The DOI matches its DataCite record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement
Open accessAbstract
We present some updates to YOLO! We made a bunch of little design changes to make it better. We also trained this new network that's pretty swell. It's a little bigger than last time but more accurate. It's still fast though, don't worry. At 320x320 YOLOv3 runs in 22 ms at 28.2 mAP, as accurate as SSD but three times faster. When we look at the old .5 IOU mAP detection metric YOLOv3 is quite good. It achieves 57.9 mAP@50 in 51 ms on a Titan X, compared to 57.5 mAP@50 in 198 ms by RetinaNet, similar performance but 3.8x faster. As always, all the code is online at https://pjreddie.com/yolo/
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“outperforming previous best detector [45] by 4 AP while being 2.7x smaller and using 7.4x fewer FLOPs.”
From EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detection (2019) · cites this paper as [45]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In general, the analyses show that the YOLO family [52,71,104,112] of network architectures and MobileNet and its derivative-based [40,53] and EfficientNet-Lite [56] backbones are very suitable for deployment with a lower number of parameters while retaining higher performance.”
From A survey on deep learning-based monocular spacecraft pose estimation: Current state, limitations and prospects (2023) · cites this paper as [104]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Later, CE loss (CrossEntropy) is typically used [21, 23, 47].”
From Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“On relatively low-accuracy regime, our EfficientDet-D0 achieves similar accuracy as YOLOv3 with 28x fewer FLOPs.”
From EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detection (2019) · cites this paper as [34]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“When applying the proposed quantization method to representative one-stage object detectors, You Only Look Once v3 and v4 (YOLOv3 and YOLOv4), detection accuracy similar to the original networks ( i.e. , YOLOv3 and YOLOv4) with a single-precision oating-point format (32-bit) is maintained despite expressing weights with only about 20% of the bits compared to a single-precision oating-point”
From Zero-Centered Fixed-Point Quantization With Iterative Retraining for Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Object Detectors (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“YOLOv3 [33], addressed the shortcomings observed in its predecessors by concentrating on rectifying localisation errors and optimising detection efficiency, particularly for smaller objects.”
From YOLOv1 to v8: Unveiling Each Variant–A Comprehensive Review of YOLO (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The third version of YOLO tries to overcome aforementioned drawbacks and provides an efficient way for detecting objects with an improved performance while trained and evaluated on the COCO dataset [55].”
From Object detection using YOLO: challenges, architectural successors, datasets and applications (2023) · cites this paper as [55]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Under similar accuracy constraint, our EfficientDet uses 28x fewer FLOPs than YOLOv3 [34], 30x fewer FLOPs than RetinaNet [24], and 19x fewer FLOPs than the recent ResNet based NAS-FPN [10].”
From EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detection (2019) · cites this paper as [34]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“On high-accuracy regime, our EfficientDet also consistently outperforms recent object detectors [10, 45] with much fewer parameters and FLOPs.”
From EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detection (2019) · cites this paper as [45]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“the YOLO series models v2-v5 [144-147] are some of the most advanced object detection methods based on DNN, which have good performance in terms of speed and precision.”
From A survey of model compression strategies for object detection (2023) · cites this paper as [146]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The proposed technique can be easily applied to various object detectors including YOLOv3 [10] and YOLOv4 [11].”
From Zero-Centered Fixed-Point Quantization With Iterative Retraining for Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Object Detectors (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The proposed technique can be easily applied to various object detectors including YOLOv3 [10] and YOLOv4 [11].”
From Zero-Centered Fixed-Point Quantization With Iterative Retraining for Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Object Detectors (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, [73] used Faster R-CNN [84] and YOLOv3 [25] to detect cars for traffic monitoring purpose.”
From A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System (2022) · cites this paper as [25]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Results increased over base YOLOv3 [25], Faster R-CNN [84] and SSD [82] frameworks.”
From A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System (2022) · cites this paper as [25]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Nonetheless, this strategy provides scarce performance when compared with SSD [82], You Only Look Once (YOLO)9000 [83], and YOLOv3 [25] frameworks.”
