Cited by 3,239Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchPeriodontal Regeneration and TreatmentsDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

Staging and grading of periodontitis: Framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition

Open access
Tonetti, Maurizio S., Greenwell, Henry, Kornman, Kenneth S.·2018·Journal of Periodontology

Abstract

Background: Authors were assigned the task to develop case definitions for periodontitis in the context of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri‐Implant Diseases and Conditions. The aim of this manuscript is to review evidence and rationale for a revision of the current classification, to provide a framework for case definition that fully implicates state‐of‐the‐art knowledge and can be adapted as new evidence emerges, and to suggest a case definition system that can be implemented in clinical practice, research and epidemiologic surveillance. Methods: Evidence gathered in four commissioned reviews was analyzed and interpreted with special emphasis to changes with regards to the understanding available prior to the 1999 classification. Authors analyzed case definition systems employed for a variety of chronic diseases and identified key criteria for a classification/case definition of periodontitis. Results: The manuscript discusses the merits of a periodontitis case definition system based on Staging and Grading and proposes a case definition framework. Stage I to IV of periodontitis is defined based on severity (primarily periodontal breakdown with reference to root length and periodontitis‐associated tooth loss), complexity of management (pocket depth, infrabony defects, furcation involvement, tooth hypermobility, masticatory dysfunction) and additionally described as extent (localized or generalized). Grade of periodontitis is estimated with direct or indirect evidence of progression rate in three categories: slow, moderate and rapid progression (Grade A‐C). Risk factor analysis is used as grade modifier. Conclusions: The paper describes a simple matrix based on stage and grade to appropriately define periodontitis in an individual patient. The proposed case definition extends beyond description based on severity to include characterization of biological features of the disease and represents a first step towards adoption of precision medicine concepts to the management of periodontitis. It also provides the necessary framework for introduction of biomarkers in diagnosis and prognosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jper.18-0006

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • oPMN level can potentially serve as a diagnostic risk marker for periodontitis.

    “These findings suggest that oPMN level can potentially serve as a diagnostic risk marker for periodontitis; as such its inclusion in the grading table 8 should be considered.”

    From Prognostic utility of oral neutrophil counts in high-risk periodontitis: A retrospective study (2025) · cites this paper as [8]

    The ‘Integrating biomarkers in a case definition system’ section says biomarkers may improve early diagnosis and assessment of periodontitis grade. The grading-table note also allows for specific biomarkers as evidence becomes available. Neither passage identifies oPMN level as a diagnostic risk marker, so the source supports the general proposal but not the oPMN-specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An increase in the mean number of sites with PD >6 mm was found between S2P/S3P only (p < 0.01).

    “Also, an increase in the mean number of sites with PD > 6 mm was found between S2P/S3P only (p < 0.01), which is consistent with the current diagnostic scheme. 8”
  • Periodontal diagnoses were obtained retrospectively, and patients without a recorded diagnosis were excluded to minimize the risk of selection bias.

    “Periodontal diagnoses 6 , 8 were obtained retrospectively; patients without a recorded diagnosis were excluded to minimize the risk of selection bias.”

    From Prognostic utility of oral neutrophil counts in high-risk periodontitis: A retrospective study (2025) · cites this paper as [8]

    The paper’s “Definition of a patient as a periodontitis case” section discusses diagnostic criteria and accuracy, but not retrospective collection of diagnoses. The “Grade of periodontitis” section discusses a different potential bias concerning missing teeth; no passage found addresses excluding patients without a recorded diagnosis to minimize selection bias (searched for retrospective diagnoses, missing records, exclusions, and selection bias). (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Common systemic diseases such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus have variable effects that modify the course of periodontitis.

    “There are, however, common systemic diseases, such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, with variable effects that modify the course of periodontitis.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. S 1. Proceedings of the World Workshop in Clinical Periodontics. Princeton, New Jersey, July 23-27, 1989. In: Nevins M, Becker W, Kornman K, eds. Chicago: American Academy of Periodontology; 1989.
  2. Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Periodontics, 1993. London: Quintessence; 1994.
  3. Lang NP, Bartold PM, Cullinan M, et al. Consensus report: aggres- sive periodontitis. Ann Periodontol. 1999;4:53.
  4. Lindhe J, Ranney R, Lamster I, et al. Consensus report: chronic peri- odontitis. Ann Periodontol. 1999;4:38.
  5. Lang NP, Hill RW. Radiographs in periodontics. J Clin Periodontol. 1977;4:16-28.
  6. European Federation of Periodontology and American Academy of Periodontology. Periodontitis and systemic diseases -Proceedings of a workshop jointly held by the European Federation of Periodon- tology and American Academy of Periodontology.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tonetti, M. S., Greenwell, H., & Kornman, K. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Tonetti, Maurizio S.
Venue
Journal of Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-06
Volume
89
Issue
S1
Pages
S159-S172
ISSN
  • 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-3670
OpenAlex
W2809048536
Cited by
3,239
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 272 · 2025: 450 · 2024: 523 · 2023: 576 · 2022: 474 · 2021: 440 · 2020: 326 · 2019: 146 · 2018: 22 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
34.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Periodontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Procter and Gamble
  • Unilever
  • Osteology Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
periodontitis, case definition, periodontal disease classification, disease progression rate, risk factors, tooth loss, probing depth, furcation involvement, masticatory dysfunction, biomarkers, precision medicine
MeSH terms
Humans, Periodontitis, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Tooth Loss, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review