Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,597

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change

Bandura, Albert, Adams, Nancy E.·1977·Cognitive Therapy and Research
DOI 10.1007/bf01663995
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01663995

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Agras, W. S. Transfer during systematic desensitization therapy.Behaviour Research and Therapy 1967,5 193–199. · DOI
  2. Bandura, A. Influence of models' reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1965,1 589–595. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bandura, A.Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.
  4. Bandura, A.Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1977. (b)
  5. Bandura, A. On paradigms and recycled ideologies.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1978,2(1), in press. · DOI
  6. Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., & Beyer, J. Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1977,35 125–139. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bandura, A., Blanchard, E. B., & Ritter, B. The relative efficacy of desensitization and modeling approaches for inducing behavioral, affective, and attitudinal changes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1969,13 173–199. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bandura, A., Jeffery, R. W., & Gajdos, E. Generalizing change through participant modeling with self-directed mastery.Behaviour Research and Therapy 1975,13 141–152. · DOI
  9. Bandura, A., Jeffery, R. W., & Wright, C. L. Efficacy of participant modeling as a function of response induction aids.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1974,83 56–64. · DOI
  10. Barlow, D. H., Leitenberg, H., Agras, W. S., & Wincze, J. P. The transfer gap in systematic desensitization: An analogue study.Behaviour Research and Therapy 1969,7 191–196. · DOI
  11. Bolles, R. C. The avoidance learning problem. In G. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 6). New York: Academic Press, 1972.
  12. Dawson, M. E., & Furedy, J. J. The role of awareness in human differential autonomic classical conditioning: The necessary-gate hypothesis.Psychophysiology 1976,13 50–53. · DOI
  13. Dulany, D. E. Awareness, rules, and propositional control: A confrontation with S-R behavior theory. In T. R. Dixon & D. L. Horton (Eds.),Verbal behavior and general behavior theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1968.
  14. Eriksen, C. W. Discrimination and learning without awareness: A methodological survey and evaluation.Psychological Review 1960,67 279–300. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Herrnstein, R. J. Method and theory in the study of avoidance.Psychological Review 1969,76 49–69. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Spielberger, C. D., & De Nike, L. D. Descriptive behaviorism versus cognitive theory in verbal operant conditioning.Psychological Review 1966,73 306–326. · DOI
  17. Weiner, B.Theories of motivation. Chicago: Markham, 1972.
  18. Wolpe, J.The practice of behavior therapy. New York: Pergamon, 1974.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E.
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1977-12
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
287-310
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
DOI
10.1007/bf01663995
OpenAlex
W2152336442
Cited by
1,597
References
2
FWCI
15.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.