 2,409
Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332 · Cited by 2,303
Leonardi, P. M. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23043493 · Cited by 1,889
Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic ‘Remedies’ for Trust/Distrust
Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.4.3.367 · Cited by 1,545
Accounting and the construction of the governable person
Miller, P., & O'Leary, T. (1987) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(87)90039-0 · Cited by 1,505
Followership theory: A review and research agenda
Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R. E., Lowe, K. B., & Carsten, M. K. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.007 · Cited by 1,213
Ensley, M. D., Hmieleski, K. M., & Pearce, C. L. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.002 · Cited by 820
Integrating Theories of Motivation
Steel, P., & König, C. J. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.22527462 · Cited by 776
Humans and Technology: Forms of Conjoined Agency in Organizations
Murray, A., Rhymer, J., & Sirmon, D. G. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0186 · Cited by 518
A balance theory of job design for stress reduction
Smith, M. J., & Sainfort, P. C. (1989) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0169-8141(89)90051-6 · Cited by 488
Office procedure as practical action: models of work and system design
Suchman, L. A. (1983) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/357442.357445 · Cited by 450
Campbell, M., Snowdon, C., Francis, D., Elbourne, D., McDonald, A., Knight, R., Entwistle, V, Garcia, J., Roberts, I., Grant, A., et al. (2007) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta11480 · Cited by 433
Nabatchi, T. (2010) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074009356467 · Cited by 321
Why (we think) facilitation works: insights from organizational learning theory
Berta, W., Cranley, L., Dearing, J. W., Dogherty, E. J., Squires, J. E., & Estabrooks, C. A. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0323-0 · Cited by 286
The Denial of Slavery in Management Studies
Cooke, B. (2003) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00405.x · Cited by 308
Innovation labs in the public sector: what they are and what they do?
Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2017) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1287939 · Cited by 266
Measuring knowledge worker productivity: A taxonomy
Ramírez, Y. W., & Nembhard, D. A. (2004) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/14691930410567040 · Cited by 255
The advantages and challenges of neurodiversity employment in organizations
Krzeminska, A., Austin, R. D., Bruyère, S. M., & Hedley, D. (2019) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2019.58 · Cited by 222
Developing compassionate leadership in health care: an integrative review
de Zulueta, P. (2015) · Journal of Healthcare Leadership · doi:10.2147/jhl.s93724 · Cited by 203
A critical review of the arguments against the use of rubrics
Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2020) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100329 · Cited by 191
Does time management work? A meta-analysis
Aeon, B., Faber, A., & Panaccio, A. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0245066 · Cited by 172
‘Decolonising the university curriculum’
L, L. G. (2016) · South African Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.20853/30-2-709 · Cited by 159
Agroecology as a vehicle for contributive justice
Timmermann, C., & Félix, G. F. (2015) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-014-9581-8 · Cited by 153
Sequential Variety in Work Processes
Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.5.528.16760 · Cited by 152
Examining Crowd Work and Gig Work Through The Historical Lens of Piecework
Alkhatib, A., Bernstein, M. S., & Levi, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025974 · Cited by 148
Complexity Theory: A New Way to Look at Organizational Change
Grobman, G. (2005) · Public Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/073491490502900305 · Cited by 140
Kaufman, B. E. (2010) · ILR Review · doi:10.1177/001979391006400104 · Cited by 122
Three Faces of Human-Computer Interaction
Grudin, J. (2005) · IEEE Annals of the History of Computing · doi:10.1109/mahc.2005.67 · Cited by 118
Goshime, Y., Kitaw, D., & Jilcha, K. (2019) · International Journal of Lean Six Sigma · doi:10.1108/ijlss-06-2017-0063 · Cited by 112
Locke, R. M., & Romis, M. (2010) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290902893230 · Cited by 93
Wang, G., Van Iddekinge, C. H., Zhang, L., & Bishoff, J. (2019) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000345 · Cited by 92
Human resource management applications of knowledge-based systems
Martinsons, M. G. (1997) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/s0268-4012(96)00041-2 · Cited by 73
Ideology in HRM Scholarship: Interrogating the Ideological Performativity of ‘New Unitarism’
Greenwood, M., & Van Buren, H. J. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3084-z · Cited by 66
Manokha, I. (2020) · Surveillance & Society · doi:10.24908/ss.v18i4.13776 · Cited by 66
Kolthoff, E., Erakovich, R., & Lasthuizen, K. (2010) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/09513551011078879 · Cited by 63
(2010) · University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) · Cited by 47
History of Educational Leadership/Management
Bates, R. (2010) · International Encyclopedia of Education · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-044894-7.00412-7 · Cited by 32
Liao, K., & Tu, Q. (2007) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/17410380810843444 · Cited by 30
Renegotiating Public Value with Co-Production
Cordella, A., Paletti, A., & Shaikh, M. (2018) · Oxford Scholarship Online · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198816225.003.0008 · Cited by 15
Birken, T., Pelizaus-Hoffmeister, H., & Schweiger, P. (2016) · 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2016.78 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Venue
- The SAGE Encyclopedia of Economics and Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 2015
- OpenAlex
- W1579517781
- Cited by
- 5,038
- References
- 0
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.