Cited by 351Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

Rho GTPases, dendritic structure, and mental retardation

Newey, Sarah E., Velamoor, Vanisree, Govek, Eve‐Ellen, Van Aelst, Linda·2005·Journal of Neurobiology

Abstract

A consistent feature of neurons in patients with mental retardation is abnormal dendritic structure and/or alterations in dendritic spine morphology. Deficits in the regulation of the dendritic cytoskeleton affect both the structure and function of dendrites and synapses and are believed to underlie mental retardation in some instances. In support of this, there is good evidence that alterations in signaling pathways involving the Rho family of small GTPases, key regulators of the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons, contribute to both syndromic and nonsyndromic mental retardation disorders. Because the Rho GTPases have been shown to play increasingly well‐defined roles in determining dendrite and dendritic spine development and morphology, Rho signaling has been suggested to be important for normal cognition. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent data on the Rho GTPases pertaining to dendrite and dendritic spine morphogenesis, as well as to highlight their involvement in mental retardation resulting from a variety of genetic mutations within regulators and effectors of these molecules. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Neurobiol 64: 58–74, 2005

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/neu.20153

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rho small GTPases (particularly RhoA, Rac1, Cdc42) are regulators of the actin cytoskeleton that have a profound influence on spine morphogenesis.

    “The Rho small GTPases (particularly RhoA, Rac1, Cdc42) are regulators of the actin cytoskeleton that have a profound influence on spine morphogenesis (Luo, 2002; Newey et al., 2005).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newey, S. E., Velamoor, V., Govek, E., & Van Aelst, L.
Affiliations
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-05-09
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
58-74
ISSN
  • 0022-3034 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4695
OpenAlex
W2061895982
Cited by
351
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 23
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
Rho GTPases, dendritic spine morphology, dendritic morphology, intellectual disability, dendritic cytoskeleton, actin cytoskeleton, microtubule cytoskeleton, Rho GTPase signaling, dendrite morphogenesis, synaptic development, genetic mutations, cognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Dendrites, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Models, Biological, Morphogenesis, Neurons, rho GTP-Binding Proteins, Dendritic Spines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review