Cited by 1,012Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNuclear Receptors and SignalingNerve injury and regeneration

Clinical progression in Parkinson disease and the neurobiology of axons

Open access
Cheng, Hsiao‐Chun, Ulane, Christina M., Burke, Robert E.·2010·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Despite tremendous growth in recent years in our knowledge of the molecular basis of Parkinson disease (PD) and the molecular pathways of cell injury and death, we remain without therapies that forestall disease progression. Although there are many possible explanations for this lack of success, one is that experimental therapeutics to date have not adequately focused on an important component of the disease process, that of axon degeneration. It remains unknown what neuronal compartment, either the soma or the axon, is involved at disease onset, although some have proposed that it is the axons and their terminals that take the initial brunt of injury. Nevertheless, this concept has not been formally incorporated into many of the current theories of disease pathogenesis, and it has not achieved a wide consensus. More importantly, in view of growing evidence that the molecular mechanisms of axon degeneration are separate and distinct from the canonical pathways of programmed cell death that mediate soma destruction, the possibility of early involvement of axons in PD has not been adequately emphasized as a rationale to explore the neurobiology of axons for novel therapeutic targets. We propose that ongoing degeneration of axons, not cell bodies, is the primary determinant of clinically apparent progression of disease, and that future experimental therapeutics intended to forestall disease progression will benefit from a new focus on the distinct mechanisms of axon degeneration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.21995

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The diagnosis of Parkinson's disease is reliant on clinical motor symptoms and neuroimaging; by symptom onset, an estimated 50-70% of substantia nigra pars compacta dopaminergic neurons have already been lost.

    “The diagnosis of PD is reliant on clinical motor symptoms and neuroimaging; however, by the onset of symptoms, it is estimated that 50–70% of substantia nigra pars compacta dopaminergic neurons have already been lost [247, 248].”

    From Extracellular vesicles as nanotheranostic platforms for targeted neurological disorder interventions (2024) · cites this paper as [247]

    In “Estimates of SN Neuron Loss at Disease Onset” (page unavailable), the paper acknowledges that reviews cite 50–70% loss, but concludes that the available data consistently indicate about 30% loss when motor signs appear. Its discussion of imaging concerns estimates of striatal terminal loss, not a requirement for diagnosis. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [31]Nandhagopal R McKeown MJ Stoessl AJ Functional imaging in Parkinson disease Neurology 2008 70 1478 1488 18413571
  2. [32]Lee CS Samii A Sossi V In vivo positron emission tomographic evidence for compensatory changes in presynaptic dopaminergic nerve terminals in Parkinson's disease Ann Neurol 2000 47 493 503 10762161

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, H., Ulane, C. M., & Burke, R. E.
Affiliations
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Burke, Robert E.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05-26
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
715-725
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W1967659552
Cited by
1,012
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 23
FWCI
12.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS26836, P50NS038370, R56NS026836, NS38370, R01NS026836)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, axonal degeneration, disease progression, axonal injury, programmed cell death, therapeutic target, pathogenesis, axon terminals
MeSH terms
Axons, Humans, Neurobiology, Neurons, Parkinson Disease, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review