The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corporate Ecological Responsiveness: Antecedent Effects of Institutional Pressure and Top Management Commitment and Their Impact on Organizational Performance
Abstract
Institutional theory argues that conformity to institutional pressure enhances the survival probability of organizations. Two key limitations of institutional theory have been proposed in recent literature: one, that it ignores the role of top management, and two, that it focuses only on survival as a benefit to the exclusion of more strategic benefits such as growth and profitability. In this research, we build a conceptual model that addresses both of these limitations in the context of institutional pressure on organizations to behave more responsibly vis‐à‐vis the natural environment. Results from a survey of 199 manufacturing firms show that the relationship between institutional pressure and corporate responsiveness to the pressure (i.e. corporate environmental responsiveness) is enhanced when top management commitment to the environment is high. Moreover, results show that organizational conformity to institutional pressure enhances the strategic benefits that organizations receive. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226550 · Cited by 28,308
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
(1969) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 10,735
Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1984.4277628 · Cited by 10,220
The Content Analysis Guidebook
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017) · doi:10.4135/9781071802878 · Cited by 9,286
DiMaggio, P. (1983) · American Sociological Review · Cited by 9,078
Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes
Oliver, C. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4279002 · Cited by 8,950
Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4 · Cited by 7,806
The new institutionalism in organizational analysis
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-5991 · Cited by 5,470
A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm
Hart, S. L. (1995) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033 · Cited by 5,174
The External Control of Organizations.
Benson, J. K., Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392573 · Cited by 4,945
A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm
Hart, S. L. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258963 · Cited by 4,567
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
Green and competitive: ending the stalemate
(1995) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(95)99997-e · Cited by 3,848
The Adolescence of Institutional Theory
Scott, W. R. (1987) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392880 · Cited by 3,699
Scale Development: Theory and Applications.
Xie, Y., & DeVellis, R. F. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2075704 · Cited by 3,635
Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x · Cited by 3,410
Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing together the Old and the New Institutionalism
Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259163 · Cited by 3,214
Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development
Bansal, P. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.441 · Cited by 2,879
Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource-based views
Oliver, C. (1997) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199710)18:9<697::aid-smj909>3.0.co;2-c · Cited by 2,852
The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance
Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.8.1199 · Cited by 2,725
Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069293 · Cited by 2,679
Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199808)19:8<729::aid-smj967>3.0.co;2-4 · Cited by 2,508
INSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION AND CHANGE: ENVIRONMENTALISM AND THE U.S. CHEMICAL INDUSTRY.
Hoffman, A. J. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257008 · Cited by 2,399
The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R., & Sahlin, K. (2008) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781849200387 · Cited by 2,261
The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation
Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1.2.177 · Cited by 2,228
Top-Management-Team Tenure and Organizational Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Managerial Discretion
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393314 · Cited by 2,178
Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0836(199603)5:1<30::aid-bse38>3.0.co;2-q · Cited by 1,943
Sharma, S. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556361 · Cited by 1,867
Corporate strategy: the quest for parenting advantage
(1995) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(95)91637-7 · Cited by 1,751
Richardson, H. A., Simmering, M. J., & Sturman, M. C. (2009) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428109332834 · Cited by 1,721
Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159562 · Cited by 1,717
DEEPHOUSE, D. L. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/256722 · Cited by 1,697
Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective1
Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036518 · Cited by 1,639
Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: reality or artifact?
Williams, L. J., Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1989) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.3.462 · Cited by 1,616
Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality
Baum, J. A. C., & Oliver, C. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393353 · Cited by 1,576
Institutional Theory and Institutional Change: Introduction to the Special Research Forum
Dacin, M. T., Goodstein, J. D., & Scott, W. R. (2002) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2002.6283388 · Cited by 1,512
Organizational responses to environmental demands: opening the black box
Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.701 · Cited by 1,467
Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Latent Interaction Effects with the LMS Method
Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02296338 · Cited by 1,429
Common methods bias: does common methods variance really bias results?
Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1998) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442819814002 · Cited by 1,380
Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework
Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. W. (2004) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.409 · Cited by 1,352
Advanced Structural Equation Modeling
(2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315827414 · Cited by 1,331
Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry
Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.439 · Cited by 1,312
THE IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES ON MANUFACTURING PERFORMANCE.
Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256982 · Cited by 1,312
Approaching adulthood: the maturing of institutional theory
Scott, W. R. (2008) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/s11186-008-9067-z · Cited by 1,311
To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance
Deephouse, D. L. (1999) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199902)20:2<147::aid-smj11>3.0.co;2-q · Cited by 1,304
Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment.
