Cited by 351Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPhysical Activity and Health

Both resistance training and aerobic training reduce hepatic fat content in type 2 diabetic subjects with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (the RAED2 randomized trial)

Open access
Bacchi, Elisabetta, Negri, Carlo, Targher, Giovanni, Faccioli, Niccolò, Lanza, Massimo, Zoppini, Giacomo, Zanolin, Elisabetta, Schena, Federico +2 more·2013·Hepatology

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Although lifestyle interventions are considered the first-line therapy for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which is extremely common in people with type 2 diabetes, no intervention studies have compared the effects of aerobic (AER) or resistance (RES) training on hepatic fat content in type 2 diabetic subjects with NAFLD. In this randomized controlled trial, we compared the 4-month effects of either AER or RES training on insulin sensitivity (by hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp), body composition (by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), as well as hepatic fat content and visceral (VAT), superficial (SSAT), and deep (DSAT) subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (all quantified by an in-opposed-phase magnetic resonance imaging technique) in 31 sedentary adults with type 2 diabetes and NAFLD. After training, hepatic fat content was markedly reduced (P < 0.001), to a similar extent, in both the AER and the RES training groups (mean relative reduction from baseline [95% confidence interval] -32.8% [-58.20 to -7.52] versus -25.9% [-50.92 to -0.94], respectively). Additionally, hepatic steatosis (defined as hepatic fat content >5.56%) disappeared in about one-quarter of the patients in each intervention group (23.1% in the AER group and 23.5% in the RES group). Insulin sensitivity during euglycemic clamp was increased, whereas total body fat mass, VAT, SSAT, and hemoglobin A1c were reduced comparably in both intervention groups. CONCLUSION: This is the first randomized controlled study to demonstrate that resistance training and aerobic training are equally effective in reducing hepatic fat content among type 2 diabetic patients with NAFLD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.26393

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bonekamp S, Barone BB, Clark J, Stewart KJ. The effect of an exercise training intervention on hepatic steatosis [Abstract]. HEPATOLOGY 2008;48:806A.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bacchi, E., Negri, C., Targher, G., Faccioli, N., Lanza, M., Zoppini, G., Zanolin, E., Schena, F., Bonora, E., & Moghetti, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (IT)
Corresponding author
Moghetti, Paolo
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2013-10
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
1287-1295
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053915733
Cited by
350
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 6
FWCI
20.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Università degli Studi di Verona
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
resistance training, aerobic exercise, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, type 2 diabetes, hepatic fat content, hepatic steatosis, insulin sensitivity, visceral adipose tissue, subcutaneous abdominal fat, body composition, lifestyle intervention
MeSH terms
Body Composition, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Fatty Liver, Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Liver, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Exercise, Comorbidity, Treatment Outcome, Subcutaneous Fat, Lipid Metabolism, Resistance Training, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review