The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Big Book of Concepts
Abstract
Concepts embody our knowledge of the kinds of things there are in the world. Tying our past experiences to our present interactions with the environment, they enable us to recognize and understand new objects and events. Concepts are also relevant to understanding domains such as social situations, personality types, and even artistic styles. Yet like other phenomenologically simple cognitive processes such as walking or understanding speech, concept formation and use are maddeningly complex. Research since the 1970s and the decline of the "classical view" of concepts have greatly illuminated the psychology of concepts. But persistent theoretical disputes have sometimes obscured this progress. The Big Book of Concepts goes beyond those disputes to reveal the advances that have been made, focusing on the major empirical discoveries. By reviewing and evaluating research on diverse topics such as category learning, word meaning, conceptual development in infants and children, and the basic level of categorization, the book develops a much broader range of criteria than is usual for evaluating theories of concepts. Bradford Books imprint
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Describing objects by their attributes
Farhadi, A., Endres, I., Hoiem, D., & Forsyth, D. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206772 · Cited by 1,917
Emotional expressions reconsidered: Challenges to inferring emotion from human facial movements
Barrett, L. F., Adolphs, R., Marsella, S., Martinez, A. M., & Pollak, S. D. (2019) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100619832930 · Cited by 1,748
The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization
Barrett, L. F. (2016) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsw154 · Cited by 1,426
“The fact that human brains effortlessly and automatically construct such representations (e.g. Murphy, 2002; Posner and Keele, 1968) helps to explain why scientists continue to believe in the classical view and even propose it as an innovation (e.g. Anderson and Adolphs, 2014), even as evidence…”
Keil, F. C. (2006) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190100 · Cited by 1,350
Mayring, P., & Fenzl, T. (2014) · Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-18939-0_38 · Cited by 1,262
Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems
Barsalou, L. W., Kyle Simmons, W., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00029-3 · Cited by 1,256
The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought
Gelman, S. A. (2003) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195154061.001.0001 · Cited by 1,247
Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality
Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2012.651387 · Cited by 1,008
The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth
Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. (2002) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1 · Cited by 1,032
The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization
Barrett, L. F. (2017) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsx060 · Cited by 1,009
“The fact that human brains effortlessly and automatically construct such representations (e.g. Murphy, 2002; Posner and Keele, 1968) helps to explain why scientists continue to believe in the classical view and even propose it as an innovation (e.g. Anderson and Adolphs, 2014), even as evidence…”
Recognition in Terra Incognita
Beery, S., Van Horn, G., & Perona, P. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01270-0_28 · Cited by 679
An active inference theory of allostasis and interoception in depression
Barrett, L. F., Quigley, K. S., & Hamilton, P. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0011 · Cited by 554
Siegel, E. H., Sands, M. K., Van den Noortgate, W., Condon, P., Chang, Y., Dy, J., Quigley, K. S., & Barrett, L. F. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000128 · Cited by 515
Psychological essentialism in children
GELMAN, S. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.001 · Cited by 492
A rational analysis of rule-based concept learning
Goodman, N. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., Feldman, J., & Griffiths, T. L. (2008) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1080/03640210701802071 · Cited by 469
If deep learning is the answer, what is the question?
Saxe, A., Nelli, S., & Summerfield, C. (2021) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-020-00395-8 · Cited by 397
Atzil, S., Gao, W., Fradkin, I., & Barrett, L. F. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0384-6 · Cited by 415
Personal semantics: at the crossroads of semantic and episodic memory
Renoult, L., Davidson, P. S. R., Palombo, D. J., Moscovitch, M., & Levine, B. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.09.003 · Cited by 391
Integrating automatic and controlled processes into neurocognitive models of social cognition
Satpute, A. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2006) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.005 · Cited by 347
On staying grounded and avoiding quixotic dead ends
Barsalou, L. W. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1028-3 · Cited by 331
Lehman, D. W., O’Connor, K., Kovács, B., & Newman, G. E. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2017.0047 · Cited by 317
A mathematical theory of semantic development in deep neural networks
Saxe, A. M., McClelland, J. L., & Ganguli, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1820226116 · Cited by 284
Lafraire, J., Rioux, C., Giboreau, A., & Picard, D. (2016) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.008 · Cited by 279
Tracking the emergence of conceptual knowledge during human decision making
Kumaran, D., Summerfield, J. J., Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.07.030 · Cited by 260
“Neuron, Volume 63 Tracking the Emergence of Conceptual Knowledge during Human Decision Making Dharshan Kumaran, Jennifer J. Summerfield, Demis Hassabis & Eleanor A. Maguire”
Converging evidence for the neuroanatomic basis of combinatorial semantics in the angular gyrus
Price, A. R., Bonner, M. F., Peelle, J. E., & Grossman, M. (2015) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3446-14.2015 · Cited by 262
Principled and statistical connections in common sense conception
Prasada, S., & Dillingham, E. M. (2006) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.003 · Cited by 230
Doris, J. M., & The Moral Psychology Research Group (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199582143.001.0001 · Cited by 227
Secret Agents: Inferences About Hidden Causes by 10- and 12-Month-Old Infants
Saxe, R., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Carey, S. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01649.x · Cited by 210
Generic Statements Require Little Evidence for Acceptance but Have Powerful Implications
Cimpian, A., Brandone, A. C., & Gelman, S. A. (2010) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01126.x · Cited by 209
Monk, E. P. (2022) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/07352751221076863 · Cited by 209
Coley, J. D., & Tanner, K. D. (2012) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.12-06-0074 · Cited by 193
Why I stopped worrying about the definition of life... and why you should as well
Machery, E. (2012) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-011-9880-1 · Cited by 181
Quantified statements are recalled as generics: Evidence from preschool children and adults
Leslie, S.-J., & Gelman, S. A. (2012) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.12.001 · Cited by 172
Representation of Principled Connections: A Window Onto the Formal Aspect of Common Sense Conception
Prasada, S., & Dillingham, E. M. (2009) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01018.x · Cited by 156
Assessing knowledge of mathematical equivalence: A construct-modeling approach.