From A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System (2022) · cites this paper as [25]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The OD approaches most explored seem to be those that emerged from the beginning (year 2015) such as YOLO versions [23-26], SSD [27], and Faster R-CNN [33].”
From Ten Years of Active Learning Techniques and Object Detection: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [25]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Compared to other algorithms, YOLO V3 offers a good equilibrium between speed and accuracy and can detect objects at three different scales.”
From Edge-Computing Video Analytics for Real-Time Traffic Monitoring in a Smart City (2019) · cites this paper as [37]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“For example, the latest AmoebaNet-based NASFPN detector [45] requires 167M parameters and 3045B FLOPs (30x more than RetinaNet [24]) to achieve state-ofthe-art accuracy.”
From EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detection (2019) · cites this paper as [45]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Compared to YOLOv3-tiny [10], Gaussian YOLOv3-tiny [13], and Nayak et al. [41], the weight size of the proposed network is approximately one-third larger, but the mAP of the proposed network is much higher than that of YOLOv3-tiny [10], Gaussian YOLOv3-tiny [13], and Nayak et al. [41] by 21.42, 15.22, and 26.43, respectively.”
From Zero-Centered Fixed-Point Quantization With Iterative Retraining for Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Object Detectors (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In addition, high dimensional images, like X-rays and CT images, can be detected by 3D CNN.”
From A Survey of Convolutional Neural Networks: Analysis, Applications, and Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [156]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“We evaluate its latest extension YOLOv3 [34], as in comparison with its predecessors, its design is promising regarding the detection of smaller objects.”
From EuroCity Persons: A Novel Benchmark for Person Detection in Traffic Scenes (2019) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.01497 · Cited by 70,812
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.03385 · Cited by 4,196
Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., & Dollár, P. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1708.02002 · Cited by 1,227
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- [2][2] M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. Williams, J. Winn, and A. Zisserman. The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge. International journal of computer vision , 88(2):303338, 2010. 6 -
- [3][3] C.-Y. Fu, W. Liu, A. Ranga, A. Tyagi, and A. C. Berg. Dssd: Deconvolutional single shot detector. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06659 , 2017. 3 - · arXiv
- [4][4] D. Gordon, A. Kembhavi, M. Rastegari, J. Redmon, D. Fox, and A. Farhadi. Iqa: Visual question answering in interactive environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.03316 , 2017. 1 - · arXiv
- [8][8] T.-Y. Lin, P. Dollar, R. Girshick, K. He, B. Hariharan, and S. Belongie. Feature pyramid networks for object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 2117-2125, 2017. 2, 3 -
- [10][10] T.-Y. Lin, M. Maire, S. Belongie, J. Hays, P. Perona, D. Ramanan, P. Doll´ ar, and C. L. Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In European conference on computer vision , pages 740-755. Springer, 2014. 2 -
- [11][11] W. Liu, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, S. Reed, C.Y. Fu, and A. C. Berg. Ssd: Single shot multibox detector. In European conference on computer vision , pages 21-37. Springer, 2016. 3 -
- [15][15] J. Redmon and A. Farhadi. Yolo9000: Better, faster, stronger. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017 IEEE Conference on , pages 6517-6525. IEEE, 2017. 1, 2, 3 -
- [16][16] J. Redmon and A. Farhadi. Yolov3: An incremental improvement. arXiv , 2018. 4 -
- [18][18] O. Russakovsky, L.-J. Li, and L. Fei-Fei. Best of both worlds: human-machine collaboration for object annotation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 2121-2131, 2015. 4 -
- [20][20] A. Shrivastava, R. Sukthankar, J. Malik, and A. Gupta. Beyond skip connections: Top-down modulation for object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.06851 , 2016. 3 - · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
YOLOv7: Trainable Bag-of-Freebies Sets New State-of-the-Art for Real-Time Object Detectors
Wang, C.-Y., Bochkovskiy, A., & Liao, H.-Y. M. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00721 · Cited by 13,198
“Another real-time object detectors are developed for GPU [20, 79, 94], they mostly use ResNet [25], DarkNet [60], or DLA [85], and then use the CSPNet [77] strategy to optimize the architecture.”
MethodYOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detection
Bochkovskiy, A., Wang, C.-Y., & Liao, H.-Y. M. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.10934 · Cited by 10,307
FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detection
Tian, Z., Shen, C., Chen, H., & He, T. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00972 · Cited by 7,013
Generalized Intersection Over Union: A Metric and a Loss for Bounding Box Regression
Rezatofighi, H., Tsoi, N., Gwak, J., Sadeghian, A., Reid, I., & Savarese, S. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00075 · Cited by 6,612
Distance-IoU Loss: Faster and Better Learning for Bounding Box Regression
Zheng, Z., Wang, P., Liu, W., Li, J., Ye, R., & Ren, D. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.08287 · Cited by 5,313
Distance-IoU Loss: Faster and Better Learning for Bounding Box Regression
Zheng, Z., Wang, P., Liu, W., Li, J., Ye, R., & Ren, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i07.6999 · Cited by 5,288
CSPNet: A New Backbone that can Enhance Learning Capability of CNN
Wang, C.-Y., Mark Liao, H.-Y., Wu, Y.-H., Chen, P.-Y., Hsieh, J.-W., & Yeh, I.-H. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw50498.2020.00203 · Cited by 5,265
A Survey of Convolutional Neural Networks: Analysis, Applications, and Prospects
Li, Z., Liu, F., Yang, W., Peng, S., & Zhou, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3084827 · Cited by 5,273
DETRs Beat YOLOs on Real-time Object Detection
Zhao, Y., Lv, W., Xu, S., Wei, J., Wang, G., Dang, Q., Liu, Y., & Chen, J. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01605 · Cited by 5,020
Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey
Zou, Z., Chen, K., Shi, Z., Guo, Y., & Ye, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2023.3238524 · Cited by 3,689
A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges
Abdar, M., Pourpanah, F., Hussain, S., Rezazadegan, D., Liu, L., Ghavamzadeh, M., Fieguth, P., Cao, X., Khosravi, A., Acharya, U. R., et al. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.008 · Cited by 3,111
“Choi et al. [153] proposed a Gaussian-based model to predict the localization uncertainty in YOLOv3 [154].”
SemanticKITTI: A Dataset for Semantic Scene Understanding of LiDAR Sequences
Behley, J., Garbade, M., Milioto, A., Quenzel, J., Behnke, S., Stachniss, C., & Gall, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00939 · Cited by 2,294
Object detection in optical remote sensing images: A survey and a new benchmark
Li, K., Wan, G., Cheng, G., Meng, L., & Han, J. (2020) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.11.023 · Cited by 2,317
A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologies
Yurtsever, E., Lambert, J., Carballo, A., & Takeda, K. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2983149 · Cited by 1,889
“More recent versions of this method, YOLOv2, YOLO9000 [137] and YOLOv3 [123] briefly took over the PASCAL VOC and MS COCO benchmarks while maintaining low computation and memory cost.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA survey of deep learning techniques for autonomous driving
Grigorescu, S., Trasnea, B., Cocias, T., & Macesanu, G. (2020) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.21918 · Cited by 1,809
YOLOv6: A Single-Stage Object Detection Framework for Industrial Applications
Li, C., Li, L., Jiang, H., Weng, K., Geng, Y., Li, L., Ke, Z., Li, Q., Cheng, M., Nie, W., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.02976 · Cited by 1,792
Object detection using YOLO: challenges, architectural successors, datasets and applications
Diwan, T., Anirudh, G., & Tembhurne, J. V. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-022-13644-y · Cited by 1,549
Detection and tracking meet drones challenge
Zhu, P., Wen, L., Du, D., Bian, X., Fan, H., Hu, Q., & Ling, H. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3119563 · Cited by 1,336
RepPoints: Point Set Representation for Object Detection
Yang, Z., Liu, S., Hu, H., Wang, L., & Lin, S. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00975 · Cited by 1,307
StrongSORT: Make DeepSORT Great Again
Du, Y., Zhao, Z., Song, Y., Zhao, Y., Su, F., Gong, T., & Meng, H. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2023.3240881 · Cited by 1,191
“…[60, 3, 55, 4, 32, 21] follow the tracking-by-detection paradigm, which localizes targets first and then associates them with information on appearance, motion, etc. Benefiting from the rapid development of object detection [39, 38, 18], separate trackers have been widely applied in MOT tasks.”
