CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 63Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceEmbodied and Extended CognitionNeural dynamics and brain function

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Information Closure Theory of Consciousness

Open access
Chang, Acer Y. C., Biehl, Martin, Yu, Yen, Kanai, Ryota·2019·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1909.13045arXiv 1909.13045PMC PMC7374725
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Information processing in neural systems can be described and analysed at multiple spatiotemporal scales. Generally, information at lower levels is more fine-grained and can be coarse-grained in higher levels. However, information processed only at specific levels seems to be available for conscious awareness. We do not have direct experience of information available at the level of individual neurons, which is noisy and highly stochastic. Neither do we have experience of more macro-level interactions such as interpersonal communications. Neurophysiological evidence suggests that conscious experiences co-vary with information encoded in coarse-grained neural states such as the firing pattern of a population of neurons. In this article, we introduce a new informational theory of consciousness: Information Closure Theory of Consciousness (ICT). We hypothesise that conscious processes are processes which form non-trivial informational closure (NTIC) with respect to the environment at certain coarse-grained levels. This hypothesis implies that conscious experience is confined due to informational closure from conscious processing to other coarse-grained levels. ICT proposes new quantitative definitions of both conscious content and conscious level. With the parsimonious definitions and a hypothesise, ICT provides explanations and predictions of various phenomena associated with consciousness. The implications of ICT naturally reconciles issues in many existing theories of consciousness and provides explanations for many of our intuitions about consciousness. Most importantly, ICT demonstrates that information can be the common language between consciousness and physical reality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1909.13045

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 The scale problem of consciousness: human conscious experience does not reflect information from every scale. Only information at a certain coarse-grained scale in the neural system is reflected in consciousness.
Figure 1 The scale problem of consciousness: human conscious experience does not reflect information from every scale. Only information at a certain coarse-grained scale in the neural system is reflected in consciousness.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Dependencies between a system Y and its environment E through the channels yt^ and et^.
Figure 2 Dependencies between a system Y and its environment E through the channels yt^ and et^.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 The information flow amounts the universe X, the system S, the environment of the system E, and the coarse-grained process Y of the system S. The solid line with a filled arrow from Xt to Xt+1 represents the microscopic dynamic of the universe. The solid lines with a empty arrow represent directions of coarse-graining. The dashed lines represents virtual dependencies between two macroscopic variables. The red Yt, Yt+1, and the red dashed line in between represents a macroscopic process which forms informational closure at a certain coarse-grained scale.
Figure 3 The information flow amounts the universe X, the system S, the environment of the system E, and the coarse-grained process Y of the system S. The solid line with a filled arrow from Xt to Xt+1 represents the microscopic dynamic of the universe. The solid lines with a empty arrow represent directions of coarse-graining. The dashed lines represents virtual dependencies between two macroscopic variables. The red Yt, Yt+1, and the red dashed line in between represents a macroscopic process which forms informational closure at a certain coarse-grained scale.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 A non-monotonic relationship between the scale of coarse-graining and level of consciousness.
Figure 4 A non-monotonic relationship between the scale of coarse-graining and level of consciousness.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Schema depicting the information flow in reflexive behaviors (shown by the red nodes and arrows) happening through the interaction between a process Y and its environment E. When the sensor process êt is non-deterministic and the internal state Yt is mostly dependent on the sensor state êt driven by the environment Et−1 but less on its past state Yt−1, as a consequence, Y is unable to form informational closure and, therefore, remain unconscious.
Figure 5 Schema depicting the information flow in reflexive behaviors (shown by the red nodes and arrows) happening through the interaction between a process Y and its environment E. When the sensor process êt is non-deterministic and the internal state Yt is mostly dependent on the sensor state êt driven by the environment Et−1 but less on its past state Yt−1, as a consequence, Y is unable to form informational closure and, therefore, remain unconscious.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Distinction between the level of coarse-graining and the level of cortical hierarchy. X and Y represent the microscopic and macroscopic coarse-grained variables, respectively. X0 represents microscopic states upstream of the cortical hierarchy. The red empty arrows represents the directions of coarse-graining and the blue arrows represent the directions of the physical dependencies in the cortical hierarchy from upstream to downstream (some variables and dependencies are omitted for clarity).
