Cited by 287Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Amygdala Modulation of Multiple Memory Systems: Hippocampus and Caudate-Putamen

Packard, Mark G., Teather, Lisa A.·1998·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

A series of five experiments examined the differential mnemonic roles of the hippocampus and caudate-putamen and the modulatory influence of the amygdala on hippocampal and caudate-putamen memory processes. Findings indicate that (a) posttraining intrahippocampal injections of amphetamine selectively enhance memory in a hidden platform water maze task, (b) posttraining intracaudate injections of amphetamine selectively enhance memory in a visible platform water maze task, (c) posttraining intra-amygdala injections of amphetamine enhance memory in both water maze tasks, (d) preretention intrahippocampal lidocaine injections block expression of the memory enhancing effects of posttraining intrahippocampal amphetamine injections in the hidden platform task, (e) preretention intracaudate lidocaine injections block expression of the memory enhancing effects of posttraining intracaudate amphetamine injections in the visible platform task, (f) preretention intra-amygdala lidocaine injections do not block the memory enhancing effect of posttraining intra-amygdala amphetamine injections on either task, (g) in the hidden platform task, posttraining intrahippocampal, but not intracaudate, lidocaine injections block the memory enhancing effects of posttraining intra-amygdala amphetamine, (h) in the visible platform task, posttraining intracaudate, but not intrahippocampal, lidocaine injections block the memory enhancing effects of posttraining intra-amygdala amphetamine. The findings indicate a double dissociation between the roles of the hippocampus and caudate-putamen in memory and suggest that the amygdala exerts a modulatory influence on both the hippocampal and caudate-putamen memory systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/nlme.1997.3815

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Packard, M. G., & Teather, L. A.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-03
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
163-203
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005264554
Cited by
287
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (1R2956973-01)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1RO3MH5307-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
amygdala, hippocampus, caudate-putamen, memory systems, amphetamine, lidocaine, water maze, spatial memory, memory enhancement, memory modulation, double dissociation, intracerebral injection
MeSH terms
Amphetamine, Amygdala, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Caudate Nucleus, Corpus Striatum, Hippocampus, Male, Putamen, Retention, Psychology, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review