Bottom-Up Object Detection by Grouping Extreme and Center Points
Zhou, X., Zhuo, J., & Krahenbuhl, P. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00094 · Cited by 1,088
Conditional DETR for Fast Training Convergence
Meng, D., Chen, X., Fan, Z., Zeng, G., Li, H., Yuan, Y., Sun, L., & Wang, J. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00363 · Cited by 1,055
DN-DETR: Accelerate DETR Training by Introducing Query DeNoising
Li, F., Zhang, H., Liu, S., Guo, J., Ni, L. M., & Zhang, L. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01325 · Cited by 1,102
DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detection
Zhang, H., Li, F., Liu, S., Zhang, L., Su, H., Zhu, J., Ni, L. M., & Shum, H.-Y. (2022) · arXiv · Cited by 1,154
“One-stage models such as YOLO v2 [28] and YOLO v3 [29] directly output offsets relative to predefined anchors.”
MethodUA-DETRAC: A New Benchmark and Protocol for Multi-Object Detection and Tracking
Wen, L., Du, D., Cai, Z., Lei, Z., Chang, M.-C., Qi, H., Lim, J., Yang, M.-H., & Lyu, S. (2020) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2020.102907 · Cited by 804
Objects365: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Dataset for Object Detection
Shao, S., Li, Z., Zhang, T., Peng, C., Yu, G., Zhang, X., Li, J., & Sun, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00852 · Cited by 673
Towards Large-Scale Small Object Detection: Survey and Benchmarks
Cheng, G., Yuan, X., Yao, X., Yan, K., Zeng, Q., Xie, X., & Han, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2023.3290594 · Cited by 683
Deep learning in video multi-object tracking: A survey
Ciaparrone, G., Luque Sánchez, F., Tabik, S., Troiano, L., Tagliaferri, R., & Herrera, F. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.11.023 · Cited by 665
Deep Metallic Surface Defect Detection: The New Benchmark and Detection Network
Lv, X., Duan, F., Jiang, J.-J., Fu, X., & Gan, L. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20061562 · Cited by 643
Ego4D: Around the World in 3,000 Hours of Egocentric Video
Grauman, K., Westbury, A., Byrne, E., Chavis, Z., Furnari, A., Girdhar, R., Hamburger, J., Jiang, H., Liu, M., Liu, X., et al. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01842 · Cited by 630
YOLO-LITE: A Real-Time Object Detection Algorithm Optimized for Non-GPU Computers
Huang, R., Pedoeem, J., & Chen, C. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2018.8621865 · Cited by 622
A review of object detection based on deep learning
Xiao, Y., Tian, Z., Yu, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Du, S., & Lan, X. (2020) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-020-08976-6 · Cited by 584
QueryDet: Cascaded Sparse Query for Accelerating High-Resolution Small Object Detection
Yang, C., Huang, Z., & Wang, N. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01330 · Cited by 634
“Deep Learning based object detection can be mainly divided into two streams: the R-CNN based two-stage detectors [13, 12, 43, 28, 3] and the one-stage detectors [18, 39, 40, 41, 31, 68] pioneered by YOLO and SSD.”
BackgroundMethodEfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detection
Tan, M., Pang, R., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · Cited by 9,841
“32.4 2.5B YOLOv3[26] 33.0 71B(28x) EfficientDet-D1 38.3 6.0B RetinaNet[17] 37.0 97B(16x) MaskRCNN[8] 37.9 149B(25x) EfficientDet-D5 ‡ 49.8 136B AmoebaNet+NAS-FPN[37] ‡ 48.6 1317B(9.7x) EfficientDet-D7 † 51.0 326B AmoebaNet+NAS-FPN[37] †‡ 50.7 3045B(9.3x) † Notplotted, ‡ trainedwithauto-augmentation[37].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialData Augmentation Using Random Image Cropping and Patching for Deep CNNs
Takahashi, R., Matsubara, T., & Uehara, K. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2019.2935128 · Cited by 477
YOLOv1 to v8: Unveiling Each Variant–A Comprehensive Review of YOLO
Hussain, M. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3378568 · Cited by 492
YOLOP: You Only Look Once for Panoptic Driving Perception
Wu, D., Liao, M.-W., Zhang, W.-T., Wang, X.-G., Bai, X., Cheng, W.-Q., & Liu, W.-Y. (2022) · Machine Intelligence Research · doi:10.1007/s11633-022-1339-y · Cited by 466
Badgujar, C. M., Poulose, A., & Gan, H. (2024) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2024.109090 · Cited by 411
Vision-based vehicle detection and counting system using deep learning in highway scenes
Song, H., Liang, H., Li, H., Dai, Z., & Yun, X. (2019) · European Transport Research Review · doi:10.1186/s12544-019-0390-4 · Cited by 413
A review on modern defect detection models using DCNNs – Deep convolutional neural networks
Tulbure, A.-A., Tulbure, A.-A., & Dulf, E.-H. (2022) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2021.03.015 · Cited by 372
Progressive Domain Adaptation for Object Detection
Hsu, H.-K., Yao, C.-H., Tsai, Y.-H., Hung, W.-C., Tseng, H.-Y., Singh, M., & Yang, M.-H. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv45572.2020.9093358 · Cited by 382
Liang, S., Wu, H., Zhen, L., Hua, Q., Garg, S., Kaddoum, G., Hassan, M. M., & Yu, K. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2022.3158253 · Cited by 367
Compute Trends Across Three Eras of Machine Learning
Sevilla, J., Heim, L., Ho, A., Besiroglu, T., Hobbhahn, M., & Villalobos, P. (2022) · 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9891914 · Cited by 363
Segmentation-Driven 6D Object Pose Estimation
Hu, Y., Hugonot, J., Fua, P., & Salzmann, M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00350 · Cited by 333
A comprehensive review on deep learning-based methods for video anomaly detection
Nayak, R., Pati, U. C., & Das, S. K. (2021) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2020.104078 · Cited by 324
Complexer-YOLO: Real-Time 3D Object Detection and Tracking on Semantic Point Clouds
Simon, M., Amende, K., Kraus, A., Honer, J., Samann, T., Kaulbersch, H., Milz, S., & Gross, H. M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2019.00158 · Cited by 304
EuroCity Persons: A Novel Benchmark for Person Detection in Traffic Scenes
Braun, M., Krebs, S., Flohr, F., & Gavrila, D. M. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2897684 · Cited by 307
End-of-life or second-life options for retired electric vehicle batteries
Zhu, J., Mathews, I., Ren, D., Li, W., Cogswell, D., Xing, B., Sedlatschek, T., Kantareddy, S. N. R., Yi, M., Gao, T., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports Physical Science · doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100537 · Cited by 306
Car Detection using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Comparison between Faster R-CNN and YOLOv3
