Cited by 786Sleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness Research

SLEEP DURATION AND DEPRESSION AMONG ADULTS: A META-ANALYSIS OF PROSPECTIVE STUDIES: Research Article: Sleep Duration and Depression

Open access
Zhai, Long, Zhang, Hua, Zhang, Dongfeng·2015·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Results from longitudinal studies on sleep duration and incidence of depression remain controversial. METHODS: PubMed and Web of Science updated on October 22, 2014 were searched for eligible publications. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Seven prospective studies were included, involving 25,271 participants for short sleep duration and 23,663 participants for long sleep duration. Compared with the normal sleep duration, the pooled RR for depression was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.04-1.64; I(2) = 0%) for the short sleep duration overall. For long sleep duration, the pooled RR was 1.42 (95% CI, 1.04-1.92; I(2) = 0%). The associations between short or long sleep duration and risk of depression did not substantially change in sensitivity and subgroup analyses. No evidence of publication bias was found. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis indicates that short and long sleep duration was significantly associated with increased risk of depression in adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.22386

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disrupted sleep is a common symptom of depressive episodes and increases the risk of MDD.

    “Disrupted sleep is a common symptom of depressive episodes and increases the risk of MDD, 290”

    From Major depressive disorder: hypothesis, mechanism, prevention and treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [290]

    The Discussion reports that short and long sleep duration were significantly associated with subsequent depression in adults, supporting the risk-related part of the claim. The paper does not establish that disrupted sleep generally is a common symptom of depressive episodes, and its reported association does not establish a causal increase in risk specifically for MDD. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Patients with symptoms of sleep disturbance have a greater risk of MDD occurrence and recurrence.

    “Additionally, patients with symptoms of sleep disturbance have a greater risk of MDD occurrence and recurrence. 290 , 291”

    From Major depressive disorder: hypothesis, mechanism, prevention and treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [290]

    The Discussion reports that short and long sleep duration were associated with increased risk of subsequent depression in adults. The paper also mentions a poorer course of depressive disorders and the new onset of recurrent depression, but it does not establish a separate risk estimate for MDD recurrence. Its primary exposure is sleep duration, not sleep-disturbance symptoms generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Short sleep duration (≤6 hours) is associated with significantly higher risk of depression (RR=1.31, 95% CI 1.04-1.64).

    “individuals with both short (median reference value: ≤6 hours) and long (median reference value: ≥8 hours) average daily sleep duration were at significantly higher risk of depression over the 7.9 year average follow-up, with no heterogeneity between studies (short sleep: n=7, N=25,271, RR=1.31, 95% CI. 1.04-1.64; long sleep: n=5, N=23,663, RR=1.42, 95% CI: 1.04-1.92) 74 .”

    From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [74]

    The Short Sleep Duration and Depression section reports a significantly higher pooled risk of depression for short sleep (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.04–1.64). However, the study-characteristics table uses different short-sleep cutoffs across the included studies, so the pooled estimate is not specifically an estimate for sleep duration ≤6 hours. The indexed passages provide section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Long sleep duration (≥8 hours) is associated with significantly higher risk of depression (RR=1.42, 95% CI 1.04-1.92).

    “individuals with both short (median reference value: ≤6 hours) and long (median reference value: ≥8 hours) average daily sleep duration were at significantly higher risk of depression over the 7.9 year average follow-up, with no heterogeneity between studies (short sleep: n=7, N=25,271, RR=1.31, 95% CI. 1.04-1.64; long sleep: n=5, N=23,663, RR=1.42, 95% CI: 1.04-1.92) 74 .”

    From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [74]

    The Long Sleep Duration and Depression section reports a significantly elevated pooled risk for long versus normal sleep duration (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.04–1.92). The study-characteristics table uses varying definitions of long sleep, including >8 and ≥9 hours, so the pooled result does not establish ≥8 hours as a uniform cutoff. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MR can only test linear effects, whereas prospective meta-analyses indicate non-linear relations between sleep duration and mental illness.

    “However, it must be noted that MR can only test linear effects, whereas prospective meta-analyses indicate non-linear relations between sleep duration and mental illness 74 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]17. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. Oxford: The Cochrane Collabo- ration; 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhai, L., Zhang, H., & Zhang, D.
Affiliations
Qingdao University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Dongfeng
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06-05
Volume
32
Issue
9
Pages
664-670
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162403058
Cited by
786
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 108 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Qingdao University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
sleep duration, depression, short sleep duration, long sleep, depression risk, adults, prospective study
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Risk, Sleep, Time Factors, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review