Rittle-Johnson, B., Matthews, P. G., Taylor, R. S., & McEldoon, K. L. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021334 · Cited by 160
The centrality of language in human cognition
Lupyan, G. (2016) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12155 · Cited by 137
A conceptual and psychometric framework for distinguishing categories and dimensions
De Boeck, P., Wilson, M., & Acton, G. S. (2005) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.112.1.129 · Cited by 131
Word meaning in minds and machines.
Lake, B. M., & Murphy, G. L. (2023) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000297 · Cited by 131
Self-citationJacoby, L. L., Wahlheim, C. N., & Coane, J. H. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0020636 · Cited by 127
Developing an understanding of emotion categories: Lessons from objects
Hoemann, K., Wu, R., LoBue, V., Oakes, L. M., Xu, F., & Barrett, L. F. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.010 · Cited by 123
Structure learning and the posterior parietal cortex
Summerfield, C., Luyckx, F., & Sheahan, H. (2020) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.101717 · Cited by 118
Typical versus atypical unpacking and superadditive probability judgment
Sloman, S., Rottenstreich, Y., Wisniewski, E., Hadjichristidis, C., & Fox, C. R. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.573 · Cited by 102
Symbol Emergence in Cognitive Developmental Systems: A Survey
Taniguchi, T., Piater, J., Worgotter, F., Ugur, E., Hoffmann, M., Jamone, L., Nagai, T., Rosman, B., Matsuka, T., Iwahashi, N., et al. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · doi:10.1109/tcds.2018.2867772 · Cited by 92
The Power of Examples: Illustrative Examples Enhance Conceptual Learning of Declarative Concepts
Rawson, K. A., Thomas, R. C., & Jacoby, L. L. (2015) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9273-3 · Cited by 89
YEAR, J., & GORDON, P. (2009) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00898.x · Cited by 87
Distributional vectors encode referential attributes
Gupta, A., Boleda, G., Baroni, M., & Padó, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1002 · Cited by 79
Le Mau, T., Hoemann, K., Lyons, S. H., Fugate, J. M. B., Brown, E. N., Gendron, M., & Barrett, L. F. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25352-6 · Cited by 74
Product Categories as Judgment Devices: The Moral Awakening of the Investment Industry
Arjaliès, D.-L., & Durand, R. (2019) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2018.1267 · Cited by 75
Elgort, I., Perfetti, C. A., Rickles, B., & Stafura, J. Z. (2015) · Language, Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2014.942673 · Cited by 72
Why robots should be social: Enhancing machine learning through social human-robot interaction
de Greeff, J., & Belpaeme, T. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138061 · Cited by 66
Development of Executive Function across the Life Span
Jacques, S., & Marcovitch, S. (2010) · The Handbook of Life‐Span Development · doi:10.1002/9780470880166.hlsd001013 · Cited by 59
The Discursive Perspective of Market Categorization: Interaction, Power, and Context
Grodal, S., & Kahl, S. J. (2017) · Research in the Sociology of Organizations · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20170000051004 · Cited by 50
Narcissism and other-derogation in the absence of ego threat.
Park, S. W., & Colvin, C. R. (2015) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12107 · Cited by 41
Architecture of explanatory inference in the human prefrontal cortex
Barbey, A. K., & Patterson, R. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00162 · Cited by 40
Explanation recruits comparison in a category-learning task
Edwards, B. J., Williams, J. J., Gentner, D., & Lombrozo, T. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.011 · Cited by 34
Editorial: Basic and translational research on stimulus-stimulus relations
Dougher, M., Twohig, M. P., & Madden, G. J. (2014) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1002/jeab.69 · Cited by 23
Gendron, M., Mesquita, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2020) · Culture, Mind, and Brain · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.010 · Cited by 20
Distributional Semantics: Meaning Through Culture and Interaction
Contreras Kallens, P., & Christiansen, M. H. (2025) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12771 · Cited by 17
The language network is not engaged in object categorization
Benn, Y., Ivanova, A. A., Clark, O., Mineroff, Z., Seikus, C., Silva, J. S., Varley, R., & Fedorenko, E. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad289 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Murphy, G. L.
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2002-07-26
- OpenAlex
- W2152444902
- Cited by
- 2,505
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 47.21
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
