Cited by 122Nanomaterials and Printing TechnologiesAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Mechanically Reinforced Skin‐Electronics with Networked Nanocomposite Elastomer

Han, Seungyong, Kim, Min Ku, Wang, Bo, Wie, Dae Seung, Wang, Shuodao, Lee, Chi Hwan·2016·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Mechanically reinforced skin-electronics are presented by exploiting networked nanocomposite elastomers where high quality metal nanowires serve as conducting paths. Theoretical and experimental studies show that the established skin-electronics exhibit superior mechanical enhancements against crack and delamination phenomena. Device applications include a class of biomedical devices that offers the ability of thermotherapeutic stimulation and electrophysiological monitoring, all via the skin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201603878

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CuNW mesh patterned into serpentine shape achieved a stretchability up to 80%.

    “As shown in Figure 1a, CuNW mesh was patterned into serpentine shape and achieved a stretchability up to 80%.[23]”

    From Nanomaterial-Enabled Wearable Sensors for Healthcare (2018) · cites this paper as [23]

  • Photolithographically patterned serpentine CuNW mesh showed an increase in resistance with temperature (PTC type).

    “Photolithographically patterned serpentine CuNW mesh (Figure 1a) showed an increase in resistance with the temperature (the PTC type).”

    From Nanomaterial-Enabled Wearable Sensors for Healthcare (2018) · cites this paper as [23]

  • The temperature sensitivity of the serpentine CuNW mesh was ≈0.7 Ω °C−1 over the range RT to 50 °C.

    “The temperature sensitivity was ≈0.7 Ω °C -1 over the range of RT to 50 °C.[23]”

    From Nanomaterial-Enabled Wearable Sensors for Healthcare (2018) · cites this paper as [23]

  • The serpentine CuNW mesh can also be used as the Joule-heating element for a skin-like thermotherapy patch.

    “In addition to the applications as resistive temperature sensors and electrophysiological electrodes as previously discussed, the serpentine CuNW mesh (Figure 1a) can also be used as the Joule-heating element for a skin-like thermotherapy patch.[23]”

    From Nanomaterial-Enabled Wearable Sensors for Healthcare (2018) · cites this paper as [23]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, S., Kim, M. K., Wang, B., Wie, D. S., Wang, S., & Lee, C. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Oklahoma State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Shuodao
  • Lee, Chi Hwan
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-10-07
Volume
28
Issue
46
Pages
10257-10265
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2529514248
Cited by
122
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8
FWCI
7.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advanced Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company (209301)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
metallic nanowires, mechanical reinforcement, crack resistance, delamination, biomedical devices, electrophysiological monitoring, flexible electronics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review