Figure 6 Distinction between the level of coarse-graining and the level of cortical hierarchy. X and Y represent the microscopic and macroscopic coarse-grained variables, respectively. X0 represents microscopic states upstream of the cortical hierarchy. The red empty arrows represents the directions of coarse-graining and the blue arrows represent the directions of the physical dependencies in the cortical hierarchy from upstream to downstream (some variables and dependencies are omitted for clarity).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 79

  1. Adrian, E. D. (1926). The impulses produced by sensory nerve endings. J. Physiol. 61, 49-72. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1926.sp002273 · DOI
  2. Ashby, F. G., Turner, B. O., and Horvitz, J. C. (2010). Cortical and basal ganglia contributions to habit learning and automaticity. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 208-215. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Baars, B. J. (1988). A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Baars, B. J. (1997). In the theatre of consciousness. global workspace theory, a rigorous scientific theory of consciousness. J. Conscious. Stud. 4, 292-309. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195102659.001. · DOI
  5. Baars, B. J. (2002). The conscious access hypothesis: origins and recent evidence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 47-52. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01819-2 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bayne, T., Hohwy, J., and Owen, A. M. (2016). Are there levels of consciousness? Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 405-413. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.009 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bechtel, W., and Mundale, J. (1999). Multiple realizability revisited: Linking cognitive and neural states. Philos. Sci. 66, 175-207. doi: 10.1086/392683 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bertschinger, N., Olbrich, E., Ay, N., and Jost, J. (2006). "Information and closure in systems theory, " in Explorations in the Complexity of Possible Life. Proceedings of the 7th German Workshop of Artificial Life, (Amsterdam) 9-21.
  9. Bialek, W., Nemenman, I., and Tishby, N. (2001). Predictability, complexity, and learning. Neural Comput. 13, 2409-2463. doi: 10.1162/089976601753195969 · DOI
  10. Binder, M. D., Hirokawa, N., and Windhorst, U. (2009). Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-29678-2 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Casali, A. G., Gosseries, O., Rosanova, M., Boly, M., Sarasso, S., Casali, K. R., et al. (2013). A theoretically based index of consciousness independent of sensory processing and behavior. Sci. Transl. Med. 5:198ra105. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006294 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Chang, A. Y. C., Biehl, M., Yu, Y., and Kanai, R. (2019). Information closure theory of consciousness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.13045.
  13. Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behav. Brain Sci. 36, 181-204. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000477 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Dehaene, S., and Changeux, J.-P. (2011). Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron 70, 200-227. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Dehaene, S., Kerszberg, M., and Changeux, J.-P. (1998). A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 14529-14534. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14529 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Dehaene, S., Lau, H., and Kouider, S. (2017). What is consciousness, and could machines have it? Science 358, 486-492. doi: 10.1126/science.aan8871 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Dehaene, S., and Naccache, L. (2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition 79, 1-37. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00123-2 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Doyon, J., Bellec, P., Amsel, R., Penhune, V., Monchi, O., Carrier, J., et al. (2009). Contributions of the basal ganglia and functionally related brain structures to motor learning. Behav. Brain Res. 199, 61-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.11.012 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Faisal, A. A., Selen, L. P., and Wolpert, D. M. (2008). Noise in the nervous system. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9:292. doi: 10.1038/nrn2258 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Fazekas, P., and Overgaard, M. (2016). Multidimensional models of degrees and levels of consciousness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 715-716. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.011 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Fekete, T., and Edelman, S. (2011). Towards a computational theory of experience. Conscious. Cogn. 20, 807-827. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.010 · DOI
  22. Fekete, T., and Edelman, S. (2012). "The (lack of) mental life of some machines, " in Being in Time: Dynamical Models of Phenomenal Experience, eds S. Edelman, T. Fekete, and N. Zach (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 95-120. doi: 10.1075/aicr.88.05fek Fekete, T., van Leeuwen, C., and Edelman, S. (2016). System, subsystem, hive: boundary problems in computational theories of consciousness. Front. Psychol. 7:1041. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01041 · DOI
  23. Gamez, D. (2016). Are information or data patterns correlated with consciousness? Topoi 35, 225-239. doi: 10.1007/s11245-014-9246-7 · DOI
  24. Gerstner, W., and Kistler, W. M. (2002). Spiking Neuron Models: Single Neurons, Populations, Plasticity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815706 · DOI
  25. Goldwyn, J. H., and Shea-Brown, E. (2011). The what and where of adding channel noise to the Hodgkin-Huxley equations. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7:e1002247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002247 · DOI
  26. Himmelbach, M., and Karnath, H.-O. (2005). Dorsal and ventral stream interaction: contributions from optic ataxia. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 632-640. doi: 10.1162/0898929053467514 · DOI
  27. Hoel, E. P. (2018). Agent Above, Atom Below: How Agents Causally Emerge from Their Underlying Microphysics. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-75726-1_6 · DOI
  28. Hoel, E. P., Albantakis, L., Marshall, W., and Tononi, G. (2016). Can the macro beat the micro? integrated information across spatiotemporal scales. Neurosci. Conscious. 2016:niw012. doi: 10.1093/nc/niw012 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Hoel, E. P., Albantakis, L., and Tononi, G. (2013). Quantifying causal emergence shows that macro can beat micro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 19790-19795. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314922110 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Hohwy, J. (2013). The Predictive Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682737.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Humphrey, N. (1999). A History of the Mind: Evolution and the Birth of Consciousness. London: Springer Science & Business Media.
