Cited by 132Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Developing an observing attitude: an analysis of meditation diaries in an MBSR clinical trial

Open access
Kerr, Catherine E., Josyula, Krishnapriya, Littenberg, Ronnie·2011·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

Mindfulness‐based stress reduction (MBSR) is an 8‐week training that is designed to teach participants mindful awareness of the present moment. In randomized clinical trials (RCTs), MBSR has demonstrated efficacy in various conditions including reducing chronic pain‐related distress and improving quality of life in healthy individuals. There have, however, been no qualitative studies investigating participants' descriptions of changes experienced over multiple time points during the course of the programme. This qualitative study of an MBSR cohort (N = 8 healthy individuals) in a larger RCT examined participants' daily diary descriptions of their home‐practice experiences. The study used a two‐part method, combining grounded theory with a close‐ended coding approach. The grounded theory analysis revealed that during the trial, all participants, to varying degrees, described moments of distress related to practice; at the end of the course, all participants who completed the training demonstrated greater detail and clarity in their descriptions, improved affect, and the emergence of an observing self. The closed‐ended coding schema, carried out to shed light on the development of an observing self, revealed that the emergence of an observing self was not related to the valence of participants' experiential descriptions: even participants whose diaries contained predominantly negative characterizations of their experience throughout the trial were able, by the end of the trial, to demonstrate an observing, witnessing attitude towards their own distress. Progress in MBSR may rely less on the valence of participants' experiences and more on the way participants describe and relate to their own inner experience. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Key Practitioner Message: This article • Analyses the ways in which participants in a mindfulness‐based stress reduction (MBSR) clinical trial describe their experiences with mindfulness practice. • Carries out qualitative analysis of the ways in which participants' descriptions of home‐based meditation practice contained in their practice diaries change over the course of an 8‐week MBSR trial. • Demonstrates that the participants who successfully completed the 8‐week course show a common developmental trajectory, as each participant used less reactive, judgemental language to describe their home meditative practice‐based experiences by the end of the trial, even when, in the case of some participants, that experience was perceived as negative or distressing. • Suggests that progress in MBSR may rely less on the valence of participants' experience and more on the way participants describe and relate to their own inner experience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.700

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All except 3 of the observational studies employed quantitative methods.

    “All except 3 of the observational studies (88, 90, 94) employed quantitative methods, and its two most recent reports consisted of large surveys that accounted for 58% of the total sample size. (12, 13)”

    From Adverse events in meditation practices and meditation‐based therapies: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [90]

    The Methods (page unavailable) describe a qualitative analysis of participants’ meditation diaries, supporting this paper as an example of a non-quantitative study. The paper does not establish that exactly three studies were exceptions or that all the other observational studies used quantitative methods. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Reports of localized pain varied from the abdomen or stomach to neck pain.

    “Reports of localized pain varied from the abdomen or stomach (86, 90) to neck pain. (102)”

    From Adverse events in meditation practices and meditation‐based therapies: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [90]

    Citation 102 is attached to the neck-pain part of the sentence; the abdomen or stomach reports have separate citations. The Discussion and Conclusion describe pain in the lower back and knee, but searches for “neck pain,” “pain in neck,” and “neck” found no report of neck pain in our copy. Page numbers were not supplied. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Deikman AJ The observing self 1982 Beacon Press Boston
  2. Hayes SC Strosahl KD Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change 1999 The Guilford Press New York
  3. Linehan MM Skills training manual for borderline personality disorder 1993 The Guilord Press New York
  4. Morone NE Lynch CS I felt like a new person.“ the effects of mindfulness meditation on older adults with chronic pain: qualitative narrative analysis of diary entries J Pain 2008 9 9 841 848 18550444 PMC2569828

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kerr, C. E., Josyula, K., & Littenberg, R.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Kerr, Catherine E.
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
80-93
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
OpenAlex
W2082586145
Cited by
132
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K01AT003459)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, affect, developmental trajectories, inner experience, healthy individuals
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Attitude, Female, Humans, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Cohort Studies, Health Behavior, Treatment Outcome, Meditation, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review