Benjdira, B., Khursheed, T., Koubaa, A., Ammar, A., & Ouni, K. (2019) · 2019 1st International Conference on Unmanned Vehicle Systems-Oman (UVS) · doi:10.1109/uvs.2019.8658300 · Cited by 307
Spacecraft pose estimation dataset (speed)
Sharma, S., Park, T. H., & D'Amico, S. (2026) · Stanford Digital Repository · doi:10.25740/dz692fn7184 · Cited by 304
Satellite Pose Estimation Challenge: Dataset, Competition Design, and Results
Kisantal, M., Sharma, S., Park, T. H., Izzo, D., Martens, M., & D'Amico, S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · doi:10.1109/taes.2020.2989063 · Cited by 304
Combining EfficientNet and Vision Transformers for Video Deepfake Detection
Coccomini, D. A., Messina, N., Gennaro, C., & Falchi, F. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06433-3_19 · Cited by 296
Carranza-García, M., Torres-Mateo, J., Lara-Benítez, P., & García-Gutiérrez, J. (2020) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs13010089 · Cited by 270
A review of Earth Artificial Intelligence
Sun, Z., Sandoval, L., Crystal-Ornelas, R., Mousavi, S. M., Wang, J., Lin, C., Cristea, N., Tong, D., Carande, W. H., Ma, X., et al. (2022) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105034 · Cited by 271
SentiNet: Detecting Localized Universal Attacks Against Deep Learning Systems
Chou, E., Tramer, F., & Pellegrino, G. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW) · doi:10.1109/spw50608.2020.00025 · Cited by 281
David, E., Madec, S., Sadeghi-Tehran, P., Aasen, H., Zheng, B., Liu, S., Kirchgessner, N., Ishikawa, G., Nagasawa, K., Badhon, M. A., et al. (2020) · Plant Phenomics · doi:10.34133/2020/3521852 · Cited by 277
Video Coding for Machines: A Paradigm of Collaborative Compression and Intelligent Analytics
Duan, L., Liu, J., Yang, W., Huang, T., & Gao, W. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2020.3016485 · Cited by 260
NAS-FCOS: Fast Neural Architecture Search for Object Detection
Wang, N., Gao, Y., Chen, H., Wang, P., Tian, Z., Shen, C., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01196 · Cited by 258
Ke, R., Zhuang, Y., Pu, Z., & Wang, Y. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2020.2984197 · Cited by 240
Auto-FPN: Automatic Network Architecture Adaptation for Object Detection Beyond Classification
Xu, A., Yao, A., Li, A., Liang, A., & Zhang, A. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00675 · Cited by 228
Application of Deep-Learning Methods to Bird Detection Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Imagery
Hong, S.-J., Han, Y., Kim, S.-Y., Lee, A.-Y., & Kim, G. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19071651 · Cited by 227
Implicit identity leakage: The stumbling block to improving deepfake detection generalization
Dong, S., Wang, J., Ji, R., Liang, J., Fan, H., & Ge, Z. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00389 · Cited by 220
Localization Distillation for Dense Object Detection
Zheng, Z., Ye, R., Wang, P., Ren, D., Zuo, W., Hou, Q., & Cheng, M.-M. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00919 · Cited by 220
Review of the State of the Art of Deep Learning for Plant Diseases: A Broad Analysis and Discussion
Hasan, R. I., Yusuf, S. M., & Alzubaidi, L. (2020) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants9101302 · Cited by 213
End-to-End Object Detection with Fully Convolutional Network
Wang, J., Song, L., Li, Z., Sun, H., Sun, J., & Zheng, N. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01559 · Cited by 235
“Modern onestage [22, 25, 31, 38, 29, 7] or two-stage detectors [33, 21, 2] heavily rely on the anchors or anchor-based proposals.”