  32. Humphrey, N. K. (1970). What the frog's eye tells the monkey's brain. Brain Behav. Evol. 3, 324-337. doi: 10.1159/000125480 · DOI
  33. Humphrey, N. K. (1974). Vision in a monkey without striate cortex: a case study. Perception 3, 241-255. doi: 10.1068/p030241 · DOI
  34. Jackendoff, R. (1987). Consciousness and the Computational Mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  35. James, T. W., Culham, J., Humphrey, G. K., Milner, A. D., and Goodale, M. A. (2003). Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study. Brain 126, 2463-2475. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg248 · DOI
  36. Kanai, R., Chang, A., Yu, Y., de Abril, I. M., Biehl, M., and Guttenberg, N. (2019). Information generation as a functional basis of consciousness. doi: 10.31219/osf.io/7ywjh · DOI
  37. Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., Jessell, T. M., Siegelbaum, S., and Hudspeth, A. (2000). Principles of Neural Science, Vol. 4. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  38. Klein, B., and Hoel, E. (2019). Uncertainty and causal emergence in complex networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.03902. · arXiv
  39. Kohn, A., Coen-Cagli, R., Kanitscheider, I., and Pouget, A. (2016). Correlations and neuronal population information. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 39, 237-256. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-070815-013851 · DOI
  40. Krakauer, D., Bertschinger, N., Olbrich, E., Flack, J. C., and Ay, N. (2020). The information theory of individuality. Theory Biosci. 139, 209-23. doi: 10.1007/s12064-020-00313-7 · DOI
  41. Kristan, W. B. Jr., and Shaw, B. K. (1997). Population coding and behavioral choice. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7, 826-831. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(97) 80142-0 · DOI
  42. Lamme, V. A. (2006). Towards a true neural stance on consciousness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 494-501. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Laureys, S. (2005). The neural correlate of (un) awareness: lessons from the vegetative state. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 556-559. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.010 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Lemon, R., and Edgley, S. (2010). Life without a cerebellum. Brain 133, 652-654. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq030 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Maass, W., and Bishop, C. M. (2001). Pulsed Neural Networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  46. Mathis, D. W., and Mozer, M. C. (1995). "On the computational utility of consciousness, " in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, eds D. Tesauro and D. S. Touretzky. (Cambridge: MIT Press) 10-18.
  47. Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. J. (1991). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Vol. 42. Boston, MA: Springer Science & Business Media.
