Cited by 213Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

Maintenance of age in human neurons generated by microRNA-based neuronal conversion of fibroblasts

Open access
Huh, Christine J, Zhang, Bo, Victor, Matheus B, Dahiya, Sonika, Batista, Luis FZ, Horvath, Steve, Yoo, Andrew S·2016·eLife

Abstract

Aging is a major risk factor in many forms of late-onset neurodegenerative disorders. The ability to recapitulate age-related characteristics of human neurons in culture will offer unprecedented opportunities to study the biological processes underlying neuronal aging. Here, we show that using a recently demonstrated microRNA-based cellular reprogramming approach, human fibroblasts from postnatal to near centenarian donors can be efficiently converted into neurons that maintain multiple age-associated signatures. Application of an epigenetic biomarker of aging (referred to as epigenetic clock) to DNA methylation data revealed that the epigenetic ages of fibroblasts were highly correlated with corresponding age estimates of reprogrammed neurons. Transcriptome and microRNA profiles reveal genes differentially expressed between young and old neurons. Further analyses of oxidative stress, DNA damage and telomere length exhibit the retention of age-associated cellular properties in converted neurons from corresponding fibroblasts. Our results collectively demonstrate the maintenance of age after neuronal conversion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.18648

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct cellular reprogramming retains age-related signatures stored in pre-reprogrammed non-neural somatic cells such as fibroblasts, including the epigenetic age, telomere length, and gene expression changes.

    “Direct cellular reprogramming retains age-related signatures stored in pre-reprogrammed non-neural somatic cells such as fibroblasts, including the epigenetic age, telomere length, and gene expression changes (22, 23).”
  • Fibroblast-derived iNs preserve substantial signatures of human aging, including transcriptomic, nuclear pore, mitochondrial, epigenetic, and other aspects of aging.

    “Fibroblast-derived iNs preserve substantial signatures of human aging, including transcriptomic, nuclear pore, mitochondrial, epigenetic, and other aspects of aging (Herdy et al., 2019; Huh et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2018; Mertens et al., 2015a; Traxler et al., 2019).”
  • Pluripotent stem cells and their derivatives reflect pre-natal DNA methylation ages.

    “Clearly, iN DNAm ages reflect the adult and old chronological ages of their donors, whereas pluripotent stem cells and their derivatives reflect pre-natal DNAm ages (Figure 7H; Huh et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2014; Lo Sardo et al., 2017).”
  • iN DNA methylation ages reflect the adult and old chronological ages of their donors.

    “Clearly, iN DNAm ages reflect the adult and old chronological ages of their donors, whereas pluripotent stem cells and their derivatives reflect pre-natal DNAm ages (Figure 7H; Huh et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2014; Lo Sardo et al., 2017).”
  • AD iNs do not display signs of accelerated epigenetic aging over control iNs.

    “AD iNs did not display signs of accelerated epigenetic aging over control iNs (Figures 7I and 7J; Figure S6; Horvath, 2013; Huh et al., 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huh, C. J., Zhang, B., Victor, M. B., Dahiya, S., Batista, L. F., Horvath, S., & Yoo, A. S.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Yoo, Andrew S
Venue
eLife
Published
2016-09-20
Volume
5
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2521543069
Cited by
213
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 11
FWCI
9.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R25 DA027995)
  • National Institutes of Health (K99/R00, 4R00HL114732-03, 1U34AG051425-01, 5R01, AG042511-02, DP2NS083372-01)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (DDRCC, NIDDK P30 DK052574)
  • Ellison Medical Foundation (AG-NS-0878-12)
  • Cure Alzheimer's Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Keywords
neuronal aging, fibroblast-to-neuron conversion, epigenetic clocks, DNA methylation, age-related gene expression, oxidative stress, DNA damage, telomere length, neurodegenerative diseases, human neurons
MeSH terms
Aging, Cytological Techniques, DNA Damage, Fibroblasts, Humans, Neurons, Telomere, Oxidative Stress, Gene Expression Profiling, MicroRNAs, Epigenesis, Genetic, Cell Transdifferentiation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review