BackgroundMazzia, V., Khaliq, A., Salvetti, F., & Chiaberge, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2964608 · Cited by 212
Edge-Computing Video Analytics for Real-Time Traffic Monitoring in a Smart City
Barthélemy, J., Verstaevel, N., Forehead, H., & Perez, P. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19092048 · Cited by 203
IoU-aware single-stage object detector for accurate localization
Wu, S., Li, X., & Wang, X. (2020) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2020.103911 · Cited by 202
Attention Mask R-CNN for ship detection and segmentation from remote sensing images
Nie, X., Duan, M., Ding, H., Hu, B., & Wong, E. K. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2964540 · Cited by 200
A Comprehensive Review of Deep Learning-Based Crack Detection Approaches
Hamishebahar, Y., Guan, H., So, S., & Jo, J. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12031374 · Cited by 188
Computer-aided detection of COVID-19 from X-ray images using multi-CNN and Bayesnet classifier
Abraham, B., & Nair, M. S. (2020) · Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.bbe.2020.08.005 · Cited by 169
Bringing ai to edge: from deep learning’s perspective
Liu, D., Kong, H., Luo, X., Liu, W., & Subramaniam, R. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.04.141 · Cited by 171
“To boost the efficiency of object detection on resource-limited devices, some works strive to reduce the computational complexity of backbone part of object detection models, like Tiny-dsod [58] for DSOD [69], Tiny-SSD [59] for SSD [65], and Tiny-YOLO [57] for YOLO.”
BackgroundA survey on deep transfer learning to edge computing for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic
Sufian, A., Ghosh, A., Sadiq, A. S., & Smarandache, F. (2020) · Journal of Systems Architecture · doi:10.1016/j.sysarc.2020.101830 · Cited by 156
Improved YOLO-V3 with DenseNet for Multi-Scale Remote Sensing Target Detection
Xu, D., & Wu, Y. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20154276 · Cited by 141
Li, W., & Hsu, C.-Y. (2022) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi11070385 · Cited by 147
OpenEI: An Open Framework for Edge Intelligence
Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Lu, S., Liu, L., xu, L., & Shi, W. (2019) · 2019 IEEE 39th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) · doi:10.1109/icdcs.2019.00182 · Cited by 139
“Since the algorithms will be deployed on the vehicle, which is a resource-constrained and real-time EC system, the algorithm should consider not only precision but also latency, as the end-to-end deep learning algorithm YOLOv3 [68].”
MethodPyTorchFI: A Runtime Perturbation Tool for DNNs
Mahmoud, A., Aggarwal, N., Nobbe, A., Vicarte, J. R. S., Adve, S. V., Fletcher, C. W., Frosio, I., & Hari, S. K. S. (2020) · 2020 50th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshops (DSN-W) · doi:10.1109/dsn-w50199.2020.00014 · Cited by 140
T-YOLO: Tiny Vehicle Detection Based on YOLO and Multi-Scale Convolutional Neural Networks
Padilla Carrasco, D., Rashwan, H. A., García, M. Á., & Puig, D. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3137638 · Cited by 145
Transformer for object detection: Review and benchmark
Li, Y., Miao, N., Ma, L., Shuang, F., & Huang, X. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107021 · Cited by 135
Multimodal Sentiment Detection Based on Multi-channel Graph Neural Networks
Yang, X., Feng, S., Zhang, Y., & Wang, D. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.28 · Cited by 145
“To explicitly model this co-occurrence, we first extract objects O = { o 1 , ..., o l o } by YOLOv3 (Farhadi and Redmon, 2018), and extract scenes S = { s 1 , ..., s l s } by VGG-Place (Zhou et al., 2017).”
MethodMelanoma Lesion Detection and Segmentation Using YOLOv4-DarkNet and Active Contour
Albahli, S., Nida, N., Irtaza, A., Yousaf, M. H., & Mahmood, M. T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3035345 · Cited by 126
ATRW: A Benchmark for Amur Tiger Re-identification in the Wild
Li, S., Li, J., Tang, H., Qian, R., & Lin, W. (2020) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3394171.3413569 · Cited by 121
A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System
Bisio, I., Garibotto, C., Haleem, H., Lavagetto, F., & Sciarrone, A. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3207282 · Cited by 139
A deep learning model for steel surface defect detection
Li, Z., Wei, X., Hassaballah, M., Li, Y., & Jiang, X. (2024) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-023-01180-7 · Cited by 122
Anchor Box Optimization for Object Detection
Zhong, Y., Wang, J., Peng, J., & Zhang, L. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv45572.2020.9093498 · Cited by 118
Characterizing the deployment of deep neural networks on commercial edge devices
Hadidi, R., Cao, J., Xie, Y., Asgari, B., Krishna, T., & Kim, H. (2019) · 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization (IISWC) · doi:10.1109/iiswc47752.2019.9041955 · Cited by 118
OmniDet: Surround View Cameras Based Multi-Task Visual Perception Network for Autonomous Driving
Ravi Kumar, V., Yogamani, S., Rashed, H., Sitsu, G., Witt, C., Leang, I., Milz, S., & Mader, P. (2021) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2021.3062324 · Cited by 121
“We adapted the YOLOv3 [19] decoder to output polygons and other representations listed above for a uniform comparison.”