  48. Mazzi, C., Bagattini, C., and Savazzi, S. (2016). Blind-sight vs. degraded- sight: different measures tell a different story. Front. Psychol. 7:901. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00901 · DOI
  49. Milner, A., Paulignan, Y., Dijkerman, H., Michel, F., and Jeannerod, M. (1999). A paradoxical improvement of misreaching in optic ataxia: new evidence for two separate neural systems for visual localization. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 266, 2225-2229. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0912 · DOI
  50. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., and Alho, K. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118, 2544-2590. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007. 04.026 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philos. Rev. 83, 435-450. doi: 10.2307/2183914 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Oizumi, M., Albantakis, L., and Tononi, G. (2014). From the phenomenology to the mechanisms of consciousness: integrated information theory 3.0. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10:e1003588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003588 · DOI · Paper page
  53. O'Regan, J. K., and Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 939-973. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X010 00115 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Overgaard, M. (2011). Visual experience and blindsight: a methodological review. Exp. Brain Res. 209, 473-479. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2578-2 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Overgaard, M., and Overgaard, R. (2010). Neural correlates of contents and levels of consciousness. Front. Psychol. 1:164. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00164 · DOI
  56. Palmer, S. E., Marre, O., Berry, M. J., and Bialek, W. (2015). Predictive information in a sensory population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 6908-6913. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1506855112 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Panzeri, S., Macke, J. H., Gross, J., and Kayser, C. (2015). Neural population coding: combining insights from microscopic and mass signals. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19, 162-172. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.002 · DOI
  58. Pennartz, C. M. (2015). The Brain's Representational Power: On Consciousness and the Integration of Modalities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262029315.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Pennartz, C. M. (2018). Consciousness, representation, action: the importance of being goal-directed. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22, 137-153. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.10.006 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Pfante, O., Bertschinger, N., Olbrich, E., Ay, N., and Jost, J. (2014a). Comparison between different methods of level identification. Adv. Complex Syst. 17:1450007. doi: 10.1142/S0219525914500076 · DOI
  61. Pfante, O., Olbrich, E., Bertschinger, N., Ay, N., and Jost, J. (2014b). Closure measures for coarse-graining of the tent map. Chaos 24:013136. doi: 10.1063/1.4869075 · DOI
  62. Pouget, A., Dayan, P., and Zemel, R. (2000). Information processing with population codes. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 1:125. doi: 10.1038/35039062 · DOI
  63. Price, H., and Corry, R. (2007). Causation, Physics, and the Constitution of Reality: Russell's Republic Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  64. Prinz, J. (2007). "The intermediate level theory of consciousness, " in The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness, eds M. Velmans and S. Schneider. 257-271. doi: 10.1002/9780470751466. · DOI
  65. ch20 · DOI
  66. Quian Quiroga, R., and Panzeri, S. (2009). Extracting information from neuronal populations: information theory and decoding approaches. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 173-185. doi: 10.1038/nrn2578 · DOI
  67. Raymont, P., and Brook, A. (2006). "Unity of consciousness, " in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind, eds A. Beckermann and B. P. McLaughlin (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 565-577.
  68. Revol, P., Rossetti, Y., Vighetto, A., Rode, G., Boisson, D., and Pisella, L. (2003). Pointing errors in immediate and delayed conditions in unilateral optic ataxia. Spatial Vis. 16, 347-364. doi: 10.1163/156856803322467572 · DOI
  69. Revonsuo, A. (2006). Inner Presence: Consciousness as a Biological Phenomenon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  70. Rosen, R. (1991). Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  71. Sederberg, A. J., MacLean, J. N., and Palmer, S. E. (2018). Learning to make external sensory stimulus predictions using internal correlations in populations of neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710779115 · DOI
  72. Seth, A. K. (2014). A predictive processing theory of sensorimotor contingencies: explaining the puzzle of perceptual presence and its absence in synesthesia. Cogn. Neurosci. 5, 97-118. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2013.877880 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Seth, A. K. (2015). Presence, objecthood, and the phenomenology of predictive perception. Cogn. Neurosci. 6, 111-117. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1026888 · DOI
  74. Stein, R. B., Gossen, E. R., and Jones, K. E. (2005). Neuronal variability: noise or part of the signal? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6:389. doi: 10.1038/nrn1668 · DOI
  75. Tononi, G., Boly, M., Massimini, M., and Koch, C. (2016). Integrated information theory: from consciousness to its physical substrate. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 17:450. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016. · DOI · Paper page
  76. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1124, 239-261. doi: 10.1196/annals.1440.004 · DOI · Paper page
  77. White, J. A., Rubinstein, J. T., and Kay, A. R. (2000). Channel noise in neurons. Trends Neurosci. 23, 131-137. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(99)01521-0 · DOI · Paper page
  78. Whitwell, R. L., Milner, A. D., and Goodale, M. A. (2014). The two visual systems hypothesis: new challenges and insights from visual form agnosic patient DF. Front. Neurol. 5:255. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00255 · DOI
  79. Woodward, J. (2007). "Causation with a human face, " in Causation, Physics, and the Constitution of Reality: Russell's Republic Revisited, eds H. Price and R. Corry (Oxford: Oxford University Press) 66-105

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chang, A. Y. C., Biehl, M., Yu, Y., & Kanai, R.
Affiliations
Araya Inc. (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Chang, Acer Y. C.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Volume
11
Pages
1504-1504
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1909.13045
arXiv
1909.13045
PMC
PMC7374725
OpenAlex
W3043137967
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Templeton World Charity Foundation
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (CREST)
  • Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
informational closure, consciousness, coarse-graining, spatial and temporal scales, conscious content, neural information processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review