Fligstein, N., & Zucker, L. G. (1989) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393165 · Cited by 1,286
Ecologically Sustainable Organizations: An Institutional Approach
Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258964 · Cited by 1,148
Corporate Environmentalism: Antecedents and Influence of Industry Type
Banerjee, S. B., Iyer, E. S., & Kashyap, R. K. (2003) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.2.106.18604 · Cited by 1,120
Mizruchi, M. S., & Fein, L. C. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667051 · Cited by 1,105
TEACHER’S CORNER: Testing Measurement Invariance of Second-Order Factor Models
Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. (2005) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1203_7 · Cited by 1,032
Microfoundations of Institutional Theory
Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008) · The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism · doi:10.4135/9781849200387.n11 · Cited by 976
Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy
Walters, K. D., & Preston, L. E. (1982) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257239 · Cited by 969
Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256975 · Cited by 936
Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2004) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4131489 · Cited by 895
INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTS OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL COLLABORATION: THE EMERGENCE OF PROTO-INSTITUTIONS.
Lawrence, T. B., Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2002) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069297 · Cited by 863
The Informant in Quantitative Research
Campbell, D. T. (1955) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/221565 · Cited by 742
Institutional Embeddedness and the Dynamics of Organizational Populations
Baum, J. A. C., & Oliver, C. (1992) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2096100 · Cited by 687
Palmer, D. A., Jennings, P. D., & Zhou, X. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393256 · Cited by 655
Permanently Failing Organizations.
Mezias, S. J., Meyer, M. W., & Zucker, L. G. (1990) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2072803 · Cited by 644
Research in the Sociology of Organizations
(2010) · Research in the Sociology of Organizations · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x(2010)0000031017 · Cited by 626
Structure! Agency! (And Other Quarrels): A Meta-Analysis Of Institutional Theories Of Organization
Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & Lander, M. W. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.36461835 · Cited by 623
The Effectiveness of Environmental Monitoring and Enforcement: A Review of the Empirical Evidence
Gray, W. B., & Shimshack, J. P. (2011) · Review of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1093/reep/req017 · Cited by 519
Jonsson, S., Greve, H. R., & Fujiwara-Greve, T. (2009) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.195 · Cited by 419
Atuahene-Gima, K. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159603 · Cited by 414
The Role of Institutional and Market Forces in Divergent Organizational Change
D'Aunno, T., Succi, M., & Alexander, J. A. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667016 · Cited by 380
Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: institutional and strategic perspectives
Machado-da-Silva, C. L. (2003) · Revista de Administração Contemporânea · doi:10.1590/s1415-65552003000200019 · Cited by 345
de Luque, M. S., Washburn, N. T., Waldman, D. A., & House, R. J. (2008) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.53.4.626 · Cited by 340
Oliver, C. (1997) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00044 · Cited by 275
Clemens, B., & Douglas, T. J. (2006) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.09.016 · Cited by 258
González‐Benito, J., & González‐Benito, Ó. (2010) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.631 · Cited by 241
Washington, M., & Ventresca, M. J. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1030.0057 · Cited by 198
Managerial discretion and corporate commitment to the natural environment
Aragón-Correa, J. A., Matı́as-Reche, F., & Senise-Barrio, M. E. (2004) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(02)00500-3 · Cited by 196
Levitt, B., & Nass, C. (1989) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989895 · Cited by 185
Minding the Competition: From Mapping to Mastery
Ginsberg, A. (1994) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250150911 · Cited by 165
The Dynamics of Strategic Change
Waring, D., Hinings, C. R., & Greenwood, R. (1989) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2583146 · Cited by 100
Environmental strategy and low waste operations: exploring complementarities
Simpson, D., & Samson, D. A. (2008) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.626 · Cited by 98
Organizational Legitimacy and the Strategic Bridging Ability of Green Alliances
Shah, K. U. (2011) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.706 · Cited by 56
Internet Addiction in Malaysia Causes and Effects
Kapahi, A., Ling, C. S., Ramadass, S., & Abdullah, N. (2013) · iBusiness · doi:10.4236/ib.2013.52009 · Cited by 53
Normative barriers to imitation: social complexity of core competences in a mutual fund industry
Jonsson, S., & Regnér, P. (2009) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.739 · Cited by 48
Berrone, P., Gelabert, L., Fosfuri, A., & Gómez‐Mejía, L. R. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1115243 · Cited by 29
How do trade media influence green building practice?
Gluch, P., & Stenberg, A.-C. (2006) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/09613210500491613 · Cited by 19
Vandenberg, R. J. (2006) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428105284949 · Cited by 9
Cited by
Gray Shades of Green: Causes and Consequences of Green Skepticism
Leonidou, C. N., & Skarmeas, D. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2829-4 · Cited by 589
Dubey, R., Altay, N., Gunasekaran, A., Blome, C., Papadopoulos, T., & Childe, S. J. (2018) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-04-2016-0173 · Cited by 494
Haldorai, K., Kim, W. G., & Garcia, R. L. F. (2022) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104431 · Cited by 486
Huang, X.-X., Hu, Z.-P., Liu, C.-S., Yu, D.-J., & Yu, L.-F. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.106 · Cited by 424
Yusliza, M.-Y., Norazmi, N. A., Jabbour, C. J. C., Fernando, Y., Fawehinmi, O., & Seles, B. M. R. P. (2019) · Benchmarking: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-09-2018-0283 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Colwell, S. R., & Joshi, A. W.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-09-21
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 73-91
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W1593776199
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 90
- FWCI
- 16.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.