Cited by 144Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Measurement properties of tools used to assess depression in adults with and without autism spectrum conditions: A systematic review

Open access
Cassidy, S. A., Bradley, L., Bowen, E., Wigham, S., Rodgers, J.·2018·Autism Research

Abstract

Depression is the most commonly experienced mental health condition in adults with autism spectrum conditions (ASC). However, it is unclear what tools are currently being used to assess depression in ASC, or whether tools need to be adapted for this group. This systematic review therefore aimed to identify tools used to assess depression in adults with and without ASC, and then evaluate these tools for their appropriateness and measurement properties. Medline, PsychINFO and Web of Knowledge were searched for studies of depression in: (a) adults with ASC, without co‐morbid intellectual disability; and (b) adults from the general population without co‐morbid conditions. Articles examining the measurement properties of these tools were then searched for using a methodological filter in PubMed, and the quality of the evidence was evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. Twelve articles were identified which utilized three tools to assess depression in adults with ASC, but only one article which assessed the measurement properties of one of these tools was identified and thus evaluated. Sixty‐four articles were identified which utilized five tools to assess depression in general population adults, and fourteen articles had assessed the measurement properties of these tools. Overall, two tools were found to be robust in their measurement properties in the general population—the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI‐II), and the patient health questionnaire (PHQ‐9). Crucially only one study was identified from the COSMIN search, which showed weak evidence in support of the measurement properties of the BDI‐II in an ASC sample. Implications for effective measurement of depression in ASC are discussed. Autism Res 2018, 11: 738–754 . © 2018 The Authors Autism Research published by International Society for Autism Research and Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Lay Summary: Depression is the most common mental health problem experienced by adults with autism. However, the current study found very limited evidence regarding how useful tools developed for the general population are for adults with autism. We therefore suggest how these tools could be adapted to more effectively assess depression in adults with autism, and improve these individuals access to mental health assessment and support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aur.1922

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The TAS-20 has never undergone a thorough examination as to whether autistic individuals understand items in the same way as non-autistic people.

    “Another instance is the TAS-20, which despite being robustly used in autism research (see, for instance, [80, 82, 141]), has never undergone a thorough examination (e.g. [118, 119]) as to whether autistic individuals understand items in the same way as non-autistic people”

    From A 'choice', an 'addiction', a way 'out of the lost': Exploring self-injury in autistic people without intellectual disability (2019) · cites this paper as [118]

    The Introduction and Discussion call for examining how autistic adults interpret items in depression measures, but they do not address the TAS-20. Searches for “TAS-20” and “Toronto Alexithymia Scale” found no passage establishing whether its items have undergone the examination claimed. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Eaton, W.W., Smith, C., Ybarra, M., Muntaner, C., & Tien, A. (2004). Center for epidemiologic studies depression scale: Review and revision (CESD and CESD‐R), In Maruish M.E. (Ed.), The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcomes Assessment (3rd ed.). Instruments for Adults (Vol. 3, pp. 363– 377). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cassidy, S. A., Bradley, L., Bowen, E., Wigham, S., & Rodgers, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Coventry University (GB)
  • University of Worcester (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Cassidy, S. A.
Venue
Autism Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-23
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
738-754
ISSN
  • 1939-3792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-3806
OpenAlex
W2783826777
Cited by
144
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autism Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Worcester Research and Publications (University of Worcester) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/N000501/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
depression, autism spectrum disorder, autistic adults, measurement properties, Beck Depression Inventory-II, PHQ-9, COSMIN, tool adaptation, mental health assessment
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review