MethodLi, Y., Han, Z., Xu, H., Liu, L., Li, X., & Zhang, K. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9183781 · Cited by 115
Pauly, L., Rharbaoui, W., Shneider, C., Rathinam, A., Gaudillière, V., & Aouada, D. (2023) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.08.001 · Cited by 121
Intelligent Traffic-Monitoring System Based on YOLO and Convolutional Fuzzy Neural Networks
Lin, C.-J., & Jhang, J.-Y. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3147866 · Cited by 116
Torney, C. J., Lloyd‐Jones, D. J., Chevallier, M., Moyer, D. C., Maliti, H. T., Mwita, M., Kohi, E. M., & Hopcraft, G. C. (2019) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13165 · Cited by 110
PP-PicoDet: A Better Real-Time Object Detector on Mobile Devices
Yu, G., Chang, Q., Lv, W., Xu, C., Cui, C., Ji, W., Dang, Q., Deng, K., Wang, G., Du, Y., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.00902 · Cited by 112
“The one-stage object detectors[18, 19, 1, 2, 3, 20, 21, 4] are also anchor-based detectors, which have a better balance between speed and accuracy, thus have been widely used in practice.”
BackgroundDeep learning-based spacecraft relative navigation methods: A survey
Song, J., Rondao, D., & Aouf, N. (2022) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.10.025 · Cited by 106
YOLOv3-DPFIN: A Dual-Path Feature Fusion Neural Network for Robust Real-Time Sonar Target Detection
Kong, W., Hong, J., Jia, M., Yao, J., Cong, W., Hu, H., & Zhang, H. (2020) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2019.2960796 · Cited by 107
YOLOv3 and YOLOv4: Multiple Object Detection for Surveillance Applications
Kumar B., C., Punitha, R., & Mohana (2020) · 2020 Third International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT) · doi:10.1109/icssit48917.2020.9214094 · Cited by 101
Simultaneously Detecting and Counting Dense Vehicles From Drone Images
Li, W., Li, H., Wu, Q., Chen, X., & Ngan, K. N. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2019.2899548 · Cited by 96
LiDAR Panoptic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving
Milioto, A., Behley, J., McCool, C., & Stachniss, C. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros45743.2020.9340837 · Cited by 98
Device-Circuit-Architecture Co-Exploration for Computing-in-Memory Neural Accelerators
Jiang, W., Lou, Q., Yan, Z., Yang, L., Hu, J., Hu, X. S., & Shi, Y. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.2020.2991575 · Cited by 96
A rapid recognition method for electronic components based on the improved yolo-v3 network
Huang, R., Gu, J., Sun, X., Hou, Y., & Uddin, S. (2019) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics8080825 · Cited by 94
Object Detection with Transformers: A Review
Shehzadi, T., Hashmi, K. A., Liwicki, M., Stricker, D., & Afzal, M. Z. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25196025 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Redmon, J., & Farhadi, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- ORCID
- Farhadi, Ali
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1804.02767
- OpenAlex
- W2796347433
- Cited by
- 17,141
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 204 · 2025: 1024 · 2024: 2199 · 2023: 3036 · 2022: 2907 · 2021: 3494 · 2020: 2657 · 2019: 1446 · 2018: 170
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- YOLOv3, object detection, real-time detection, Single Shot MultiBox Detector, detection accuracy, inference speed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
